Team Assignment Process Improvement MSD P18711: Beths Favorite Team - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

team assignment process improvement
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Team Assignment Process Improvement MSD P18711: Beths Favorite Team - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Team Assignment Process Improvement MSD P18711: Beths Favorite Team Problem Definition Review Madeline Galvin Joseph Yeiter Ann Brautigam Agenda Project Team Project Background Problem Statement & Deliverables


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Team Assignment Process Improvement

MSD P18711: Beth’s Favorite Team Problem Definition Review

Madeline Galvin Joseph Yeiter Ann Brautigam

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Agenda

  • Project Team
  • Project Background
  • Problem Statement & Deliverables
  • Stakeholders
  • Current State
  • Use Cases
  • Customer Requirements
  • Engineering Requirements
  • Project Plan
  • Risk Management
  • Next Steps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Team

  • Madeline Galvin

○ Project Manager ○ ISE Dual Degree - 5th Year

  • Joseph Yeiter

○ Industrial & Systems Engineering - 4th Year

  • Ann (Lissa) Brautigam

○ Industrial & Systems Engineering - 4th Year

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Background

  • Spring and Fall Semester MSD Team Assignments made each

year

  • Multiple MSD staff members complete Team Assignments over

multiple weeks

  • Pre-course survey sent out to students to gather data
  • Number of students enrolled in KGCOE has been increasing over

the years

  • As more students need to be assigned to projects, the number of

constraints to complete Team Assignments increases

  • Some students remain unassigned to projects and projects

remain incomplete

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Problem Statement & Deliverables

  • Improve the Team Assignment process by:

○ Increasing efficiency ○ Limiting assignment errors ○ Maintaining or improving the current level of assignment success

  • Revamp the pre-course student survey to streamline results

collection

  • Prioritize project selection criteria
  • Deliverables

○ Prototype of system for Spring Semester assignments ○ Data and analysis from test run ○ Final Team Assignment system ○ Operator's manual to guide use of program ○ Presentation at Imagine RIT

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Stakeholders

  • Elizabeth Debartolo

○ Director of MSD & Project Sponsor

  • Christine Fisher

○ MSD Program Coordinator

  • Edward Hanzlik

○ MSD Program Manager

  • John Kaemmerlen

○ Project Guide

  • MSD Guides
  • MSD Student Employees
  • MSD Students
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Current State

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Use Cases

Students add or drop MSD after the pre-course survey is sent out

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Use Cases

Projects need to be dropped or added after Team Assignment process begins

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Customer Requirements

ID Requirement Importance 1 Improve the current Team Assignment selection process High 2 Update the current MSD Pre-Course Survey to support process improvement High 3 Improve the issue resolution process of student enrollment changes Medium 4 Improve the issue resolution process of project proposal changes Medium 5 Incorporate selection criteria that is currently being used in Team Assignments High 6 Incorporate additional selection criteria that is not currently being used in assignments Low 7 Maintain the current level of Team Assignment success Medium 8 Improve student satisfaction of Team Assignments Medium 9 Eliminate missed students in assignment process Medium 10 Create a reliable system with repeatable results Medium 11 Reduce time taken to do full student assignment process Medium 12 Decrease the number of manual steps in the assignment process Medium

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Engineering Requirements

ID Requirement Importance Measurement 1 Increase system verification 9 Frequency of data refreshes 2 Reduce students without a project 9 Students Missed 3 Increase student satisfaction 3 Number of students assigned to prefered projects 4 User friendly 3 Time taken to learn 5 Reliable and repeatable results 3 Number of errors/malfunctions 6 Decrease processing time 9 Time taken to complete each process step 7 Enable process to incorporate multiple constraints 9 Number of constraints used to create team assignments 8 Increase effectiveness/usefulness of pre-course survey 3 Number of non-free-text survey questions 9 Ability to modify completed team assignments with new projects 3 Time taken to add a project 10 Ability to modify completed team assignments with dropped projects 3 Time taken to remove a project 11 Ability to modify completed team assignments with added students 3 Time taken to add a student 12 Ability to modify completed team assignments with dropped students 3 Time taken to remove a student

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Project Plan

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Risk Management

  • The new process produces team assignments which are worse

than if they were created using the original manual process

  • Lack of data sets available to test the new process
  • System is not responsive to last minute issues in the Team

Assignment process

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Next Steps

  • Present to ISE faculty
  • Analyze possible solutions from ISE faculty
  • Collect student satisfaction data by comparing students top

project choices with actual project assignments

  • Complete benchmarking research of similar systems used on

and off campus

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank You

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18