line intensities and collisional radiative modeling
play

Line intensities and Collisional-Radiative Modeling H. K. Chung - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Line intensities and Collisional-Radiative Modeling H. K. Chung (many slides from Y . Ralchenko & J. Seely presentations at ICTP-IAEA School in 2017) http://indico.ictp.it/event/7950/other-view?view=ictptimetable


  1. Line intensities and 
 Collisional-Radiative Modeling H. K. Chung (many slides from Y . Ralchenko & J. Seely presentations at ICTP-IAEA School in 2017) http://indico.ictp.it/event/7950/other-view?view=ictptimetable https://www-amdis.iaea.org/Workshops/ICTP2017/ May 8 th , 2019 Joint ICTP-IAEA School on Atomic and Molecular Spectroscopy in Plasmas Trieste, Italy 1

  2. Spectroscopic observables of matter states INTRODUCTION 2

  3. Experimental X-Ray Spectra What are the spectral lines? Can we determine the plasma temperature and density? Other plasma properties? Unexpected discoveries? 3

  4. Spectral Line Intensity (optically thin) Einstein coefficient or transition probability (s -1 ) Upper state density (cm -3 ) ( almost ) purely I N A h strongly depends = ⋅ ⋅ ν atomic parameters ij j ij ij on plasma conditions Photon energy (J) Energy emitted due to a specific transition from a unit volume per unit time j E ij i 4

  5. 5 fields of expertize to constitute plasma spectroscopic analysis INGREDIENTS OF SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSIS 5

  6. 1) A Complete Set of Atomic Data BOUND-BOUND TRANSITIONS Energy levels of an atom Continuum A 3 A 1 → A 2 +hv 2 Spontaneous emission A 1 +hv 1 ↔ A 2 + hv 1 +hv 2 Photo-absorption or emission B 1 A 1 +e 1 ↔ A 2 +e 2 Collisional excitation or deexcitation Ground state of ion Z+1 BOUND-FREE TRANSITIONS A 1 B 1 +e → A 2 +hv 3 Radiative recombination B 1 +e ↔ A 2 +hv 3 Photoionization / stimulated recombination B 1 +e 1 ↔ A 2 +e 2 Collisional ionization / recombination A 2 B 1 +e 1 ↔ A 3 ↔ A 2 +hv 3 Autoionization / Dielectronic Ground state of ion Z Recombination (electron capture + stabilization) Atomic Physics Codes: FAC, HULLAC, LANL, GRASP-2K 6

  7. 2) Population Kinetics Modeling The key is to figure out how to manage the infinite set of levels and transitions of atoms and ions into a model with a tractable set of levels and transitions that represents a physical reality! (Completeness + Tractability + Accuracy) N max N max dn i n W n W ∑ ∑ = − + i ij j ji dt j i j i ≠ ≠ RR DR 2 W B J n C n W A B J n D n ( ) n = + + β + γ = + + + α + α + δ ij ij ij e ij ij e ij ji ij ji ji e ji e ji ji e ij A ij Spontaneous emission B ij Stimulated absorption B ij Stimulated emission C ij Collisional excitation D ij Collisional deexcitation γ ij Collisional ionization α ijDR Dielectronic recombination β ij Photoionization (+st. recom) α ijRR Radiative recombination δ ij Collisional recombination 7

  8. 3) Radiation Transport Radiation field carries the information on atoms in plasmas through population distributions • Radiation intensity I(r,n,v,t) is determined self-consistently from the coupled integro-differential radiation transport and population kinetic equations 1 [ c ( / t ) ( n )] I ( r , n , , t ) ( r , n , , t ) ( r , n , , t ) I ( r , n , , t ) − ∂ ∂ + ⋅ ∇ ν = η ν − χ ν ν • Emissivity η ( r,n ,v,t) and Opacity χ ( r,n ,v,t) and are obtained with population densities and radiative transition probabilities ⎡ ⎤ ( ) 3 2 * h / kT h / kT 2 h / c ( g / g ) n ( ) n e ( ) n n ( , T ) e − ν − ν ∑∑ ∑ ∑ η = ν α ν + α ν + α ν ⎢ ⎥ i j j ij i i e ν κ κ κκ ⎣ ⎦ i j i i > κ * h / kT [ n ( g / g ) n ] ( ) ( n n e ) ( ) − ν ∑∑ ∑ χ = − α ν + − α ν i i j j ij i i i ν κ i j i i > h / kT n n ( , T )( 1 e ) − ν ∑ + α ν − e κ κκ κ 8

  9. 4) Line Shape Theory for Radiation Transport • Line shape theory is a theoretically rich field incorporating quantum-mechanics and statistical mechanics Line shapes have provided • successful diagnostics for a vast range of plasma conditions – Natural broadening (intrinsic) – Doppler broadening (T i ) ν – Stark broadening (N e ) ν ij – Opacity broadening Ground state of ion Z – Resonance broadening (neutrals) 9

  10. 5) Particle Energy Distribution • Time scales are very different between atomic processes and classical particle motions : separation between QM processes and particle mechanics Is this a valid assumption? • Radiation-Hydrodynamics simulations – Fluid treatment of plasma physics • Mass, momentum and energy equations solved – Plasma thermodynamic properties – LTE (Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium) (assumed) • PIC (Particle-In-Cell) simulations – Particle treatment of plasma physics • Boltzmann transport and Maxwell equations solved – Electron energy distribution function – Simple ionization model (assumed) 10

