Local Planning Panel 30 October 2019 84 City Road, Chippendale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

local planning panel 30 october 2019
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Local Planning Panel 30 October 2019 84 City Road, Chippendale - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Local Planning Panel 30 October 2019 84 City Road, Chippendale D/2019/823 Applicant: Merbell Pty Ltd Owner: Merbell Pty Ltd Planner: LK Planning Designer: Cubitor Design and Drafting proposal alterations and additions to existing boarding


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Local Planning Panel 30 October 2019

84 City Road, Chippendale D/2019/823 Applicant: Merbell Pty Ltd Owner: Merbell Pty Ltd Planner: LK Planning Designer: Cubitor Design and Drafting

slide-2
SLIDE 2

proposal

alterations and additions to existing boarding house

recommendation

approved subject to conditions

slide-3
SLIDE 3

background

  • used as a boarding house since 1982
  • D/2018/841 for alterations and additions to the existing boarding house

refused by LPP on 30 January 2019

  • proposal has been amended in the following ways:
  • first floor extension removed
  • elevated walkways deleted
  • improved amenity for future occupants (room sizes, communal

spaces)

  • additional information provided
slide-4
SLIDE 4

notification information

  • exhibition period 8 August to 23 August 2019
  • 25 owners and occupiers notified
  • 4 submissions received
slide-5
SLIDE 5

submissions

  • use and built form of rear lane building
  • management of the site
  • heritage impacts
  • loss of privacy
slide-6
SLIDE 6

subject site submitters

submissions

slide-7
SLIDE 7

site

slide-8
SLIDE 8

site viewed from City Road

site

slide-9
SLIDE 9

City Road elevation

slide-10
SLIDE 10

rear of the site from Maze Lane

slide-11
SLIDE 11

rear elevation

slide-12
SLIDE 12

looking east from the attic of No.82 City Road (adjacent)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

looking east from the rear of site to Maze Lane

slide-14
SLIDE 14

looking south along Maze Lane

site

slide-15
SLIDE 15

looking north along Maze Lane site

slide-16
SLIDE 16

proposed ground floor

slide-17
SLIDE 17

proposed first floor

slide-18
SLIDE 18

proposed second (attic) floor

slide-19
SLIDE 19

proposed roof plan

slide-20
SLIDE 20

section

slide-21
SLIDE 21

proposed front (west) and rear (east) elevations

slide-22
SLIDE 22

proposed south elevation

slide-23
SLIDE 23

perspective - Maze Lane

slide-24
SLIDE 24

control proposed compliance communal living room 1 minimum 20sqm required in DCP 1 no 17sqm proposed minimum room size 12sqm 5 rooms less than 12sqm smallest 9sqm no

compliance with affordable housing SEPP

slide-25
SLIDE 25

compliance with affordable housing SEPP

control proposed compliance

lodgers per room 1 per room below 16sqm 2 per room above max 11 proposed 9 rooms 1 occupant 1 room 2 occupants yes

  • pen space 20sqm
  • ther than front

set back no communal open space no

slide-26
SLIDE 26

control proposed compliance bicycle spaces 2 2 yes motorcycle spaces 2 no

compliance with affordable housing SEPP

slide-27
SLIDE 27

compliance - key LEP development standards

control proposed compliance

height 9m 10.48m 16% variation non compliance due to rear dormer window floor space ratio 1.75:1 (including 0.5:1 bonus) 1.16:1 yes

slide-28
SLIDE 28

compliance with DCP controls

required proposed comply height in storeys 2 storeys 2 + attic storeys yes minimum room size 12sqm >12sqm (50%) no indoor communal area 20sqm 17sqm no

  • pen space

20sqm nil no

slide-29
SLIDE 29

issues

  • clause 4.6 for height and motorcycle parking
  • amenity for future occupants
slide-30
SLIDE 30

height

  • clause 4.6 supported
  • height exceedance limited to rear dormer only
  • proposal below height of existing ridge line
  • no significant impacts arising from non compliance
slide-31
SLIDE 31

motorcycle parking

  • 2 spaces required – no spaces provided
  • clause 4.6 supported
  • lack of parking provided will facilitate communal living room,

kitchen and laundry providing improved amenity for future

  • ccupants of the site
  • well serviced by public transport
  • no significant impacts arising from non compliance
slide-32
SLIDE 32

amenity

  • overall improvement in the amenity for future residents
  • average room sizes to be increased
  • all rooms to now have access to adequate light and ventilation
  • improved communal living areas provided
slide-33
SLIDE 33

response to submissions

  • rear lane building complies with the provisions of DCP 2012 and will

be used only as a secondary access for future occupants

  • management of the site is subject to a Plan of Management
  • heritage impacts are minor and in keeping with the character of the

conservation area

  • no additional overlooking will be created by the proposal
slide-34
SLIDE 34

recommendation

  • approval subject to conditions