EE-612: Lecture 11: Effective Mobility Mark Lundstrom Electrical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ee 612 lecture 11 effective mobility
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

EE-612: Lecture 11: Effective Mobility Mark Lundstrom Electrical - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EE-612: Lecture 11: Effective Mobility Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN USA Fall 2008 NCN www.nanohub.org Lundstrom EE-612 F08 1 outline 1) Review of mobility 2) Effective


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 1

EE-612: Lecture 11: Effective Mobility

Mark Lundstrom Electrical and Computer Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, IN USA Fall 2008

www.nanohub.org

NCN

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 2

  • utline

1) Review of mobility 2) “Effective” mobility 3) Physics of the effective mobility 4) Measuring effective mobility 5) Discussion 6) Summary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 3

mobility

μ = qτ m*

(1/τ ) Δt = probability per second of scattering [(1/τ ) is ‘scattering rate’]

μ1 = qτ1 m* μ2 = qτ 2 m* μ12 = ? μ12 ≠ μ1 + μ2 μ12 = 1 μ1 + 1 μ2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

−1

τ = average time between scattering events

Mathiessen’s Rule

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 4

diffusion coefficient

D = υTλ 2 = υRλ D μ = kBT q

D ↔ μ

unidirectional thermal velocity Richardson velocity mean-free-path for scattering

υT υR λ

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 5

mobility vs. doping density (silicon)

μ(NI ) NI = ND NA

( )

NCR ≈ 1017 cm-3

1360(480 holes) 100(80)

μII : T 3/2 NI μ = 1 μL + 1 μII ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

−1

μ NI << NCR

( )≈ μL

μL : T −3/2 μ NI >> NCR

( )≈ μI

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 6

μII temperature dependence (silicon)

μ(T ) T 1 2 m*υ 2 = 3 2 kBT μII : T 3/2 +

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 7

lattice scattering (silicon)

μ(T ) T μII : T 3/2 μL : T −3/2 μTOT (T ) NP ~ kBT hω (acoustic phonons) ~ (optical phonons)

B

k T P

N e

ω −

μTOT = 1 μL + 1 μII ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

−1

Mathiessen’s Rule

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 8

comment (added after lecture)

E(k) k ω(k) β

electrons phonons

EC π a π a − π a − π a

ω0

υS = ω k

AP OP

Electrons in a periodic structure are characterized by “dispersion curve” E(k). Phonons in a periodic structure are characterized by “dispersion curve” ω (β). Two types of phonons, acoustic (AP) and optical (OP).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 9

high-field transport (silicon)

−υy Ey υy = −μoEy 1+ Ey Ecr

( )

2

104 υy = −μoEy υsat 107 Ey >> Ecr → υy → μoEcr ≡ υsat Ecr = υsat μ

electric field along the direction of current flow

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 10

field-dependent mobility

μ(Ey) Ey 104 μo μ(Ey) ≡ −υy Ey = μo 1+ Ey Ecr

( )

2

υy = μ Ey

( )Ey

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 11

  • utline

1) Review of mobility 2) Effective mobility 3) Physics of the effective mobility 4) Measuring effective mobility 5) Discussion 6) Summary

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 12

mobility in an inversion layer

VD VS VB VG

source drain

y x μn NA,T,Ey,Ex ?

( )

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 13

effective mobility

ID = −WQi y

( )υy = WCG VG − VT − mV(y)

[ ]μn(x,y) dV

dy ID dy

L

= WCG μeff VG − VT − mV(y)

[ ]dV

VDS

μeff = n(x)μn(x)dx

n(x)dx

(If we only consider the x- dependence, i.e. normal to the surface)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 14

effective normal field

μeff (Eeff ) Eeff Eeff ≡ n(x)Ex(x)dx

n(x)dx

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 15

effective normal field

ES = qNAW εSi E W / 2

( )= qNAW

2εSi W x NA

below threshold

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 16

effective normal field (ii)

ES = QS εSi WDM x NA

above threshold electron inversion layer

QI

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 17

effective normal field (iii)

ES = QS εSi Ex x WDM tinv ES = E 0

( )

E tinv

( )

ES = 1 εSi QDM + QI

( )

E(tinv) = QDM εSi Eeff = Ex tinv / 2

( )

Eeff = 1 εSi QDM + QI 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 18

effective normal field (iv)

Eeff = 1 εSi QDM + QI 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ VT = VFB + 2ψ B + QDM Cox QI = CG VGS − VT

( )

Eeff = Cox εSi VT − VFB − 2ψ B + VG 2 − VT 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

(1)

QDM = Cox VT − VFB − 2ψ B

( )

QI ≈ Cox VGS − VT

( )

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 19

effective normal field (v)

Eeff = COX εSi VT − VFB − 2ψ B + VG 2 − VT 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ VFB = − EG 2q −ψ B Eeff = εOX εSi tOX VG + VT 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟ + EG 2q −ψ B ⎡ ⎣ ⎢ ⎤ ⎦ ⎥

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 20

  • utline

1) Review of mobility 2) Effective mobility 3) Physics of the effective mobility 4) Measuring effective mobility 5) Discussion 6) Summary

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 21

transport in bulk Si

z x y

ml

* = 0.9m0

mt

* = 0.19m0

Si conduction band mC

* =

2 6ml

* +

4 6mt

*

⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

−1

= 0.26m0

dominant scattering processes:

(low-field, room temperature)

  • acoustic phonons (ADP)
  • ionized impurities (II)
  • intervalley phonons (IV)

under low (and modest) fields:

  • 6 equivalent ellipsoids
  • n/6 electrons in each one
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 22

transport in Si inversion layers

is different from transport in bulk Si….. z x y

ml

* = 0.9m0

mt

* = 0.19m0

Si conduction band

x

energy -->

W ∞ ∞ ε1 ε3 ε2 ′ ε1 ′ ε2

EF

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 23

transport in Si inversion layers

z x y

ml

* = 0.9m0

mt

* = 0.19m0

Si conduction band

expectations: most carriers in unprimed subbands

mC

* ≈ 0.19m0

  • lighter conductivity m*
  • suppressed intersubband scattering

X

  • enhanced intra subband phonon

scattering

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 24

surface roughness

VD VS VB VG

source drain

μeff = 1 μL + 1 μII + 1 μSR ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

−1

Si : SiO2 interface is rough! (possibly present too)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 25

effective mobility vs. effective field

μeff Ex or VG μII μSR μL

1) screening 2) electron confinement 3) proximity to the surface

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 26

surface roughness scattering

δtOX SiO2 Si Δ r r

( )

VG = VFB +ψ S − QS Cox δtOX ⇒ δψ S

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 27

from Jing Wang, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., Aug. 2005

surface roughness scattering (ii)

δtOX ⇒ δψ S

EC EV EF VG

εi

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 28

‘universal’ mobility

μeff Eeff

increasing NA

NA1 NA4 Eeff = 1 εSi QDM + QI 2 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

electrons:

Eeff = 1 εSi QDM + QI 3 ⎛ ⎝ ⎜ ⎞ ⎠ ⎟

holes: universal behavior

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 29

  • utline

1) Review of mobility 2) Effective mobility 3) Physics of the effective mobility 4) Measuring effective mobility 5) Discussion 6) Summary

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 30

measuring μeff

ID = W L μeffQiVDS

ID VDS

VGS

Qi(VG) ≈ CG VGS −VT

( )

RCH = VDS ID = L WμeffQ

i

μeff (VG) = L W RCH VG

( )

Qi(VG) RCH >> RSD

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 31

measuring μeff (ii)

VG ID VT

VDS = 10mV

QI VG

( )=

Cgs

VG

VG

( )dVG

VG QI

QI VG

( ) = Cox VGS − VT ( )

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 32

universal mobility for electrons

  • S. Takagi, A. Toriumi, M. Iwase, and H. Tango, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev.,

41, pp. 2357-2362, 1994

Effective field (MV/cm) Effective mobility (cm2/V -s)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 33

universal mobility for holes

  • S. Takagi, A. Toriumi, M. Iwase, and H. Tango, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev.,

41, pp. 2357-2362, 1994

Effective field (MV/cm) Effective mobility (cm2/V -s)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 34

  • utline

1) Review of mobility 2) Effective mobility 3) Physics of the effective mobility 4) Measuring effective mobility 5) Discussion 6) Summary

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 35

“field-effect” mobility

ID = W L μeffQI VGS

( )

VDS ≈ W L μeffCG VGS −VT

( )

VDS gm = ∂ID ∂VGS VDS = W L μ CGVDS μFE ≡ L WCGVDS gm

(assumes μ is independent of VG)

For a discussion of mobility measurement techniques, see: Narain Arora, MOSFET Models for VLSI Circuit Simulation, Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993.

“field-effect mobility”

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 36

mobility and on-current

ID = W L μeffCG VGS −VT

( )

VDS

Linear region current is proportional to the effective mobility: What about the on-current?

ID = WCGυsat VGS −VT

( )

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 37

mobility and on-current (ii)

ID = WCG T 2 −T % υT V

GS −V T

( )

Dn = υTλ 2 = kBT q

( )μn

μn = qτ m*

smaller m* implies larger ballistic velocity:

υT = 2kBT πm*

  • ε1 x

( )

x E

T = λ λ + l

( )

also:

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 38

effective mobility for the 45 nm technology node

Eeff = εOX εSi tOX (VG + VT ) 2 + EG 2q −ψ B

[ ]

tOX = 1.1 nm V

T ≈ 0.25 V

V

G = VDD = 1.0 V

NA ≈ 2.7 ×1018 cm-3 →ψ B = 0.48 Eeff VG = 1V

( )≈ 2 MV/cm

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 39

universal mobility for electrons

  • S. Takagi, A. Toriumi, M. Iwase, and H. Tango, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev.,

41, pp. 2357-2362, 1994

Effective field (MV/cm) Effective mobility (cm2/V -s)

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 40

the tyranny of the effective mobility*

Eeff = εOX εSi tOX (VG + VT ) 2 + EG 2q −ψ B

[ ]

each technology generation, device scaling increases NA, decreases tox --> Eeff increases and mobility decreases mobility decreases each technology generation, unless we can find ‘new’ materials with higher mobilities (e.g. strained silicon).

(* Dimitri Antoniadis at MIT describes the problem this way.)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 41

strain engineering

C.-H. Jan, et al., “A 65nm Ultra Low Power Logic Platform Technology using Uni-axial Strained Silicon Transistors,” Intel Corporation, IEDM 2005,

PMOS

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 42

  • utline

1) Review of mobility 2) Effective mobility 3) Physics of the effective mobility 4) Measuring effective mobility 5) Discussion 6) Summary

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Lundstrom EE-612 F08 43

summary

1) Effective mobility is an important device parameter for both the linear and saturated region currents 2) Effective mobility is strongly reduced by surface roughness scattering 3) Mobility enhancement through strain engineering has been an important performance booster in recent years.