  11. First, identify lines and then obtain line intensities using a kinetics code and determine the temperature and density of the plasma emission region. 11

  12. Statistical Distributions of Electronic Level Population Density 3 Representative Models POPULATION KINETICS MODELS 12

  13. (1) Thermodynamic equilibrium ● Principle of detailed balance – each direct process is Photons balanced by the inverse ● radiative decay (spontaneous+stimulated) ↔ photoexcitation Atoms Electron ● photoionization ↔ photorecombination s Ions ● excitation ↔ deexcitation ● ionization ↔ 3-body recombination ● autoionization ↔ dielectronic capture 13

  14. TE: distributions Four “systems”: photons , electrons , atoms and ions ● Same temperature T r = T e = T i ● We know the equilibrium distributions for each of them ● – Photons: Planck – Electrons (free-free): Maxwell – Populations within atoms/ions (bound-bound): Boltzmann – Populations between atoms/ions (bound-free): Saha 14

  15. TE: energy scheme Maxwell Continuum Energy Ionization Saha energy Bound states Boltzmann N g E E ⎛ ⎞ − Boltzmann: 1 1 exp 1 2 ⎜ ⎟ = − ⎜ ⎟ N g T ⎝ ⎠ 2 2 e 15

  16. Planck and Maxwell ● Planck distribution ● Maxwell distribution 3 2 E 1 2 E ⎛− ⎞ ( ) B E 1 / 2 ( ) = f E dE E exp dE = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ 2 2 E / T M h c e 1 1 / 2 3 / 2 T T − π ⎝ ⎠ e e 16

  17. Saha Distribution A Z (+ e) ↔ A Z+1 + e (+ e) I 3 / 2 Z 1 N + g 2 mT 1 Z π − ⎛ ⎞ T Z 1 2 e e + = e ⎜ ⎟ Z 2 N g h N ⎝ ⎠ Z Z+1 Z e E E − i 0 − T g g e ∑ = e Z Z , i i Which ion is the most 3-body ionization abundant? recombination I Z 1 N + ( ) Z 1 ~ 10 1 >> dielectronic = autoionization Z T N capture e 17

  18. Local Thermodynamic Equilibrium • (Almost) never complete TE : photons decouple easily…therefore, let’s forget about the photons! • LTE = Saha + Boltzmann + Maxwell • Griem’s criterion for Boltzmann: collisional rates > 10*radiative rates [ ] 3 1 / 2 3 14 ( [ ] ) ( [ ] ) 7 N cm 1 . 4 10 E eV T eV Z − > × Δ ∝ H I (2 eV): 2 × 10 17 cm -3 e 01 e C V (80 eV): 2 × 10 22 cm -3 • Saha criterion for low T e : [ ] H I (2 eV): 10 17 cm -3 5 / 2 1 / 2 3 14 6 ( [ ] ) ( [ ] ) N cm 1 10 I eV T eV Z − > × ∝ C V (80 eV): 3 × 10 21 cm -3 e z e 18

  19. LTE Line Intensities No atomic transition data (only energies and statistical ● weights) are needed to calculate populations I N E A g E A E E ⎛ ⎞ Intensity ratio Δ Δ − ● 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 exp 1 2 ⎜ ⎟ = = − ⎜ ⎟ I N E A g E A T Δ Δ ⎝ ⎠ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 e Or just plot the intensities on a log scale: ● Boltzmann plot g I N A E i AE exp( E / T ) = ⋅ ⋅ = − i e G ln( / I g AE ) E / T ln( ) G = − − i i e Aragon et al, J Phys B 44 , 055002 (2011) 19

  20. Saha-LTE conclusions • Collisions >> radiative processes – Saha between ions – Boltzmann within ions • Since collisions decrease with Z and radiative processes increase with Z, higher densities are needed for higher ions to reach Saha/LTE conditions – H I: 10 17 cm -3 – Ar XVIII: 10 26 cm -3 ASD: can calculate Saha/LTE spectra!!! 20

  21. Deviations from LTE Partial LTE (PLTE) for high excited states • Radiative processes are non- negligible – LTE: coll.rates (~n e ) > 10*rad.rates • Non-Maxwellian plasmas Radiative (~n -3 ) • Unbalanced processes Collisional (~n 4 ) • Anisotropy • External fields • … 21

  22. (2) The other limiting case: 
 Coronal Equilibrium Low electron densities! Aug 21, 2017 22

  23. Coronal Model • High temperature, low density and optically thin plasmas (J v = 0) • Excitations (and ionization) only from ground state… x • …and metastables x x • Does require a complete set of x collisional cross sections x • Do we have to calculate all direct and inverse processes?.. 23

  24. Coronal Model Rates (N e2 ) << Rates (N e ) << Rates • (spontaneous) – 3-body recombination not important – Collisional processes from excited levels dominated by spontaneous radiative decays – Left with collisional processes from ground levels x and radiative processes from excited levels Atomic processes: • x x – Collis. ionization (including EA), x – Radiative recombination (including DR) – Collisional excitation x – Radiative decay (including cascades) Ions basically in their ground state • Ionization decoupled from excitation • 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend