Implementing CAP for Hazard Warning in Sri Lanka Gordon A. Gow - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

implementing cap for hazard warning in sri lanka
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Implementing CAP for Hazard Warning in Sri Lanka Gordon A. Gow - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I nternational Telecom m unication Union ITU-T Implementing CAP for Hazard Warning in Sri Lanka Gordon A. Gow University of Alberta (Canada) I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6

I nternational Telecom m unication Union

ITU-T

Implementing CAP for Hazard Warning in Sri Lanka

Gordon A. Gow

University of Alberta (Canada)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 2

ITU-T 2 5 Decem ber 2 0 0 4 , 1 5 :1 5 hrs local tim e, Pacific Tsunam i W arning Centre, Haw aii

slide-3
SLIDE 3

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 3

ITU-T 2 6 Decem ber 2 0 0 4 , 0 8 :2 7 local tim e Kalum nai, Sri Lanka

  • 06:59 earthquake off

the coast of S umatra

  • 07:06 GS

MB in Colombo alerted of quake

  • 07:14 PTWC issues

bulletin

  • 08:04 PTWC revises

bulletin

  • 08:27 Kalumnai hit
  • 08:55 Trincomalee hit
  • 09:30 Galle, Kalutara
slide-4
SLIDE 4

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 4

ITU-T Last-Mile Hazard I nform ation Dissem ination Project ( LI RNEasia/ Sarvodaya)

  • Expert Consultation Jan. 26, 2005 (Colombo)
  • Concept paper, “ NEWS

:S L” (March, 2005)

  • Research proposal to IDRC (Oct. 2005)
  • Planning workshop (CAP is introduced) (Jan. 2006)
  • Hazard Warning Relay Network begins operation (July 2006)
  • CAP Profile and Operational Guidelines in place
slide-5
SLIDE 5

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 5

ITU-T Last Mile Hazard I nform ation Dissem ination Project

  • Need to reach rural and remote communities:
  • Lack of infrastructure and limited resources
  • Evaluate the suitability of different ICTs deployed

in different settings for effective warning:

  • 32 villages, varied levels of development
slide-6
SLIDE 6

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 6

ITU-T Sarvodaya’s Hazard I nform ation Hub and Relay Netw ork

mobile phone fixed wireless VSAT/Internet satellite radio

slide-7
SLIDE 7

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 7

ITU-T Com m on Alerting Protocol ( CAP)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 8

ITU-T Special considerations

  • Events of Interest <incidents>
  • Government messages <description>
  • Message priority profile
  • S

everity, urgency, certainty

  • <status> element and testing
  • <scope> always restricted
  • <language> en, si, ta
  • Handling of special scripts
  • <resources> audio file
slide-9
SLIDE 9

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 9

ITU-T

info <language> Ņ taÓ <category> <event> <urgency> <severity> <certainty> <description> info <language> Ņ siÓ <category> <event> <urgency> <severity> <certainty> <description> info <language> Ņ enÓ <category> <event> <urgency> <severity> <certainty> <description> alert <incidents> <identifier> <sender> <sent> <status> <msgtype> <scope> resource <resourceDesc> area <areaDesc>

CAP Message Structure

slide-10
SLIDE 10

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 1 0

ITU-T Regional Coordination

“ As countries move forward to develop a new tsunami warning system, they must ensure that such efforts carefully match with existing regional and national warning capacities in order to enable interoperability with other warning systems …international coordination on implementing CAP for all hazards is an essential step toward this broad-scale interoperability.”

— NEWS / S L concept paper (2005, p.18)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 1 1

ITU-T I nstitutional Arrangem ents for Public Alerting

government supply

  • f warnings

citizens of the state media media first responders non-governmental entity (Sarvodaya) relay network

slide-12
SLIDE 12

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 1 2

ITU-T Coordinating for inform ation exchange am ong grassroots-based system s

media first responders NGO relay network media clientele and guests Tourism board private network environment community First responders local network

slide-13
SLIDE 13

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 1 3

ITU-T Coordination I ssues w ith CAP in Sri Lanka

  • <alert>
  • <identifier>common format?
  • <sender>authorized users?
  • <sent> time stamp (when, what format?

)

  • <scope> restricted?

public?

  • <info>
  • <category> uncertain role for LM-HWS
  • S

tandard <event> common terminology?

  • <event> “ Government message”
  • <area>
  • <areaDesc> interoperability with addressable

satellite radio and other systems?

slide-14
SLIDE 14

I TU-T/ OASI S W orkshop and Dem onstration of Advances in I CT Standards for Public W arning Geneva, 1 9 -2 0 October 2 0 0 6 1 4

ITU-T I ssues for Consideration

  • Need for interoperability between community-

based warning systems

  • Decisions with path dependent consequences might
  • ccur in several sectors independently (e.g.,

tourism, NGO)

  • What is the appropriate forum in which to establish

regional coordination for CAP implementation?

  • Where is the appropriate focus for standardizing

practice while respecting the need for diversity?

  • How are best practices to be communicated and

are they equally applicable to both developing and developed states?