Program-for-Results Financing Overview Overview Overview of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

program for results financing overview overview
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Program-for-Results Financing Overview Overview Overview of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Program-for-Results Financing Overview Overview Overview of World Bank Instruments PforR: What does it Involve? Program-for-Results Financing Overview 2 Three Complementary Financing Instruments Implementation Mechanism Investment


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Program-for-Results Financing Overview

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 2

  • Overview of World Bank Instruments
  • PforR: What does it Involve?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Three Complementary Financing Instruments

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 3

Implementation Mechanism Funds for specific expenditures Bank IPF rules and procedures

Investment Project Financing (IPF)

Funds for non- earmarked general budget support Country policy processes

Development Policy Financing (DPF)

Funds for specific expenditure program

Program-for- Results Financing (PforR)

Program systems

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Where Can PforR be Used?

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 4

  • PforR can be used in any country in support of its development program(s) at

national or sub-national levels in any sector.

  • Useful in areas where government wants to enhance efficiency, effectiveness,

and impact of its program.

  • Helps leverage development assistance by fostering the alignment of

development partners around the same development program.

  • Two types of activities are not included in the PforR:

1) Potentially significant, irreversible impact on the environment and affected people 2) Certain high value procurement packages are normally not eligible for financing and are also excluded from the Program*

*In exceptional cases, high value contracts may be included in the Program financed by PforR if they are deemed to be of

critical importance to the integrity of the Program

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What Clients Like about PforR

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 5

80% of clients who responded to a recent survey and who have used

PforR are likely to use PforR again, because of:

Use own country systems and value for their own resources Capacity building and system improvements Dialogue shift from details to results Reduced Bank transaction processes Verification of results is institutionalized

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Partnership

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 6

Government: Government/Bank partnerships enhanced because Bank staff focus on helping translate Government strategies into specific programs with clearly identified expenditures and results. Development Partners: PforR emphasizes the importance of development partner coordination and alignment with government programs

  • World Bank has supported Asian Development Bank and African

Development Bank with creating their own results-based instruments Other Stakeholders: PforR also enables more transparent engagement with

  • ther stakeholder including Civil Society organizations
  • increased disclosure of preparation documentation and assessments
  • groups outside of government involved in verification of DLIs
  • requirement of establishing grievance redress arrangements
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 7

  • Overview of World Bank Instruments
  • PforR: What does it Involve?
slide-8
SLIDE 8

What does Program-for-Results Involve?

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 8

PforR involves the following steps:

  • Identification of Government program (national or subnational, sectoral or

cross-sectoral, existing or new)

  • Definition of the Program supported by the operation
  • Identification of key results and Disbursement Linked indicators
  • Assessment of the program in terms of technical, fiduciary and social and

environmental impacts

  • Identification of opportunities for building capacity and enhancing system

performance

  • Strong focus on implementation support and achievement of results
slide-9
SLIDE 9

PforR Processing Cycle

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 9

PforR follows the basic processing cycle used for Investment Project Financing operations and has a similar time frame

Preparation Implementation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Identification Stage

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 10

IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT APPRAISAL IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT COMPLETION & EVALUATION NEGOTIATIONS & BOARD APPROVAL

Preliminarily:

  • Defines the scope of the program (this is key!)
  • Identifies the results
  • Identifies the overall program expenditures,

activities and implementation arrangements

  • Identifies possible exclusions
  • Estimates the scope of financing
  • Considers whether the program systems are

broadly adequate

  • If part of an ongoing program, considers

performance to date and lessons learned

  • Considers the risks to achieving the Program’s
  • bjectives and results
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Two Pillars of PforR: Programs and DLIs

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 11

Program Definition/Program

  • f Expenditures
  • PforR has supported a

range of DLIs depending on the Program

  • DLIs include service

delivery indicators, outputs and/or outcomes

  • DLIs also include

institutional indicators including on fiduciary and environmental and social issues

  • Each DLI has a specified

verification protocol before disbursement

Disbursement Linked Indicators (DLIs)

  • PforR has supported a

range of government programs

  • The majority have

supported sub Programs, either sectorally or geographically

  • Program boundaries also

define the scope of the assessments to be carried out

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Program Definition

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 12

  • If government Program and PforR scope are the same - that is ideal
  • PforR operations aim to support Programs that are as close as possible to

government program; however in some cases, there are reasons to go smaller

  • Defining the PforR Program, including the boundaries it supports, is essential to

support the government’s program.

  • There is no legal structure required to defining the Program – basic clarity on

what is included and what is not. That is part of the identification and preparation

  • f a PforR.
  • Defining the PforR Program is also key for determining the scope of the needed

assessments as well as the relevant results and action plans.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The Government program = The Program The Government program

Program Definition

Program Definition

The Program PforR Financing

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Key to Incentives - Disbursement Linked Indicators (DLIs)

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 14

  • Depending on the Program, DLIs can be:
  • DLIs should be:
  • DLIs can be scalable, meaning disbursement is

proportional to progress in achieving the DLI. This helps provide a more stable basis for disbursements than threshold-type conditions.

Up to

25%

  • f financing can be

advanced

25%

can be disbursed against results achieved between concept and signing of legal agreement (Prior results)

Tangible Transparent Under government’s influence Verifiable

actions

  • utputs

intermediate

  • utcomes
  • utcomes

PforR operations disburse funds based on “Disbursement-linked Indicators (DLIs)”

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DLI Formulation

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 15

  • Variables to take into consideration in selecting DLIs— the quantity, allocation of

funding, scalability, and timing

Program Objectives

Key Milestones from Program’s Results Framework

Systems Assessments

Measures to strengthen the performance of Program systems

Results Framework Program Action Plan Disbursement Linked Indicators

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DLIs from Operations

Program-for-Results Overview 16

Mozambique Public Financial Management For Results Program

DLI

Total DLI (Million US$) % of Total Financing Amount Indicative Timeline for DLI Achievement and validation* March 2015 March 2016 March 2017 DLI 7: Proportion

  • f complete primary

schools which receive direct school grant funds on or before February 28

  • f each year

50% 75% 90% Allocated Amount 6 12% US$2 million US$2 million US$2 million

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Credible verifications arrangements to be put in

place

  • Verification is typically handled by government

independent entities (usually in charge of conducting audits) or by private firms contracted by the government

  • Each DLI should have a specified verification

protocol agreed upon during preparation and appraisal

Government agency 38% Independent 3rd Party 62%

Distribution of Verification Protocols in approved PforR Operations

DLIs: Verification Mechanisms

34 Program-for-Results Financing Overview

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Assessment Stage

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 18

The Bank conducts for types of assessments:

  • Technical Assessment
  • Fiduciary Systems Assessment (procurement,

financial management)

  • Environment and Social Systems Assessment

(systems, capacity, consultation)

  • Risk Assessment (overall assessment to PforR
  • bjective)
  • Purpose of Assessment: To understand how systems are

currently working and how they can be strengthened

  • Within Program boundaries, the Bank works with

government and other partners

  • Draws on existing studies and analytic work to assess

Program systems and technical aspects

IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT APPRAISAL IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT COMPLETION & EVALUATION NEGOTIATIONS & BOARD APPROVAL

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Technical Soundness Expenditure Framework Results Framework and M&E Economic Analysis

Technical Assessment: Key Elements

Strategic Relevance

  • Assess the borrowers development issues and relevance to

economic development and poverty reduction

  • Review suitability for public or private support ( or mixed)
  • Review relevance to sector and country strategies

Technical Soundness

  • Assess if the Program is designed, organized, and implemented to

efficiently produce results and reach the Program’s objectives.

  • Assess the Program activities suitability to support the achievement
  • f the Program’s objectives
  • Assess the Program against relevant international experience and

good practices.

Institutional Arrangements

  • Review the Program ability to plan, design, execute, and monitor

Program activities

  • Asses the adequacy of the Client's capacity and commitment to

implement the Program

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Expenditure Framework Review: Key Points

  • The review is the bridge between the technical and fiduciary assessments.

Hence needs to be coordinated with both.

  • The review is to be driven by the scope and boundaries of the Program.
  • Counterparts include Budget departments/Ministry of Finance, Sector Ministries.
  • Existing analytics such as PERs, PEFAs, Sector Institutional and Financial

reviews provide excellent starting points for information and analysis.

