St. Vrain Creek Breaches Restoration Alternatives Analysis August - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

st vrain creek breaches restoration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

St. Vrain Creek Breaches Restoration Alternatives Analysis August - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

St. Vrain Creek Breaches Restoration Alternatives Analysis August 10, 2016 Jesse Rounds & Clint Brown Stream Restoration Stream Restoration Goals Sub-Reach 1 Floodplain Connectivity Sediment Conveyance Bank Stabilization


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • St. Vrain Creek Breaches Restoration

Alternatives Analysis

August 10, 2016 Jesse Rounds & Clint Brown

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Stream Restoration

slide-3
SLIDE 3

www.enganalytics.com

Stream Restoration Goals

Sub-Reach 1

 Floodplain Connectivity  Sediment Conveyance  Bank Stabilization

Sub-Reach 2

 Floodplain Connectivity  Grade Control  Bank Stabilization

Sub-Reach 3

 Bank Stabilization  Sediment Conveyance  Backwater Habitat Development

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Restoration – Typical Cross Section

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Restoration Details – Cross Vanes

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Restoration Details - Vanes

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Restoration Details – Root Wads

slide-8
SLIDE 8

www.enganalytics.com

Alternative Analysis – Minimum Design Evaluation Criteria

 Reduce hazards and protect life safety and

property.

 No increase in hazard over pre-flood condition.  Technically sound design.  Meets the objectives of CDBG-DR.  Meets the objectives of NRCS/EWP.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

www.enganalytics.com

Alternative Analysis – Additional Parameters to Assess and Compare

 Additional benefits of design

 Threatened and Endangered Species  Native Fish Passage  Riparian improvements  Maximizes bioengineering  Reconnects floodplain  Restores natural processes  Time to complete final design

slide-10
SLIDE 10

www.enganalytics.com

Alternative Analysis – Additional Parameters to Assess and Compare

 Construction considerations

 Time for construction  Obstacles for timely implementation  Difficulty in meeting construction period

 Cost Considerations

 Construction Cost  Operation and Maintenance Cost (O&M)  Lifetime Cost

slide-11
SLIDE 11

BREACH 1 – Alternative 1: No Action

Reduce hazards and protect life safety and property? NO No increase in hazard over pre-flood condition? NO Not analyzed further

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BREACH 1 – Alternative 2: Gradual Low-Profile Setback Berm

  • Restores natural

processes

  • Riparian

improvements

  • Few obstacles in

meeting construction deadlines

  • Moderate cost
slide-13
SLIDE 13

BREACH 1 – Alternative 3: Maximum Floodplain Setback Berm

  • Riparian improvements
  • Disturbance to existing

established riparian areas

  • Reconnects maximum amount
  • f floodplain
  • May disturb natural processes,

introduce new erosion

  • Potential for many obstacles in

meeting construction deadlines

  • Highest construction cost
slide-14
SLIDE 14

BREACH 1 – Comparative Analysis

Preferred Alternative: Alternative 2 Gradual Low-Profile Setback Berm

slide-15
SLIDE 15

BREACH 2 – Alternative 1: No Action

Reduce hazards and protect life safety and property? NO No increase in hazard over pre-flood condition? NO Not analyzed further

slide-16
SLIDE 16

BREACH 2 – Alternative 2: Berm and Downslope Grading

  • Protects downstream flows to

diversion structures

  • Restores natural processes
  • Maximizes bioengineering
  • Riparian improvements
  • Improved resiliency
  • Few obstacles in meeting construction

deadlines

  • Moderate cost
slide-17
SLIDE 17

BREACH 2 – Alternative 3: Overflow Berm and Downslope Grading

  • Impacts total flows to downstream

diversion structures

  • Modifies the floodplain
  • Maximizes bioengineering
  • Riparian improvements
  • Few obstacles in meeting construction

deadlines

  • Moderate cost
slide-18
SLIDE 18

BREACH 2 – Comparative Analysis

Preferred Alternative: Alternative 2 Berm and Downslope Grading

slide-19
SLIDE 19

BREACHES 5-9 – Alternative 1: No Action

Reduce hazards and protect life safety and property? NO No increase in hazard over pre-flood condition? NO Not analyzed further

slide-20
SLIDE 20

BREACHES 5-9 – Alternative 2: Redirect Flow and Full Berm

  • Reconnects large floodplain
  • Riparian improvements
  • High level of difficulty for construction
  • Potential for many obstacles in

meeting construction deadlines

  • Highest cost
slide-21
SLIDE 21

BREACHES 5-9 – Alternative 3: Overflow Berm and Full Berm

  • Geomorphically most stable
  • ption
  • Highest protection for life and

property

  • Restores natural processes
  • Riparian improvements
  • Moderate cost
slide-22
SLIDE 22

BREACH 5-9 – Comparative Analysis

Preferred Alternative: Alternative 3 Overflow Berm and Full Berm

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Habitat Restoration Opportunities

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Pre-Flood Inundation Map

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Post-Flood Inundation Map

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Current Inundation Map

slide-27
SLIDE 27

www.enganalytics.com

Thank you!

For more information, visit the project website

http://www.bouldercounty.org/os/openspace/pages/ssv-36-to- airport.aspx

  • r contact

Jesse Rounds at BCPOS

jrounds@bouldercounty.org 303-678-6271