CLEAR CREEK RESTORATION 3406 (b)(12) Matt Brown, FWS Jim De Staso, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

clear creek restoration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CLEAR CREEK RESTORATION 3406 (b)(12) Matt Brown, FWS Jim De Staso, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CLEAR CREEK RESTORATION 3406 (b)(12) Matt Brown, FWS Jim De Staso, Reclamation 530-527-3043 530-276-2046 Whiskeytown Keswick Lake Reservoir Sacramento River Spring-run and steelhead Clear Creek Redding (ESA threatened) Fall-run and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CLEAR CREEK RESTORATION

3406 (b)(12)

Matt Brown, FWS 530-527-3043 Jim De Staso, Reclamation 530-276-2046

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Keswick Reservoir

Whiskeytown Lake

Redding

Clear Creek

Sacramento River

18 miles

Spring-run and steelhead (ESA threatened) Fall-run and late-fall-run

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Clear Creek Funding Sources

CVPIA Local Other Federal CALFED 9.7 0.2 1.7 9.4 8 46 45 1 Program Expenditures (mil) Percent

Total expenditures $21.0 million since 1995

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Program Goals

Flows Gravel Channel restoration Erosion Passage Adaptive management / monitoring

Clear Creek Fish Restoration mandates habitat restoration projects

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Passage at Saeltzer Dam

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Completed in October 2000

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Erosion Control Completed

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Channel Restoration Project

2 mile reach Rebuild floodplains / realign channel

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Channel Restoration Project

3A

Completed Phases 1-3A

2A 2B 1 2B

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Complete Phase 3A Summer 2002 Channel Restoration Project

Old alignment

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Sept 2002 May 2004 Phase 3A

Channel Restoration Project

342 % increase in use of spawning habitat Highest densities of juvenile rearing

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Spawning Gravel Additions 82,700 tons - $1.2 million

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Monitoring

  • Fish: adult counts

juvenile counts, stranding

  • Spawning gravel
  • Geomorphic characteristics
  • Riparian revegetation
  • Birds
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Program Goals (1996 to present)

Flows – IFIM started in FY 2004 Gravel – in perpetuity Channel – 4 phases completed

  • ne or two phases to complete

Erosion - Completed Passage - Completed

Monitoring – Ongoing

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fiscal Year 2005 Budget

Reclamation WRR: $0 Restoration Fund: $800,000

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Channel Restoration Project

Phase 3B Phase 3C

Fiscal Year 2005

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Fiscal Year 2005

Channel Restoration Phase 3B

Currently being designed ($97,000 CVPIA) CALFED considers 3B a Directed Action

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Oct 1995 Oct 2000

Fiscal Year 2005

Channel Restoration Phase 3B Severe headcutting is occurring

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Fiscal Year 2005

Inject at Whiskeytown Dam, Dog Gulch, and NEED Camp ($140,000) Continue Gravel Management Plan ($24,000) Fund ESSA for gravel transport model ($42,000) Monitoring continues

Spawning gravel management / addition: CVPIA $206,000

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Fiscal Year 2005

October - June: 200 cfs July - September: ~ 75 cfs

(temperature control at Igo)

Interim Base Flows:

slide-21
SLIDE 21

IFIM

Red Bluff field support of $69,000

Fiscal Year 2005

Conducted by the FWS Sacramento

Determine long-term flow requirements

slide-22
SLIDE 22

CALFED Environmental Water Program Clear Creek Geomorphic Flow Project

Reactivate geomorphic processes to re-create and maintain the diverse habitats in Clear Creek

Fiscal Year 2005

Large scale adaptive management flow experiment 4,000-6,000 cfs, for 2 to 3 days, 3 times over ten years

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Preparation of a full proposal, expected to take 18 months

Fiscal Year 2005

CALFED Environmental Water Program Clear Creek Geomorphic Flow Project

Reclamation & ESSA analyzing dam safety and flood risks. Conceptual proposal reviewed by 3 panels: ERP, related water management program staff, and independent scientists. Re-operate Whiskeytown Dam to produce a glory hole spill

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Fiscal Year 2005

Geomorphic, fish, vegetation and bird monitoring funded by CALFED

Monitoring

Fish and geomorphic monitoring $339,000 funded by CVPIA

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FWS CVPIA Monitoring

  • Adult Spring Chinook and steelhead
  • Habitat use by juvenile fish
  • Spawning area mapping
  • Fish stranding on floodplains
  • Procure and operate barrier weir
  • Chinook genetics
  • Sediment evaluation
  • Stream channel morphology
slide-26
SLIDE 26

3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 18,000

1 9 6 7 1 9 7 1 9 7 3 1 9 7 6 1 9 7 9 1 9 8 2 1 9 8 5 1 9 8 8 1 9 9 1 1 9 9 4 1 9 9 7 2 2 3

Fall-Run Chinook Salmon Escapement

1967-1991: 1,689 1992-2004: 8,551 Number of Fish

slide-27
SLIDE 27

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

Spring-Run Chinook Counted in August

Fish Counted

slide-28
SLIDE 28

50 100 150 200 250 300 2001 2002 2003 2004

Steelhead Redds Counted

Redds

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Flows - in perpetuity, IFIM through 2009, EWP Gravel - in perpetuity, ~$500k until 2015, then ~$200k Channel restoration - Implement 3B in summer 2006 Assess need for 3C Monitoring - $1.0 mil until 2010, then $500 k

What’s Left To Be Done