Board of directors March 28, 2019 Wholesale rate projections March - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

board of directors
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Board of directors March 28, 2019 Wholesale rate projections March - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Board of directors March 28, 2019 Wholesale rate projections March 28, 2019 Lower long-term rate pressure August 2018 2.0 percent annual increases from 2020 through 2030 March 2019 1.7 percent annual increases from 2020


slide-1
SLIDE 1

March 28, 2019

Board of directors

slide-2
SLIDE 2

March 28, 2019

Wholesale rate projections

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Lower long-term rate pressure

  • August 2018
  • 2.0 percent annual increases from 2020 through 2030
  • March 2019
  • 1.7 percent annual increases from 2020 through 2030
  • Revised municipal loads
  • Higher surplus sales volumes
  • Revenue increases offset by higher purchased power

and fuel costs

  • 2020 revised rate structure implementation has varying impact on
  • wner communities
slide-4
SLIDE 4

2020 owner community impacts

  • The board’s preference has been long-term rate smoothing
  • The rate structure change in combination with long-term

smoothing exceeds the previously communicated 2.0 percent increase

  • 2020 alternatives analyzed to mitigate owner community impact

Estes Park Fort Collins Longmont Loveland

Long-term smoothing 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7% Rate structure impact1 0% (1.0%) 1.0% 1.0% Total impact 1.7% 0.7% 2.7% 2.7%

1 Owner community load factors have most significant impact in the transition to the proposed rate

  • structure. Impacts are based on preliminary cost of service model estimates
slide-5
SLIDE 5

2020 recommendation

  • Platte River staff recommends foregoing a 2020 rate increase
  • Platte River, due to past board action, has the financial flexibility

to mitigate the owner community impacts

1 Owner community load factors have most significant impact in the transition to the proposed rate

  • structure. Impacts are based on preliminary cost of service model estimates

Estes Park Fort Collins Longmont Loveland

Recommendation 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Rate structure impact1 0.0% (1.0%) 1.0% 1.0% Total impact 0.0% (1.0%) 1.0% 1.0%

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rate recommendation

  • Mitigates 2020 impacts to the owner communities
  • Maintains Platte River’s long-term financial sustainability
  • Higher increases (2021-2025) compared to long-term 1.7 percent

smoothing to adjust for one less year of rate smoothing

Rate projections 2020 2020 – 2025 2020 – 2030

August 2018 2.0% (2020-2030) 2.0% 12.6% 24.3% Long-term smoothing 1.7% (2020-2030) 1.7% 10.6% 20.3% Recommendation 0.0% (2020) 2.0% (2021-2025) 1.7% (2026-2030) 0.0% 10.4% 20.1%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 $/MWh

$59.3 million revenue requirement increase 20 percent average rate increase

Recommendation: 0% (2020) 2.0% (2021-2025) 1.7% (2026- 2030) Long-term smoothing: 1.7% (2020-2030) August 2018 projections: 2.0% (2020-2030)

Rate recommendation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rate drivers: 2019 to 2030

(10) (5)

  • 5

10 15 20 25 Purchased Power A&G Depreciation DSM Trans O&M Prod O&M Interest Exp Interest Inc Owner Comm (load growth) Surplus sales Fuel

Millions $59.3 million revenue requirement increase 20 percent average rate increase

Rate Relief Rate Pressure

Category Activity Purchase Power

  • Increased non-firm to replace

Craig

  • Wind and solar PPA

A&G

  • Staffing and inflation

Depreciation

  • Windy Gap, HQ campus,

capital plan DSM

  • Increasing investment

Trans O&M

  • Ancillary services and inflation

Prod O&M

  • Inflation, new generation

capacity

  • (Craig retirements)

Surplus sales

  • Transmission sales, energy

prices

  • (Craig volumes)

Fuel

  • Craig retirements
  • (CTs, inflation)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Rate competitiveness

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2018 wholesale rate comparison

Platte River's average wholesale rate is 19 percent lower than the next lowest regional provider

$60.97 $75.43 $80.68 $104.35 Platte River Tri- State PSCo ARPA

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Next steps

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2020 proposed charges

2020 proposed monthly charges Recovery method Period Owner Per percent owner community energy Year-round Demand: transmission Per kW owner community system member demand (non-coincident peak) or minimum Year-round Demand: generation Per kW System Coincident Peak or minimum Summer Non-Summer Energy: dispatchable fixed Per kWh for all energy supplied Year-round Energy: dispatchable variable Per kWh for dispatchable energy supplied Year-round Energy: intermittent variable Per kWh for intermittent energy supplied Year-round Energy: Tariff 7 legacy Per kWh for Tariff 7 energy supplied Year-round

2020 charges proposed in April, seeking approval in May

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rates schedule

2019 2020 Mar Apr May Jun – Sep Oct Nov – Dec Jan Follow up and owner community support as needed Councils, staff, customers 2020 average rate increase and long-term rate projections Board information 2020 proposed rate structure and charges Board information 2020 tariffs approved by the BOD Board action 2020 tariffs effective

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Questions

slide-15
SLIDE 15

March 28, 2019

Board of directors

slide-16
SLIDE 16

March 28, 2019

20 MW solar/battery update

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Background

February 2018 Issued RFP for 20 MW solar and up to 5 MWh storage April 2018 Limited the battery size to 2 MWh May 2018 Short-listed three bidders August 2018 First choice bidder withdrew, and Platte River contacted remaining bidders for updated proposals October 2018 Selected GCL New Energy as the project developer November 2018 GCL New Energy teamed up with DEPCOM Power and PPA negotiations began December 2018 Platte River began negotiating LLA February 2019 Executed the PPA and LLA with GCL New Energy and filed the 1041 Larimer County permit

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Solar project

  • Nameplate capacity: 20 MW
  • Year 1 annual generation estimate: 52,000 MWh
  • PPA price: Approximately half the price of Rawhide Flats solar
  • Estimated interconnection cost: $2.00/MWh
  • Single axis tracking (same as existing Rawhide solar)
  • High capacity factor (30 percent) due to clipping of solar output

during peak times

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Proposed site – constraint map

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Storage project

  • Tier 1 battery vendor (e.g. LG Chem, Samsung)
  • Battery size (year 1):
  • 2 MWh maximum discharge capability
  • 1 MW discharge capacity
  • Battery degrades over two percent per year:
  • Maximum degradation of 20 percent
  • Round-trip efficiency of 90 percent
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Battery charging implications

  • During initial five years, battery must be charged by 20 MW solar

project

  • After initial five years, battery may be charged by grid
  • Unless Platte River owns battery, any charging from grid may be

considered a retail purchase from Poudre Valley REA:

  • Retail purchases to charge battery would not be economical
  • Platte River could purchase battery after five years
  • If Platte River purchases battery, it must be purchased at

market value, due to IRS requirements

slide-22
SLIDE 22

February 2019 Execute PPA and LLA February 2019 File 1041 permit with Larimer County May 2019 Larimer County Planning Commission public hearing June 2019 Larimer County Commissioners public hearing on 1041 permit June 2019 Finalize development plans August 2019 Site prep and commence construction March 2020 Commercial operation date

Timeline

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Takeaways

  • The solar project will serve approximately 1.5 percent of Platte

River’s total member load, after the commercial operation date

  • The battery project will give Platte River an opportunity to

understand communication needs as well as the battery’s limitations and will provide an opportunity to learn how to maximize the value of this resource

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Questions

slide-25
SLIDE 25

March 28, 2019

Board of directors

slide-26
SLIDE 26

March 28, 2019

Wind interconnection update

slide-27
SLIDE 27

City of Fort Collins approved easement over Meadow Springs Ranch

February 2019

Laramie County Commissioners (WY) approved transmission site plan application

February 2019

Larimer County Planning Commission (CO) recommended approval of the Roundhouse renewable energy transmission project’s 1041 permit application

February 2019

Larimer County Commissioners (CO) approved Roundhouse renewable energy transmission project’s 1041 permit application

March 2019

Timeline

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Weld County Planning Commission (CO) decision on the Roundhouse renewable energy transmission project’s 1041 permit application

April 2019

Weld County Commissioners (CO) final decision on the Roundhouse renewable energy transmission project’s 1041 permit application

May 2019

Finalize acquisition of all easements on preferred route

  • n transmission site plan

June 2019

Wyoming Industrial Siting Council hearing and initial decision

June 2019

Timeline

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Generator outlet vs. transmission line

Rawhide Substation Fort Collins Estes Park Longmont Loveland

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Terms of purchasing generator outlet

  • Purchase generator outlet (transmission line and substation

interconnection facilities) for an estimated cost of $19.8 million on

  • r close to the Dec. 1, 2020, commercial operation date
  • $950,000 per mile (estimated 19 miles)
  • $1.75 million in substation interconnection costs
  • Estimated net present value of -$6.0 million
  • Generator outlet constructed to Platte River’s standards
  • Steel poles, cement foundations and no guy wires
  • 72 fiber strand OPWG
  • NextEra will provide light detection and radar (LIDAR) data

for the entire generator outlet line

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Terms of purchasing generator outlet

  • Power purchase agreement (PPA) purchase price reduced

$2.00/MWh

  • Platte River agrees to purchase an additional 15 MW of wind at

the same discounted price of the initial 150 MW purchase, to replace 12 MW of wind sold to third party

  • Option to purchase an additional 60 MW of wind extended until

July 1, 2019

  • Platte River is not responsible for wind that could not be

generated during any planned or unplanned generator outlet transmission line outage that limits deliveries into the Rawhide Substation

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Benefits of the generator outlet purchase

  • Ensure line is built to Platte

River’s standards

  • Retain greater control over future

deliveries into the Rawhide Substation

  • Access to future renewables in

Wyoming with potential expansion capability, since Platte River owns line and easement (line capacity

  • f at least 400 MW)
  • Provides negotiating leverage to

potentially obtain future renewables at a lower cost

  • Third-party use of the

transmission line or generator

  • utlet facility will require them to

pay Platte River

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Key takeaways

  • Roundhouse wind project is ahead of schedule which may allow

construction to commence this fall

  • Generator outlet ownership will provide greater opportunities to

add additional renewables in the future at a lower cost

  • Risk of being required to purchase wind during generator outlet
  • utage or limitation is mitigated
  • Extending the option to purchase additional wind until July 1,

2019, will provide an opportunity to pursue sales from Craig generation and test Rawhide Unit 1 at lower minimum levels

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Questions

slide-35
SLIDE 35

March 28, 2019

Board of directors

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Category February variance YTD variance Municipal demand (2.6%)  (5.2%)  Municipal energy (3.9%)  (2.2%)  Baseload generation (1.7%)  (6.5%)  Wind generation (18.9%)  (10.4%)  Solar generation (4.9%)  1.4%  Surplus sales volume 33.3%  27.1%  Surplus sales price 49.8%  40.1%  Dispatch cost (2.5%)  (2.7%) 

February operational results

Variance key: Favorable:  >2% | Near budget:  +/- 2% | Unfavorable:  <-2%

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • 5,000

10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 Jan-16 Feb-16 Mar-16 Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 Aug-16 Sep-16 Oct-16 Nov-16 Dec-16 Jan-17 Feb-17 Mar-17 Apr-17 May-17 Jun-17 Jul-17 Aug-17 Sep-17 Oct-17 Nov-17 Dec-17 Jan-18 Feb-18 Mar-18 Apr-18 May-18 Jun-18 Jul-18 Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 MWh

2016-2018 renewables generation

Wind Rawhide Flats solar

Renewable resources 36 month budget (MWh) 36 month actual (MWh) 36 month goal achievement 36 month variance

Spring Canyon Phase II 390,293 394,446 101.06% 1.06% Spring Canyon Phase III 330,248 335,711 101.65% 1.65% Silver Sage 111,972 107,994 96.45%

  • 3.55%

Medicine Bow 51,903 54,943 105.86% 5.86% Total wind 884,415 893,094 100.98% 0.98% Solar - Rawhide Flats 146,952 134,830 91.75%

  • 8.25%

Total solar 146,952 134,830 91.75%

  • 8.25%

Total renewables 1,031,368 1,027,924 99.67%

  • 0.33%

36-month renewables performance

slide-38
SLIDE 38

March 28, 2019

Board of directors

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Financial summary

> 2%  Favorable | 2% to -2%  At or near budget | < -2%  Unfavorable Category February variance from budget

($ in millions)

Year to date variance from budget

($ in millions)

Net income $1.5  $3.5  Fixed obligation charge coverage .95x  1.07x  Revenues $1.2  $2.2  Operating expenses $0.3  $1.1  Capital additions $1.6  $2.6 

slide-40
SLIDE 40

March 28, 2019

Board of directors