Local Planning Panel 7 August 2019 375 Glebe Point Road, Glebe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

local planning panel 7 august 2019
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Local Planning Panel 7 August 2019 375 Glebe Point Road, Glebe - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Local Planning Panel 7 August 2019 375 Glebe Point Road, Glebe D/2018/1586 Applicant: Environa Studio Owner: Lawrence Luk Architect: Environa Studio proposal alterations and additions to heritage building including: extension,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Local Planning Panel 7 August 2019

375 Glebe Point Road, Glebe D/2018/1586 Applicant: Environa Studio Owner: Lawrence Luk Architect: Environa Studio

slide-2
SLIDE 2

proposal

alterations and additions to heritage building including:

  • extension, including excavation works, of the existing ground level small

bar

  • internal alterations to the residential apartments
  • addition of rear balconies to apartments within levels 2 and 3
  • addition of front and rear dormers for an additional level with access to

rooftop terraces

recommendation

refusal

slide-3
SLIDE 3

notification information

  • exhibition period 9 January to 25 January 2019
  • 60 owners and occupiers notified
  • 1 submission received

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

submissions

  • privacy and noise impacts from the rooftop terraces
  • unsympathetic additions to a heritage item
slide-5
SLIDE 5

subject site submitters

submissions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

site

slide-7
SLIDE 7

site viewed from cnr of Glebe Point Road & Forsyth Street

site

slide-8
SLIDE 8

entrance to apartments entrance to small bar

site viewed from Forsyth Street & entry points

slide-9
SLIDE 9

rear of site viewed from Forsyth Street

slide-10
SLIDE 10

rear of subject site & adjoining heritage items

site

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Charlton Way street view looking south

slide-12
SLIDE 12

existing level 2 terrace looking east (common open space & waste storage)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

perspective – 3D model

proposal

slide-14
SLIDE 14

perspective – 3D model

slide-15
SLIDE 15

proposal

level 1

slide-16
SLIDE 16

level 2

slide-17
SLIDE 17

level 3

slide-18
SLIDE 18

level 4

slide-19
SLIDE 19

section plan

slide-20
SLIDE 20

materials – level 2 and 3 balconies

clear glass balustrades balcony flooring in Modwood ‘silver gum’ aluminium sliding door in Dulux ‘monument’

slide-21
SLIDE 21

materials – dormers and rooftop terraces

aluminium sliding door in Dulux ‘monument’ terrace flooring in Modwood ‘silver gum’ rooftop render planter boxes Lysaght metal cladding in Colorbond ‘basalt’

slide-22
SLIDE 22

compliance with key LEP development standards

control existing proposed compliance height 9m 12.9m works up to 12.1m no – 34% variation floor space 1.5:1 1.7:1 2.06:1 no – 37% variation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

compliance with key DCP development standards

control existing proposed compliance height in storeys 2 3 4 no

slide-24
SLIDE 24

issues

  • height
  • floor space
  • heritage
  • amenity
slide-25
SLIDE 25

height of building

slide-26
SLIDE 26

height of building

  • height non-compliance results from front and rear dormers, rooftop

terraces and level 3 balcony

  • exacerbates existing height non-compliance
  • adverse impacts on the heritage item
  • clause 4.6 not supported
slide-27
SLIDE 27

height in storeys

  • New upper level and lower ground level addition results in 4 storeys
  • non compliance with 2 storey height in storeys DCP control

1 2 3 4

slide-28
SLIDE 28

floor space

  • floor space non-compliance results from the attic space and bar

extension

  • exacerbates floor space non compliance
  • adds uncharacteristic features / bulk to heritage item
  • clause 4.6 not supported
slide-29
SLIDE 29

heritage

  • unsympathetic additions to a heritage item
  • untraditional dormers with aluminium framed doors
  • impact to side horizontal parapet wall
  • extensive glazing
slide-30
SLIDE 30

amenity - privacy

  • rooftop terraces and balconies create privacy and overlooking impacts
  • any further screening would add bulk
slide-31
SLIDE 31

amenity – waste management

  • existing communal waste storage removed
  • removal of communal residential waste

storage, no clear path of travel to street for collection

  • commercial waste storage not demonstrated
slide-32
SLIDE 32

recommendation

refusal