overview
play

OVERVIEW Kenneth C. Holt, Secretary Goals and Goals and process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2020 QAP LISTENING SESSIONS OVERVIEW Kenneth C. Holt, Secretary Goals and Goals and process for process for revising revising current QAP current QAP AGENDA and Guide and Guide Overview of Spring 2019 Competitive Funding Round


  1. 2020 QAP LISTENING SESSIONS OVERVIEW Kenneth C. Holt, Secretary

  2. Goals and Goals and process for process for revising revising current QAP current QAP AGENDA and Guide and Guide Overview of Spring 2019 Competitive Funding Round Input and Discussion

  3. • Seeking input and engagement in the process for revising the Qualified Allocation Plan and Multifamily Rental Financing Program Guide – ensure that the Department provides ample opportunity for interested parties to have their Listening say and inform DHCD of key issues that should be considered during the revision process. Sessions – Goals and • The Department’s Goal: adopt a revised QAP and Guide that achieves a balance of many Process competing priorities and benefits from the collective expertise and experience of interested parties.

  4. • PSH - In addition to the required Non-Profit Set- Aside, DHCD established a set-aside of up to $1.5 million of competitively allocated LIHTC • Twinning - DHCD added three (3) points for projects that involved “twinning” of 9% LIHTC and MBP/4% LIHTC 2019 QAP & • Opportunity Zones - DHCD incorporated Guide Overview incentives for Opportunity Zones • Tenant Services – DHCD added an option to certify the provision of tenant services through a sponsor organization or contract service provider that has achieved designation as a Certified Organization for Resident Engagement and Services (CORES)

  5. Applications Received and Funded by Year 50 47 44 45 41 40 35 32 Applications Received 30 Applications Funded 25 25 25 21 20 20 17 15 14 15 11 10 5 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019

  6. Applications Received by Round 100% 90% QAP updated in 2019 80% 80% 81% 68% 70% 61% 60% 50% QCT 50% COO 44% 47% Other 36% 38% 40% 32% 32% 32% 30% 19% 20% 13% 10% 4% 3% 7% 0% 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 Total percentage may not add up to 100% since some properties are located in multiple community context categories. Opportunity Zones are included in the Other category as part of the 2019 revisions. 6

  7. Applications Funded by Round 100% QAP updated in 2019 90% 95% 90% 80% 73% 71% 76% 70% 60% 60% QCT 50% 53% 50% COO Other 40% 40% 27% 30% 24% 20% 19% 10% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2018 2019 Total percentage may not add up to 100% since some properties are located in multiple community context categories. Opportunity Zones are included in the Other category as part of the 2019 revisions. 7

  8. • 15 Projects • 8 Twinned Projects • Total 9% Units: 935 2019 Round • Total 4% Units: 902 • Total 9% & 4% Units: 1,837 Funded Projects • PSH Units: 35 • Elderly Units: 262 • Disability Units:207

  9. Progress towards VCA Unit Production Goal 1600 1,417 1400 1,624 Units Closed 254 or Processing out 1200 of 1,500 Unit Goal 1163 1000 Closed 800 Processing 600 381 400 200 7 0 New Construction Assisted Rehab Unassisted Rehab 1,050 Unit Min 200 Unit Max 250 Unit Max

  10. • $1.2 M remaining used to identify about 20 to 25 units Disability Housing • Awardees’ announcement pending Updates – • No additional funds available from FY12 Section 811 PRA or FY13 awards • HUD expected to announce new funding during FFY 20

  11. • First $2M grant awarded in 2011 • Units set aside at 15% to 30% of AMI Disability Housing • Generated 20 units spread over 7 counties Updates – Weinberg • Last $2M grant awarded in 2016 • Units set aside at 10% to 30% of AMI • 14 units generated spread over five counties and Baltimore City

  12. 2019 Round Average Sc Score Average Score – Funded: 185.02 points Average Score – Not Funded: 177.89 points Average Score – All Projects: 180.22 points Significant Score Differentials Category Total Points Funded Not Funded % Differential 4.4.1 Income Targeting 15 12.07 11.5 4.96% 4.4.2 Targeted Populations 10 9.85 9.12 8.00% 4.5.1 Direct Leveraging 15 8.11 6.16 31.66% 4.6.2 Energy Conservation 6 4.53 3.55 27.61% and Sustainability

