Upper Harbor Terminal Community Engagement Summary . Agenda 1. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file. Upper Harbor Terminal Community Engagement Summary . Agenda 1. Community Engagement + Program Model Explanation 2. Where do these comments come from? 3. Why + How we coded
Community Engagement Summary
. 2
Explanation
engagements (20 minutes)
Agenda
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file. 3
Park Design Process
Design + Operations Program Model
Community Advisory Committee
YOU ARE HERE
Previous Community Engagement
Continued Community Engagement
4
PREVIOUS UPPER HARBOR COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
5
Community Engagement Events + Survey
Note: Numbers reflect specific park related comments only; comments may reflect individuals comments or those of a group.
6
Engagement Phases
Early Engagement Pre Concept Post Concept
215 Comments | 16% 290 Comments | 22% 813 Comments | 62%
7
Comments from Survey
Of all comments are from Zip Codes closest to site (55412, 55411, 55418)
Of survey comments from Zip Codes closest to site (55412, 55411, 55418)
Where are the comments coming from?
Note: Survey comments are categorized by the respondent's zip code. Event comments are categorized by the location they were received.
9
Summaries
‘theme’
Want to explore more?
10
Coding comments to distill information
11
Distill a large quantity of comments (~1300) Extract recommendations from the community's own words Sort into key categories
‒ Identify gaps ‒ Identify Meta-Themes
Create a framework to be able to hold against the program model and design
Why code?
The image part with relationship ID rId2 was not found in the file. 12
How we coded
Identified Activities/Uses that the comments mentioned Read each individual comment and coded for its themes (if appropriate) and the uses/activities it mentioned Called out New Ideas that comments contain
CREATE A FRAMEWORK CODE
Identified Themes in which comments could be coded under Manually entered new ideas
REPEAT
Created new categories of activities and uses based upon highly mentioned ‘new ideas’ Re-Coded + Reviewed
13
14
Age Natural/Built Intensity Pubic/Commercial Individual/Group Local/Regional River Use Active/Passive Arts & Culture Parking Access Idea
15
How did we define these terms? Natural- coded if it contained references to “natural spaces”, “restoration of environments/habitats”, “prairie, pollinators, nature”. Did not include: "open green space”
Built- coded if it included comments about more "designed" spaces or comments that specifically mentioned buildings or more substantial infrastructure. Did not include: more general references for activates and uses that would require a more designed space
THEME
BUILT(designed) + NATURAL
BUILT (designed) NATURAL
COMMENT
17 56 96 5
RESULTS
16
17
Current North Minneapolis Age Demographics
Theme
CONSIDER NEEDS OF AGE GROUPS
Under 9 16% 10-14 7% 15-24 15% 25-34 18% 35-44 14% 45-54 13% 55-66 9% 65+ 8%
Sources: US Census 2013-2017 ACS
RESULTS
5 Comments 7% SENIORS YOUTH 71 Comments 93%
18
19
20
THEME
LOCAL / REGIONAL USE
LOCAL REGIONAL
COMMENT
27 8 2
RESULTS
Comments were coded into this theme if they specifically mentioned use/access/ownership by either local or more ‘regional’ users
21
22
23
THEME
COMMERCIAL / PUBLIC
RESULTS:
35 53 Commercial Public
“Our primary priority for the site is to retain public ownership of the riverfront, make it accessible through trails and recreational amenities, and to restore as much of the shoreline as possible” + Public “Permanent restaurant that draws a crowd… with food trucks or casual cafe with food for before and after shows.” + Commercial “Public space for everyone.” + Public
24
THEME
INDIVIDUAL / GROUP
RESULTS: “Something that involves the individual on different levels.” + Individual “..a place for people to sit, while writing, reflecting” + Individual “Places to convene and gather.” + Group “Come with friends and kick it.” + Group
10 24 Individual Group
25
THEME
ACTIVE / PASSIVE
RESULTS:
18 38 Active Passive
People need to move, sports, anything where you can move your body + Active I've always found it calming and meditative to walk along it
the trees on an small island near the park north of this
Personally, I'm not looking forward to a flashy, high use area along the river. I would hope that the area would remain park like, and not built up with homes, large restaurants or other commercial venues. + Passive
26
THEME
RIVER USE (YES/NO)
RESULTS: “River related activities boat, swim, fish, river enhanced activities, restaurants, hotels, boats rentals, bike rentals.” + River Use (yes)
94 3 Yes No
We (Northsiders) want the same things that people in other parts of Minneapolis want - beautiful spaces, access to the water, places to eat…+ River Use (yes) would stay away from the river - River Use (no)
27
Theme
OTHER IDEAS
RESULTS
OTHER IDEAS
28
Baseball Soccer Field Sports (General) Other Field Sports Court Sports (General) Basketball Fitness Ice Skating Skate Park Biking Walking/Trails Picnic Purchase Food Views/Views of the Water Boating Swimming Fishing Interact with Water Playground Urban Ag Winter Activity Relics Dog Park Music/Performance Visual Art
29
Activities and Uses by Engagement Period
20 40 60 80 100 120 Soccer Dog Park Ice Skating Fitness Interact with Water Skatepark Winter Activity Playground Views/View of Water Court Sports (general) Swimming Fishing Urban Arg. Biking Boating Purchase Food Walking /'Trails' Picnic Basketball Field Sports (General) Market Other Field Sports Movies Baseball Farmers Market Rentals Events/Festivals Fitness Music Garden Pool
Early engagement Pre Concept Post Concept
30
Activities and Uses TIERS
TIER 1 (ABOVE 60 COMMENTS) TIER 2 (~ 40 COMMENTS) TIER 3 (ABOVE 20 COMMENTS) PURCHASE FOOD BOATING WALKING/TRAILS BIKING PICNIC PLAYGROUND URBAN AGRICULTURE WINTER ACTIVITY FISHING VIEWS (VIEWS OF WATER) FIELD SPORTS (GENERAL) MARKET FARMERS MARKET MUSIC INTERACT WITH WATER
31
32
33
themes and principles for The Park @ UHT
post-it-notes and place on board Instructions
Explore themes + principles to guide the development of the program model and design
20 Minutes
34
Interaction with the river Local community use and ownership Recognize historic inequities around UHT and the Mississippi River Natural Spaces for people to use Creating dynamic spaces that can be programmed to accommodate multiple uses Access to food Active and vibrant space Creating connections Gathering Embracing and blurring the river edge Considering and mitigating ‘Green Gentrification’ Space for youth and families Music Pursue environmental justice
35
Discover the questions, details and clarifications that are still needed to drive upcoming community engagement
Instructions
20 Minutes
details and clarifications that you have
them on post-it notes and place on board
36
What are the ways people want to ‘picnic’? Individual vs. group? Purchase food, cook food or bring food in? Is it safe to eat fish out of the Mississippi River? What do people mean when they say ‘natural’? Is this an open green space, a soccer field or a prairie? Should soccer, basketball and other sports be programmed or should there just be space to allow people to play? Since there were so few comments about seniors we should engage with seniors more to figure out how they would like to interact with the site. It seems like there is a desired for a mixture between a designed/natural waterfront? How should these spaces be divided? Should they be mixed or completely separate?
What is missing? What needs further exploration or detail? What needs more information?
37
Community Engagement Summary
.