Solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus inerea - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus inerea - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Solu ii pentru publicarea lucr rilor de cercetare i sus inerea procesului de selec ie a revistelor n Romnia Massimiliano Carloni Bucharest, 26 th April 2017 AGENDA 1. A bit of History 2. The Clarivate Strategy 3. Emerging Source


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Soluții pentru publicarea lucrărilor de cercetare și susținerea procesului de selecție a revistelor în România

Massimiliano Carloni Bucharest, 26th April 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA

  • 1. A bit of History
  • 2. The Clarivate Strategy
  • 3. Emerging Source Citation Index (ESCI)
  • 4. The Key Value: Data Indexing
  • 5. The Added Value: Data Processing
  • 6. Journal Citation Report
  • 7. InCites Benchmarking & Analytics
  • 8. Q&A
slide-3
SLIDE 3

In Memoriam of the Grandfather of Google

slide-4
SLIDE 4

A bit of History

slide-5
SLIDE 5

A bit of History

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Growth Strategies

Keeping the Core very selective Adding “external” layers

Expanding Coverage

Recognize diversity inside the Core Adding “new” research products

Going Beyond Papers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Core Collection WoS Core Collection Main indexes ESCI Regional Indexes

The Web of Science Universe

Data Citation Index Derwent Innovation Index Other Databases

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-E) 1900 Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) 1900 Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) 1975 Conference Proceedings Citation Index (CPCI) 1990 Current Chemical Reactions (CCR) 1985 Index Chemicus (IC) 1993 Book Citation Index (BkCI) 2005 Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) 2015

12,870* journals ~9.5 million records 80k books ~1.15 million bk chapters 5,200 indexed journals

65.5 million records

Web of Science Core Collection

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A very different strategy

SCIE SSCI AHCI 12,870 ESCI 5,200 Unique titles BIOSIS & ZR 5,000 Unique titles Regional Citation Indexes- 4,500 Unique titles

Main Competito r

27,500 Journals* 22,747

A “content sets” (layer) strategy to not mix up quantity with quality

*Excluding Hosted Content (Medline, CABI, FSTA, Inspec)

139m records in a network of more than 1bn cited references

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Overall Figures

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why being so selective ?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

As a result, the core literature of all scientific disciplines involved a group of not more than 1,000 journals and may even possibly be reduced to as few as 500 journals (1972). A relatively small number of journals account for the bulk of what is published and what is cited. - E. Garfield

A relatively small number of journals publish the majority of significant scholarly results

  • Selectivity. Scientific Theory
slide-13
SLIDE 13

76,056

slide-14
SLIDE 14

N°of Peer Reviewed Journals Number of Predatory Journals Number of Fraudolent Papers 25,500* 76,056

Ulrich’s- April 2017

~1,000

Jeffrey Beall –January 2017

There are too many journals and digital publishing allowed market access to low level journals

  • Selectivity. Practical reasons

Number of Articles per year ~12-14M

Daniele Fanelli, 2009

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Do you really think journals are equal?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Are journals equal ?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Are journals equal ?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

How to preserve selectivity and same time expand the collection ?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Expanding the Core. Emerging Science Citation Index “ESCI has a positive effect on research assessment and it accelerates communication in the scientific community”

Early Insight on the ESCI: an overlay map-based bibliometric study Scientometrics, 18 March 2017

Started in 2015 Currently indexing ~5,200 journals from +2,700 publishers (1,500 NEW) + 100 countries (23 NEW) represented 46% of ESCI titles not indexed by main competitor

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Expanding the Core. Emerging Science Citation Index

Research output from 200+ countries 80% of the Research

  • utput is from outside

North America 53% of the research

  • utput is outside North

America and Western Europe

Global research coverage enhanced by Emerging Sources Citation Index (Author addressed in ESCI)*

Region # Countries per region Africa 55 Asia Pacific 30 Eastern Europe 27 India 1 Middle East 22 North America 3 Latin America 35 Western Europe 26

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Expanding the Core. Emerging Science Citation Index

ESCI breakout by subject categories

Social sciences Arts & Humanities Clinical medicine Physics Engineering Ecology and environment Life sciences

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • ESCI. The selection criteria

§ BASIC ESCI EDITORIAL ATTRIBUTES ̶ All content must meet key selection criteria ̶ Same features and rigorous indexing standards as other Core Collection editions ̶ Cover-to-cover indexing (authors, institutions, etc.) ̶ True Citation Index, capturing times cited and cited references ̶ Objective and neutral selection

Evidence of peer review Adherence to ethical publishing prac7ces Recommended by regional domain experts Preferred electronic formats (XML / PDF) for accuracy

KEY ESCI SELECTION CRITERIA

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Selectivity. The new selection process

http://wokinfo.com/publisher_relations/journals/? utm_source=false&utm_medium=false&utm_campaign=fal se

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Selectivity. The new criteria
slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • Selectivity. The Editors

18 Full Time Clarivate Employees No one of them is a journal editor

  • r publishes

12 main languages covered fluently Be-weekly meetings

No conflict of interest Continuous monitoring

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Selectivity. The Results

10 - 12% Accepted for flagship indexes 56% Accepted for ESCI

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Selectivity. The Results
slide-28
SLIDE 28
  • Selectivity. The Results
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Reasons for Rejection

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Romanian Indexed Journals

SCI-E SSCI AHCI Journals 43 10 7 ESCI Ac7ve 34 Pending 32 Rejected 12

slide-31
SLIDE 31

What’s new

slide-32
SLIDE 32

UI Light Redesign

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Expanding the Coverage. The Regional Indexes

Regional Citation Indexes complement the global coverage of the Web of Science Core Collection, focusing on the top research in the key knowledge economies. Our regional indexes offer both English and local language content and local language search interfaces and are curated by independent authorities § Chinese Science Citation Database § KCI Korean Journal Database § Russian Science Citation Index § SciELO Citation Index

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Expanding the Coverage. The Regional Indexes

slide-35
SLIDE 35

“There is no point that the +50-years success of Web of Science Core Collection is due to the value of the data”

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Value of the Data – The Four Pillars

Cover to cover All authors & affiliations All Cited References Funding Data Document Types Category Schemes

Selectivity Indexing Coverage Process

Consistenc y is the key A different level of metadata capture

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Indexing – the Key Value

“The data recorded in the SCI and SSCI [in the Web of Science] is generally more curated than the data in SCOPUS.”

slide-38
SLIDE 38

122 vs 186

slide-39
SLIDE 39

EVERY ISSUE OF ANY COVERED JOURNAL IS INDEXED WITH NO CONTENT GAPS EVERY DOCUMENT OF ANY PUBLISHED ISSUE IS INDEXED (all contributions included). Indexing – Cover to Cover

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Indexing – Cover to Cover

slide-41
SLIDE 41

ALL AUTHORS AND ALL AFFILIATIONS ARE CAPTURED AND RECEIVE FULL CREDIT

“Indicators based on co-authorships are highly influenced by the quality of the information about the address of authors of each

  • paper. This report shows that the quality of data in SCOPUS is

lower including the important fact that some authors appear to be missing”

Indexing – Authors and Affiliations

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Indexing – Authors and Affiliations

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Indexing – Cited References

More than 1bn cited references

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Indexing – Document Type Documents are indexed directly from the publisher: all content stems from direct indexing (not from an aggregation of 3rd party materials)

  • Doc. Types are assigned at the

section level. The rules about how sections are defined (considering abstracts, citation density, article length, etc) are kept in a separate authority file for each journal.

Documents not necessarily maintain the Doc Type assigned by publishers that cannot “play” to influence the journal metrics. Clarivate doesn’t defer classification authority to them.

“The classification of document by source type and by document type in Scopus is imperfect and cannot be used directly to identify all relevant papers in the database”

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Indexing – New Document Types Traditionally, “Retracted Publications” have been identified only via a title amendment that included the notification of retraction in the title. This lead to it being difficult to find, or filter, on “Retracted Publications” in WoS and InCites.

  • Published notice stating why

article has been retracted

  • Links to original article via Cited

References

  • Original article title has “Retracted

Article” added (Dual Doctype)

  • Links to retraction notice via Citing

Items

Retraction Retracted Publication

slide-46
SLIDE 46

LAUNCH OF A NEW DOC TYPE: DATA PAPER Indexing – New Document Types

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Indexing – Categorization

Large - Scale Analysis of the Accuracy of the Journal Classification Systems of Web of Science and Scopus (Wang, Waltman, 2016)

Almost 60% of all journals In WoS belong to one category, whereas in Scopus more than 60% of Journals are assigned to two or more categories

In Scopus journals are assigned to categories with which they are

  • nly weakly connected much more frequently than in WoS
slide-48
SLIDE 48

Indexing – Funding Data

Funding acknowledgments are captured on SCI-E for what concerns articles and reviews since August 2008. Funding acknowledgments are captured on SSCI for all document types since March 2015.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

“Curating a world class database is not only indexing data, it also means processing them to add value to the community”

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Processing the Data

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Istitutional Name Identification

In WoS- CC more than 6,000 istitutions are carefully unified: this harmonizes the different ways an institution name is stated into one “organisation enhanced” preferred name, creating a list of variances and a set of rules.

CNRS, for instance, has hundreds of variances and thousands of rules Nothing comparable exists

1

Processing - Affiliation

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Istitutional Name Identification

Unification Rules are built and validated in collaboration with institutions. The procedure leverages many data elements from each publication through semi-automated process as well as the collaboration with the organisations. 2

Processing - Affiliation

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Author Name Disambiguation

In 2008 “Full Author Names” have been introduced in lieu of “Block Names” (last name + first name initial)

Authors and their address affiliations are linked together since 2008

The correct way to write an author name, is the following format: Last name, First name / First initial

Names are ambiguous (Eastern countries, Spain, etc…)

Almost 200 million authorships in WOS Core Collection. Need of methods able to scale up millions of papers.

Processing - Authors

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Author Name Disambiguation

More data points. A machine learning (assigning weights) algorithm

Processing - Authors

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Author Name Disambiguation

Distinct Author Sets

Processing - Authors

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Author Identifiers

+ 830,000 + 15,000 +8,400,000

ResearcherID profiles RID monthly growth rate WoS-CC records with a RID

slide-57
SLIDE 57

+ 3,000,000 + 85,000 +7,700,000

ORCID profiles ORCID monthly growth rate WoS-CC records with an ORCID

Author Identifiers

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Author Identifiers – RID adoption (TOP 10 countries)

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Author Identifiers – RID adoption

Romania is 24th in the world for what concerns RID adoption

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Funding data unification

Funding unification is currently available

  • n InCites 2.0.

As usual it’s a collaborative

  • effort. A funding

unification file is available for doublecheck and validation. Funding agencies could act as affiliations (intramural activities) or funded bodies . Around 700 funding agencies have been unified with the possibility to exploit a hierarchical structure.

Processing – Funding agencies

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Key world plus

For each article some keyword metadata are added looking at the titles of references cited by the article.Especially important for discoverability when author keywords are missing

Open Access

All journals indexed on DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) are flagged as Open Access (following the gold road). Especially important for retrieving articles free of charge for the readers

Multidisciplinary re-classification

In InCites all articles belonging to the “multidisciplinary” categories are possibly reassigned to a not “multidisciplinary” category looking at the cited references (more stable respect to the citations). Especially important for evaluation purposes

Processing – Other

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Data cleansing (article, citation counts...)

Unique Cited Title Citation Variants

Citation Aggregation

“Currently, the Thomson Reuters production system includes over 210,000 variant title entries, for the resolution of citations to nearly 30,000 current and historic preferred titles. The average entry for a covered journal contains 10 variants, but approximately 1% of preferred titles require more than 50 variants”

JIF is a reflection of the citation performance of a journal as a whole unit, not as an assembly of diverse published items

Processing – Citations

slide-63
SLIDE 63

“Journal names and ISSN have been thoroughly standardized in the WoS, but only partially in SCOPUS. Volume, issue and pages are more standardized in the WoS than in SCOPUS”

Errors are quite common when dealing with citations (i.e. bibliographic data)

Indexing – Cited References

slide-64
SLIDE 64

11,365

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Journal Citation Reports – Impact Factor

2014 2015 2013 2012 2016 2015 Impact Factor: Ratio of citations from 2015 to citable items published in 2013-2014

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Which citations are we taking in consideration?

