SR 710 North Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 18 March - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
SR 710 North Study Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 18 March 11, 2015 Stakeholder Outreach Advisory Committee Meeting No. 14 March 12, 2015 1 1 1 1 Agenda Public Outreach Activities Recap of TAC No. 17 and SOAC No. 13
1
Technical Advisory Committee Meeting No. 18– March 11, 2015 Stakeholder Outreach Advisory Committee Meeting No. 14– March 12, 2015
1
1
2
3
4
5
La Crescenta
6
US Congress Members: Adam Schiff, Xavier Becerra, Judy Chu, Janice Hahn, Lucille Roybal-Allard State Senators: Kevin De Leon, Ed Hernandez, Carol Liu State Assembly Members: Mike Eng, Jimmy Gomez, John Perez, Chris Holden Los Angeles Country Board of Supervisors: Michael Antonovich, Gloria Molina, Hilda Solis Los Angeles City Council: Jose Huizar, Gil Cedillo, Eric Garcetti, Antonio Villaraigosa Local Elected Officials: Luis Ayala (Alhambra), John Fasana (Duarte), John Kennedy (Pasadena), Dennis Kneier (San Marino), David Lau (Monterey Park), Steve Madison (Pasadena), Barbara Messina (Alhambra), Ara Najarian (Glendale), Jacque Robinson (Pasadena), Stephen Sham (Alhambra)
7
8
10 AM -11 AM Map Viewing 11 AM to 4 PM Public Hearing
5 PM- 6 PM Map Viewing 6 PM to 9 PM Public Hearing
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Connector Rd
Ramps
Del Mar Ave to California Blvd
(2014 dollars)
17
18
between East Los Angeles and Pasadena
and both directions)
during off-peak
Montebello Metrolink Stations
19
miles of tunnels
using pressurized Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)
guidelines
stations
20
Protection Association (NFPA) guidelines
portals
21
tunnel
cover tunnel
segments
22
23
24
25
General Plans
26
27
28
10 20 30 40 50 60 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Acquisitions
Acquisitions
Partial Acquistions Full Acquistions 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Relocations/Employee Displacements
Relocations
Business Relocations Employee displacements
1 business displaced
29
50 100 150 200 250 300 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Number of Parking Space Losses
Temporary Parking Space Loss
Temporary 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Number of Parking Space Losses
Permanent Parking Space Loss
Permanent (All Hours) Permanent (Peak Period)
30
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Number of Jobs
Operation/ Maintenance Jobs
Operation/ Maintenance Jobs $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Employment Earnings (Millions)
Annual Operation/ Maintenance Employment Earnings
Annual Operation/ Maintenance Employment Earnings
31
10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000
TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual)
Number of Jobs
Construction Jobs
Construction Jobs
$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $3,000 $3,500 $4,000
TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual)
Employment Earnings (Millions)
Construction Employment Earnings
Construction Employment Earnings
32
$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000 $80,000
TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual)
Revenue Loss
Property and Sales Tax Revenue Loss
Annual Property Tax Revenue Loss Annual Sales Tax Revenue Loss
33
TSM/TDM BRT LRT Freeway Tunnel Physical change/visible impacts Minor Low Moderately low to moderate Moderately low to moderate Lighting Minimal Minimal Low None Glare Minimal Minimal Low Minimal Shade/Shadow None Minimal Low Minimal Noise barrier visual impact Low to high Moderate to high Low to high Moderate to high
34
Proposed Bus Rapid Transit Lane (BRT) at 245 Fair Oaks Avenue in South Pasadena Light Rail Transit crossing the I-10 Freeway Freeway Tunnel proposed northern portal LRT maintenance yard at Valley Blvd.
View simulation does not include aesthetic treatments.
35
Existing Condition Existing Condition Freeway Tunnel: Proposed View at W. Colorado Blvd. Freeway Tunnel: Proposed Operation Maintenance Building (OMC)
View simulation does not include aesthetic treatments.
36
37
TSM/TDM BRT LRT Freeway Tunnel
Fault rupture, seismically- induced ground motion, liquefaction, and/or landslides Yes Yes Yes Yes Naturally occurring oil or gas encountered during construction Low Potential Low Potential Low to Moderate Potential Low to Moderate Potential Settlement above and adjacent to tunnel due to tunnel boring NA NA Low Potential Low Potential
38
Subject Property No. Facility Alternative(s) Affected
1
Former Circle K Stores BRT
2
Fashion Master Cleaners BRT, LRT, TSM/TDM (I-10)
3
Railroad ROW TSM/TDM (Other Road Improvement T-1)
4
Elite Cleaners BRT, LRT
5
Blanchard Landfill LRT
6
Mercury Die/ Mission Corrugated LRT, Freeway Tunnel, TSM/TDM (Other Road Improvement T-1)
5 4 1 3 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 6
39
40
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2012 Existing No Build (2020) TSM/TDM BRT Project Study Area (lbs/day)
2020 Opening Year
CO ROG Nox PM10 PM2.5
41
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2012 Existing No Build (2025) LRT FWY (single) with Tolls FWY (single) with Tolls and No Trucks FWY (single) with Tolls and Express Bus FWY (dual) No Tolls FWY (dual) No Trucks FWY (dual) With Tolls Project Study Area (lbs/day)
2025 Opening Year
CO ROG Nox PM10 PM2.5
42
20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 2012 Existing No Build (2035) TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) with Tolls FWY (single) with Tolls and No Trucks FWY (single) with Tolls and Express Bus FWY (dual) No Tolls FWY (dual) No Trucks FWY (dual) With Tolls Project Study Area (lbs/day)
2035 Horizon Year
CO ROG Nox PM10 PM2.5
43
TSM/TDM BRT LRT Freeway Tunnel Single-bore Dual-bore 27 receptors approach or exceed NAC 9 receptors approach or exceed NAC 12 moderate impact receptors 5 severe impact receptors 66 receptors approach or exceed NAC 75 approach or receptors exceed NAC
44
2 4 6 8 10 12 TSM/TDM BRT LRT FWY (single) FWY (dual) Number of Noise Barriers
Recommended Noise Barriers
Recommended Noise Barriers for the Build Alternative*
*Includes Recommended Noise Barriers for the TSM/TDM Improvements
45
46
47
existing conditions
shifting of traffic for each of the build alternatives, etc.
reduction in the future
the ventilation structure
dispersion
48
49
50
51
52
52
53
54
55
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Additional roadway capacity attracts traffic from local streets (served by freeways).
Alternative/Variation
Lower is better
55
56
Regional VMT changes are near zero, as traffic is redistributed.
Lower is better
Alternative/Variation
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
56
57
Study area travel time (VHT) drops as more roadway capacity is added, even though VMT increases.
Alternative/Variation
Lower is better
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
57
58
All alternatives serve more north-south travel.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
58
59
Arterial traffic volume is reduced with the freeway tunnel compared to transit alternatives.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
Lower is better
59
60
Additional freeway capacity serves more vehicle trips.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
Higher is better 60
61
Arterial VMT is reduced when freeway capacity is increased.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
Lower is better
61
62
The percent of long (cut-through) trips on local streets is reduced up to half when freeway capacity is increased.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
Lower is better
62
63
Linked transit trips (a measure of additional use of transit) is highest for the LRT. The bus service improvements with the TSM/TDM provide benefits for all alternatives.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
Higher is better 63
64
North-south transit travel in the study area is approximately the same for all alternatives.
Toll values ($4 and $1) are preliminary, based on those used for traffic analysis. These tolls were set to achieve optimized traffic volumes at high speeds, to maximize person-throughput. Refined tolls (and revenues) would have to be determined in a future, formal “Traffic and Revenue” study.
Alternative/Variation
Higher is better 64
65
66
67
68
69