+
Implementing PBIS in Schools: Practical Applications
Paola Enciso, Jon Mari, Adam Rudow Boston Public Schools
+ Implementing PBIS in Schools: Practical Applications Paola - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
+ Implementing PBIS in Schools: Practical Applications Paola Enciso, Jon Mari, Adam Rudow Boston Public Schools Learner Objectives This session will help participants: 1. Obtain a basic understanding of having a comprehensive model of
Implementing PBIS in Schools: Practical Applications
Paola Enciso, Jon Mari, Adam Rudow Boston Public Schools
This session will help participants:
model of delivering social-emotional supports-CBHM
school-wide PBIS
challenges in implementation.
implementation
Multi-Tiered Systems of Support (MTSS) & Comprehensive Behavioral Health Model (CBHM)
❖ Comprehensive Behavioral Health Model ❖ Partnerships amongst School District, Community Agencies, Boston Children’s Hospital ❖ Plan for Multi-tiered System of Supports to Address the Social Emotional Needs and Well-being of our Students
across the nation to teach students socially desired behaviors.
behavioral expectations across settings commonly found within schools.
student discipline referrals (Bradshaw, Mitchell, & Leaf, 2010), a decrease in suspensions (Horner, Sugai, Todd, & Lewis-Palmer, 2005), and improved perception of safety (Sprague et. al, 2010).
academic performance (Nelson, Martella, & Marchand-Martella, 2002).
Primary Prevention: School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings Secondary Prevention: Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Tertiary Prevention: Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior
~80% of Students
~15% ~5%
Classroom Non-classroom Family Student S c h
i d e
teachers, special education teachers, specials teachers, guidance, parent, etc.
systems.
PBIS and be active participants.
The vision of the San Antonio School is to nurture and empower all students to think critically, achieve academic excellence, contribute as global citizens, and succeed in a culturally and linguistically diverse world. The San Antonio School is a school where we believe in the core values of Respect, Responsibility, and Safety.
and staff in all settings.
applicable in multiple settings, but specific enough to be of assistance in generating rules for targeted settings
Respect, Responsibility, Safety, Participation, etc. (as nouns). Respectful, Responsible, Safe, Involved (as adjectives).
Cooperate) "The BBD's (Be Safe, Be Kind and Do the Right Thing) "Do Your BEST" (Believe in Yourself, Extend a helping hand, Show respect, and Take responsibility).
Possible Activity with School Climate or PBIS Team: Identify the characteristics of an ideal student. What qualities do you want to see from your students?
Expectations Rules?
Expectations Rules
Listen to other’s ideas Collaborate with team members Listen quietly while the speaker is presenting
Complete task Come to consensus as a team Come back from breaks and lunch on time Start training on time
Share ideas with others Follow through with task and activities Work on activities as a team Equal task distribution
encounters in their daily routine, and envision how you would like students to behave.
student behaviors across multiple contexts to identify most common problems.
contrasting, positive behavior that you would like to replace it with.
■ Agreeing on language ■ Extensive time commitment ■ Administrator commitment/buy-in ■ Inadequate representation within the team ■ Setting unreasonable/ “unfair” expectations, leading to inconsistency in enforcement ■ Inconsistency, which equals reduced credibility
Questions?
Expectations Defined
the year?
plans based on data trends?
“If a child doesn’t know how to read, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to swim, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to multiply, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to drive, we teach.” “If a child doesn’t know how to behave, we… …teach? …punish?” “Why can’t we finish the last sentence as automatically as we do the others?”
Student Engagement = 80% 80% of School Day Allocated to Instruction
repeated on average 8 times (Joyce and Showers, 2006)
it with a new behavior, the new behavior must be repeated on average 28 times times
activity
need/improvement
expectations
the skill
Classroom Non-classroom Family Student S c h
i d e
Defined as involving ALL students, ALL staff, and ALL settings
Is there: > A leadership team that believes in the initiative > Common approach to discipline > A continuum of procedures to encourage AND discourage behavior
Defined as particular times or places where supervision is emphasized
Is there: > Consistent application of school-wide expectations > Active supervision and opportunities to improve skills > Involvement from ALL staff (directly or indirectly) in management of these settings
Defined as instructional settings in which teacher(s) supervise and teach groups of students
Is there: > A set of clearly defined expectations > A continuum of strategies to acknowledge AND respond to behavior > A consistency between classroom and school-wide expectations
✓Do they consider all of the school’s main settings? ✓Are there any existing lesson plans? ✓At some point, where other students and staff involved? ✓Are they contextually, culturally, and developmentally appropriate? ✓Is there as schedule for initial and on-going instructions (review/practice)? ✓Is there a structure for continuous evaluation? ✓A system of support for students who do not respond to the instruction?
■ Not having a system for teaching the expectations ■ Having consistency around the lesson plans in terms
■ Having a direct connection to expectations being presented school-wide (i.e. Behavioral Matrix) ■ Fidelity around teaching/re-teaching of lesson plans. ■ Administrator not allocating time ■ Making them culturally relevant to the student body and staff
Questions?
Expectations Taught
“A system that provides immediate, intermittent, and long-term reinforcements, given by adults in the building, to any students displaying desired school-wide expectations, behaviors, or associated rules”
use
appropriate/relevant
“…our research team has conducted a series of reviews and analysis of (the reward) literature; our conclusion is that there is no inherent negative property of reward. Our analyses indicate that the argument against the use of rewards is an
circumstances.”
■ Cameron, 2002 ■ Cameron & Pierce, 1994, 2002 ■ Cameron, Banko & Pierce, 2001
■ Decide upon a Method of Reinforcement
■ Scholar Dollars ■ King Coins ■ Pride Dollars ■ Paws ■ Hoots ■ Jag Tags ■ Gator Gotchas ■ Most of our schools have tried to tie in the school mascot to selection
■ Meeting Schedule ■ 2 Times Monthly ■ Team Composition ■ Administrator, Teaachers, Specialists, Psychologist, Paraprofessionals ■ Roles/Assignments ■ Facilitator, Notetaker, Time Keeper
■ There is quite a bit to do! The focus of meetings will depend upon where your school is in the PBIS process. ■ Reinforcement takes less time as you go ■ Event planning, Fundraising, Troubleshooting ■ Use & Consult your rolling agenda ■ Posters, Fundraising letter, Scheduling, Collections, Setup.
■ Brainstorming / Resource Mapping ■ Funding ■ Activities ■ Assemblies/Pep Rally ■ Cost vs. No Cost ■ Plenty of ‘no-cost’ options- Still Requires Planning ■ Scheduling, Staffing, Etc.
■ Computer Time ■ “Fall Fest” ■ Sports Tournaments ■ Free Time ■ Ice Cream Socials ■ Special Lunches
■ School Store ■ Field Trips ■ Staff/Student Luncheon ■ Raffle
■ Piloted this year in our 2nd year of PBIS ■ Targeting Fall & Spring Implementation ■ Funded by staff donations and Box Top funds ■ Duration of 2 weeks- not permanent
■ School Grants
■ Safe & Healthy Schools Grant ■ Dudley Street Initiative
■ Check local, statewide, and federal grant
■ PBIS.org ■ Donors Choose ■ Box Tops!
■ UNIFORMITY IN TYPE OF REINFORCEMENT SYSTEM ■ Administrative support, Frequent Feedback to Staff w Data ■ INCONSISTENT OR NON USE AMONGST CLASSROOMS ■ Staff Reinforcement ■ Raffles, Recognition, Plunger, Goose, Golden Tiger ■ ATTITUDES ■ Focus on “Growing The Green” Mantra ■ Reframing
Questions?
Reinforcement System
✓Physical Space ✓Routines ✓Time ✓Transitions ✓Attention ✓Student Engagement ✓Curriculum and Content ✓Behavior Management
Move Continuous ly Scan Always & Overtly Interact Frequentl y Positively Recognize Rule Following Remind/ Pre-corre ct
Clear definitions for behaviors that interfere with academic and social success and a clear policy/procedure for addressing
Examples
school-wide expectations
discipline data
KEY CHARACTERISTICS
appropriate response to behavior (office referral form… clearly defined problem behavior categories)
Minor (Classroom) Major (Out of Classroom)
✓ Unkind words ✓ Physical contact ✓ Non-Compliance ✓ Disruption/Talking in class ✓ Lack of preparedness ✓ Abusive language ✓ Physical aggression ✓ Leaving class without permission ✓ Damaged property
✓Name/Grade of student in violation ✓Where there other people involved? ✓What was the expectation being violated ✓Who observed/responded to the violation ✓What was the initial response ✓Date/Time ✓School setting in which it occurred ✓Possible Motivation
✓Are there specific definitions for violations of
✓Are there specific procedures for managing
✓Are there specific mechanisms of
■ Uniform understanding amongst staff of developmentally appropriate consequences ■ Often difficult to agree upon ■ Consistent availability of disciplinary staff ■ Administration often most resistant to this process ■ Lack of investment of implementers ■ Insufficient use of time and expertise ■ Train staff without any follow-up and/or monitoring
Questions?
Consequence System
Overview
children and adolescents ages 5 to 18 years old.
are used for universal screening and for assessing response to intervention.
teacher or staff person who knows/works with them.
Uses
Screening Student Progress Monitoring Program Evaluation
Behavioral Concern Scales
Adaptive Scales
What did the data say?
Fall 2017: K-6 → What did the data say?
Fall 2017: 7-8 → What did the data say?
Classroom Strategies → What did we do about it?
Tier 1/Tier 2 Initiatives → What did we do about it? Focus on “growing the green” in Social scale in Grades 7 and 8: ■ Community meetings ■ Leadership elective ■ Restorative Justice
Data-based decision making and accountability is a “practice that permeates all aspects of service delivery” according to NASP’s Model of Comprehensive and Integrated School Psychological Services (2009). Progress monitoring is an essential component of these data-based decisions. Federal and state legislation has encouraged the use of formative measures as a means to track academic progress
such as the Computerized Oral Reading Evaluation (CORE) measure of oral reading and the DIBELS measure of math fluency.
Research and Legislation
Research and Legislation
Yet, while this legislation broadly calls for the use of both formative and summative measures in all areas, schools generally struggle to incorporate formative assessment related to behavioral concerns. Such struggles are supported by research suggested there is yet to be developed a progress monitoring tool for social behavior that serves as a parallel to academic formative assessments (Gresham et. al. 2010).
Best Practices
Progress monitoring is more valid, reliable and precise as the number of data points increase (Christ et. al. 2013). Graphing of student-level data including rate
in evaluating student response to intervention (McDougal, LeBlanc, Hintze 2010).
■ Time consuming to: ■ track which teachers and have not completed their universal assessment and following up with teachers who have not; ■ train teachers in how to complete the universal assessment; ■ follow-up with teachers regarding their class level data. ■ If there is not administrative buy-in, it can be difficult to hold teachers accountable to completing the universal assessment. ■ Teachers can have contrasting motivations when completing the universal assessment. Some feel that doing so is a “cry for help” and that “difficult” data will necessitate more support; others worry that accurate answers could reflect porrly on their performance and lead to punitive measures from administration. ■ Other data needs to collected as well, including attendance and
Questions?
Data System
So does it work?
COHORT ONE
COHORT TWO
COHORT ONE
COHORT TWO
An analysis of SY 14-15 MCAS & PARCC Data revealed the following:
non-CBHM schools on state tests.
schools that have been implementing CBHM for a longer period of time.
Questions?
Data
presentations
PBIS.
failure to teach behavioral expectations).
Questions?
PBIS Tier 1 Essentials
Thank you to MSPA & Alex
If you would like a copy
write your email on the sheet located at the back table.