  13. Input and Discussion

  14. QAP Revisions – Anticipated Schedule • First Draft Published: November 2019 • Comments Due: December 2019 • Applications Due: Early May 2020

  15. Co Contact Us • Notices Posted At: http://dhcd.maryland.gov/HousingDevelopment/Pages/MFLibrary. aspx#notices • Email: dhcd.qap@maryland.gov

  16. PERMANENT SUPPORTIVE HOUSING SET-ASIDE PROJECT NAME: Sojourner Place at Wolfe SPONSOR: Episcopal Housing Corporation & Healthcare for the Homeless LOCATION: Baltimore, MD UNITS: 70 – 35 PSH, 35 Family TOTAL PROJECT COST: $19,761,836 OCCUPANCY: Family/Special Needs

  17. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Cold Spring Lane SPONSOR: Conifer Realty, LLC LOCATION: Baltimore, MD UNITS: 163 – 56 9%, 107 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $16,011,090 OCCUPANCY: Family

  18. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Residences at Forest Glen SPONSOR: Montgomery Housing Partnership, Inc. LOCATION: Silver Spring, MD UNITS: 176 – 53 9%, 123 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $24,719,544 OCCUPANCY: Family

  19. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Parkway Overlook SPONSOR: Osprey Property Company II LLC & Pax Edwards, LLC LOCATION: Baltimore, MD UNITS: 180 – 62 9%, 118 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $19,321,097 OCCUPANCY: Family

  20. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Henrietta Lacks Village at Lyons Homes SPONSOR: CT Development Partners & Telesis Baltimore Corporation LOCATION: Turner Station, MD UNITS: 90 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $23,444,105 OCCUPANCY: Family

  21. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Rosemont Gardens SPONSOR: Pax Edwards, LLC & Osprey Property Company II LLC LOCATION: Baltimore, MD UNITS: 199 – 68 9%, 131 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $19,885,529 OCCUPANCY: Family

  22. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Artist Flats SPONSOR: Howard County Housing Commission LOCATION: Columbia, MD UNITS: 174 – 53 9%, 121 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $23,681,213 OCCUPANCY: Family

  23. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: McCleary Hill Phase II SPONSOR: Hagerstown Housing Authority LOCATION: Hagerstown, MD UNITS: 79 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $21,982,290 OCCUPANCY: Family

  24. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Residences at Roslyn Rise SPONSOR: Enterprise Homes LLC LOCATION: Columbia, MD UNITS: 153 – 59 9%, 94 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $26,105,962 OCCUPANCY: Family

  25. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Woodyard Station SPONSOR: Pax Edwards LLC LOCATION: Clinton, MD UNITS: 158 – 46 9%, 112 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $18,697,115 OCCUPANCY: Family 9%, Elderly 4%

  26. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Millersview Crossing SPONSOR: Woda Cooper Development, Inc. LOCATION: Millersville, MD UNITS: 54 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $16,508,614 OCCUPANCY: Elderly

  27. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Ellicott Gardens Two SPONSOR: Homes for America LOCATION: Ellicott City, MD UNITS: 70 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $25,368,678 OCCUPANCY: Family

  28. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Homes at Berlin SPONSOR: Homes for America LOCATION: Berlin, MD UNITS: 54 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $11,208,142 OCCUPANCY: Family

  29. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: South Street Centre SPONSOR: SCG Development Partners, LLC, Housing Authority of the City of Frederick, & New Harbor Development, LLC LOCATION: Frederick, MD UNITS: 152 – 56 9%, 96 4% TOTAL PROJECT COST: $22,425,160 OCCUPANCY: Family 9%, Elderly 4%

  30. AWARDED PROJECTS PROJECT NAME: Willows at Berlin SPONSOR: Milford Housing Development Corporation & MBID of Delaware, LLC LOCATION: Berlin, MD UNITS: 65 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $17,479,148 OCCUPANCY: Family

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend