Results for the Quarter ended 30 June 2019 Cautionary Statement on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

results for the quarter ended 30 june 2019 cautionary
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Results for the Quarter ended 30 June 2019 Cautionary Statement on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Results for the Quarter ended 30 June 2019 Cautionary Statement on Forward Looking Information Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this presentation, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Results for the Quarter ended 30 June 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Cautionary Statement on Forward Looking Information

Certain information contained or incorporated by reference in this presentation, including any information as to our strategy, projects, plans or future financial or operating performance, constitutes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target”, “plan”, “objective”, “assume”, “intend”, “project”, “pursue”, “goal”, “continue”, “budget”, “estimate”, “potential”, “may”, “will”, “can”, “could”, “would”, “should” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. In particular, this presentation contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, with respect to: Barrick’s forward-looking production guidance; estimates of future cost of sales per ounce for gold and per pound for copper, total cash costs per ounce and C1 cash costs per pound, and all-in-sustaining costs per ounce/pound; cash flow forecasts; projected capital, operating and exploration expenditures; mine life and production rates; estimated timing for construction of, and production from, new projects; anticipated gold production from the Deep South Project; potential benefits of the Nevada joint venture, including potential synergies; timing of completion of feasibility study for Goldrush and Fourmile; the potential for plant expansion at Pueblo Viejo to increase throughput and convert resources into reserves; our pipeline of high confidence projects at or near existing operations; potential for existing or newly acquired and/or developed assets to become Tier One gold assets; potential mineralization and metal or mineral recoveries;

  • ur ability to convert resources into reserves; our project pipeline and results of our greenfield and brownfield exploration work; expectations regarding timing of completion of the acquisition of the minority interest in Acacia; asset sales,

joint ventures and partnerships and other statements, including regarding our non-core assets; potential future transactions, including with respect to KCGM; and expectations regarding future price assumptions, financial performance and

  • ther outlook or guidance.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions including material estimates and assumptions related to the factors set forth below that, while considered reasonable by the Company as at the date of this presentation in light of management’s experience and perception of current conditions and expected developments, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements and information. Such factors include, but are not limited to: fluctuations in the spot and forward price of gold, copper or certain other commodities (such as silver, diesel fuel, natural gas and electricity); the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; changes in mineral production performance, exploitation and exploration successes; risks associated with projects in the early stages of evaluation and for which additional engineering and other analysis is required; the duration of the Tanzanian ban on mineral concentrate exports; the ultimate terms of any definitive agreement between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania to resolve a dispute relating to the imposition of the concentrate export ban and allegations by the Government

  • f Tanzania that Acacia under-declared the metal content of concentrate exports from Tanzania and related matters; whether Acacia will approve the terms of any final agreement reached between Barrick and the Government of Tanzania

with respect to the dispute between Acacia and the Government of Tanzania; approval of the Recommended Final Offer by minority shareholders of Acacia, and timing and completion of such transaction; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals, including with respect to Barrick Niugini Limited’s application for an extension to the Porgera mine’s special mining lease the benefits expected from recent transactions being realized, including Nevada Gold Mines; diminishing quantities or grades of reserves; increased costs, delays, suspensions and technical challenges associated with the construction of capital projects; operating or technical difficulties in connection with mining or development activities, including geotechnical challenges and disruptions in the maintenance or provision of required infrastructure and information technology systems; failure to comply with environmental and health and safety laws and regulations; timing of receipt of, or failure to comply with, necessary permits and approvals; uncertainty whether some or all of Barrick's targeted investments and projects will meet the Company’s capital allocation

  • bjectives and internal hurdle rate; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability on the timing of cash flows and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; adverse changes in our credit ratings; the

impact of inflation; fluctuations in the currency markets; changes in U.S. dollar interest rates; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; changes in national and local government legislation, taxation, controls or regulations and/or changes in the administration of laws, policies and practices, expropriation or nationalization of property and political or economic developments in Canada, the United States and other jurisdictions in which the Company or its affiliates do

  • r may carry on business in the future; lack of certainty with respect to foreign legal systems, corruption and other factors that are inconsistent with the rule of law; risks associated with illegal and artisanal mining; the risks of operating in

jurisdictions where infectious diseases present major health care issues; disruption of supply routes which may cause delays in construction and mining activities; damage to the Company’s reputation due to the actual or perceived

  • ccurrence of any number of events, including negative publicity with respect to the Company’s handling of environmental matters or dealings with community groups, whether true or not; the possibility that future exploration results will not

be consistent with the Company’s expectations; risks that exploration data may be incomplete and considerable additional work may be required to complete further evaluation, including but not limited to drilling, engineering and socioeconomic studies and investment; risk of loss due to acts of war, terrorism, sabotage and civil disturbances; litigation and legal and administrative proceedings; contests over title to properties, particularly title to undeveloped properties, or over access to water, power and other required infrastructure; business opportunities that may be presented to, or pursued by, the Company; risks associated with the fact that certain of the initiatives described in this presentation are still in the early stages and may not materialize; our ability to successfully integrate acquisitions or complete divestitures; risks associated with working with partners in jointly controlled assets; employee relations including loss of key employees; increased costs and physical risks, including extreme weather events and resource shortages, related to climate change; and availability and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor. In addition, there are risks and hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration, development and mining, including environmental hazards, industrial accidents, unusual or unexpected formations, pressures, cave-ins, flooding and gold bullion, copper cathode or gold or copper concentrate losses (and the risk of inadequate insurance, or inability to obtain insurance, to cover these risks). Many of these uncertainties and contingencies can affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, us. Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in this presentation are qualified by these cautionary statements. Specific reference is made to the most recent Form 40-F/Annual Information Form on file with the SEC and Canadian provincial securities regulatory authorities for a more detailed discussion of some of the factors underlying forward-looking statements and the risks that may affect Barrick’s ability to achieve the expectations set forth in the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Health & Safety…

Fatality prevention commitments (FPC) programme continued to be implemented during Q2 – focused communication during safety meetings and leadership field engagements saw improvement in safety performance quarter on quarter Lost time injury frequency rate (LTIFR) decreased to 0.52 in Q2 (Q1: 0.61) 49 injuries recorded in Q2 – an improvement in the total recordable injury frequency rate (TRIFR)1 to 2.13 (Q1: 2.74) Ebola steering committee established at Watsa, NE DRC, for effective prevention of the outbreak spreading - Kibali continues its prevention activities with employees, the local community and along the supply routes Malaria incidence of 4.2%, a 6% increase compared to Q2 2018 – corrective action plan being implemented at Kibali Local partner NGOs continue HIV/AIDS programme throughout African operations offering onsite services at clinic – 3 406 Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCTs) conducted during Q2

*Frequency rates are per 1 000 000 hours worked

0,61 0,52 2,74 2,13 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3

Q1 Q2

2019 Group Injury Rate

LTIFR TRIFR

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Environment & Community…

Zero high significance environmental incidents recorded during the quarter Response to the Church of England’s request for information regarding tailing storage facilities (TSF) prepared and posted to Barrick’s website Independent assurance of Barrick’s sustainability related data, including climate and water, received Veladero recertified ISO 14001 on June 6, with full compliance and no

  • bservations

Porgera obtained recertification for International Cyanide Management Code at the end of May 2019 Malian government approved the Loulo-Gounkoto solar project environmental report and authorized the project to move forward Group withdrew 1.5 cubic metres of water per tonne of ore processed; average water use efficiency of 66% $5.85 million spent on community investment projects during Q2, including significant investment in refurbishment of Paiam hospital in Porgera 2018 consolidated Sustainability Report published today

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Q2 highlights…

Another strong quarter points to annual production at top end of guidance range and costs at lower end Debt, net of cash unchanged at $3.7bn, after payment of Q1 dividend Net earnings of $0.11 per share increased quarter on quarter; adjusted net earnings per share2 of $0.09 in line with consensus Copper operations continue efficiency improvements with AISC3 down 7% Nevada Gold Mines JV closed July 1 and set to deliver forecast synergies with positive impact on production

  • utlook for the year

Pueblo Viejo progresses plant expansion prefeasibility study expected by year end African and LatAm operations deliver as Loulo-Gounkoto joins Kibali and Veladero with strong performance Drilling at Fourmile returns best-ever borehole intersection; Loulo-Gounkoto and Kibali on track for further brownfields expansion to replace depletion Agreement reached on Recommended Final Offer for shares in Acacia not already owned by Barrick ICSID arbitration award represents significant milestone in recognition of Reko Diq project value Sustainability Report underscores group’s commitment to environmental and social goals Decrease in Lost Time and Total Recordable Injury Frequency Rate from Q1 $0.04 per share quarterly dividend maintained for Q2

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Group operating results…

Gold production in-line with the solid base set in Q1 2019, driven by strong performances at Loulo-Gounkoto, Veladero and Kibali Expected annual gold production at upper end of 2019 group guidance and cost metrics at the lower end of ranges Copper production slightly lower than Q1 2019, primarily as a result of lower production at Lumwana Despite this, group C1 cash costs and AISC were lower quarter on quarter Production recovered at Lumwana in June Gold operating results

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Production (oz 000) 1,353 1,367 1,067 Cost of sales ($/oz)4 964 947 882 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 651 631 605 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 869 825 856

Copper operating results

Production (millions of pounds) 97 106 83 Cost of sales ($/lb)4 2.04 2.21 2.45 C1 cash costs ($/lb)5 1.59 1.66 2.10 All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)5 2.28 2.46 3.04

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Group financial results…

Adjusted net earnings of $0.09 per share2 (Q2 2018: $0.07) slightly down on Q1 following lower copper revenue and earnings Net cash provided by operating activities of $434 million On July 15, 2019, Barrick repurchased $248 million of principal of 4.95% notes due 2020 Reduced total debt to < $5.6 billion subsequent to quarter end Annualized interest saving of approximately $12 million Tethyan Copper Company (a joint venture held equally by Barrick and Antofagasta) awarded $5.84 billion in damages in relation to arbitration claims on Reko Diqi

Financial Results Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018

Revenue ($ million)

2,063 2,093 1,712

Net earnings (loss) ($ million)

194 111 (94)

Adjusted net earnings ($ million)2

154 184 81

Adjusted EBITDA6

972 1,002 679

Net cash provided by operating activities ($ million)

434 520 141

Free cash flow ($ million)7

55 146 (172)

Net earnings (loss) per share ($)

0.11 0.06 (0.08)

Adjusted net earnings per share ($)2

0.09 0.11 0.07

Total attributable capital expenditures ($ million)8,9

359 361 303

Cash and equivalents ($ million) 2,15310 2,153 2,085 Debt, net of cash ($ million) 3,654 3,654 4,307

iNot reflected in our financial accounts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Cortez…

Nevada, USA

Production improved 7% from Q1 2019 primarily due to increased tonnes and grade to the Goldstrike Roaster marginally offset by lower grades through the

  • xide mill as mining from higher grade Cortez Hills

Open Pit (CHOP) was completed in the second quarter Leach production increased as mining and placement

  • f ore from Crossroads open pit ramped up

Costs contained despite the depletion of CHOP Operation continues its transition to a higher proportion of double refractory, underground ore

Cortez Deep South Project

Under the current Life of Mine (LOM) plan, Deep South starts to contribute to Cortez production from 2020, ramping up to approximately 150-250koz (100% basis) from 2022 to 2031 at an estimated average cost of sales of approximately $650/oz and all-in sustaining cost3 of $580/oz Receipt of a Record of Decision (ROD) expected in the second half of 2019 Cortez (100%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Total tonnes mined (000) 31,598 27,572 29,420 Average grade processed (g/t) 1.82 1.66 3.00 Ore tonnes processed (000) 5,014 5,473 3,496 Recovery rate (%) 84% 85% 87% Gold produced (oz 000) 280 262 294 Gold sold (oz 000) 281 259 284 Income ($ millions) 158 155 179 EBITDA ($ millions)6 223 219 264 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8,11 83 76 87 Minesite sustaining8,11 15 13 17 Project8,11 68 63 70 Cost of sales ($/oz) 719 682 653 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 489 433 352 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 561 506 437

See the Technical Report on the Cortez Joint Venture Operations, dated March 22, 2019, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 22, 2019

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Goldstrike…

Nevada, USA

Gold produced decreased 22% primarily due to lower throughput and grade processed through the autoclave as well as lower autoclave recoveries impacted by a higher blend of alkaline ore Lower roaster production as less underground

  • re was available for processing, offset by

increase in Cortez ore processed Combination of Goldstrike and Carlin increases full year guidance range, even on an attributable basis Goldstrike12 (100%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Total tonnes mined (000) 12,138 11,982 16,864 Average grade processed (g/t) 4.26 4.31 3.49 Ore tonnes processed (000) 1,961 2,162 2,033 Recovery rate (%) 71% 78% 75% Gold produced (oz 000) 181 233 170 Gold sold (oz 000) 181 239 160 Income ($ millions) 33 83 14 EBITDA ($ millions)6 86 149 68 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8 54 50 54 Minesite sustaining8 54 50 54 Cost of sales ($/oz)4 1,116 947 1,199 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 769 671 856 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 1,088 891 1,220

See the Technical Report on the Goldstrike mine, dated March 22, 2019, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 22, 2019

Exploration at Goldstrike

Targeting efforts completed in June with all legacy data incorporated into geological model followed by peer review and prioritization Drilling of the targets will commence early in the third quarter

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Turquoise Ridge…

Nevada, USA

Gold production was 16% lower, primarily due to lower ore tonnes mined resulting from unplanned shaft repairs and power interruptions, combined with lower cut off grades Combination with Twin Creeks results in an increase in attributable gold production guidance for the year Turquoise Ridge13 (75%) Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018

Tonnes mined (000) 180 191 165 Average grade mined (g/t) 14.28 15.90 14.76 Recovery rate (%) 91% 94% 92% Gold produced (oz 000) 65 77 69 Gold sold (oz 000) 85 76 58 Income ($ millions) 53 54 28 EBITDA ($ millions)6 62 60 35 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8 19 16 14 Minesite sustaining8 7 7 4 Project8 12 9 10 Cost of sales ($/oz) 665 592 802 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 569 506 692 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 667 592 757

Turquoise Ridge Third Shaft

Construction of the third shaft, which has a hoisting capacity of 5 500 tonnes per day, continues to advance according to schedule and within budget Shaft pre-sink was completed at a depth of 63m out

  • f a total planned depth of 1 052m below collar

Headframe columns erected to 29m of the 43m above collar All three mine hoists installed and nearly mechanically complete

See the Technical Report on the Turquoise Ridge mine, dated March 19, 2018, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 23, 2018

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Nevada Gold Mines JV…

Nevada Gold Mines Joint Venture transaction closed

  • n 1 July, establishing Nevada Gold Mines LLC –

Barrick (operator, 61.5%); Newmont Goldcorp (38.5%) Hosts three of the world’s top 10 Tier One

14 gold

assets

Comprises 12 open pit and 10 underground mines Proven and probable reserves of 48.3Moz15

Progress being made with review of synergies in functional areas

Integrated planning Regional and site-based indirect costs Opex, fleet and maintenance Turquoise Ridge / Twin Creeks complex Supply chain

$450-$500m per yeari

35% 22 % 24% 12% 7% Integrated planning Regional & site-based indirect costs Supply chain TR-TC complex Opex, fleet & maintenance

iFor the first 5 years from 2020

Goldstrike Cove/McCoy JV Robertson Turquoise Ridge South Arturo Cortez Hills Goldrush

Winnemucca Elko

Twin Creeks Pipeline Carlin Phoenix Gold Quarry Emigrant Long Canyon Fourmile

Operations included in Nevada JV

N

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Nevada Gold Mines…Carlin ore movement

  • ptimised

Pete R2 Autoclave Roaster Mill 5 Mill 6 BR19 Exodus Leeville

Former Barrick asset (orebody / processing facility) Former Newmont Goldcorp asset (orebody / processing facility)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Goldrush – Fourmile…drilling closes the gap

Nevada, USA

Update of geological model completed resulting in the merger of the Goldrush and Fourmile models At Fourmile, significant drill intercepts confirm Anna Fault and associated breccia is an important ore control below known resourcei

33.4m @ 44g/t (FM19-34D) 16.6m @ 63g/t (FM19-20D)

Drilling between Goldrush and Fourmile is closing the gapi

7.5m @ 29g/t (FM19-25D) Goldrush - Fourmile Oblique View looking W-SW

RED > 5 g/t YELLOW > 1 g/t Goldrush – Meadow Zone Goldrush

  • Red Hill

Zone Fourmile Dw4 Srm Ohc Oe Ch Fourmile Carve Out

Construction of twin declines continued with each advancing to 1 200m of the planned 4 000m The declines will provide access to the orebody allowing for further drilling and conversion of resources to reserves

Goldrush – twin exploration declines

iSee Appendix A for additional details including assay results for the significant intercepts

slide-14
SLIDE 14

300m

FM19-34D 12.2m @ 12.7g/t 33.4m @ 44.0g/t 12.8m @ 16.9g/t

Fourmile Resource

Fourmile…on track to deliver significant

resource growth

Drilling continued to expand the high grade mineralization with approximately 100m added along strike to the south Drilling in Q2 delineated a new zone of strong and continuous mineralization from targeting of a structural intersection below the resource Highlighting best grades to datei 16.6m @ 63g/t (FM19-20D) 11.4m @ 29.9g/t (FM19-21D) 21.5m @ 40.2g/t (FM19-22D) 30.3m @ 23.2g/t (FM19-24D) 20.1m @ 20.0g/t (FM19-33D) 33.4m @ 44.0g/t (FM19-34D) Expecting more high-grade intercepts Drilling shifting focus to wider spaced step out and scout holes evaluating extensions along north and south

Dhc Dw8 Dw5 Ovi Dw4 FM19-35D FM19-22D FM19-23D FM19-27D FM19-20D FM19-30D FM19-24D FM19-26D FM19-33D FM19-28D FM19-32D FM19-29D FM19-36D 5400 LEVEL

Resource Inventory Breccia Drilling Results pending Results received

Barrick Nevada Gold Mines FM19-25D FM18-54D Reported Q1 2019 FM19-21D FM19-34D Section line

Cross section looking north Plan view – geology at 5 400 level

100m

N

iSee Appendix A for additional details including assay results for the significant intercepts

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Hemlo…

Ontario, Canada

Gold production in Q2 2019 in line with the prior quarter as higher throughput was offset by lower grade – on track to achieve guidance All-in sustaining costs per ounce3 increased by 11% compared to prior quarter due to higher costs relating to both underground mining and processing, as well as increase in tailings dam expenditure Hemlo (100%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Ore tonnes processed (000) 779 733 755 Average grade processed (g/t) 2.38 2.49 1.69 Recovery rate (%) 94% 94% 93% Gold produced (oz 000) 55 55 38 Cost of sales ($/oz) 953 906 1,277 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 822 769 1,184 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 1,015 915 1,453

See the Technical Report on the Hemlo Mine, Marathon, Ontario, Canada, dated April 25, 2017, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on April 25, 2017

Exploration at Hemlo

First drill hole of a series testing the down-plunge extent of the C-Zone successfully intersected economic mineralization as predicted C-Zone represents the majority of current resources and underground mill feed at Hemlo New D Zone lodes identified as prospective - close to infrastructure Follow-up drilling will resume in Q3 2019 Potential to add ounces and extend life of mine

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Pueblo Viejo…

Dominican Republic

Gold production in Q2 2019 was 16% lower than prior quarter mainly due to delayed access to higher grade phases of Moore pit as a result of a wall failure, and lower grade reconciliation from the Cumba pit Q2 production also impacted by lower throughput as a result of a scheduled total plant shutdown and unplanned autoclave maintenance Production expected to increase in the second half

  • f 2019 driven by better access to Moore ore and

stronger performance at Cumba following improved reconciliation started in June Currently there are no total plant shutdowns scheduled in the second half of 2019 On track to meet guidance Pueblo Viejo16 (60%) Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018

Open pit tonnes mined (000) 6,116 7,070 6,685 Average grade processed (g/t) 3.56 3.75 3.60 Ore tonnes processed (000) 1,212 1,306 1,171 Recovery rate (%) 90% 89% 91% Gold produced (oz 000) 124 148 123 Gold sold (oz 000) 132 142 125 Income ($ millions) 75 98 67 EBITDA ($ millions)6 104 126 94 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8 18 16 20 Minesite sustaining8 18 16 20 Cost of sales ($/oz)4 852 696 852 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 557 421 524 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 702 543 690

See the Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo mine, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic, dated March 19, 2018, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 23, 2018

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Pueblo Viejo JV upside…expansion to extend

Life of Mine

Expansion study

Proposed expansion includes an extension of the mine’s processing plant and tailings capacity with an estimated initial capital investment approximately $1.3 billion dollars (100% basis) and the potential to extend the life of the mine into the 2030s and beyond Studies and pilot work support a plant expansion that could significantly increase throughput, allowing average annual production of approximately 800 000oz (100%) after 2022 Lower indicative processing costs on the back of the higher throughput, together with unconstrained TSF capacity, shows potential to convert approximately 11Moz of measured and indicated resources to proven and probable reserves Feasibility study for the process plant expansion project expected to be completed during 2020

See the Technical Report on the Pueblo Viejo mine, Sanchez Ramirez Province, Dominican Republic, dated March 19, 2018, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 23, 2018

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Pueblo Viejo…improved geological model

demonstrates upside potential

Geological modeling efforts defined a new stratigraphic and geological framework for PV with more clearly defined key controls to mineralization and potential for extensions - will be used to generate an improved block model and resource estimate to de-risk the expansion project Monte Negro mineralisation occurs at boundary of geochemically distinct andesite - area surrounding andesite to be tested to define upside potential

Identified 3 high grade feeder structures in the pits and 2 additional potential high-grade feeders outside pits

High grade feeder Potential High grade feeder

Monte Negro / Oculto Section

A A’ Expansion Pit Open Mineralisation Potential Open High-grade Breccia Mineralisation

200m 500m

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Veladero…

Argentina

Gold production 7% higher, primarily as a result of leach pad recovery initiatives resulting in improved recoveries on material stacked in prior periods and a reduction in pad inventories. AISC per ounce3 was 5% lower primarily due to lower minesite sustaining capital expenditure On track to meet guidance Veladero (50%) Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018

Open pit tonnes mined (000) 8,184 8,848 9,242 Average grade processed (g/t) 0.75 0.75 0.88 Heap leach ore tonnes processed (000) 2,828 3,416 2,891 Gold produced (oz 000) 75 70 78 Gold sold (oz 000) 74 68 82 Income ($ millions) 12 10 27 EBITDA ($ millions)6 43 40 61 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8 19 40 33 Minesite sustaining8 19 25 33 Project8 15 Cost of sales ($/oz) 1,186 1,195 984 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 746 713 534 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 1,046 1,100 946

For additional detail regarding Veladero, see the Technical Report on the Veladero Mine, San Juan Province, Argentina, dated March 19, 2018, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on March 23, 2018

Projects at Veladero

Valley Leach Facility Phase 6 Expansion work is progressing and is expected to start contributing to production from 2020 to 2028 Power transmission project connecting Veladero with grid power at Pascua is advancing. Upon commissioning in H2 2020, this will have a positive impact on operating costs and help reduce our carbon footprint

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Exploration along the El Indio Belt…

Veladero - Re-logging process and geological model review progressing according to plan

Cuatro Esquinas – near surface results beat expectations and satellite target evaluation continues

Pascua-Lama / Penelope – updating geological model as part of due diligence to review past feasibility studies El Indio Sur Cluster – Rojo Grande, 17 drillholes completed 4 satellite targets tested Other projects – evaluate other opportunities in

  • ther provinces of Argentina and along the

Andean belt

Pascua Lama Chile Argentina Barrick Claims Porphyry Cu-Au Targets HS Au Targets

130km long / 350km2 El Indio Norte Cluster

Veladero

El Indio Sur Cluster

Rio del Medio El Indio Tambo Rojo Grande Penelope Alturas

20km 200km

Collahuasi Abra Chuquicamata Zaldivar Escondida Salvador El Morro Pelambres Pachon Los Bronces Andina Teniente

Argentina Chile

Eocene- Oligocene

Cerro Casale Veladero Pascua Lama

Miocene

Mineralized Belt

N

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Porgera…

Papua New Guinea

Gold production was 8% lower, primarily due to lower throughput partially offset by higher ore grades and the continued reduction of process inventories related to the emptying of the concentrate pond Lower throughput resulting from powerline tower interference that interrupted the mine's power supply, reducing processing capacity during the quarter Full power was restored to site in early July Special Mining Lease extension – National Court of PNG ruled that provisions

  • f 1992 Mining Act applied to the Porgera

gold mine allowing operations to continue while the application to extend its Special Mining Lease, due to expire August 16, is considered Porgera (47.5%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Ore tonnes processed (000) 557 673 389 Average grade processed (g/t) 3.25 3.19 4.21 Recovery rate (%) 90% 96% 78% Gold produced (oz 000) 61 66 41 Cost of sales ($/oz) 1,032 1,031 1,233 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 893 854 846 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 1,112 978 1,183

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Loulo-Gounkoto…delivers solid performance

Mali

Gold production was 15% higher than the prior quarter mainly due to higher grade from the Gounkoto South pit, in line with plan, as well as slightly higher throughput, partially offset by slightly lower recovery On track to meet guidance Brownfields exploration has confirmed the potential to replace depletion and maintain an

  • ngoing 10 year operating plan

Gounkoto underground feasibility study making progress Installation of a 20MW solar power plant underway at Loulo Loulo-Gounkoto17 (80%) Q2 2019 Q1 2019

Total tonnes mined (000) 8,048 8,779 Average grade processed (g/t) 4.74 4.19 Ore tonnes processed (000) 1,034 1,011 Recovery rate (%) 93% 94% Gold produced (oz 000) 147 128 Gold sold (oz 000) 148 128 Income ($ millions) 32 29 EBITDA ($ millions)6 102 76 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8 31 18 Minesite sustaining8 29 18 Cost of sales ($/oz)4 1,072 1,052 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 598 684 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 811 840

See the Technical Report on the Loulo-Gounkoto Gold Mine Complex, Mali dated September 18, 2018 with an effective date of December 31, 2017, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on January 2, 2019

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Loulo District…Tier 1 Destination

First pass auger program to test for in-situ anomalism under suppressive regolith defined several anomalies Most notable anomaly extends over +5km length along the Gefa NS corridor, significantly extending the previously defined 800m long target Another +8km highly prospective corridor defined on margins of albitite intrusive on northern extension of Gounkoto domain boundary Follow up work on these corridors planned for Q3

Depositional Erosional Low laterite Mid-high laterite Transported laterite Erosional slopes Colluvium Residual Deposit Exploration Target

Follow up RC drilling planned to test continuity of mineralisation at Teriya and Teriya SE Sinsinko structure, follow-up RC confirmed high grade mineralisation within two sub-parallel zones

Bena permit Bakolobi permit

Infill drilling completed at Gamaye to advance the target to resource stage. Deeper holes planned to test the down dip upside potential Auger program completed over the southern extension

  • f Koliguinda target confirms continuity of the target

structure over 3km Follow up Aircore and RC drilling planned next field season

Regolith Map

Bambadji permit

Loulo permit Gounkoto permit

Senegal Mali

N

10km

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Financial assessment 100% basis Gold Price ($/oz) 1200 1300 1400 1500 NPV @ 5% $ m 421 550 677 805 IRR % 28% 35% 41% 47% Payback period years 2.6 2.4 2.2 1.9

Massawa…significant upside

Senegal

Application for mining permit underway and the project’s environmental impact study has been approved Update of reserve pricing to $1 200/oz adds 200koz - lower strip ratios, higher proportions of low cost ore fed to the plant result in

  • verall increased project value

A Technical Report to support the feasibility study for the Massawa gold project has been filed on SEDAR dated as of 23 July 2019, prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101i Ongoing exploration in 2019 has identified additional opportunities to further add to the project inventory $1200/oz Ore Reserve Tonnes (Mt) Grade (g/t Au) Contained Gold (Moz) Attributable Gold Moz (83.25%) Total OP Probable 20.9 3.94 2.6 2.2

Sabodala Mine (Teranga Gold) 2.7Moz @ 1.37g/t

Sofia

KB

Tiguida Matiba

Massawa CZ

Samina Delya

Makana 2 Hill Sofia South Makana 2 Bakan

Tin a

Tiwana Thianga

Exploration targets Mineral Reserve Priority exploration targets

Legend

Major structure Mineralisation on structure Felsic intrusives Ultramafics Conductive rocks Siltstones Late dyke

Massawa NZ

10km

N

iFiled on SEDAR at www.sedar.com on July 23, 2019 and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on July 25, 2019.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Kibali…another strong quarter

DRC

Gold production was 2% higher than the prior quarter as a result of slightly higher throughput, in spite of a winder failure during the quarter that restricted ore hoisted through the shaft Stockpile material was available to sustain production AISC3 were 3% lower reflecting lower total cash cost/oz resulting from increased availability of hydropower On track to meet or beat guidance Kibali18 (45%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Total tonnes mined (000) 2,938 3,162 Average grade processed (g/t) 3.88 3.89 Ore tonnes processed (000) 850 840 Recovery rate (%) 89% 89% Gold produced (oz 000) 95 93 Gold sold (oz 000) 95 90 Income ($ millions) 43 10 EBITDA ($ millions)6 74 66 Capital expenditures ($ millions)8 10 10 Minesite sustaining8 10 9 Project8 1 Cost of sales ($/oz)4 868 1,202 Total cash costs ($/oz)3 540 573 All-in sustaining costs ($/oz)3 651 673

See the Technical Report on the Kibali Gold Mine, Democratic Republic of the Congo dated September 18, 2018 with an effective date of December 31, 2017, and filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov on January 2, 2019

Brownfields exploration focused on closing the gap between the Gorumbwa and Sessengue deposits with the relogging of key holes followed by a small diamond program, which is in progress. First hole confirmed geology and intersected three mineralized zones, supporting the continuity of mineralization from Gorumbwa into the gap Ongoing exploration points to replacement of gold depletion

Exploration at Kibali

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Kibali…drilling extends underground

reserve basei

Continuity between Sessenge open pit, Gorumbwa

  • pen pit and KCD UG 9000 lode supports first

stage of potential Super Pit 3000 and 5000 lodes down plunge infill drilling on track to extend the existing UG reserve base Entire system open down plunge over at least 600m from current development 3000 Lode up plunge extension 5000 Lode down plunge 12.64m @ 4.27g/t 9000 Lode Gap Ave drill intersection 9.40m @ 3.24g/t Holes planned Holes completed 11000 Lode Ave drill intersection 20.61m @ 6.08g/t

Haulage Level 5210 rL

3000 Lode down plunge KCD Open Pit20 PB#3 & PB2 North 2018 Proven reserve:1.2Mt@ 2.45g/t for 94koz 2018 Probable reserve 3.2Mt @ 2.32g/t for 238koz Sessenge Open Pit20 2018 Proven reserve:1.7Mt @ 2.71g/t for 148koz 2018 Probable reserve 0.1Mt @ 2.20g/t for 8koz Current Mining Reserves Defined Reserves Current Drilling Reserves Potential Reserves

iSee Appendix B for additional details including assay results for the significant intercepts

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Central and East Africa…potential for

additional Tier One14 discoveries

Barrick set to expand its exploration portfolio across the Congo and Tanzanian cratons Acacia Tanzanian assets to be managed as part of Barrick portfolio after completion of purchase of minority shareholders

Kibali Ngayu Project Bulyanhulu Buzwagi North Mara

500km

N

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Acacia acquisition…summary of terms

On 19 July 2019, Barrick and Acacia jointly announced that they had reached agreement on the terms of Barrick’s offer for the acquisition of the ordinary share capital of Acacia that it did not already own. Barrick’s offer received a unanimous, unqualified recommendation from Acacia’s Board of Directors The acquisition is intended to be implemented by way of a Scheme of Arrangement; see timetable to close below Pursuant to the terms of the Recommended Offer, if implemented, Acacia minority shareholders will receive for every share of Acacia subject to the Scheme : 0.168 New Barrick Shares; and Contingent consideration comprising their pro rata share of net cash proceeds from the sale of Acacia’s exploration properties (excluding Nyanzaga and South Houndé, for which a sales process is already well-advanced), to be paid by way of a special dividend Barrick has undertaken to run a sales process for the exploration properties, to be completed within two years of the Scheme becoming effective All Acacia shareholders (including Barrick) will be entitled to receive Special Dividends

  • Publication of Scheme Document
  • Court Meeting
  • General Meeting
  • Court Hearing
  • Suspension and last day of dealings in and disablement in CREST of Acacia Shares on the LSE
  • Scheme Record Time
  • Effective Date of the Scheme(i)
  • Issue of New Barrick Shares
  • Listing of New Barrick Shares on the TSX and NYSE

12 August 2019 13 September 2019 16 September 2019 17 September 2019 3 September 2019

  • Latest time for lodging Proxy Forms for the Court Meeting and General Meeting
  • Scheme Voting Record Time for the Court and General Meetings

30 August 2019 Following dates indicative & subject to change

  • Cancellation of listing of Acacia Shares on the main market of the LSE

18 September 2019

  • New Barrick Shares registered through DRS
  • Barrick CDIs credited to CREST accounts

19 September 2019

Timetable to Closing

(i) Within 14 days of the Effective Date, dispatch of statements of entitlement relating to New Barrick Shares held through DRS (in respect of Scheme Shares held in certificated form only) and payment of fractional entitlements will occur

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Other gold mines…

Q2 gold production of 61koz in line with the prior quarter Continued exploration of satellite deposits and targets along the Badenou trend in the Tongon lease area to extend three year reserve life by converting near- mine resources to reserves Preliminary pit optimization work on the Djinni target on the Badenou trend confirmed that it remains a potential oxide-ore satellite pit

Tongon (89.7% basis), Côte d'Ivoire Lagunas Norte, Peru Golden Sunlight, Montana, USA Kalgoorlie, Australia (50%)

Gold production of 57koz was 4% higher compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to higher grade and tonnes processed, partially offset by lower recovery 2019 guidance lowered by Newmont Goldcorp (the operator) to reflect the lower mining rates achieved in the first half of the year related to geotechnical constraints In line with Barrick’s strategy to sell non core assets not meeting our investment filters, we intend to initiate a process to explore the sale of our 50 percent stake in the KCGM operation in Western Australia in the third quarter of 2019 Continued under-performance of the dry screening of carbonaceous ore during the current quarter has resulted in a decision to accelerate care and maintenance from the end of 2019 (as per our previous guidance) to end Q3 2019 Focus now on the evaluation of tailings reprocessing to produce gold concentrate Production in Q3 is expected to be minimal and as such, we will cease to include production or non-GAAP cost metrics for this operation going forward

Morila, Mali (40%)

Mining activity has ended at Morila as expected and as such, we will cease to include production or non-GAAP cost metrics for this operation going forward.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Copper mines….

Production was 20% lower was due to repeated tears in main crusher conveyor and subsequent use of lower grade stockpile as mill feed, resulting in a reduction in throughput and grade in the first two months of the quarter Production levels in the final month of the quarter showed a strong recovery

Lumwana, Zambia Jabal Sayid, Saudi Arabia (50%) Zaldívar, Chile (50%)

Production was 6% lower compared to the prior quarter but still exceeded planned levels, primarily due to a decrease in the feed grade in line with the mine plan Concentrate filter expansion project to boost mill throughput by ~25% to 2.4 Mtpa on a 100% basis is underway - completion expected H1 2020, on budget and on time Improved performance resulting in 14% higher production after crusher and conveyor reliability issues experienced in Q1 Chloride leach project progressing in accordance with plan

Lumwana (100%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Copper produced (lbs million) 49 61 47 Cost of sales ($/lb) 2.07 2.16 2.43 C1 cash costs ($/lb)5 1.70 1.67 2.16 All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)5 2.78 2.79 3.13

Jabal Sayid (50%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Copper produced (lbs million) 16 17 13 Cost of sales ($/lb)4 1.45 1.55 1.84 C1 cash costs ($/lb)5 1.22 1.10 1.50 All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)5 1.31 1.30 2.30

Zaldívar (50%)

Q2 2019 Q1 2019 Q2 2018 Copper produced (lbs million) 32 28 23 Cost of sales ($/lb)4 2.32 2.68 2.69 C1 cash costs ($/lb)5 1.61 1.91 2.19 All-in sustaining costs ($/lb)5 1.85 2.12 2.64

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Annual gold production19 at top end of guidance range…

Producing Projects Acacia (63.9% Barrick) Copper producing

Golden Sunlight Nevada Gold Mines (61.5%) Fourmile (100%) Hemlo Pueblo Viejo (60%) Lagunas Norte Massawa (83.25%) Kibali (45%) Kalgoorlie (50%) Porgera (47.5%) Donlin Gold (50%) Jabal Sayid (50%) Zaldivar (50%) Norte Abierto (50%) Pascua-Lama Veladero (50%) Lumwana Loulo-Gounkoto (80%) Morila (40%) Tongon (89.7%) North Mara Bulyanhulu Buzwagi

Reunion

Strategic Alliance

Africa 1 420 – 1 540koz LATAM, Australia, Pacific 1 280 – 1 390koz N America 2 340 – 2 540koz Total forecast annual gold production attributable to Barrick: 5 100koz – 5 600koz

slide-32
SLIDE 32

G&A costs halved relative to previous plans…

Our original market guidance for 2018 was $275 million in corporate administration expenses with G&A headcount

  • f almost 500 people

Following the Randgold merger proposal, in H2 2018 the G&A was cut significantly Notwithstanding the enlarged group after the merger, corporate administration expenses for 2019 were forecast to be $140 million equating to a reduction of almost 50% For H1 2019, corporate administration expenses were $68 million (excluding severances) G&A headcount as at June 30, 2019 is now at ~140 with approximately half of these in Toronto In 2019 we closed offices in Tucson, San Francisco and Buenos Aires and substantially reduced consultant costs In Q2 2019, corporate administration expenses were $40 million, including severances of $10 million

50 100 150 200 250 300 Guidance 2018 Actual 2018 Guidance 2019 Actual Q1 2019 Actual Q2 2019

Corporate administration charges $ million

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Global gold mine supply…2019 - 2029

Industry facing production precipice Very few companies able to deliver value growth in this environment

  • 10

20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

Production Committed Probable Possible Concept Others

Source: AME Research. See Endnote 21 for further information on each category.

Moz

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Disciplined and thoughtful strategy secures six Tier 1 mines14…

Due Diligence - 2 years Deal discipline - zero premium Execution and integration to create world’s most valued gold business operating five Tier 1 mines14 Opportunity and synergy identification – detailed analysis Develop alternative strategy to secure synergies Consolidate management of world’s largest gold complex

EXECUTION and DELIVERY

BARRICK - RANDGOLD NEVADA JV

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Barrick…synonymous with value creation

Index value (September 21, 2018 = 100)

80 90 100 110 120 130 140 150 160 170 180 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19

Barrick Agnico Newmont Gold US$ Spot

72% 68% 25% 25%

Source: Bloomberg

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Endnotes

  • 1. Total reportable incident frequency rate (TRIFR) is a ratio calculated as follows: number of reportable injuries x 1,000,000 hours divided by the total number of hours worked. Reportable injuries include fatalities, lost

time injuries, restricted duty injuries, and medically treated injuries.

  • 2. “Adjusted net earnings” and “adjusted net earnings per share” are non-GAAP financial performance measures. Adjusted net earnings excludes the following from net earnings: certain impairment charges (reversals)

related to intangibles, goodwill, property, plant and equipment, and investments; gains (losses) and other one-time costs relating to acquisitions or dispositions; foreign currency translation gains (losses); significant tax adjustments not related to current period earnings; unrealized gains (losses) on non-hedge derivative instruments; and the tax effect and noncontrolling interest of these items. The Company uses this measure internally to evaluate our underlying operating performance for the reporting periods presented and to assist with the planning and forecasting of future operating results. Barrick believes that adjusted net earnings is a useful measure of our performance because these adjusting items do not reflect the underlying operating performance of our core mining business and are not necessarily indicative of future operating results. Adjusted net earnings and adjusted net earnings per share are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. For further details on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to pages 78-79 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s second quarter 2019 financial statements filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

  • 3. “Total cash costs” per ounce and “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “Total cash costs” per ounce starts with cost of sales applicable to gold production, but excludes

the impact of depreciation, the non-controlling interest of cost of sales, and includes by-product credits. “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce begin with “Total cash costs” per ounce and add further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, sustaining leases, general & administrative costs, minesite exploration and evaluation costs, and reclamation cost accretion and

  • amortization. Barrick believes that the use of “total cash costs” per ounce and “all-in sustaining costs” per ounce will assist investors, analysts and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with

producing gold, understanding the economics of gold mining, assessing our operating performance and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “Total cash costs” per ounce and “All-in sustaining costs” per ounce are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS. Although a standardized definition of all-in sustaining costs was published in 2013 by the World Gold Council (a market development organization for the gold industry comprised of and funded by 26 gold mining companies from around the world, including Barrick), it is not a regulatory organization, and other companies may calculate this measure differently. Starting from the first quarter of 2019, we have renamed "cash costs" to "total cash costs" when referring to our gold operations. The calculation of total cash costs is identical to our previous calculation of cash costs with only a change in the naming convention of this non-GAAP measure. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with IFRS. For further details on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to pages 80-94 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s second quarter 2019 financial statements filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

  • 4. Cost of sales applicable to gold per ounce is calculated using cost of sales applicable to gold on an attributable basis (removing the non-controlling interest of 40% Pueblo Viejo, 20% of Loulo-Gounkoto, 10.3% of

Tongon, 36.1% Acacia and 40% South Arturo from cost of sales and including our proportionate share of cost of sales attributable to our equity method investments in Kibali and Morila), divided by attributable gold

  • unces sold. Also removes the non-controlling interest of 38.5% Nevada Gold Mines from cost of sales from July 1, 2019 onwards. Cost of sales applicable to copper per pound is calculated using cost of sales

applicable to copper including our proportionate share of cost of sales attributable to our equity method investments in Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid, divided by consolidated copper pounds sold (including our proportionate share of copper pounds sold from our equity method investments). The guidance for cost of sales for Carlin, Turquoise Ridge/Twin Creeks, Phoenix and Long Canyon does not include the impact of the Nevada Gold Mines purchase price allocation.

  • 5. “C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are non-GAAP financial performance measures. “C1 cash costs” per pound is based on cost of sales but excludes the impact of depreciation and

royalties and includes treatment and refinement charges. “All-in sustaining costs” per pound begins with “C1 cash costs” per pound and adds further costs which reflect the additional costs of operating a mine, primarily sustaining capital expenditures, general & administrative costs and royalties and production taxes. Barrick believes that the use of “C1 cash costs” per pound and “all-in sustaining costs” per pound will assist investors, analysts, and other stakeholders in understanding the costs associated with producing copper, understanding the economics of copper mining, assessing our operating performance, and also our ability to generate free cash flow from current operations and to generate free cash flow on an overall Company basis. “C1 cash costs” per pound and “All-in sustaining costs” per pound are intended to provide additional information only, do not have any standardized meaning under IFRS, and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. For further details on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to pages 95-96 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s second quarter 2019 financial statements filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Endnotes

  • 6. EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure, which excludes income tax expense; finance costs; finance income; depreciation; and income tax expense, finance costs, finance income and depreciation from equity
  • investees. Management believes that EBITDA is a valuable indicator of our ability to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital
  • expenditures. Management uses EBITDA for this purpose. EBITDA is also frequently used by investors and analysts for valuation purposes whereby EBITDA is multiplied by a factor or “EBITDA multiple” that is based
  • n an observed or inferred relationship between EBITDA and market values to determine the approximate total enterprise value of a company. EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for

measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA removes the effect of impairment charges; acquisition/disposition gains/losses; foreign currency translation gains/losses; other expense adjustments; and unrealized gains on non-hedge derivative instruments. We believe these items provide a greater level of consistency with the adjusting items included in our Adjusted Net Earnings reconciliation, with the exception that these amounts are adjusted to remove any impact on finance costs/income, income tax expense and/or depreciation, including the impact incurred in our equity method accounted investments, as they do not affect EBITDA. We believe this additional information will assist analysts, investors and other stakeholders of Barrick in better understanding our ability to generate liquidity from operating cash flow, by excluding these amounts from the calculation as they are not indicative of the performance of our core mining business and not necessarily reflective of the underlying operating results for the periods presented. For further details on these non-GAAP measures, please refer to pages 97-98 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s second quarter 2019 financial statements filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

  • 7. “Free cash flow” is a non-GAAP financial performance measure which deducts capital expenditures from net cash provided by operating activities. Barrick believes this to be a useful indicator of our ability to operate

without reliance on additional borrowing or usage of existing cash. Free cash flow is intended to provide additional information only and does not have any standardized meaning under IFRS and may not be comparable to similar measures of performance presented by other companies. Free cash flow should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with IFRS. For further details on this non-GAAP measure, please refer to page 79 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s second quarter 2019 financial statements filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.

  • 8. Presented on a cash basis as a result of adopting IFRS 16 Leases starting in the first quarter of 2019. Capital expenditures for the three months ended June 30, 2018 are presented on an accrued basis. Please

refer to page 32 of the MD&A accompanying Barrick’s second quarter 2019 financial statements filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov for more details.

  • 9. These amounts are presented on the same basis as our guidance and include our 60% share of Pueblo Viejo and South Arturo, our 63.9% share of Acacia and our 50% share of Zaldivar and Jabal Sayid. Also

includes our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, 89.7% share of Tongon, 45% share of Kibali and 40% share of Morila commencing January 1, 2019, the effective date of the Merger.

  • 10. Includes $150 million of cash, primarily held at Acacia, which may not be readily deployed.
  • 11. Amounts presented exclude capitalized interest.
  • 12. Includes our 60% share of South Arturo.
  • 13. Barrick owned 75% of the mine through the end of the second quarter of 2019, with our joint venture partner, Newmont Goldcorp, owning the remaining 25%. Turquoise Ridge is proportionately consolidated on the

basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities relating to the arrangement. The figures presented in the table and related discussion are based on

  • ur 75% interest in Turquoise Ridge. On July 1, 2019, Turquoise Ridge became part of Nevada Gold Mines.
slide-38
SLIDE 38

Endnotes

  • 14. A Tier One Gold Asset is a mine with a stated life in excess of 10 years with 2017 production of at least 500,000 ounces of gold and 2017 total cash cost per ounce within the bottom half of Wood Mackenzie’s cost

curve tools (excluding state owned and privately-owned mines). For purposes of determining Tier One Gold Assets, total cash cost per ounce is based on data from Wood Mackenzie as of August 31, 2018, except in respect of Barrick’s mines where Barrick may rely on its internal data which is more current and reliable. The Wood Mackenzie calculation of total cash cost per ounce may not be identical to the manner in which Barrick calculates comparable measures. Total cash cost per ounce is a non-GAAP financial performance measure with no standardized meaning under IFRS and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. Total cash cost per ounce should not be considered by investors as an alternative to operating profit, net profit attributable to shareholders, or to other IFRS measures. Barrick believes that total cash cost per ounce is a useful indicator for investors and management of a mining company’s performance as it provides an indication of a company’s profitability and efficiency, the trends in cash costs as the company’s operations mature, and a benchmark of performance to allow for comparison against other companies. Wood Mackenzie is an independent third party research and consultancy firm that provides data for, among others, the metals and mining industry. Wood Mackenzie does not have any affiliation to Barrick.

  • 15. The pro forma reserves and resources figures of Nevada Gold Mines were derived by adding the respective reserves and resources in respect of Nevada operations reported by Barrick in its Q4 2018 Report and

Newmont in its press release dated February 21, 2019 reporting its 2018 Reserves and Resources and its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 in respect of the relevant Nevada properties set out in endnotes 3 and 4. The pro forma reserves and resources are provided for illustrative purposes only. Barrick and Newmont calculate such figures based on different standards and assumptions, and accordingly such figures may not be directly comparable and the pro forma reserves and resources may be subject to adjustments due to such differing standards and assumptions. In particular, Barrick mineral reserves and resources have been prepared according to Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum 2014 Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves as incorporated by National Instrument 43- 101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects, which differ from the requirements of U.S. securities laws. Newmont’s reported reserves are prepared in compliance with Industry Guide 7 published by the SEC, however, the SEC does not recognize the terms “resources” and “measured and indicted resources”. Newmont has determined that its reported “resources” would be substantively the same as those prepared using Guidelines established by the Society of Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME) and that its reported measured and indicated resources (combined) are equivalent to “Mineralized Material” disclosed in its annual report on Form 10-K. Reserves and resources of Barrick in Nevada are stated on an attributable basis as of December 31, 2018 and include Goldstrike, Cortez, Goldrush, South Arturo (60%) and Turquoise Ridge (75%). Proven reserves of 84.4 million tonnes grading 4.36g/t, representing 11.8 million ounces of gold. Probable reserves of 155.6 million tonnes grading 2.93g/t, representing 14.7 million ounces of gold. Measured resources of 13.5 million tonnes grading 4.22g/t, representing 1.8 million ounces of gold. Indicated resources of 101.6 million tonnes grading 4.34g/t, representing 14.2 million ounces of gold. Inferred resources of 28.7 million tonnes grading 5.2g/t, representing 4.8 million ounces of gold. Complete mineral reserve and resource data for all Barrick mines and projects referenced in this press release, including tonnes, grades, and ounces, as well as the assumptions on which the mineral reserves for Barrick are reported, are set out in Barrick’s Q4 2018 Report issued on February 13, 2019. Reserves and resources of Newmont in Nevada are stated on an attributable basis as of December 31, 2018 and include Carlin, Phoenix, Lone Tree, Twin Creeks (including Newmont’s 25% equity in Turquoise Ridge) and Long Canyon. Proven reserves of 46.6 million tonnes grading 3.84g/t, representing 5.8 million ounces of gold. Probable reserves of 378.1 million tonnes grading 1.32g/t, representing 16.0 million ounces of gold. Measured resources of 19.7 million tonnes grading 2.2 g/t, representing 1.4 million ounces of gold. Indicated resources of 244.4 million tonnes grading 1.27g/t, representing 10.0 million ounces of gold. Inferred resources

  • f 45.5 million tonnes grading 1.81g/t, representing 2.7 million ounces of gold. Complete mineral reserve and resource data for all Newmont mines and projects referenced in this press release, including tonnes, grades,

and ounces, as well as the assumptions on which the mineral reserves for Newmont are reported, are set out in Newmont’s press release dated February 21, 2019 reporting its 2018 Reserves and Resources and its annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

  • 16. Pueblo Viejo is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 40% non-controlling interest. The figures presented in the table and related discussion are based on our 60% share only.
  • 17. Barrick owns 80% of Société des Mines de Loulo SA and Société des Mines de Gounkoto with the Republic of Mali owning 20%. Loulo-Gounkoto is accounted for as a subsidiary with a 20% non-controlling interest
  • n the basis that Barrick controls the asset. The figures presented in the table and related discussion are based on our 80% share inclusive of the impact of the purchase price allocation resulting from the Merger
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Endnotes

The scientific and technical information contained in this presentation has been reviewed and approved by Steven Yopps, MMSA, Director - Metallurgy, North America; Chad Yuhasz, P.Geo, Mineral Resource Manager, Latin America and Australia Pacific; Simon Bottoms, CGeol, MGeol, FGS, MAusIMM, Mineral Resources Manager: Africa and Middle East; Rodney Quick, MSc, Pr. Sci.Nat, Mineral Resource Management and Evaluation Executive; John Steele, CIM, Metallurgy, Engineering and Capital Projects Executive; and Rob Krcmarov, FAusIMM, Executive Vice President, Exploration and Growth – each a “Qualified Person” as defined in National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are estimated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral

  • Projects. Unless otherwise noted, such mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are as of December 31, 2018.

Technical Information

  • 18. Barrick owns 45% of Kibali Goldmines SA (Kibali) with the Democratic Republic of Congo ("DRC") and our joint venture partner owning 10% and 45%, respectively. Kibali is accounted for as an equity method investment
  • n the basis that the joint venture partners that have joint control have rights to the net assets of the joint venture. The figures presented in the table and related discussion are based on our 45% effective interest in Kibali

inclusive of the impact of the purchase price allocation resulting from the Merger.

  • 19. 2019 Guidance includes our 60% share of Pueblo Viejo, our 80% share of Loulo-Gounkoto, our 89.7% share of Tongon, our 63.9% share of Acacia, our 50% share of Zaldívar and Jabal Sayid, our 45% of Kibali, and our

share of joint operations. Furthermore, 2019 Guidance includes Cortez (100%), Goldstrike (100%) and Turquoise Ridge (75%), also known as Barrick Nevada, from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019, and Cortez, Carlin (including Goldstrike), Turquoise Ridge/Twin Creeks, Phoenix and Long Canyon on a 61.5% basis from July 1, 2019 onwards as a result of the formation of Nevada Gold Mines with Newmont Goldcorp on July 1, 2019. South Arturo is included on a 60% basis from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019 and 36.9% from July 1, 2019 onwards.

  • 20. Estimated in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 as required by Canadian securities regulatory authorities. Estimates are as of December 31, 2018, unless otherwise noted. Complete mineral reserve and

mineral resource data for all mines and projects referenced in this presentation, including tonnes, grades, and ounces, can be found on pages 33-45 of Barrick’s Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2018.

  • 21. Production – A site which is in commercial operation.

Committed – AME believes these projects will come online by their planned start date with the highest degree of probability. In AME's assessment, this category contains projects that are already completed and awaiting commissioning, or those projects that are in a sufficiently advanced stage of construction, such that it considers it uneconomic to discontinue construction. AME has also included some projects that fall outside of these two categories, as these projects are owned by major mining companies or have strong financial backing. Probable – AME believes these projects will come online with the next highest degree of probability. AME considers that these projects are very likely to begin production, but are differentiated by those in the “Committed” category because the degree of certainty is reduced by key factors, which include, but are not limited to: current stage of construction/development, location of project, owner/financiers and product mix. Possible – AME regards these projects to have sufficiently strong fundamentals to consider that they will possibly begin production by the end of AME's s long-term forecast period, but there remains some uncertainty as to aspects of the project. Concept – AME considers it is unable to provide any concrete assessment of the timing of these project start dates or capacity with any great detail without further information. The majority of these projects are unlikely to proceed to development. Other – AME has not assigned a likelihood to certain assets in the “Care & Maintenance” and “On Hold” status categories because they are unable to make a definitive judgment on their likelihood of coming on line. We’re incorporated both into a separate “Other” category so as to be able to account for all assets tracked by AME, but note that estimated production of assets in these categories is not material to the full forecast.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Appendix A – Fourmile Significant Intercept Tablei

Drill Results from Q2 2019 Core Drill Holeii Azimuth Dip Interval (m) Width (m)iii Au (g/t) FM19-20D 155

  • 72

732 - 748.6 16.6 63.0 803 - 807.1 4.1 12.1 810.2 - 820.8 10.7 7.1 FM19-21D 2

  • 72

762.6 - 774 11.4 29.9 FM19-22D 50

  • 84

665.7 - 670.3 4.6 7.4 761.4 - 782.9 21.5 40.2 FM19-23Div 95

  • 73

696.5 - 698 1.5 7.9 722.1 - 723.8 1.7 13.4 FM19-24D 110

  • 76

760.6 - 762.1 1.5 12.8 800.1 - 801.6 1.5 10.6 804.7 - 806.2 1.5 5.0 843.7 - 874 30.3 23.2 FM19-25D 8

  • 77

791.5 - 799 7.5 29.0 FM19-26Dv 65

  • 75

717.8 - 719.2 1.4 5.2 FM19-27D 144

  • 77

703.5 - 706.2 2.7 10.5 716 - 717.4 1.4 10.7 725.5 - 729.8 4.3 7.6 FM19-28D 249

  • 89

732.4 - 736.1 3.7 35.3 767.5 - 772.7 5.2 40.7 868.7 - 869.6 0.9 38.9 871.1 - 872.8 1.7 10.7 897 - 898.4 1.4 7.6

i. All intercepts calculated using a 5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 0.8 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width ii. Fourmile drill hole nomenclature: FM (Fourmile) followed by the year (18 for 2018) or GRC (Gold Rush Core) with no designation of the year iii. True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage iv. A partial result reported in Q1 was diluted by >20% and removed from the tabulation as a result v. Partial results The drilling results for the Fourmile property contained in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Fourmile property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Appendix A – Fourmile Significant Intercept Tablei

i. All intercepts calculated using a 5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 0.8 m; internal dilution is less than 20% total width ii. Fourmile drill hole nomenclature: FM (Fourmile) followed by the year (18 for 2018) or GRC (Gold Rush Core) with no designation of the year iii. True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage The drilling results for the Fourmile property contained in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Fourmile property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

Drill Results from Q2 2019 Core Drill Holeii Azimuth Dip Interval (m) Width (m)iii Au (g/t) FM19-29D 180

  • 81

755.9 - 765.3 9.4 36.2 818.4 - 819.6 1.2 26.5 918.4 - 919.9 1.5 5.1 FM19-30D 70

  • 69

690.4 - 691.9 1.5 16.1 694.9 - 696.4 1.5 5.3 709.1 - 727.2 18.1 16.7 761.4 - 766 4.6 24.4 769.3 - 770.8 1.5 9.7 FM19-32D 98

  • 84

769.6 - 771 1.4 7.4 776.1 - 777.5 1.4 41.9 967.6 - 970 2.4 54.6 FM19-33D 158

  • 74

732.4 - 752.5 20.1 20.0 FM19-34D 115

  • 87

718.1 - 730.3 12.2 12.7 816.6 - 818.1 1.5 6.2 824.2 - 825.7 1.5 8.0 856.2 - 889.6 33.4 44.0 908.6 - 921.4 12.8 16.9 972.5 - 976.9 4.4 10.9 FM19-35D 18

  • 76

687.0 - 688.5 1.5 14.8 690.1 - 691.6 1.5 7.1 FM19-36D 20

  • 85

766.3 - 768.7 2.4 28.4 784 - 790.7 6.7 21.9 808.6 - 810.3 1.7 10.5

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Appendix B – Kibali Significant Intercept Tablei

i. All intercepts calculated using a 0.5 g/t Au cutoff and are uncapped; minimum intercept width is 2 m; internal dilution is equal to or less than 25% total width ii. Kibali drill hole nomenclature: prospect initial (OR =Oere, IV=Ikamva , IO=Ikamva Orientation) followed by the type of drilling (RC=Reverse Circulation ,DD=Diamond ,GC=Grade control) with no designation of the year .KCDU= KCD Underground. iii. True width of intercepts are uncertain at this stage iv. Weighted average is calculated by fence using significant intercepts, over the strike length The drilling results for the Kibali property contained in this presentation have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 –Standards of Disclosure for Mineral

  • Projects. All drill hole assay information has been manually reviewed and approved by staff

geologists and re-checked by the project manager. Sample preparation and analyses are conducted by an independent laboratory. Procedures are employed to ensure security of samples during their delivery from the drill rig to the laboratory. The quality assurance procedures, data verification and assay protocols used in connection with drilling and sampling on the Kibali property conform to industry accepted quality control methods.

Drill Results from Q2 2019 Lode RC Drill Hole Azimuth Dip Interval (m) Width (m) Au (g/t) Lode 9000 KCDU2132 315

  • 72

282.1 - 299 16.9 4.80 Lode 9000 KCDU2141 319

  • 78

286 - 290.03 4.03 4.91 Lode 9000 KCDU2141 319

  • 78

305 - 311 6 2.02 Lode 9000 KCDU2142 324

  • 76

197.5 - 201.95 4.45 2.12 Lode 9000 KCDU2142 324

  • 76

256 - 262.15 6.15 2.36 Lode 9000 KCDU2142 324

  • 76

268 - 286 18 3.91 Lode 9000 KCDU2142 324

  • 76

291.81 - 295 3.19 14.56 Lode 9000 KCDU2148 325

  • 70

173 - 182 9 3.18 Lode 9000 KCDU2148 325

  • 70

212 - 217 5 2.93 Lode 9000 KCDU2149 321

  • 70

171 - 197.27 26.27 1.63 Lode 9000 KCDU2149 321

  • 70

206 - 217 11 2.44 Lode 9000 KCDU2150 323

  • 65

107 - 111 4 2.51 Lode 9000 KCDU2150 323

  • 65

131 - 139 8 6.73 Lode 11000 KCDU2162 341

  • 34

410 - 423 13 3.45 Lode 11000 KCDU2162 341

  • 34

489 - 560 71 10.57 Lode 9000 KCDU2181 269

  • 88

283 - 287 4 2.98 Lode 9000 KCDU2181 269

  • 88

292 - 311 19 2.02 Lode 9000 KCDU2182 321

  • 58

247.5 - 253.5 6 1.41 Lode 5000 KCDU2190 344

  • 1

150 - 152 2 4.16 Lode 5000 KCDU2190 344

  • 1

244 - 246 2 5.66 Lode 5000 KCDU2190 344

  • 1

255.29 - 256.48 1.19 5.14 Lode 5000 KCDU2190 344

  • 1

309.1 - 313.2 4.1 5.42 Lode 5000 KCDU2191 344 12 226 - 232 6 4.58 Lode 5000 KCDU2191 344 12 250.44 - 259.5 9.06 2.49 Lode 5000 KCDU2191 344 12 270.4 - 281.35 10.95 5.78 Lode 5000 KCDU2192 344 24 238 - 260.6 22.6 4.77 Lode 11000 KCDU2213 336

  • 37

189.43 - 193.27 3.84 3.58 Lode 11000 KCDU2214 336

  • 30

229 - 236 7 2.34 Lode 11000 KCDU2214 336

  • 30

268 - 275 7 2.87 Lode 9000 KCDU2257 345

  • 61

241 - 245 4 1.31 Lode 9000 KCDU2257 345

  • 61

250 - 262.7 12.7 7.28 Lode 9000 KCDU2259 314

  • 79

233.42 - 243.6 10.18 1.53 Lode 9000 KCDU2259 314

  • 79

247 - 256.5 9.5 4.53 Drill Results from Q2 2019 Lode RC Drill Hole Azimuth Dip Interval (m) Width (m) Au (g/t) Lode 11000 KCDU2277 312

  • 20

292.9 - 300 7.1 8.92 Lode 9000 KCDU2278 154

  • 67

167.22 - 170.7 3.48 4.66 Lode 9000 KCDU2278 154

  • 67

176.3 - 187.77 11.47 1.54 Lode 9000 KCDU2278 154

  • 67

217.5 - 226.5 9 2.99 Lode 11000 KCDU2312 318

  • 25

174.1 - 202 27.9 4.31 Lode 11000 KCDU2313 318

  • 36

168 - 184 16 3.96 Lode 11000 KCDU2313 318

  • 36

188 - 200 12 4.79 Lode 11000 KCDU2313 318

  • 36

205.9 - 225 19.1 3.94 Lode 11000 KCDU2314 318

  • 48

191.5 - 218 26.5 9.01 Lode 11000 KCDU2314 318

  • 48

221.7 - 233.7 12 3.62 Lode 11000 KCDU2314 318

  • 48

238.1 - 255 16.9 13.64