Lectures on Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (Texas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

lectures on cosmic microwave background
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Lectures on Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (Texas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Lectures on Cosmic Microwave Background Eiichiro Komatsu (Texas Cosmology Center, Univ. of Texas, Austin) KEK Winter School, Kusatsu, February 10-12, 2009 From Cosmic Voyage Night Sky in Optical (~500nm) Night Sky in Microwave (~1mm)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lectures on Cosmic Microwave Background

Eiichiro Komatsu (Texas Cosmology Center, Univ. of Texas, Austin) KEK Winter School, Kusatsu, February 10-12, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

From “Cosmic Voyage”

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Night Sky in Optical (~500nm)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Night Sky in Microwave (~1mm)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Night Sky in Microwave (~1mm) Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) Uniform Across the Entire Sky

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Birth of CMB

~1950

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • G. Gamow, 1948
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Determination of physical conditions in the early universe

n+pD+γ

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why is it so important?

  • The baryon number density was ~1018 cm-3 when

temperature was 109 K.

  • It’s ~10-7 cm-3 now.
  • Since the baryon number density scales as (radius of

the universe)–3 ~(temperature)3, we get for the present- day temperature

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • R. Alpher and R. Herman, 1949

~5K

~109 K

Deuterium formation NOW Log TIME (sec)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

…Then forgotten…

  • Gamow has tried to synthesize ALL the elements (not
  • nly H and He) in the early Universe, which turned out

to be impossible.

–Therefore, consequences of his theory were also forgotten for many years.

  • The other reason was because it seemed impossible to

measure the CMB: radio astronomy was just born.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

An Effort in Japan, 1951

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Translated from Haruo Tanaka (1979) - to be published in “Finding the Big Bang” edited by Jim Peebles.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Rebirth and Discovery

1965

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • R. Dicke and J. Peebles, 1965

3.5K

NOW

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • A. Penzias & R. Wilson, 1965
  • Isotropic
  • Unpolarized
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Is the measured signal thermal?

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • P. Roll and D. Wilkinson, 1966

D.Wilkinson (W of WMAP) What about Wien region?

slide-21
SLIDE 21
  • Ya. Zel’dovich and R. Sunyaev, 1969
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Sunyaev-Zel’dovich effect

  • Additional energy injection in the early universe would

create energetic electrons.

  • The hot electrons scatter background photons, giving

their energy to the photons.

–The thermal spectrum distorted (non-equilibrium) –The amplitude of distortion parameterized by y:

slide-23
SLIDE 23

1969 (4 years later than P&W) Penzias&Wilson Roll&Wilkinson

Wien region of the spectrum is very sensitive to the thermal history of the Universe. In the limit of Te>>T,

slide-24
SLIDE 24

S-Z Effect Toward Individual Clusters

  • RXJ1347-1145
  • Left, SZ increment (350GHz)
  • Right, SZ decrement (150GHz)
slide-25
SLIDE 25

COBE/FIRAS, 1990

Perfect blackbody = Thermal equilibrium = Big Bang proved No y distortion = No energy injection = Silent universe

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Temperature fluctuations

Radiation transport in a perturbed universe (perturbations are small ~ 10-5)

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • R. Sachs and A. Wolfe, 1967
  • SOLVE GENERAL RELATIVISTIC BOLTZMANN EQUATIONS TO THE

FIRST ORDER IN PERTURBATIONS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Introduce temperature fluctuations, Θ=ΔT/T: Expand the Boltzmann equation to the first order: where describes the Sachs-Wolfe effect: purely GR-induced fluctuations.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

For metric perturbations in the form of: the Sachs-Wolfe terms are given by where γ is the directional cosine of photon propagations. Newtonian potential Curvature perturbations 1.The 1st term = gravitational redshift 2.The 2nd term = integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect h00/2 Δhij/2 (higher T)

slide-30
SLIDE 30

COBE/DMR, 1992

  • Fluctuations are due to the

Sachs-Wolfe effect!

  • Gravity is stronger in colder

spots (i.e. ΔΤ/Τ∼Φ)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Why Sachs-Wolfe Only?

  • DMR’s angular resolution (7 degrees) corresponds to 1300h-1Mpc at

z~1100 (the surface of the last scatter, where CMB photons come from).

  • The horizon radius at z~1100 is only about 280h-1Mpc.
  • Therefore, collision terms in the Boltzmann equation must not have

any effects on temperature fluctuations (it violates causality

  • therwise!).
  • The collision terms become important on scales smaller than the

“sound crossing scales”~horizon/sqrt(3), which subtends ~ 1 degree

  • n the sky.
slide-32
SLIDE 32

GO TO SMALL SCALES

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Small scales: Hydrodynamic perturbations

  • When coupling is strong, photons and

baryons move together and behave as a single fluid.

  • When coupling becomes less strong, they

behave as two fluids with viscosity.

  • So, the problem can be formulated as

“hydrodynamics”. (cf S-W effect was pure GR.)

Collision term describing coupling between photons and baryons via electron scattering.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

The Cosmic Sound Wave

slide-35
SLIDE 35

COBE to WMAP (x35 better resolution)

COBE WMAP

COBE 1989 WMAP 2001

[COBE’s] measurements also marked the inception of cosmology as a precise science. It was not long before it was followed up, for instance by the WMAP satellite, which yielded even clearer images of the background radiation.

Press Release from the Nobel Foundation

slide-36
SLIDE 36

How to see the sound waves

  • The angular power spectrum, Cl

–Cl measures the amplitude of temperature fluctuations at a given angular scale:

slide-37
SLIDE 37

The Spectral Analysis

Angular Power Spectrum Large Scale Small Scale about 1 degree

  • n the sky
slide-38
SLIDE 38

CMB to Ωbh2 & Ωmh2

  • 1-to-2: baryon-to-photon; 1-to-3: matter-to-radiation ratio
  • Ωγ=2.47x10-5h-2 & Ωr=Ωγ+Ων=1.69Ωγ=4.17x10-5h-2

Ωb/Ωγ Ωm/Ωr =1+zEQ

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Cosmic Pie Chart

  • Cosmological observations

(CMB, galaxies, supernovae)

  • ver the last decade told us

that we don’t understand much of the Universe.

Hydrogen & Helium Dark Matter Dark Energy

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Tilting=Primordial Shape->Inflation

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

“Red” Spectrum: ns < 1

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

“Blue” Spectrum: ns > 1

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Expectations From 1970’s: ns=1

  • Metric perturbations in gij (let’s call that “curvature

perturbations” Φ) is related to δ via

  • k2Φ(k)=4πGρa2δ(k)
  • Variance of Φ(x) in position space is given by
  • <Φ2(x)>=∫lnk k3|Φ(k)|2
  • In order to avoid the situation in which curvature

(geometry) diverges on small or large scales, a “scale- invariant spectrum” was proposed: k3|Φ(k)|2 = const.

  • This leads to the expectation: P(k)=|δ(k)|2=k (ns=1)
  • Harrison 1970; Zel’dovich 1972; Peebles&Yu 1970

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Getting rid of the Sound Waves

Angular Power Spectrum

44

Primordial Ripples

Large Scale Small Scale

slide-45
SLIDE 45

The Early Universe Could Have Done This Instead

Angular Power Spectrum

45

More Power on Large Scales (ns<1)

Small Scale Large Scale

slide-46
SLIDE 46

...or, This.

Angular Power Spectrum

46

More Power on Small Scales (ns>1)

Small Scale Large Scale

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Current Limit on ns

  • ns = 0.960 ± 0.013
  • Gravitational waves were ignored.
  • ns = 0.970 ± 0.015
  • Gravitational waves were included
slide-48
SLIDE 48
  • Low-l polarization data (TE/EE/BB at l<23) only: r<20
  • BB data only with tau=0.10 (fixed): r<4.5
  • High-l TE data included: r<2
  • Low-l temperature data included: r<0.2
slide-49
SLIDE 49
slide-50
SLIDE 50
slide-51
SLIDE 51
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Wave Form and Cosmological Parameters (Example)

Higher baryon density Lower sound speed Compress more Higher peaks at compression phase (even peaks)

slide-53
SLIDE 53
slide-54
SLIDE 54

Determining Baryon Density

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Determining Dark Matter Density

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Measuring Geometry

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Power Spectrum

Scalar T

Tensor T

Scalar E Tensor E Tensor B