particle physics with the cosmic microwave background
play

Particle Physics with the Cosmic Microwave Background with SPT-3G - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Particle Physics with the Cosmic Microwave Background with SPT-3G Jessica Avva on behalf of the SPT-3G collaboration UC Berkeley Photo: Jason Galliccio The Early Universe: a Particle Physics Laboratory Neutrinos Atoms < 1% 4.6% Today


  1. Particle Physics with the Cosmic Microwave Background with SPT-3G Jessica Avva on behalf of the SPT-3G collaboration UC Berkeley Photo: Jason Galliccio

  2. The Early Universe: a Particle Physics Laboratory Neutrinos Atoms < 1% 4.6% Today Dark Matter 23% ● Neutrinos account for < 1 percent ● Dark Energy dominates the universe Dark Energy 72% 2 NASA/WMAP Science Team

  3. The Early Universe: a Particle Physics Laboratory Neutrinos Energy Density (log scale) Photons Dark Matter + Atoms Today The universe is dark energy dominated Dark Energy 10 9 10 5 1100 0 3 Redshift M. Millea

  4. The Early Universe: a Particle Physics Laboratory Neutrinos Energy Density (log scale) Early Universe 10 The universe is matter dominated (~380,000 yrs after the Photons BIg Bang) Dark Matter + Atoms Today The universe is dark energy dominated Dark Energy 10 9 10 5 1100 0 4 Redshift M. Millea

  5. The Early Universe: a Particle Physics Laboratory 44 Early Early Universe The universe is radiation dominated Neutrinos (~1 sec after the Big Bang Energy Density (log scale) Early Universe 10 The universe is matter dominated (~380,000 yrs after the Photons BIg Bang) Dark Matter + Atoms Today The universe is dark energy dominated Dark Energy 10 9 10 5 1100 0 5 Redshift M. Millea

  6. The Big Picture of the Universe Observable: [now] Galaxy Surveys, tracers of large scale structure Observable: [~380,000 yrs after the Big Bang] The Cosmic Microwave Background 6

  7. The Big Picture of the Universe Observable: [now] Galaxy Surveys, tracers of large scale structure Now: CνB neutrinos are not Beginning: Neutrinos (CνB) were relativistic, dominant Observable: [~380,000 yrs after relativistic, dominant observable observable is their effect on the Big Bang] The Cosmic is their effect on the expansion structure growth Microwave Background 7 history of the universe

  8. Effect of Neutrinos in the Early Universe: N eff N eff corresponds to number of relativistic species in early universe - sensitive to number of neutrinos, sterile neutrinos, light dark matter, axions, etc. Standard Model prediction for 3 neutrinos = 3.046 Matter underdensity Matter overdensity 8 Z. Hou, L. Knox

  9. Effect of Neutrinos in the Early Universe: N eff ● θ s - sound horizon ( typical overdensity / N eff corresponds to underdenisty size ) number of relativistic ● θ d - photon diffusion scale ( map smoothed species in early below this scale ) universe - sensitive to number of neutrinos, More relativistic sterile neutrinos, light species and/or dark particles (larger N eff ) = dark matter, axions, etc. increased expansion rate = increased θ s Standard Model and θ d prediction for 3 neutrinos = 3.046 Matter underdensity Matter overdensity 9 Z. Hou, L. Knox

  10. Effect of Neutrinos in the Early Universe: N eff ● θ s - sound horizon ( typical overdensity / N eff corresponds to underdenisty size ) number of relativistic ● θ d - photon diffusion scale ( map smoothed species in early below this scale ) universe - sensitive to number of neutrinos, More relativistic sterile neutrinos, light species and/or dark particles (larger N eff ) = dark matter, axions, etc. increased expansion rate = increased θ s Standard Model and θ d prediction for 3 neutrinos = 3.046 Matter underdensity Matter overdensity 10 Z. Hou, L. Knox

  11. Effect of Neutrino Mass on Structure Over Time ● As the universe expands, the CνB loses energy ● Neutrino velocities drop and they become bound to large structures ● Given known neutrino energy, time of transition for when neutrinos become non-relativistic determines Σm ν N. Whitehorn 11 Now Time

  12. The SPT-3G camera on The South Pole Telescope ● 16,000 TES bolometers ● 90, 150, and 220 GHz 10m diameter ● Polarization ● 1.6, 1.2, 1.0 arcmin beams Observing 1500 deg 2 patch ● ● 2017-2023 Anderson 2018 8 arcmin NASA diameter Goddard circle 12 Huang 1907.09621

  13. Field maps from the SPT-3G Survey Observation Strategy: Observe the SPT-3G 1500 deg 2 field every ~2 days for 6 years! 13

  14. Extracting Particle Physics from SPT-3g Field Maps Galaxy Clusters and Power Spectrum Lensing Power →N eff Spectrum →Σ m ν 14

  15. Extracting Particle Physics from SPT-3g Field Maps Galaxy Clusters and Power Spectrum Lensing Power →N eff Spectrum →Σ m ν 15

  16. SPT-3G Sensitivity Comparison - EE Power Spectrum Planck SPTpol SPT-3G forecast Large angular scales Small angular scales 16

  17. SPT-3G 2018 EE Power Spectrum Planck best-fit model SPT-3G EE Data Using 2018 150 GHz data, y SPT-3G is the most sensitive r a n measurement of the CMB EE i m polarization spectrum from 700 < i l e ℓ < 1700! r P 17 Daniel Dutcher

  18. SPT-3G 2018 EE Power Spectrum Planck best-fit model SPT-3G EE Data N eff y r a Characterize n i m suppression i l of structure at e r P small angular scales 18 Daniel Dutcher

  19. SPT-3G 2018 EE Power Spectrum Planck best-fit model Characterize peak SPT-3G EE Data locations at larger angular scales Characterize y r suppression a n i of structure at m i small angular l e r scales P 19 Daniel Dutcher

  20. SPT-3G EE Power Spectrum to N eff Constraint Precision constraint of the energy density in relativistic and dark particles; search for deviations from Standard Model prediction Constraints and Forecasts for ΛCDM+Y p +N eff Cosmology Standard Model Predicted value for 3 neutrino species: N eff = 3.046 Planck constraint ΔN eff = 0.19 (1 𝜏 ) Previous constraint from SPT-3G forecast ΔN eff = 0.1 (1 𝜏 ) SPTpol + PlanckTT - 10 σ confirmation of CνB: N eff = 3.54 ± 0.54 (Henning et al, ΛCDM+Y p +N eff ) 20 https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.04473.pdf

  21. Extracting Particle Physics from SPT-3g Field Maps Galaxy Clusters and Power Spectrum Lensing Power →N eff Spectrum →Σ m ν 21

  22. Two independent measurements of Σm ν with SPT-3G The CMB probes the evolution of structure over time ESA and the Planck Collaboration CMB Lensing: Measure the distortions to the CMB power spectrum by intervening matter Galaxy Clusters: Measure the between us and the surface of last scattering abundance of galaxy clusters as a function of mass and redshift 22

  23. Two independent measurements of Σm ν with SPT-3G The CMB probes the evolution of structure over time Independent systematics ESA and the Planck Collaboration CMB Lensing: Measure the distortions to the CMB power spectrum by intervening matter Galaxy Clusters: Measure the between us and the surface of last scattering abundance of galaxy clusters as a function of mass and redshift 23

  24. Two independent measurements of Σm ν with SPT-3G The CMB probes the evolution of structure over time Galaxy Clusters: Measure the abundance of galaxy clusters as a function of mass and redshift 24

  25. Two independent measurements of Σm ν with SPT-3G The CMB probes the evolution of structure over time ESA and the Planck Collaboration CMB Lensing: Measure the distortions to the CMB power spectrum by intervening matter Galaxy Clusters: Measure the between us and the surface of last scattering abundance of galaxy clusters as a function of mass and redshift 25

  26. Two independent measurements of Σm ν with SPT-3G The CMB probes the evolution of structure over time E (curl-free component): B (curl component): CMB has polarization Polarization that follows follows gradient of gradient of temperature temperature field. E field. Should NOT exist modes should exist from from just primordial T: Gaussian random primordial density density fluctuations we temperature field fluctuations we see in T. see in T. ESA and the Planck Collaboration CMB Lensing: Measure the distortions to the CMB power spectrum by intervening matter between us and the surface of last scattering 26 Hu and Okamoto 2001

  27. Two independent measurements of Σm ν with SPT-3G The CMB probes the evolution of structure over time Adds CMB lensing non-gaussianity potential: 2-d projection of the full and polarization 3-d gravitational curl component potential between us and surface of last scattering ESA and the Planck Collaboration CMB Lensing: Measure the distortions to the CMB power spectrum by intervening matter between us and the surface of last scattering 27 Hu and Okamoto 2001

  28. Measuring Σm ν with Galaxy Clusters and Lensing Cosmological constraint on neutrino mass at level comparable to known lower limit (~60 meV) from oscillation experiments! Neutrino oscillation experiments : Σm ν ≳ 0.058 eV Inverted Hierarchy: two neutrinos with m ν ≳ 0.058 eV, so Σm ν ≳ 0.116 eV Assuming normal hierarchy and minimum value Σm ν = 0.058 eV, SPT-3G could provide evidence against the inverted hierarchy. Assuming the inverted hierarchy, SPT-3G could rule out Σm ν = 0 at 2 sigma . 28 K. Aylor

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend