localification of variable basis topological systems
play

Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia Summer School on General Algebra and Ordered Sets 2008 T


  1. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Historical remarks Variable-basis topological systems 2007 S. Solovyov introduces the category of variable-basis topological spaces over an arbitrary variety of algebras generalizing the category C - Top of S. E. Rodabaugh. 2008 S. Solovyov introduces the category of variable-basis topological systems over an arbitrary variety of algebras generalizing the respective notion of S. Vickers. !!! The latter category provides a single framework in which to treat both variable-basis lattice-valued topological spaces and the respective algebraic structures underlying their topologies. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 6/43

  2. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Current talk The above-mentioned framework is good on the topological side (spatialization of variable-basis topological systems is possible) and is bad on the algebraic one (the procedure of localification collapses). Stimulated by the deficiency we introduced a modified version of the category of variable-basis topological systems. It is the purpose of the talk to show that localification is possible in the new setting as well as to provide a relation of the new category to lattice-valued topology. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 7/43

  3. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Current talk The above-mentioned framework is good on the topological side (spatialization of variable-basis topological systems is possible) and is bad on the algebraic one (the procedure of localification collapses). Stimulated by the deficiency we introduced a modified version of the category of variable-basis topological systems. It is the purpose of the talk to show that localification is possible in the new setting as well as to provide a relation of the new category to lattice-valued topology. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 7/43

  4. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Current talk The above-mentioned framework is good on the topological side (spatialization of variable-basis topological systems is possible) and is bad on the algebraic one (the procedure of localification collapses). Stimulated by the deficiency we introduced a modified version of the category of variable-basis topological systems. It is the purpose of the talk to show that localification is possible in the new setting as well as to provide a relation of the new category to lattice-valued topology. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 7/43

  5. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms Let Ω = ( n λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a class of cardinal numbers. Definition 1 An Ω-algebra is a pair ( A , ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) (denoted by A ), where A ω A is a set and ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ is a family of maps A n λ λ − → A . λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) f An Ω-homomorphism ( A , ( ω A → ( B , ( ω B − λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) is a map A f λ ◦ f n λ for every λ ∈ Λ. → B such that f ◦ ω A λ = ω B − Definition 2 Alg (Ω) is the category of Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set (sets). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 8/43

  6. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms Let Ω = ( n λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a class of cardinal numbers. Definition 1 An Ω-algebra is a pair ( A , ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) (denoted by A ), where A ω A is a set and ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ is a family of maps A n λ λ − → A . λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) f An Ω-homomorphism ( A , ( ω A → ( B , ( ω B − λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) is a map A f λ ◦ f n λ for every λ ∈ Λ. → B such that f ◦ ω A λ = ω B − Definition 2 Alg (Ω) is the category of Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set (sets). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 8/43

  7. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms Let Ω = ( n λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a class of cardinal numbers. Definition 1 An Ω-algebra is a pair ( A , ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) (denoted by A ), where A ω A is a set and ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ is a family of maps A n λ λ − → A . λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) f An Ω-homomorphism ( A , ( ω A → ( B , ( ω B − λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) is a map A f λ ◦ f n λ for every λ ∈ Λ. → B such that f ◦ ω A λ = ω B − Definition 2 Alg (Ω) is the category of Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set (sets). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 8/43

  8. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms Let Ω = ( n λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a class of cardinal numbers. Definition 1 An Ω-algebra is a pair ( A , ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) (denoted by A ), where A ω A is a set and ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ is a family of maps A n λ λ − → A . λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) f An Ω-homomorphism ( A , ( ω A → ( B , ( ω B − λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) is a map A f λ ◦ f n λ for every λ ∈ Λ. → B such that f ◦ ω A λ = ω B − Definition 2 Alg (Ω) is the category of Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set (sets). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 8/43

  9. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms Let Ω = ( n λ ) λ ∈ Λ be a class of cardinal numbers. Definition 1 An Ω-algebra is a pair ( A , ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) (denoted by A ), where A ω A is a set and ( ω A λ ) λ ∈ Λ is a family of maps A n λ λ − → A . λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) f An Ω-homomorphism ( A , ( ω A → ( B , ( ω B − λ ) λ ∈ Λ ) is a map A f λ ◦ f n λ for every λ ∈ Λ. → B such that f ◦ ω A λ = ω B − Definition 2 Alg (Ω) is the category of Ω-algebras and Ω-homomorphisms. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set (sets). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 8/43

  10. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Varieties of algebras Definition 3 Let M (resp. E ) be the class of Ω-homomorphisms with injective (resp. surjective) underlying maps. A variety of Ω-algebras is a full subcategory of Alg (Ω) closed under the formation of products, M -subobjects (subalgebras) and E -quotients (homomorphic images). The objects (resp. morphisms) of a variety are called algebras (resp. homomorphisms). Example 4 The categories Frm , SFrm and SQuant of frames, semiframes and semi-quantales (popular in lattice-valued topology) are varieties. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 9/43

  11. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Varieties of algebras Definition 3 Let M (resp. E ) be the class of Ω-homomorphisms with injective (resp. surjective) underlying maps. A variety of Ω-algebras is a full subcategory of Alg (Ω) closed under the formation of products, M -subobjects (subalgebras) and E -quotients (homomorphic images). The objects (resp. morphisms) of a variety are called algebras (resp. homomorphisms). Example 4 The categories Frm , SFrm and SQuant of frames, semiframes and semi-quantales (popular in lattice-valued topology) are varieties. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 9/43

  12. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Varieties of algebras Definition 3 Let M (resp. E ) be the class of Ω-homomorphisms with injective (resp. surjective) underlying maps. A variety of Ω-algebras is a full subcategory of Alg (Ω) closed under the formation of products, M -subobjects (subalgebras) and E -quotients (homomorphic images). The objects (resp. morphisms) of a variety are called algebras (resp. homomorphisms). Example 4 The categories Frm , SFrm and SQuant of frames, semiframes and semi-quantales (popular in lattice-valued topology) are varieties. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 9/43

  13. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Varieties of algebras Varieties of algebras Definition 3 Let M (resp. E ) be the class of Ω-homomorphisms with injective (resp. surjective) underlying maps. A variety of Ω-algebras is a full subcategory of Alg (Ω) closed under the formation of products, M -subobjects (subalgebras) and E -quotients (homomorphic images). The objects (resp. morphisms) of a variety are called algebras (resp. homomorphisms). Example 4 The categories Frm , SFrm and SQuant of frames, semiframes and semi-quantales (popular in lattice-valued topology) are varieties. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 9/43

  14. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Q -powersets From now one fix a variety A and an algebra Q . Definition 5 Given a set X , Q X is the Q -powerset of X . An arbitrary element of Q X is denoted by p (with indices). Q X is an algebra with operations lifted point-wise from Q by ( ω Q X λ ( � p i � n λ ))( x ) = ω Q λ ( � p i ( x ) � n λ ) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 10/43

  15. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Q -powersets From now one fix a variety A and an algebra Q . Definition 5 Given a set X , Q X is the Q -powerset of X . An arbitrary element of Q X is denoted by p (with indices). Q X is an algebra with operations lifted point-wise from Q by ( ω Q X λ ( � p i � n λ ))( x ) = ω Q λ ( � p i ( x ) � n λ ) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 10/43

  16. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Q -powersets From now one fix a variety A and an algebra Q . Definition 5 Given a set X , Q X is the Q -powerset of X . An arbitrary element of Q X is denoted by p (with indices). Q X is an algebra with operations lifted point-wise from Q by ( ω Q X λ ( � p i � n λ ))( x ) = ω Q λ ( � p i ( x ) � n λ ) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 10/43

  17. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Q -powersets From now one fix a variety A and an algebra Q . Definition 5 Given a set X , Q X is the Q -powerset of X . An arbitrary element of Q X is denoted by p (with indices). Q X is an algebra with operations lifted point-wise from Q by ( ω Q X λ ( � p i � n λ ))( x ) = ω Q λ ( � p i ( x ) � n λ ) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 10/43

  18. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Image and preimage operators g f Let X − → Y be a map and let A − → B be a homomorphism. There exist: f → the standard image and preimage operators P ( X ) − − → P ( Y ) f ← and P ( Y ) − − → P ( X ); f ← → Q X defined by the Zadeh preimage operator Q Y Q − − f ← Q ( p ) = p ◦ f ; g X → B X defined by g X a map A X − − → → ( p ) = g ◦ p . Lemma 6 g f For every map X − → Y and every homomorphism A − → B, both f ← g X → Q X and A X → B X are homomorphisms. Q Q Y − − − − → Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 11/43

  19. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Image and preimage operators g f Let X − → Y be a map and let A − → B be a homomorphism. There exist: f → the standard image and preimage operators P ( X ) − − → P ( Y ) f ← and P ( Y ) − − → P ( X ); f ← → Q X defined by the Zadeh preimage operator Q Y Q − − f ← Q ( p ) = p ◦ f ; g X → B X defined by g X a map A X − − → → ( p ) = g ◦ p . Lemma 6 g f For every map X − → Y and every homomorphism A − → B, both f ← g X → Q X and A X → B X are homomorphisms. Q Q Y − − − − → Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 11/43

  20. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Image and preimage operators g f Let X − → Y be a map and let A − → B be a homomorphism. There exist: f → the standard image and preimage operators P ( X ) − − → P ( Y ) f ← and P ( Y ) − − → P ( X ); f ← → Q X defined by the Zadeh preimage operator Q Y Q − − f ← Q ( p ) = p ◦ f ; g X → B X defined by g X a map A X − − → → ( p ) = g ◦ p . Lemma 6 g f For every map X − → Y and every homomorphism A − → B, both f ← g X → Q X and A X → B X are homomorphisms. Q Q Y − − − − → Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 11/43

  21. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Image and preimage operators g f Let X − → Y be a map and let A − → B be a homomorphism. There exist: f → the standard image and preimage operators P ( X ) − − → P ( Y ) f ← and P ( Y ) − − → P ( X ); f ← → Q X defined by the Zadeh preimage operator Q Y Q − − f ← Q ( p ) = p ◦ f ; g X → B X defined by g X a map A X − − → → ( p ) = g ◦ p . Lemma 6 g f For every map X − → Y and every homomorphism A − → B, both f ← g X → Q X and A X → B X are homomorphisms. Q Q Y − − − − → Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 11/43

  22. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Image and preimage operators g f Let X − → Y be a map and let A − → B be a homomorphism. There exist: f → the standard image and preimage operators P ( X ) − − → P ( Y ) f ← and P ( Y ) − − → P ( X ); f ← → Q X defined by the Zadeh preimage operator Q Y Q − − f ← Q ( p ) = p ◦ f ; g X → B X defined by g X a map A X − − → → ( p ) = g ◦ p . Lemma 6 g f For every map X − → Y and every homomorphism A − → B, both f ← g X → Q X and A X → B X are homomorphisms. Q Q Y − − − − → Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 11/43

  23. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Fixed-basis topological spaces Definition 7 Given a set X , a subset τ of Q X is a Q -topology on X provided that τ is a subalgebra of Q X . A Q -topological space (also called a Q -space) is a pair ( X , τ ), where X is a set and τ is a Q -topology on X . A map ( X , τ ) f − → ( Y , σ ) between Q -spaces is Q -continuous provided that ( f ← Q ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . Definition 8 Q - Top is the category of Q -spaces and Q -continuous maps. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 12/43

  24. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Fixed-basis topological spaces Definition 7 Given a set X , a subset τ of Q X is a Q -topology on X provided that τ is a subalgebra of Q X . A Q -topological space (also called a Q -space) is a pair ( X , τ ), where X is a set and τ is a Q -topology on X . A map ( X , τ ) f − → ( Y , σ ) between Q -spaces is Q -continuous provided that ( f ← Q ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . Definition 8 Q - Top is the category of Q -spaces and Q -continuous maps. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 12/43

  25. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Fixed-basis topological spaces Definition 7 Given a set X , a subset τ of Q X is a Q -topology on X provided that τ is a subalgebra of Q X . A Q -topological space (also called a Q -space) is a pair ( X , τ ), where X is a set and τ is a Q -topology on X . A map ( X , τ ) f − → ( Y , σ ) between Q -spaces is Q -continuous provided that ( f ← Q ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . Definition 8 Q - Top is the category of Q -spaces and Q -continuous maps. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 12/43

  26. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Fixed-basis topological spaces Definition 7 Given a set X , a subset τ of Q X is a Q -topology on X provided that τ is a subalgebra of Q X . A Q -topological space (also called a Q -space) is a pair ( X , τ ), where X is a set and τ is a Q -topology on X . A map ( X , τ ) f − → ( Y , σ ) between Q -spaces is Q -continuous provided that ( f ← Q ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . Definition 8 Q - Top is the category of Q -spaces and Q -continuous maps. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 12/43

  27. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Fixed-basis topology Fixed-basis topological spaces Definition 7 Given a set X , a subset τ of Q X is a Q -topology on X provided that τ is a subalgebra of Q X . A Q -topological space (also called a Q -space) is a pair ( X , τ ), where X is a set and τ is a Q -topology on X . A map ( X , τ ) f − → ( Y , σ ) between Q -spaces is Q -continuous provided that ( f ← Q ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . Definition 8 Q - Top is the category of Q -spaces and Q -continuous maps. | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 12/43

  28. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Notations From now on introduce the following notations: The dual of the category A is denoted by LoA (the “ Lo ” comes from “localic”). The objects (resp. morphisms) of LoA are called localic algebras (resp. homomorphisms). The respective homomorphism of a localic homomorphism f is denoted by f op and vice versa. To distinguish between maps and homomorphisms denote them by “ f , g ” and “ ϕ, ψ ” respectively. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 13/43

  29. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Notations From now on introduce the following notations: The dual of the category A is denoted by LoA (the “ Lo ” comes from “localic”). The objects (resp. morphisms) of LoA are called localic algebras (resp. homomorphisms). The respective homomorphism of a localic homomorphism f is denoted by f op and vice versa. To distinguish between maps and homomorphisms denote them by “ f , g ” and “ ϕ, ψ ” respectively. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 13/43

  30. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Notations From now on introduce the following notations: The dual of the category A is denoted by LoA (the “ Lo ” comes from “localic”). The objects (resp. morphisms) of LoA are called localic algebras (resp. homomorphisms). The respective homomorphism of a localic homomorphism f is denoted by f op and vice versa. To distinguish between maps and homomorphisms denote them by “ f , g ” and “ ϕ, ψ ” respectively. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 13/43

  31. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Notations From now on introduce the following notations: The dual of the category A is denoted by LoA (the “ Lo ” comes from “localic”). The objects (resp. morphisms) of LoA are called localic algebras (resp. homomorphisms). The respective homomorphism of a localic homomorphism f is denoted by f op and vice versa. To distinguish between maps and homomorphisms denote them by “ f , g ” and “ ϕ, ψ ” respectively. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 13/43

  32. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Notations From now on introduce the following notations: The dual of the category A is denoted by LoA (the “ Lo ” comes from “localic”). The objects (resp. morphisms) of LoA are called localic algebras (resp. homomorphisms). The respective homomorphism of a localic homomorphism f is denoted by f op and vice versa. To distinguish between maps and homomorphisms denote them by “ f , g ” and “ ϕ, ψ ” respectively. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 13/43

  33. � � � � Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis preimage operator Definition 9 ( f ,ϕ ) Given a Set × LoA -morphism ( X , A ) − − − → ( Y , B ), there exists the ( f ,ϕ ) ← → A X defined by Rodabaugh preimage operator B Y − − − − ( f , ϕ ) ← ( p ) = ϕ op ◦ p ◦ f . Lemma 10 ( f ,ϕ ) For every Set × LoA -morphism ( X , A ) − − − → ( Y , B ) , the diagram B Y A Y ( ϕ op ) Y → f ← ( f ,ϕ ) ← f ← B A B X � A X ( ϕ op ) X → ( f ,ϕ ) ← → A X is a homomorphism. commutes and therefore B Y − − − − Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 14/43

  34. � � � � Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis preimage operator Definition 9 ( f ,ϕ ) Given a Set × LoA -morphism ( X , A ) − − − → ( Y , B ), there exists the ( f ,ϕ ) ← → A X defined by Rodabaugh preimage operator B Y − − − − ( f , ϕ ) ← ( p ) = ϕ op ◦ p ◦ f . Lemma 10 ( f ,ϕ ) For every Set × LoA -morphism ( X , A ) − − − → ( Y , B ) , the diagram B Y A Y ( ϕ op ) Y → f ← ( f ,ϕ ) ← f ← B A B X � A X ( ϕ op ) X → ( f ,ϕ ) ← → A X is a homomorphism. commutes and therefore B Y − − − − Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 14/43

  35. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  36. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  37. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  38. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  39. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  40. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  41. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis topology Variable-basis topological spaces Definition 11 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - Top comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological spaces or C -spaces ( X , A , τ ), where ( X , A ) is a Set × C -object and ( X , τ ) is an A -space. ( f ,ϕ ) Morphisms: C -continuous pairs ( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ ), where ( f , ϕ ) is a Set × C -morphism and (( f , ϕ ) ← ) → ( σ ) ⊆ τ . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . C - Top generalizes the respective category of S. E. Rodabaugh. This talk considers the case C = LoA . Call LoA -spaces by spaces and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 15/43

  42. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Satisfaction relation Definition 12 | = Let X be a set and A be a frame. Then X − → A is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ) if | = is a binary relation from X to A satisfying the following join interchange law and meet interchange law: For any family { a i } i ∈ I of elements of A , x | = � a i iff x | = a i for at least one i ∈ I . i ∈ I For any finite family { a i } i ∈ I of elements of A , x | = � a i iff x | = a i for every i ∈ I . i ∈ I Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 16/43

  43. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Satisfaction relation Definition 12 | = Let X be a set and A be a frame. Then X − → A is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ) if | = is a binary relation from X to A satisfying the following join interchange law and meet interchange law: For any family { a i } i ∈ I of elements of A , x | = � a i iff x | = a i for at least one i ∈ I . i ∈ I For any finite family { a i } i ∈ I of elements of A , x | = � a i iff x | = a i for every i ∈ I . i ∈ I Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 16/43

  44. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Satisfaction relation Definition 12 | = Let X be a set and A be a frame. Then X − → A is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ) if | = is a binary relation from X to A satisfying the following join interchange law and meet interchange law: For any family { a i } i ∈ I of elements of A , x | = � a i iff x | = a i for at least one i ∈ I . i ∈ I For any finite family { a i } i ∈ I of elements of A , x | = � a i iff x | = a i for every i ∈ I . i ∈ I Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 16/43

  45. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Topological systems Definition 13 A topological system is a triple ( X , A , | =), where ( X , A ) is a Set × Loc -object and | = is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ). Elements of X are points and elements of A are opens. The category TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: topological systems ( X , A , | =). Morphisms: continuous maps f =(pt f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × Loc -morphism and for every x ∈ X , b ∈ B , pt f ( x ) | = 2 b iff x | = 1 Ω f ( b ). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 17/43

  46. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Topological systems Definition 13 A topological system is a triple ( X , A , | =), where ( X , A ) is a Set × Loc -object and | = is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ). Elements of X are points and elements of A are opens. The category TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: topological systems ( X , A , | =). Morphisms: continuous maps f =(pt f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × Loc -morphism and for every x ∈ X , b ∈ B , pt f ( x ) | = 2 b iff x | = 1 Ω f ( b ). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 17/43

  47. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Topological systems Definition 13 A topological system is a triple ( X , A , | =), where ( X , A ) is a Set × Loc -object and | = is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ). Elements of X are points and elements of A are opens. The category TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: topological systems ( X , A , | =). Morphisms: continuous maps f =(pt f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × Loc -morphism and for every x ∈ X , b ∈ B , pt f ( x ) | = 2 b iff x | = 1 Ω f ( b ). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 17/43

  48. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Topological systems Definition 13 A topological system is a triple ( X , A , | =), where ( X , A ) is a Set × Loc -object and | = is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ). Elements of X are points and elements of A are opens. The category TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: topological systems ( X , A , | =). Morphisms: continuous maps f =(pt f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × Loc -morphism and for every x ∈ X , b ∈ B , pt f ( x ) | = 2 b iff x | = 1 Ω f ( b ). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 17/43

  49. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological systems of S. Vickers Topological systems Definition 13 A topological system is a triple ( X , A , | =), where ( X , A ) is a Set × Loc -object and | = is a satisfaction relation on ( X , A ). Elements of X are points and elements of A are opens. The category TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: topological systems ( X , A , | =). Morphisms: continuous maps f =(pt f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × Loc -morphism and for every x ∈ X , b ∈ B , pt f ( x ) | = 2 b iff x | = 1 Ω f ( b ). Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 17/43

  50. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Variable-basis topological systems Definition 14 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , (Σ f ) op , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , Σ f ( | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d )) = | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d )) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 18/43

  51. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Variable-basis topological systems Definition 14 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , (Σ f ) op , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , Σ f ( | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d )) = | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d )) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 18/43

  52. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Variable-basis topological systems Definition 14 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , (Σ f ) op , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , Σ f ( | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d )) = | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d )) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 18/43

  53. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Variable-basis topological systems Definition 14 Given a subcategory C of LoA , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , (Σ f ) op , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , Σ f ( | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d )) = | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d )) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 18/43

  54. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach From variable-basis to fixed-basis Definition 15 For a C -object Q , Q - TopSys is the subcategory of C - TopSys of all C -systems ( X , Q , B , | =) with basis Q and all continuous f such that Σ f = 1 Q . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . Lemma 16 The subcategory Q- TopSys is full iff C ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then Q- TopSys is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 19/43

  55. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach From variable-basis to fixed-basis Definition 15 For a C -object Q , Q - TopSys is the subcategory of C - TopSys of all C -systems ( X , Q , B , | =) with basis Q and all continuous f such that Σ f = 1 Q . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . Lemma 16 The subcategory Q- TopSys is full iff C ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then Q- TopSys is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 19/43

  56. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach From variable-basis to fixed-basis Definition 15 For a C -object Q , Q - TopSys is the subcategory of C - TopSys of all C -systems ( X , Q , B , | =) with basis Q and all continuous f such that Σ f = 1 Q . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . Lemma 16 The subcategory Q- TopSys is full iff C ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then Q- TopSys is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 19/43

  57. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach From variable-basis to fixed-basis Definition 15 For a C -object Q , Q - TopSys is the subcategory of C - TopSys of all C -systems ( X , Q , B , | =) with basis Q and all continuous f such that Σ f = 1 Q . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C . Lemma 16 The subcategory Q- TopSys is full iff C ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then Q- TopSys is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 19/43

  58. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Examples Example 17 2 = {⊥ , ⊤} is initial in Frm . The full subcategory 2 - TopSys of Loc - TopSys is isomorphic to the category TopSys of S. Vickers. Example 18 Given a set K , the subcategory K - TopSys of LoSet - TopSys is isomorphic to the category Chu ( Set , K ) of Chu spaces over K . K - TopSys is full iff K is the empty set or a singleton. The following considers the category LoA - TopSys . Call LoA -systems by systems and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 20/43

  59. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Examples Example 17 2 = {⊥ , ⊤} is initial in Frm . The full subcategory 2 - TopSys of Loc - TopSys is isomorphic to the category TopSys of S. Vickers. Example 18 Given a set K , the subcategory K - TopSys of LoSet - TopSys is isomorphic to the category Chu ( Set , K ) of Chu spaces over K . K - TopSys is full iff K is the empty set or a singleton. The following considers the category LoA - TopSys . Call LoA -systems by systems and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 20/43

  60. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Examples Example 17 2 = {⊥ , ⊤} is initial in Frm . The full subcategory 2 - TopSys of Loc - TopSys is isomorphic to the category TopSys of S. Vickers. Example 18 Given a set K , the subcategory K - TopSys of LoSet - TopSys is isomorphic to the category Chu ( Set , K ) of Chu spaces over K . K - TopSys is full iff K is the empty set or a singleton. The following considers the category LoA - TopSys . Call LoA -systems by systems and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 20/43

  61. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Variable-basis approach Examples Example 17 2 = {⊥ , ⊤} is initial in Frm . The full subcategory 2 - TopSys of Loc - TopSys is isomorphic to the category TopSys of S. Vickers. Example 18 Given a set K , the subcategory K - TopSys of LoSet - TopSys is isomorphic to the category Chu ( Set , K ) of Chu spaces over K . K - TopSys is full iff K is the empty set or a singleton. The following considers the category LoA - TopSys . Call LoA -systems by systems and LoA -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 20/43

  62. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems From spaces to systems Lemma 19 E T � LoA - TopSys with There exists a full embedding LoA - Top � � ( f ,ϕ ) E T (( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ )) = ( f ,ϕ, (( f ,ϕ ) ← ) op ) ( X , A , τ, | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , σ, | = 2 ) where | = i ( z , p ) = p ( z ) . Proof. As an example show that E T ( f , ϕ ) is in LoA - TopSys : = 1 ( x , ϕ op ◦ p ◦ f ) = = 1 ( x , ( f , ϕ ) ← ( p )) = | | ϕ op ◦ p ◦ f ( x ) = ϕ op ( | = 2 ( f ( x ) , p )) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 21/43

  63. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems From spaces to systems Lemma 19 E T � LoA - TopSys with There exists a full embedding LoA - Top � � ( f ,ϕ ) E T (( X , A , τ ) − − − → ( Y , B , σ )) = ( f ,ϕ, (( f ,ϕ ) ← ) op ) ( X , A , τ, | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , B , σ, | = 2 ) where | = i ( z , p ) = p ( z ) . Proof. As an example show that E T ( f , ϕ ) is in LoA - TopSys : = 1 ( x , ϕ op ◦ p ◦ f ) = = 1 ( x , ( f , ϕ ) ← ( p )) = | | ϕ op ◦ p ◦ f ( x ) = ϕ op ( | = 2 ( f ( x ) , p )) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 21/43

  64. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems From systems to spaces: spatialization Lemma 20 Spat There exists a functor LoA - TopSys − − → LoA - Top defined by = 1 ) f Spat(( X , A , B , | − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 )) = (pt f , (Σ f ) op ) ( X , A , τ ) − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , σ ) where τ = {| = 1 ( − , b ) | b ∈ B } ( | = 1 ( − , b ) is the extent of b). Proof. As an example show that Spat( f ) is in LoA - Top : ((pt f , (Σ f ) op ) ← ( | = 2 ( − , d )))( x ) = Σ f ◦ | = 2 ( − , d ) ◦ pt f ( x ) = Σ f ( | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d )) = | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d )) = ( | = 1 ( − , Ω f ( d )))( x ) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 22/43

  65. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems From systems to spaces: spatialization Lemma 20 Spat There exists a functor LoA - TopSys − − → LoA - Top defined by = 1 ) f Spat(( X , A , B , | − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 )) = (pt f , (Σ f ) op ) ( X , A , τ ) − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , σ ) where τ = {| = 1 ( − , b ) | b ∈ B } ( | = 1 ( − , b ) is the extent of b). Proof. As an example show that Spat( f ) is in LoA - Top : ((pt f , (Σ f ) op ) ← ( | = 2 ( − , d )))( x ) = Σ f ◦ | = 2 ( − , d ) ◦ pt f ( x ) = Σ f ( | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d )) = | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d )) = ( | = 1 ( − , Ω f ( d )))( x ) . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 22/43

  66. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems E T and Spat form an adjoint pair Theorem 21 Spat is a right-adjoint-left-inverse of E T . Proof. Given a system ( X , A , B , | =), (1 X , 1 A , Φ op ) E T Spat( X , A , B , | =) − − − − − − − → ( X , A , B , | =) with Φ( b ) = | =( − , b ) provides an E T -(co-universal) map. Straightforward computations show that Spat E T = 1 LoA - Top . Corollary 22 LoA - Top is isomorphic to a full (regular mono)-coreflective subcategory of LoA - TopSys . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 23/43

  67. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems E T and Spat form an adjoint pair Theorem 21 Spat is a right-adjoint-left-inverse of E T . Proof. Given a system ( X , A , B , | =), (1 X , 1 A , Φ op ) E T Spat( X , A , B , | =) − − − − − − − → ( X , A , B , | =) with Φ( b ) = | =( − , b ) provides an E T -(co-universal) map. Straightforward computations show that Spat E T = 1 LoA - Top . Corollary 22 LoA - Top is isomorphic to a full (regular mono)-coreflective subcategory of LoA - TopSys . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 23/43

  68. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems E T and Spat form an adjoint pair Theorem 21 Spat is a right-adjoint-left-inverse of E T . Proof. Given a system ( X , A , B , | =), (1 X , 1 A , Φ op ) E T Spat( X , A , B , | =) − − − − − − − → ( X , A , B , | =) with Φ( b ) = | =( − , b ) provides an E T -(co-universal) map. Straightforward computations show that Spat E T = 1 LoA - Top . Corollary 22 LoA - Top is isomorphic to a full (regular mono)-coreflective subcategory of LoA - TopSys . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 23/43

  69. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Topological spaces versus topological systems E T and Spat form an adjoint pair Theorem 21 Spat is a right-adjoint-left-inverse of E T . Proof. Given a system ( X , A , B , | =), (1 X , 1 A , Φ op ) E T Spat( X , A , B , | =) − − − − − − − → ( X , A , B , | =) with Φ( b ) = | =( − , b ) provides an E T -(co-universal) map. Straightforward computations show that Spat E T = 1 LoA - Top . Corollary 22 LoA - Top is isomorphic to a full (regular mono)-coreflective subcategory of LoA - TopSys . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 23/43

  70. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From localic algebras to systems Lemma 23 There exists an embedding LoA � � E Q � LoA - TopSys with L ϕ E Q L ( B − → C ) = ( | ϕ op | ← Q , 1 Q ,ϕ ) ( Pt Q ( B ) , Q , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − → ( Pt Q ( C ) , Q , C , | = 2 ) where Pt Q ( B ) = A ( B , Q ) and | = i ( p , d ) = p ( d ) . E Q L is full iff A ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then E Q L is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 24/43

  71. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From localic algebras to systems Lemma 23 There exists an embedding LoA � � E Q � LoA - TopSys with L ϕ E Q L ( B − → C ) = ( | ϕ op | ← Q , 1 Q ,ϕ ) ( Pt Q ( B ) , Q , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − → ( Pt Q ( C ) , Q , C , | = 2 ) where Pt Q ( B ) = A ( B , Q ) and | = i ( p , d ) = p ( d ) . E Q L is full iff A ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then E Q L is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 24/43

  72. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From localic algebras to systems Lemma 23 There exists an embedding LoA � � E Q � LoA - TopSys with L ϕ E Q L ( B − → C ) = ( | ϕ op | ← Q , 1 Q ,ϕ ) ( Pt Q ( B ) , Q , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − → ( Pt Q ( C ) , Q , C , | = 2 ) where Pt Q ( B ) = A ( B , Q ) and | = i ( p , d ) = p ( d ) . E Q L is full iff A ( Q , Q ) = { 1 Q } . If Q is an initial (terminal) object in A , then E Q L is full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 24/43

  73. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From systems to localic algebras: localification Lemma 24 There exists a functor LoA - TopSys Loc − − → LoA defined by (Ω f ) op = 1 ) f Loc(( X , A , B , | − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 )) = B − − − − → D. Lemma 25 Loc is a left inverse of E Q L . In general E Q L has neither left nor right adjoint and therefore Loc is neither left nor right adjoint of E Q L . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 25/43

  74. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From systems to localic algebras: localification Lemma 24 There exists a functor LoA - TopSys Loc − − → LoA defined by (Ω f ) op = 1 ) f Loc(( X , A , B , | − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 )) = B − − − − → D. Lemma 25 Loc is a left inverse of E Q L . In general E Q L has neither left nor right adjoint and therefore Loc is neither left nor right adjoint of E Q L . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 25/43

  75. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From systems to localic algebras: localification Lemma 24 There exists a functor LoA - TopSys Loc − − → LoA defined by (Ω f ) op = 1 ) f Loc(( X , A , B , | − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 )) = B − − − − → D. Lemma 25 Loc is a left inverse of E Q L . In general E Q L has neither left nor right adjoint and therefore Loc is neither left nor right adjoint of E Q L . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 25/43

  76. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems E Q L has neither left nor right adjoint Proof. If E Q L has a left adjoint, then it preserves limits. In particular, it preserves terminal objects. However, 1 is a terminal object in Frm and E 2 L ( 1 ) = ( Pt 2 ( 1 ) , 2 , 1 , | =) = ( ∅ , 2 , 1 , | =) is not a terminal object in Loc - TopSys . If E Q L has a right adjoint, then it preserves colimits and, in particular, initial objects. However, 2 is an initial object in Frm and E 2 L ( 2 ) = ( Pt 2 ( 2 ) , 2 , 2 , | =) = ( 1 , 2 , 2 , | =) is not an initial object in Loc - TopSys . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 26/43

  77. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems E Q L has neither left nor right adjoint Proof. If E Q L has a left adjoint, then it preserves limits. In particular, it preserves terminal objects. However, 1 is a terminal object in Frm and E 2 L ( 1 ) = ( Pt 2 ( 1 ) , 2 , 1 , | =) = ( ∅ , 2 , 1 , | =) is not a terminal object in Loc - TopSys . If E Q L has a right adjoint, then it preserves colimits and, in particular, initial objects. However, 2 is an initial object in Frm and E 2 L ( 2 ) = ( Pt 2 ( 2 ) , 2 , 2 , | =) = ( 1 , 2 , 2 , | =) is not an initial object in Loc - TopSys . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 26/43

  78. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From localic algebras to systems again Definition 26 Let LoA i × LoA be the subcategory of LoA × LoA with the same objects and with ( ϕ, ψ ) in LoA i × LoA iff ϕ is a LoA -isomorphism. Lemma 27 E i There exists an embedding LoA i × LoA � � L � LoA - TopSys defined by ( ϕ,ψ ) E i L (( A , B ) − − − → ( C , D )) = (( | ψ op | ,ϕ − 1 ) ← ,ϕ,ψ ) ( Pt A ( B ) , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Pt C ( D ) , C , D , | = 2 ) where Pt A ( B ) = A ( B , A ) and | = i ( p , e ) = p ( e ) . In general E i L is non-full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 27/43

  79. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From localic algebras to systems again Definition 26 Let LoA i × LoA be the subcategory of LoA × LoA with the same objects and with ( ϕ, ψ ) in LoA i × LoA iff ϕ is a LoA -isomorphism. Lemma 27 E i There exists an embedding LoA i × LoA � � L � LoA - TopSys defined by ( ϕ,ψ ) E i L (( A , B ) − − − → ( C , D )) = (( | ψ op | ,ϕ − 1 ) ← ,ϕ,ψ ) ( Pt A ( B ) , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Pt C ( D ) , C , D , | = 2 ) where Pt A ( B ) = A ( B , A ) and | = i ( p , e ) = p ( e ) . In general E i L is non-full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 27/43

  80. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Localic algebras versus topological systems From localic algebras to systems again Definition 26 Let LoA i × LoA be the subcategory of LoA × LoA with the same objects and with ( ϕ, ψ ) in LoA i × LoA iff ϕ is a LoA -isomorphism. Lemma 27 E i There exists an embedding LoA i × LoA � � L � LoA - TopSys defined by ( ϕ,ψ ) E i L (( A , B ) − − − → ( C , D )) = (( | ψ op | ,ϕ − 1 ) ← ,ϕ,ψ ) ( Pt A ( B ) , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Pt C ( D ) , C , D , | = 2 ) where Pt A ( B ) = A ( B , A ) and | = i ( p , e ) = p ( e ) . In general E i L is non-full. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 27/43

  81. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Modified approach Modified variable-basis topological systems Definition 28 Given a subcategory C of A , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C op -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , Σ f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C op -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d ) = Σ f ( | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d ))) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C op . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 28/43

  82. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Modified approach Modified variable-basis topological systems Definition 28 Given a subcategory C of A , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C op -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , Σ f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C op -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d ) = Σ f ( | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d ))) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C op . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 28/43

  83. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Modified approach Modified variable-basis topological systems Definition 28 Given a subcategory C of A , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C op -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , Σ f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C op -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d ) = Σ f ( | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d ))) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C op . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 28/43

  84. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Modified approach Modified variable-basis topological systems Definition 28 Given a subcategory C of A , the category C - TopSys comprises the following data: Objects: C -topological systems or C -systems ( X , A , B , | =), | = where ( X , A , B ) is a Set × C × C op -object and X × B − → A is a map (satisfaction relation) such that for every x ∈ X , | =( x , − ) B − − − − → A is a homomorphism. Morphisms: C -continuous maps f =(pt f , Σ f , (Ω f ) op ) ( X , A , B , | = 1 ) − − − − − − − − − − − → ( Y , C , D , | = 2 ), where f is a Set × C × C op -morphism and for every x ∈ X , d ∈ D , | = 2 (pt f ( x ) , d ) = Σ f ( | = 1 ( x , Ω f ( d ))) . | − | is the forgetful functor to the category Set × C × C op . Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 28/43

  85. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Modified approach Some remarks Given a subcategory C of A , the categories C op - TopSys and C - TopSys have (eventually) the same objects. For a C -object Q , Q - TopSys is (eventually) a subcategory of both C op - TopSys and C - TopSys . Let D be the subcategory of C with the same objects and with ϕ in C iff ϕ is an isomorphism. Then the categories D op - TopSys and D - TopSys are isomorphic. The following considers the category A - TopSys . Call A -systems by systems and A -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 29/43

  86. Motivation Preliminaries Topological systems Spatialization Localification Problems Modified approach Some remarks Given a subcategory C of A , the categories C op - TopSys and C - TopSys have (eventually) the same objects. For a C -object Q , Q - TopSys is (eventually) a subcategory of both C op - TopSys and C - TopSys . Let D be the subcategory of C with the same objects and with ϕ in C iff ϕ is an isomorphism. Then the categories D op - TopSys and D - TopSys are isomorphic. The following considers the category A - TopSys . Call A -systems by systems and A -continuity by continuity. Localification of variable-basis topological systems Sergejs Solovjovs University of Latvia 29/43

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend