Clear Creek / North Clear Creek Overview
Highlight Past
Improvements
Discuss Feasibility Study
& Record of Decision North Clear Creek
Metals of Concern
Clear Creek / North Clear Creek Overview Highlight Past - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Clear Creek / North Clear Creek Overview Highlight Past Improvements Discuss Feasibility Study & Record of Decision North Clear Creek Metals of Concern Zinc, Copper, Manganese Cadmium, Aluminum, Iron The Upper Clear Creek
Highlight Past
Discuss Feasibility Study
Metals of Concern
1994 - Present
1998 - Argo Water
300 600 900 Autumn Winter Spring Summer
150 300 450 600 750
Pre Q (cfs) Post Q (cfs) Pre D-Zn Post D-Zn
Autumn Winter Spring Summer
150 300 450 600 750
Pre D-Zn Post D-Zn
Segment High Flow May 1 Through August 31 Low Flow September 1 through April 30 North Clear Creek Segment 13b 80 184 Clear Creek Segment 11 53 103
Kermits, Dissoved Zinc
300 600 900 Autumn Winter Spring Summer
Quarter S tream flo w , cfs
200 400 600
D is-Z in c C o n c., u g /L
Pre Q (cfs) Post Q (cfs) Pre D-Zn Post D-Zn
Golden Dissolved Zinc, Pre- vs. Post-4/98
300 600 900 Autumn Winter Spring Summer
Quarter S tre a m flo w , c fs
200 400 600
D is -Z in c C o n c ., u g /L
is protective of aquatic life (i.e., survival of a brown trout population) is a goal of the OU4 remedy.
streams, and may continue to limit habitat for aquatic life.
Low Flow High Flow
Pile Remedial Action Old Jordan Remove (to Druid) Niagra Remove Mattie May Cap with Rock Baltimore Cap with Rock Centennial Remove Pittsburgh Cap with Rock Upper Nevada Gulch Piles Soil Cap and Revegetate (northern aspect) Upper Nevada Gulch Piles Cap with Rock (southern aspect) Gregory Gulch No. 3 Remove Argo Cap with Rock Druid Soil Cap and Revegetate Iroquois Cap with Rock Anchor Soil Cap and Revegetate Hazeltine Soil Cap and Revegetate
Concentration/Mass Flux Zinc (dissolved) Copper (dissolved) Cadmium (dissolved) Manganese (dissolved) Iron (total recoverable) Current Low-Flow Conditions Concentration (μg/L) 1,657 15.5 6.0 3,579 7,856 Low-Flow Goals Concentration (μg/L) 675 15.1 3.5 2,021 5,400 Load Reduction Required to Goals Under Low-Flow Conditions
Percent Reduction 59% 2% 41% 44% 31%
Alternative 1A & B No Action / Institutional Controls Alternative 2A & B
Alternative 3A, B & C Water Treatment at Argo, at New
Alternative 4A & B Passive (Wetland Substrate),
Low Flow High Flow
Percent Reduction in Loading for the Given Flow Regime
Low-Flow High-Flow Gregory Incline 99% 85% National Tunnel 85% 85% Gregory Gulch 25% 45% Russell Gulch 20% 40% Chase Gulch 10% 5% Non-Point Sources 40% 40%
Waste Pile Remedial Action Capped Surface Area (acres) Volume Removed (cy) Length of Channel Stabilization (ft) Old Jordan Remove (to Druid) 2,900 200 Mattie May Rock Cap Baltimore Rock Cap Argo Rock Cap Pittsburgh Rock Cap Druid Soil Cap 19.0 Upper Nevada Gulch (South Aspect) Rock Cap 16.5 4,800 Upper Nevada Gulch (North Aspect) Soil Cap 16.5 Gregory Gulch #3 Remove 3,700 300 Centennial Remove 1,500 100 Niagra Remove 5,600 200 Iroquois Rock Cap 3.0 300 Hazeltine Soil Cap 0.9 300 Anchor Soil Cap 1.9 300 Total 67.8 13,700 9,200 10.0 2,700
Public Comment 8/23 Agencies consider