Public Opinion Survey Results Public Meeting #2 May 11, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

public opinion survey results
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Public Opinion Survey Results Public Meeting #2 May 11, 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Land Acquisition Strategy and Implementation Policy Public Opinion Survey Results Public Meeting #2 May 11, 2017 Background Parks CIP: - Allocated $13 million to Land Acquisition Purpose: - Changing needs / balance development - Proactive


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Land Acquisition Strategy and Implementation Policy

Public Opinion Survey Results

Public Meeting #2 May 11, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Background

Parks CIP:

  • Allocated $13 million to Land Acquisition

Purpose:

  • Changing needs / balance development
  • Proactive approach

First Phase:

  • Strategy for land acquisition
  • Policy & Procedures for Implementation
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Components of LAS Study

Existing Conditions Analysis Survey Needs/Priorities Analysis and Selection Criteria Implementation Policy Confidential Preliminary List of Properties for Acquisition

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Public Opinion Survey Results Presentation

Presentation Topics:

  • Brief Review of Focus Group & Virtual Town

Hall Results

  • Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results

regarding Land Acquisition

  • Needs & Priorities Summary
  • Land Acquisition Methods
  • Next Steps
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Focus Group Results

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Focus Group Results

  • Invited representatives and stakeholders from public and non-profit
  • rganizations that use or advocate for open space
  • Focus group meeting was held March 28th
  • Discussion topics were partnership opportunities, methods of

acquisition, and interactive “Sammamish Bucks” exercise to rank priorities

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Focus Group Results: Partnership Opportunities

  • School Districts (shared use of fields,

environmental education)

  • Work with King County (TDR program,

Conservation Futures)

  • Land trusts, non-profits, private donations,

NGOs

  • Sports organizations
  • Homeowner associations
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Focus Group Results: Key Findings

  • In Active Use category, athletic fields

and waterfront recreation were the highest priorities

  • In Passive Use category, trails were

highest priority

  • In Preservation category, preserving

tree canopy and linking streams and wildlife corridors were the highest priorities

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Statistically- Valid Household Survey Results

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results

  • Mailed to randomized addresses in the City
  • March 6th through March 30th
  • 856 respondents (22% response rate)
  • 40% think there are not enough parks
  • 46% think there are just enough parks
  • Only 9% think there are more than enough

parks

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results Preferred Priorities for Parks and Recreation

33 33 30 25 67 67 70 75 Buy Land for Future Use Conduct Maintenance on Existing Improve/Upgrade Existing New Facilities on Undeveloped Sites

Priority Not a Priority

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results: Preferred Focus

47% 78% 69% 7% Active Use & Recreation Passive Use Preservation Other

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results: Priorities for Active Use/Recreation

58% 57% 47% 55% 43% 8%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Playgrounds Athletic Fields Sports Courts Waterfront Recreation Indoor Recreation Other

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results: Priorities for Passive Use

45% 96% 62% 33% 46% 7%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Picnic Areas Trails Wildlife Viewing Cultural/ Historic Sites Community Gardens Other

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results: Priorities for Preservation

89% 78% 46% 80% 3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Preserving Tree Canopy Linking Streams & Wildlife Corridors Lands in Proximity to Existing Open Spaces Wetlands & Sensitive Areas with Ecological Benefits Other

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Statistically-Valid Household Survey Results: Additional Comments

57% 57% 23% 17% 15% 14% 14% 14% 13%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Urban development Preserve nature/open spaces General positive comments Trails Cost concerns Walkability Sports/recreation Child focused Traffic/roads

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Review of Virtual Town Hall Survey Results

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Virtual Town Hall Survey Results

  • January 27 through

March 21

  • 207 respondents
  • 96% favor land

acquisition for parks,

  • pen space and

community use

42% 87% 83% 11% Active Use Passive Use Preservation Other

Preferred Focus

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Total Responses

Use Category Open Space Use Responses Response Rate Active Use & Recreation Playgrounds 66 32% Athletic Fields 61 29% Sports Courts 51 25% Waterfront Recreation 75 36% Indoor Recreation 61 29% Passive Use Picnic Areas 107 52% Trails 170 82% Wildlife Viewing 147 71% Cultural/Historic Sites 109 53% Community Gardens 108 52% Preservation Preserving Tree Canopy 159 77% Linking Streams & Wildlife Habitat Corridors 145 70% Lands in Proximity to Existing Open Spaces 129 62% Wetlands & Sensitive Areas with Ecological Benefits 147 71%

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Key Findings

  • Most people participated in the survey to give opinions on passive

uses and preservation uses

  • Trails are the highest priority for land acquisition
  • Most responses of all options
  • Most priority 1 ranking of all options
  • Preserving tree canopy is the second-highest priority
  • Second-highest response rate of all options
  • Second-highest number of priority 1 rankings of all options
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Summary of Needs and Priorities

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Summary of Needs and Priorities

Community Priorities for Land Acquisition

  • Passive Recreation Use
  • Trails
  • Wildlife Viewing
  • Preservation/Open Space
  • Preserving Tree Canopy
  • Preserving Wetlands and Sensitive Areas with

Ecological Benefits

  • Linking Streams & Fish/Wildlife Corridors
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Summary of Needs and Priorities

Community Priorities for Land Acquisition

  • Active Use & Recreation
  • Playgrounds
  • Athletic Fields
  • Waterfront Recreation
  • Other Considerations
  • Strategy needs to address approach to land

acquisition for other public needs that may arise

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Land Acquisition Methods

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Land Acquisition Methods: Purchase

Method Definition Fee Simple Purchase The outright purchase of property at market value. Option to Purchase Exclusive right to purchase property, including a purchase price and valid for a specified term. Option holder is not obligated to purchase the property. Right of First Refusal The right to be the first allowed to purchase a property if it’s offered for sale. The holder is not

  • bligated to purchase the property.
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Land Acquisition Methods: Donations

Method Definition Donation The gift of a property. Partial Donation The sale of property for less than market value. Life Estate Donation or sale of property with the seller reserving the right to live on and use the property until death or release of life interest.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Land Acquisition Methods: Other

Method Definition Public Easement A right to use someone’s land for a specific purpose, such as access or conservation. Lease Rental of property for use by the holder for a specified term and cost. Land Trade Trading a City-owned surplus property for a privately-owned property. Dedication Property dedicated by a private property owner or land developer for public use.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Land Acquisition Methods: Other

Method Definition Concomitant Agreement A development agreement setting development conditions for a property. Partnerships Agreement for public use between agencies or multiple parties/property owners. Eminent Domain/ Condemnation Compulsory purchase of a property at fair market value for a specific public purpose.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Land Acquisition Methods: Other

Method Definition Transfer of Development Rights Voluntary, incentive- based program that allows landowners to sell development rights from their land to a developer to increase density of a development at another location Conservation Futures Program County managed program focused on preserving critical open space within King County.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Next Steps

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Next Steps – Future Meeting Dates

Selection Criteria and Acquisition Strategy:

  • Joint City Council/Parks Commission

Meeting—June 13, 2017

  • 3rd Public Meeting—June 14, 2017
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Next Steps – Future Meeting Dates

Introduction/Adoption of Implementation Policy:

  • City Council Regular Meeting—July 11, 2017
  • City Council Regular Meeting—July 18, 2017
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Land Acquisition Strategy and Implementation Policy

Public Opinion Survey Results

Public Meeting #2 May 11, 2017

Thank You

https://www.sammamish.us/parks-recreation/park-planning-projects/land-acquisition- strategy-implementation-policy/site-nomination-form/

Land Acquisition Site Nomination Online Form (web address)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Open Space Use Categories

  • Active Use & Recreation
  • Playgrounds
  • Athletic Fields
  • Sports Courts
  • Waterfront Recreation
  • Indoor Recreation
  • Passive Use
  • Preservation
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Open Space Use Categories

  • Active Use & Recreation
  • Passive Use
  • Picnic Areas
  • Trails
  • Wildlife Viewing
  • Cultural & Historic Sites
  • Community Gardens
  • Preservation
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Open Space Use Categories

  • Active Use & Recreation
  • Passive Use
  • Preservation
  • Preserving Tree Canopy
  • Linking Streams and Fish/Wildlife Corridors
  • Lands in Proximity to Existing Open Spaces
  • Wetlands and Sensitive Areas with Ecological

Benefit

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Virtual Town Hall Survey Results: Priorities for Active Use/Recreation

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Playgrounds Athletic Fields Sports Courts Waterfront Recreation Indoor Recreation

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Virtual Town Hall Survey Results: Priorities for Passive Use

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Priority 5 Picnic Areas Trails Wildlife Viewing Cultural/Historic Sites Community Gardens

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Virtual Town Hall Survey Results: Priorities for Preservation

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 Preserving Tree Canopy Linking Streams and Fish/Wildlife Corridors Lands in Proximity to Existing Open Spaces Wetlands and Sensitive areas with Ecological benefit

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Virtual Town Hall Survey Results: Preferred Location for Acquisition

SE Quad, 46% SW Quad, 38% NE Quad, 38% NW Quad, 38% None, 21%