Lundstrom EE-612 F06 1
EE-612: Lecture 1: MOSFET Review
Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN USA Fall 2006
www.nanohub.org
NCN
EE-612: Lecture 1: MOSFET Review Mark Lundstrom Electrical and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EE-612: Lecture 1: MOSFET Review Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN USA Fall 2006 NCN www.nanohub.org Lundstrom EE-612 F06 1 MOSFETs physical structure circuit schematic S G D G
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 1
Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN USA Fall 2006
www.nanohub.org
NCN
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 2
S D G
physical structure
S D G
circuit schematic 65 nm technology node: L = 35 nm Tox = 1.2nm VDD = 1.2V
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 3
S D G
1) ground source 2) set VG 3) sweep VD from 0 to VDD 4) Step VG from 0 to VDD ID VDS
VGS
VDD VG = VDD
1 2
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 4
ID VDS
VGS
VDD
channel resistance = VDS / IDS
VG = VDD
conductance
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 5
ID VGS
VDD
S D G
1) ground source 2) set VD 3) sweep VG from 0 to VDD
low VD high VD
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 6
ID VGS
VDD low VD high VD intercept gives VT(lin) slope is related to the effective mobility intercept gives VT(sat) < VT(lin)
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 7
VGS --> Log10 IDS-->
S D G
1) ground source 2) set VD = VDD 3) sweep VG from 0 to VDD
VT
subthreshold region above threshold
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 8
VDD Log10 IDS--> VGS VGS = VDS = VDD
VGS = 0 VDS = VDD
S > 60 mV/decade
subthreshold swing
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 9
VDD Log10 IDS--> VGS VD = 0.05V VD = 1.0V
VT(VD = 1.0V) < VT(VD = 0.05V) DIBL mV/V
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 10
VDD Log10 IDS--> VGS VD = 1.0V
GIDL
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 11
S D G VD= VDD
electron energy
VD≈ 0V
E.O. Johnson, RCA Review, 34, 80, 1973
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 12
Intel Technical J., Vol. 6, May 16, 2002. (low VT device)
130 nm technology (LG = 60 nm)
PMOS IDS (mA/μm) NMOS
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 13
VG VD
ID = W Qi x
ID = W Cox VGS −VT
E x = VDS L
Qi x
( )= −Cox VGS −VT −V(x) ( )
ID VDS
VGS
ID = W L μeffCox VGS −VT
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 14
VG VD
ID = W Qi x
ID = W Cox VGS −VT
V x
( )= VGS −VT ( )
VGS
ID VDS
ID = W L μeffCox VGS −VT
2
2
E x ≈ VGS − VT L
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 15
electric field V/cm ---> velocity cm/s ---> 107 104
VDS L = 1.5V 60nm ≈ 25 ×104 V/cm
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 16
VG VD
ID = W Qi x
ID = W Cox VGS −VT
ID = W Cox υsat VGS − VT
E x >> 104
0.4 0.8 1.2 1.4
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 17
VGS 1.2V VT = 0.3V Tox = 1.5 nm
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 18
Intel Technical J., Vol. 6, May 16, 2002.
130 nm technology (LG = 60 nm)
ID ≈ W Qi(0)υ sat ≈1.6 mA/μm
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 19
Frank, Laux, and Fischetti, IEDM Tech. Dig., p. 553, 1992 Velocity (cm/s) Position along Channel (mm)
0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
VD = 0.8V VG-VT = 0.5V
0.0 1.0x107 2.0x107 3.0x107
Position along Channel (μm)
0.0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05
VD = 0.8V VG-VT = 0.5V
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 20
L = 10 nm
(quantum confinement treated in both cases)
n(x, E) ID vs. VDS
classical quantum
Log ID vs. VGS
reduced
increased
nanoMOS at www.nanohub.org
Lundstrom EE-612 F06 21
1) A MOSFET’s ID = inversion layer charge times velocity 2) 2D electrostatics determine Qi 3) Carrier transport determines the velocity 4) Second order effects are becoming first order (e.g. leakage)