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Journal Citation Reports – Evolution

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Journal Citation Reports – Transparency

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Journal Citation Reports – Analyse & Compare

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Understand the difference between categories

Journal rankings and comparisons are meaningful

  • nly within each category (not between categories).
slide-71
SLIDE 71

Understand the difference between categories

slide-72
SLIDE 72

A complete set of metrics

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Be aware of Imitations

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Have all WoS- CC journals an Impact Factor ?

slide-75
SLIDE 75

JCR vs WoS-CC

JCR us WoS

3 years needed for IF Arts & Humanities ESCI Name Changes Self-citations & Stacking

http://ipscience-help.thomsonreuters.com/incitesLiveJCR/JCRGroup/titleSuppressions.html

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Suppressed Titles (Self Citation)

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Suppressed Titles (Stacking)

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Citation Normalization

Discipline citation patterns vary by subject category Time citations accrue

  • ver time and at

different rates Document Type citations vary by document type For accurate and fair research assessment, citation data have to be normalized by discipline, year and publication type. For each article, the EXPECTED CITATION RATE is first calculated, then the normalized indicators.

Processing – Citations

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Field Baselines/Percentiles – Essential Science Indicators

slide-80
SLIDE 80

ESI TOP PAPERS – Essential Science Indicators

slide-81
SLIDE 81

HIGHLY CITED RESEARCHERS

slide-82
SLIDE 82

RESEARCH FRONTS

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Some figures for Romania

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Top Romanian Journals by IF

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Top Romanian Journals by Average Percentile

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Top Journals by publications of Romanian Authors

2006-2016

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Top Journals by publications of Romanian Authors

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Top OA Journals by publications of Romanian Authors

Trend

slide-89
SLIDE 89

In Which Journals Romanian Authors outperform average

>100 papers

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Journal Normalized Citation Impact

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Article Level Metrics

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Upload a Dataset

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Local Journal Utilization Report

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Do you know which are the most cited chemical journals by your authors ?

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Unvaluable support for your selection

2011-2016 ESI CHEMISTRY

slide-96
SLIDE 96

ENDNOTE – Publish your paper

Search thousands of online databases directly or use direct export from research database tool Organize and store your publica7on lists, PDFs, notes. Sync and access across Windows, Mac and iPad. Use the built-in bibliography maker to create and format cita7ons in over 6,000+ styles. Share your research with colleagues and team members across departments or across the world.

Product Details: http://endnote.com

slide-97
SLIDE 97

ENDNOTE is not a single product

slide-98
SLIDE 98

ENDNOTE – Manuscript Matcher

New Journal Matching Feature suggests top candidates for manuscript

  • submission. Sophisticated algorithm

utilizes the following for journal recommendations:

  • Title
  • Abstract
  • References (Optional)

Leverages meticulously indexed data from thousands of journals indexed within the Web of Science

MANUSCRIPT MATCHER PRODUCT DETAILS: http://endnote.com/product-details/manuscript-matcher

slide-99
SLIDE 99

ENDNOTE – Manuscript Matcher

Match Score Prioritizes Journals Current JCR Impact Factor & 5-yr Impact Factor Open-Access Journal Indicator Suggested Journal Name View Similar Articles within Suggested Journal Submit Manuscript to Journal Publisher Access Journal Details via Publisher Provide Feedback on Suggestions

slide-100
SLIDE 100

ENDNOTE – Manuscript Matcher

Access JCR Categories Rank in Category Quartile in Category Journal Publisher Details Displayed Top Keywords Ranked

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Thanks !

massimiliano.carloni@clarivate.com linkedin.com/in/mcarloni

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Soluții pentru publicarea lucrărilor de cercetare și susținerea procesului de selecție a revistelor în România