  • Team members with skills in PFM could take the lead in doing the review. Local

Consultant help may be required for data collection.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Fiduciary Systems Assessment (FSA)

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 21

  • Task Teams assess whether programs have fiduciary

arrangements designed to facilitate and promote effectiveness, efficiency, economy, transparency, and accountability

  • Procurement systems
  • Financial management systems
  • Risks of fraud and corruption
  • Identifies necessary actions to strengthen or improve these

systems

  • In addition, the assessment screens for excluded activities

– i.e., high value contracts

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Fiduciary Systems Assessments: Key Elements

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 22

The flowchart below represents the Fiduciary Systems Assessment process. Background and Institutional Arrangements Assessment of Fiduciary Performance Fiduciary Risk Assessment Formulating Fiduciary Actions and Mitigation Measures Program Monitoring and Implementation Support Plan Procurement Financial Management Fraud and Corruption A B C D E

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Environmental and Social Systems Assessment (ESSA)

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 23

  • Assesses E&S effects likely to be associated with a program and the

capacity and performance of responsible agencies to manage them effectively

  • Identifies necessary actions to ensure consistency with the core

environmental and social principles, or to otherwise strengthen environmental or social management capacity

  • Consultation and disclosure. The Bank reviews how the borrower

plans to consult on the program and assesses grievance procedures

Before appraisal, Team makes the draft assessment publicly available, and subsequently consults with stakeholders either before or during appraisal

The final assessment is also made publicly available

  • Screening for excluded activities. Bank reviews all program

activities to identify any that would be deemed as high risk

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Appraisal Stage

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 24

Agreement on:  the scope of the program to be supported  the program objectives and results  The DLIs and verification protocol

  • Agreement on measures for systems

strengthening and capacity building, including with respect to the governance of the program and M&E

  • Described in the Program Action Plan
  • Consultation on the draft E&S Systems

Assessment (if it wasn't already done before appraisal) and finalize to be disclosed after appraisal

IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT APPRAISAL IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT COMPLETION & EVALUATION NEGOTIATIONS & BOARD APPROVAL

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Program Action Plan (PAP)

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 25

Every PforR operation includes a Program Action Plan (PAP)

  • A key feature of PforR Preparation, PAP is closely monitored during

implementation.

  • A limited set of key priority actions for strengthening institutions and improving

systems performance, selected from each assessment serve as key inputs to the PAP.

  • Types of improvements that may be included in the PAP include:
  • and management of the systems used to implement the program. Actions to improve

the technical dimensions of the program and the formal rules and procedures governing the organization

  • Actions to enhance the capacity and performance of the agencies involved.
  • Risk-mitigating measures to increase the potential for the Program to achieve its

results and to address fiduciary, social, and environmental concerns.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Negotiations & Board Approval

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 26

  • Negotiations follow overall process as IPF and will

require final agreement on DLIs and Program Action Plan as these will be part of the Legal Agreement

IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT APPRAISAL IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT COMPLETION & EVALUATION NEGOTIATIONS & BOARD APPROVAL

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Implementation Support

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 27

  • The Bank provides implementation support by:

 Reviewing implementation progress and achievement of results and DLIs  Providing support on resolving emerging issues and building institutional capacity  Monitoring the adequacy of systems performance  Supporting the borrower in monitoring changes in risks  Monitoring compliance with the Legal Agreements, including the program’s action plan

  • When a DLI has been achieved, the Client informs the

Bank and provides evidence as agreed in the DLI verification protocol

IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT APPRAISAL IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT COMPLETION & EVALUATION NEGOTIATIONS & BOARD APPROVAL

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Disbursement Process

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 28

1 2 3

Results are achieved Verification entity reviews results Government sends documentation on results and verification to Bank Bank task team reviews documentation and clarifies Bank task team submits recommendation for disbursement to Country Director Country Director approves Notice to government that disbursement request submitted

4 5 6 7

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Completion & Evaluation

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 29

  • All Program-for-Results operations will be

evaluated upon completion

  • Task Team prepares an Implementation

Completion and Results report (ICR)

IDENTIFICATION ASSESSMENT APPRAISAL IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT COMPLETION & EVALUATION NEGOTIATIONS & BOARD APPROVAL

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Program-for-Results Financing Overview 30

Thank you