Utilizing New Technology for Mosquito Surveillance: The BG Counter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

utilizing new technology for
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Utilizing New Technology for Mosquito Surveillance: The BG Counter - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Utilizing New Technology for Mosquito Surveillance: The BG Counter Trap- A Game Changer Marcia Reed, Sarah Wheeler, Deborah Dritz and Samer Elkashef Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District Biogents Counter Trap Solar panel


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Utilizing New Technology for Mosquito Surveillance:

The BG Counter Trap- A Game Changer

Marcia Reed, Sarah Wheeler, Deborah Dritz and Samer Elkashef Sacramento-Yolo Mosquito and Vector Control District

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Biogents Counter Trap

– Solar panel charges battery – Standard BG Sentinel trap w/ CO2 – Records data every 15 minutes – Wirelessly transmits the data – Remotely change programmable features (on/off, CO2 flow, etc…) – Differentiates mosquito sized insects from other insects

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Total Trap Cost

  • BG Sentinel

$190

  • Counter unit

$1475

  • Web Service

$434

  • Solar System

$400

  • Battery

$30

  • CO2 Tank

$100 Total $2629

(Cage Optional for Security)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Past rice adult surveillance program – MMT traps or dry ice can traps used – 4-5 days/week – One FTE for 6 hrs/day (low end $7,392 over 22 weeks) – Treatment plans decided after noon New rice adult surveillance program – BG Counter traps used – 7 days per week data – 1 day per week maintenance – One FTE for 6hrs/week (only $1,848 over 22 weeks) – Data for treatment decisions as soon as work day begins

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Picture of Unit
slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Map of placement

BG

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Weekly collections
  • Actual count vs trap recording
  • Average about 19% difference
  • 11% difference if large insects included

How accurate ?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Culex tarsalis

  • Rice habitat
  • Continuous monitoring of

populations over the season

  • Minimal labor to maintain

trap

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Some sites show the expected activity

  • Usual start time of activity – shortly after sunset

50 100 150 200 250 300 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00

  • Avg. # insects counted

Time

Hourly activity - Conaway rice site

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Other sites show different activity

0.0 20.0 40.0 60.0 80.0 100.0 120.0 140.0 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 Avg # Insects counted Time

Hourly activity - Natomas rice site

  • Extended activity time – std dev bars show variability of trapping nights
slide-11
SLIDE 11

What about urban mosquitoes?

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • One of two main West Nile Virus vectors
  • 214 positive pools in 2018 (55% of our “+” pools)
  • Green belts, parks, urban creeks habitats are

the areas of ground based control responses

– Last year - over 30,000 acres ULV applications done here – Far majority done at the usual “peak” post sunset time frame

Cx pipiens specifically:

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What we found with the BG Counter:

  • Urban/suburban site
  • Backyard of a house adjacent to a park
  • Frequently treated via backpack and quad ULV

5 10 15 20 25 30 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00

  • Avg. # Insects Counted

Time

Parklite Circle Site- Average Hourly Activity July 19-22, 2018

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • Another Urban/suburban site
  • Again shows activity much later in evening than

expected

  • Peak activity actually in the early morning

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00

  • Avg. # Insects Counted

Time

Bond Rd Elk Grove Site - Average Hourly Activity Aug 10-12, 2018

slide-15
SLIDE 15

What this means:

  • Larger treatment window of mosquito activity is

thus indicated

  • Backpack, quad and truck ULV applications
  • Temperature inversions not as critical
  • Spraying under/into canopy commonly
  • Can perform applications when fewer people

present in parks/greenbelts

slide-16
SLIDE 16

5 10 15 20 25 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 0:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00

  • Avg. # insects counted

Time

Trap Counts - Pre Spray versus Post Spray Parklite Circle Site

pre spray post spray

More data from BG Counter:

  • Urban aerial ULV treatment pre and post trap data
  • Four days of pre-spray data and two days of post-spray
  • Visible decrease in mosquito activity
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • BG Counter trap provides very useful data
  • Multiple people can review the data from their computers
  • Will utilize data to optimize treatments

Conclusions: Next Steps:

  • Integrate weather data
  • More data at more sites

– Cx pipiens & Cx tarsalis – An freeborni & pasture Aedes

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Acknowledgments

Sac-Yolo Laboratory and Control Staff for trap work, data collection and site selection, maintenance, etc… Michael Weber of Biogents for advice, troubleshooting assistance, etc…

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Contact Information: Marcia Reed mreed@fightthebite.net 916-405-2092 (office) 916-919-2856 (cell)

Thank You 