Satellite remote sensing for landslide analysis Dr. Sigrid Roessner - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

satellite remote sensing for landslide analysis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Satellite remote sensing for landslide analysis Dr. Sigrid Roessner - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Satellite remote sensing for landslide analysis Dr. Sigrid Roessner Helmholtz Center Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences Department 1 Geodesy and Remote Sensing Section 1.4 Remote Sensing E-mail:


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner

Helmholtz Center Potsdam GFZ – German Research Centre for Geosciences Department 1 – Geodesy and Remote Sensing Section 1.4 –Remote Sensing E-mail: roessner@gfz-potsdam.de

Overview Lecture

I Introduction to GFZ Potsdam II Landslide processes III Landslide hazard assessment IV Dynamic landslide inventories V InSAR monitoring of landslides

Satellite remote sensing for landslide analysis

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

I Introduction to GFZ Potsdam

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Helmholtz Association of research centres in Gemany

  • >16 National Research Centres
  • >30.000 Employees
  • >6 Billion Euro annual Budget

(includes 30% third party funds) Objectives:

  • Society and Policy Advice
  • Industrial Application
  • Science and Capacity Building
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Albert Einstein Science Park at Telegrafenberg

GFZ Potsdam Department 1

Hosts German Research Centre for Geosciences (GFZ), Astrophysical Institute Potsdam (API) Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) Einstein Tower – Historical observatory

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Brief history of GFZ Potsdam

1832 Telegrafenberg is named after a station of an optical telegraph line built to link Berlin with Koblenz via Potsdam. 1870 Royal Prussian Geodetic Institute is founded in Berlin Geodetic Institute transferred to Potsdam - Friedrich R. Helmert established centre for geodesy and gravity research. 1889 First teleseismic recording taken of an earthquake near Japan by Ernst von Rebeur-Paschwitz. 1890 Geomagnetic Observatory is founded in Potsdam. 1892 Inauguration of the Geodetic Institute at the Telegrafenberg – today main building of Department 1 1946 Foundation of the Geotectonic Institute 1969 Establishment of Central Institute of Physics of the Earth (G.D.R.) 1992 Foundation of the GeoForschungsZentrum Potsdam GFZ

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis
slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

GFZ – Program Oriented Research

  • PT 1 Planet Earth Monitoring

Global Processes and Change

  • PT 2 Earth System Dynamics

Coupled Processes and Reg. Impact

  • PT 3 Natural Hazards

Assessment and Risk Mitigation

  • PT 4 Georesources

Sustainable Use and Geoengineering PT1

PT4 PT2 PT3

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Main reseach topics of GFZ Remote Sensing Section

Method Developments

Spectrometry Sensor Definition/Validation Simulation Software Parameter Retrieval BRDF Modeling Material Identification Microwave SAR‐Interferometry Feature Tracking

Applications

  • Mineral Exploration/Mine Waste
  • Soil Degradation/‐Moisture
  • Natural Hazards – landslides
  • Case‐II Water
  • Urban Development
  • Plant Species
  • Surface Deformation

Earth Energy (300 K) Wavelength Sun Energy (6000 K) Reflected Radiation from Sun

from Earth

Energy 0.3 0.6 1.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 10 20 40 60 0.1mm 0.2 0.5 1cm 1m 10 100

Microwaves Thermal Radiation

UV Blue Green Red IR

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Science program – fields of application Co‐operative international Networks

Hazard assessment Urban develop‐ ment Inland & coastal waters Management

  • f agricultural

and forest ecosystems mineral exploration ‐ methodological development ‐ synergies to xs and radar (InSAR)

Retrieval of biogeochemical and geophysical parameters

dry land degradation

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Study areas of Remote Sensing Section

Kyrgyzstan (GCO) Yangtze China Spain Dead Sea Rift Israel Shanghai West Australia Germany RSA (GCO) Optical RS SAR / InSAR Iran Chile (PBO) Turkey (PBO) Namibia Brazil Caribbean Peru Mongolia

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

II Landslide processes

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Global landslide hazard distribution

slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Global landslide mortality risk distribution

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Definition of landslides / mass movements

Due to the complexity of the processes over time various attempts of defintions have been made:

  • Cruden (1991) for the Working Party on World Landslide Inventory:

Movement of a mass of rock, debris or earth down a slope

  • Varnes (1978) Slope movement types and processes:

Downward and outward movement of slope forming materials under the influence of gravity

  • Brunsden (1984) Slope Instability:

preferred the term mass movement

  • Dikau et al. (1996) Landslide Recognition. Identification, Movement and Causes:

distinguished this from mass transport as being a process which did not require a transporting medium such as water, air or ice (Dikau et al, 1996). In general, the phenomena described as landslides are not limited to either the “land” or to “sliding”, and usage of the word has implied a much more extensive meaning than it component parts suggest. Ground subsidence and collapse are excluded.

Source: http://www.ukgeohazards.info/pages/eng_geol/landslide_geohazard/eng_geol_landslides_index.htm

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Slope movements as a consequence of a complex field of forces resulting from environmental and triggering factors

Shear strength (Shear resistance) Shear stress (Disturbing force) Normal stress Weight Earthquakes Volcanic eruptions Rainfall / Pressure of water

Geology (Lithology, Faults, Structure) Relief (Slope etc., flow accumulation)

Human activities (Land use) Movement occurs when the shear stress exceeds the shear strength of the material

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Classification of landslides – Material types

Landslide classification based on Varnes' (1978) system has two terms:

  • First term describes the material type
  • Second term describes the type of movement

Material types used by the various schemes are:

(1) Rock:

Hard or firm mass that was intact and in its natural place before the initiation of movement

(2) Soil:

An aggregate of solid particles, generally of minerals and rocks, that either was transported or was formed by the weathering

  • f rock in place. Gases or liquids filling the pores of the soil form part of the soil.

(3) Earth:

Material in which 80% or more of the particles are smaller than 2mm, the upper limit of sand sized particles.

(4) Mud:

Material in which 80% or more of the particles are smaller than 0.06mm, the upper limit of silt sized particles.

(5) Debris:

Contains a significant proportion of coarse material; 20% to 80% of the particles are larger than 2mm, and the remainder are less than 2mm. The terms used should describe the displaced material in the landslide before it was displaced. The types of movement describe how the landslide movement is distributed through the displaced mass (see next slide) Combining the two terms gives classifications such as Rock fall, Debris slide, Debris flow, Earth slide, Earth spread etc.

Source: http://www.ukgeohazards.info/pages/eng_geol/landslide_geohazard/eng_geol_landslides_classification.htm

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Classification of landslides – Types of movement

Five kinematically distinct types of landslide identified by Varnes (1978)

(1) Falls:

A fall starts with the detachment of soil or rock from a steep slope along a surface on which little or no shear displacement takes place. The material then descends largely by falling, bouncing or rolling.

(2) Topples:

A topple is the forward rotation, out of the slope, of a mass of soil and rock about a point or axis below the centre of gravity of the displaced mass.

(3) Slides:

A slide is the downslope movement of a soil or rock mass occurring dominantly on the surface of rupture or relatively thin zones of intense shear strain.

(4) Flows:

A flow is a spatially continuous movement in which shear surfaces are short lived, closely spaced and usually not preserved after the event. The distribution of velocities in the displacing mass resembles that in a viscous fluid.

(5) Spreads:

A spread is an extension of a cohesive soil or rock mass combined with a general subsidence of the fractured mass of cohesive material into softer underlying material. The rupture surface is not a surface of intense shear. Spreads may result from liquefaction or flow (and extrusion) of the softer material.

(6) Complex Failures:

These are failures in which one of the five types of movement is followed by another type (or even types). For such cases the name of the initial type of movement should be followed by an "en dash" and then the next type of movement: e.g. rock fall- debris flow ( WP/ WLI, 1990).

Source: http://www.ukgeohazards.info/pages/eng_geol/landslide_geohazard/eng_geol_landslides_types.htm

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Debris Flow Sierra Nevada California, 1996/97 Rockfall Yosemite Park California, July 1996

Fall Slide

Landslide La Conchita (St. Barbara) California, 2005

Flow

Sources: USGS: Multilingual Landslide Glossary The landslide handbook

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Description of mass movements

VC*

main body

Longitudinal fault zone

D

Transverse cracks Transverse ridges

Toe of surface

  • f rupture

Radial cracks

Top

Tip

Crown cracks

Sources: Varnes (1978), Multilingual Landslide Glossary (1993)

Schematic view of rotational landslide that has evolved into an earthflow

Further parameters for description:

  • State of activity:

active; suspended; re-activated; inactive

  • Distribution of activity:

advancing; retrogressive;enlarging; diminishing; confined; moving; widening

  • Style of activity

complex; composite; successive; single; multiple

  • Velocity of movement

(see next slide) *HC/VC: ratio of horizontal to vertical distance from the toe to the crown of a landslide

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Velocity classification of landslides

Source: http://www.ukgeohazards.info/pages/eng_geol/landslide_geohazard/eng_geol_landslides_classification.htm

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Key references – Landslide investigations

  • EPOCH. 1993. The temporal occurrence and forecasting of landslides in the European community (Ed: Flageollet, J. C.). Contract No. 90 0025, 3 Volumes.
  • Hutchinson, J. N. 1988. General Report: Morphological and geotechnical parameters of landslides in relation to geology and hydrogeology. Proceedings, Fifth

International Symposium on Landslides (Ed: Bonnard, C.), 1, 3-35. Rotterdam: Balkema

  • Varnes, D. J. 1978. Slope movement types and processes. In: Special Report 176: Landslides: Analysis and Control (Eds: Schuster, R. L. & Krizek, R. J.).

Transportation and Road Research Board, National Academy of Science, Washington D. C., 11-33.

  • WP/ WLI. (International Geotechnical Societies UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory) 1990. A suggested method for reporting a landslide. Bulletin of

the International Association of Engineering Geology, No. 41, 5-12.

  • WP/ WLI. (International Geotechnical Societies UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory) 1991. A suggested method for a landslide summary. Bulletin of

the International Association of Engineering Geology, No. 43, 101-110.

  • WP/ WLI. (International Geotechnical Societies UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory) 1993. A suggested method for describing the activity of a
  • landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, No. 47, 53-57.
  • WP/ WLI. (International Geotechnical Societies UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory) 1995. A suggested method for describing the rate of

movement of a landslide. Bulletin of the International Association of Engineering Geology, No. 52, 75-78.

  • WP/WLI (International Geotechnical Societies=UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide Inventory), 1993. Multilingual Landslide Glossary. BiTech Publishers Ltd,
  • Dikau, R., Brunsden, D., Schrott, L. & M.-L. Ibsen (Eds.) 1996. Landslide Recognition. Identification, Movement and Causes. Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  • Brunsden, D. 1984 Mudslides. In Slope Instability (eds D. Brunsden and D.B. Prior), Wiley, Chichester, pp. 363-418.
  • Cruden, D.M., 1993, The Multilingual Landslide Glossary, Bitech Publishers, Richmond., British Columbia, for the UNESCO Working Party on World Landslide

Inventory in 1993.

  • Brown, W.M., Cruden, D.M., and Dennison, J.S., 1992. The Directory of the World Landslide Inventory. United States Geological Survey, Open-File Report 92-427,

216 p.

  • Cruden, D.M., 1991. A simple definition of a landslide. Bulletin International Association for Engineering Geology, 43: 27-29.

Source: http://www.ukgeohazards.info/pages/eng_geol/landslide_geohazard/eng_geol_landslides_index.htm

  • The landslide handbook – A guide to understanding landslides. USGS Circular 1325, November 2008.

Source: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1325/

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

III Landslide hazard assessment

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Concept of landslide hazard and risk assessment I

Landslide inventory Hazard assessment Triggering factors Predisposing factors Risk elements Risk assessment

  • Precipitation/ seasonal

snowmelt and related infiltration

  • Seismic activity/

earthquakes

  • Lithology
  • Structural and

neotectonic setting

  • Relief
  • Human interference
  • Infrastructure
  • Census data

Magnitude probability Temporal probability Spatial probability after Guzzetti et al. 2005

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Concept of landslide hazard and risk assessment II

A: Basic datasets required B: Susceptibility and hazard modeling component C: Vulnerability assessment component D: Risk assessment component

After Van Westen et al. (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Basic data sets for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk

C = Critical data set, H = highly important, M = moderately important, and L = Less important, – = Not relevant

Source: Van Westen et al. (2008) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard, and vulnerability assessment: An overview

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Landslide mortality risk in Central Asia

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Kyrgyzstan in Central Asia

Central Asia - MODIS RGB bands 4-3-1 (32 days composite: 7th of July through 8th of August 2001)

slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Indische Platte Eurasische Platte

GFZ CATS GPS-Netz

T I B E T TARIM PAMIR ARABISCHE HALBINSEL

Arabisches Meer Bengalisches Meer

2 cm / Jahr

1000 km

Repeated GPS measurements of CATS GFZ network resulted in NNW to SSE shortening rates of ca. 2cm/year

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

94-96-98

65°E 75°E 35°N 45°N

20 mm/yr, 95% conf.

85°E 0.8°/Myr Kashi

Kashi-Aksu Th.

Aksu Korly

Kara Kul

TFF T F F

A L R CHR FGB

Tarim Tien Shan Pamirs Kasagh shield Tibet

KUCH BLZH Fergana B.

GPS vectors with respect to ‘stable’ Eurasia – derived from the 90-sites GFZ GPS network covering 1200 by 1800 km. Data provide direct evidence of current high rates of tectonic deformation far north of the India-Eurasia suture zone. (Reigber et al., 2001)

Results from repeated high accuracy GPS measurements between 1994 and 1998

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Damages caused by the December 25th Kochkor 5.8 earthquake

(pictures taken by CAIAG Bishkek)

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Population: ca. 5 Million people Minimum elevation: 135 m Size: 198,500 sq.km (25 people/sq.km) Maximum elevation: 7439 (Pik Pobedy) Rainfall: 250 – 300 up to 1500 mm 94% of country above 1000 m (7% arable land)

Kyrgyzstan MODIS RGB bands 4-3-1 (32 days composite: 7th of July through 8th of August 2001)

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Main natural hazards in Kyrgyzstan

MODIS RGB bands 4‐3‐1 (32 days composite: 7th of July through 8th of August 2001)

Background and needs:

  • Kyrgyz Republic is faced with a high number of natural disaster affecting large parts of the country

(e.g., 1994: about 1,000 landslides failed and 115 people were killed; 2008: Nura earthquake M=6.6, 75 people were killed and 150 injured, 90 glacial lakes endangered for regularly occurring ouburst floods)

  • Human living space is limited (94% of country above 1000 m NN, only 7% arable land)
  • Need for efficient and spatially differentiated hazard assessment
  • Improved understanding of natural processes forms basis for objective and spatially differentiated

hazard assessment.

  • Remote sensing and GIS techniques are required for efficient multi-temporal analysis of process

characteristics for large areas with limited ground data availability. Glacial lake outburst floods (GLOF) Deep‐seated landslides Earthquakes

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Landslide analysis in Southern Kyrgyzstan

GFZ Potsdam Section 1.4 – Remote Sensing

  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, Dr. H.-U. Wetzel,
  • Dr. Mahdi Motagh

PhD Stundents: Robert Behling, Daria Golovko, Kanayim Teshebaeva Southern Kyrgyzstan: high landslide activity along the Eastern rim of Fergana Basin Due to ongoing tectonic activity high seismicity and frequent occurrence of large landslides in populated areas Main objectives:

  • Establishment of landslide inventory
  • Development of GIS-based approach

for objective hazard assessment

  • Investigation of potential of InSAR for

monitoring of slope movements

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Study area along Eastern rim of Fergana Basin

Landslides reported by Ministry of Emergency Situations of Kyrgyzstan between 2005 and 2010 Areas of known landslide activity Study area for landslide analysis at regjonal scale

Landslides represent most severe natural hazard in Southern Kyrgyzstan (200 victims between1990 and 2010) Systematic landslide investigation limited to years between 1968 and 1992 Big need for continuation

  • f regular landslide inventories

and objective spatially differentiated hazard assessment

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis
  • High number of complex rotational/translational slides – often reactivation and repetitive failure
  • Regional spatial distribution determined by lithology and neotectonic structures
  • Landslide initiation by complex interplay between predisposing and triggering factors
  • Investigation of landslide activity since 1950-ies, mostly in areas close to settlements
  • Need for systematic inventory of landslide events and quantitative process understanding

Dominant process type – deep seated landslides

Rapid displacement of quaternary loess during 15 minutes period in March 1994 (50 victims) Displacement of clay-rich tertiary sediments during period of several days in June 1998

slide-36
SLIDE 36
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Destroyed building

Rotational landslide complex of Sary Bulak – failure of Tertiary sediments (sandstone, clay) in June 1998 of more than one million cubic meters, destroyed house indicates ongoing activity of landslide (field pictures taken in August 1998)

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Causalities caused by landslides in Kyrgyzstan

2 2 4 3 100 15 32 17 21 25 22 5 19 47 53 31 13 10

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Source: MELESHKO, Kyrgyz Ministry for Emergency Situations, 2008

  • Several thousands of known landslides – estimates between 3000 and 5000
  • Cyclic activation – recent peaks in 1994 and 2003/2004
slide-38
SLIDE 38
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Southern Kyrgyzstan – focus on spatial probability

Landslide inventory Hazard assessment Triggering factors Predisposing factors Risk elements Risk assessment

  • Precipitation/ seasonal

snowmelt and related infiltration

  • Seismic activity/

earthquakes

  • Lithology
  • Structural and

neotectonic setting

  • Relief
  • Human interference
  • Infrastructure
  • Census data

Magnitude probability Temporal probability Spatial probability after Guzzetti et al. 2005

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Existing basic GIS datasets for landslide analysis

  • Topographic data
  • Scanned topographic maps 1:100.000
  • Multitemporal Digital Elevations Models (DEM) generated from various optical (ALOS-

PRISM, MOMS-2P, ASTER) and radar (SRTM X-Band and C-Band) satellite data

  • Quantitative relief parameters and geomorphometric units derived from DEM‘s
  • 120 high accuracy geodetic GPS measurements (ground control points)
  • Geological information
  • Scanned geological maps of scales between 1:50.000 and 1:200.000
  • Digitized and revised geological map information
  • Structural interpretation of satellite remote sensing data with focus on young fault systems
  • Field investigations for verification of remote sensing analysis
  • Landslide information
  • Interpretation of complex landslides from satellite remote sensing data
  • Field investigations between 1998 and 2012
  • Reports on landslide events by Ministry of Emergency Situations
  • Automated remote sensing based landslide identification
slide-40
SLIDE 40
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Characterization of predisposing factors

Landslide inventory Hazard assessment Triggering factors Predisposing factors Risk elements Risk assessment

  • Precipitation/ seasonal

snowmelt and related infiltration

  • Seismic activity/

earthquakes

  • Lithology
  • Structural and

neotectonic setting

  • Relief
  • Human interference
  • Infrastructure
  • Census data

Magnitude probability Temporal probability Spatial probability after Guzzetti et al. 2005

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Topographic data

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Acquisition of interferometric SAR data from space shuttle

http://www.dlr.de/srtm/level1/howto_en.htm Instrument / C - Band X - Band Data provider NASA-JPL DLR Global coverage yes yes between 60°N and 54°S completeness full stripes

  • riginal resolution

30 m 30 m released resolution 90 m 30 m worldwide absolute accuracy (90% error.) geolocation (horizontal) 10 m 20 m height (vertical) 7 m 16 m relative accuracy (90% error) geolocation (horizontal)

  • 15 m

height (vertical) 7 m 6 m

SRTM – Shuttle Radar Topography Mission – February 2000 – Near global DEM coverage

slide-43
SLIDE 43
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

High accuracy geodetic GPS measurements Orientation of corner reflectors during mission

  • Two GPS campaigns in 1998 and 1999

in cooperation with State Cartography Service of Kyrgyzstan

  • Observation of 120 field points
  • Horizontal accuracy 10 cm
  • Vertical accuracy 20 cm
  • Observation of trigonometric points for

transformation of WGS-84 coordinates in State coordinate system of Kyrgyzstan

  • Deployment of corner reflectors in 1998 for

ERS-1/2 mission in cooperation with State Cartography Service of Kyrgyzstan

  • First acquisition of ERS-1/2 data for

Kyrgyzstan by mobile receiving station in Kitab (Uzbekistan) operated by DLR and GFZ Potsdam between March and June 1999

  • Re-Orientation of corner reflectors for SRTM

mission in real-time for the different recordings

Eastern rim of Fergana Basin – Pilot test site for X-SAR SRTM Mission

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Statistics of elevation differences between GPS check points (85) and DEM: Minimum:

  • 49,0 m

Maximum: 38,1 m Mean:

  • 28,4 m

Stdev.: 21,4 m

SRTM C-Band topography (90m resolution) of Fergana Basin (JPL)

slide-45
SLIDE 45
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Statistics of elevation differences between GPS check points (63 points) and DEM: Minimum:

  • 11,6 m

Maximum: 11,3 m Mean: 0,5 m Stdev.: 4,9

SRTM X-Band topography (30m resolution) of Fergana Basin (DLR)

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Statistics of elevation differences between GPS trafo (25) / check points (29) and DEM: Tafo- Check-Points Minimum:

  • 15,3 m
  • 20,6 m

Maximum: 20,7 m 33,9 Mean:

  • 1,0 m

3,4 Stdev.: 9,0 m 12,6

DEM (30m resolution) generated from ASTER data data using GPS transformation and check points of Fergana Basin (GFZ)

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Morphological correctness of DEM – flow accumulation analysis

MOMS-2P ortho image data R: 7, G: 4, B: 1; 18m pixel size Shaded relief of 30m DEM with extracted river network (solid lines) Extracted watersheds (minimum size 250.000 m2 ) dashed line – ancient landslide

2 km

Conclusions for DEM generation based on optical satellite remote sensing data:

  • DEM‘s have suitable geometric and morphological correctness for landslide analysis in Kyrgyzstan
  • Simultaneous recording of stereo and multispectral data is of special importance
  • DEM is required for image processing and GIS based thematic analysis of satellite remote sensing data
  • Availability of ASTER stereo data allows multitemporal DEM generation for whole area of interest
slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

MOMS-2P DEM (50 m) of Upper Maili-Suu river valley More than 10 Million m3 of displaced material - tertiary and quaternary sediments Kotchkor-Ata: View to main scarp (width ca. 500 m) Occurrence in spring 1994, photo July 1999 Landslide Tectonic – lower part, photo September 2002

Kotchkor-Ata Foto left 5 km Foto below Tectonic

slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

DEM-based analysis of Kochkor-Ata landslide

Profil B Profil A

slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Geological information

slide-51
SLIDE 51
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Geological map information

  • combining maps of different scales

1:50.000, 1:100.000, 1:200.000

  • requires spatial and thematic

homogenization

  • manul mapping of geological units

supported by remote sensing data

  • manual mapping of young tectonic

structures supported by remote sensing data

  • field investigations for verification

Goal: principle understanding of lithological, structural and tectonic framework for landslide occurrence

slide-52
SLIDE 52
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

QII QI QIII QIV C

Landslide Kakyr - failure (loess) June 1998 Field picutre taken in August 1998 Landsat-TM July 1994 MOMS-2P June 1998

Geological Map1:200.000 - Red arrow depicts landslide

slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Young fault systems overlayed on geology

Geological units derived from 1:50.000 geological maps and remote sensing data

slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

DEM and remote sensing based visualization of landslide prone slopes

Panorama of field pictures taken in August 2000

slide-55
SLIDE 55
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Landslide prone area along Southern Fergana fault system

Dshalal-Abad

5 km

slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Regional interpretation of tectonic structures

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • Dr. Sigrid Roessner, GFZ Potsdam ISNET/ISA Workshop Landslide hazard analysis

Remote sensing and GIS analysis of geological setting – Maili-Sai

1 km

Shear elements Landslides* Youngest accumulations Mine tailings Izolit Plant Mountain top *1 Tectonic 2 Koy-Tash

1 km

Kotschkor-Ata

1 2

Results:

  • Identification of a young shear zone

cutting the anticline (red lines)

  • Shear zone formed by right side

strike-slip fault

  • Subsequent development of tectonic

extensional fractures (yellow line)

  • Spatial correlation between young

fractures and occurrence of landslides