qcd with isospin chemical potential low densities and
play

QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Bastian Brandt and Gergely Endr odi Goethe University Frankfurt 28.07.2016 QCD with isospin


  1. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Bastian Brandt and Gergely Endr˝ odi Goethe University Frankfurt 28.07.2016

  2. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Contents 1. (short) Introduction 2. Simulation setup and λ extrapolation 3. QCD at small isospin chemical potential 4. Comparison to Taylor expansion around µ I = 0

  3. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Introduction 1. Introduction

  4. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Introduction QCD at finite isospin chemical potential QCD at finite chemical potential ( N f = 2): u quark: µ u d quark: µ d ◮ Can be decomposed in baryon and isospin chemical potentials: µ B = 3( µ u + µ d ) / 2 and µ I = ( µ u − µ d ) / 2 ◮ Non-zero µ I introduces an asymmetry between isospin ± 1 particles Positive µ I : ⇒ More protons than neutrons! ◮ Such situations occur regularly in nature: ◮ Within nuclei with # neutrons > # protons. ◮ Within neutron stars. ◮ . . . ◮ However: Usually µ I ≪ µ B . ◮ Finite µ I breaks SU V (2) explicitly to U τ 3 (1). Here: consider µ B = 0!

  5. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Introduction Expected phase diagram Exploring the phase diagram using χ PT at finite µ I : [ Son, Stephanov, PRL86 (2001) ] crossover 2nd O (2)? T 1st pion condensation 0 µ I m π / 2

  6. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Introduction Expected phase diagram Exploring the phase diagram using χ PT at finite µ I : [ Son, Stephanov, PRL86 (2001) ] crossover 2nd O (2)? T 1st pion condensation 0 µ I m π / 2 First lattice simulations ( N t = 4, m π > m phys ): π 1st order deconfinement and 2nd order curve join? ⇒ Existence of tri-critical point? [ Kogut, Sinclair, PRD66 (2002); PRD70 (2004) ]

  7. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation 2. Simulation setup and λ extrapolation

  8. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation Lattice action [ G. Endr˝ odi, PRD90 (2014) ] ◮ Gauge action: Symanzik improved ◮ Mass-degenerate u / d quarks: Fermion matrix: [ Kogut, Sinclair, PRD66 (2002); PRD70 (2004) ] � D ( µ ) � λγ 5 M = − λγ 5 D ( − µ ) D ( µ ): staggered Dirac operator with 2 × -stout smeared links λ : small explicit breaking of residual symmetry ◮ Necessary to observe spontaneous symmetry breaking at finite V . ◮ Serves as a regulator in the pion condensation phase. ◮ Strange quark: rooted staggered fermions (no chemical potential) ◮ Quark masses are tuned to their physical values. 6 × 16 3 , 24 3 , 32 3 , 8 × 24 3 , 32 3 , 40 3 , 10 × 28 3 , 40 3 ◮ Lattice sizes: . . .

  9. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation Lattice action [ G. Endr˝ odi, PRD90 (2014) ] ◮ Gauge action: Symanzik improved ◮ Mass-degenerate u / d quarks: Fermion matrix: [ Kogut, Sinclair, PRD66 (2002); PRD70 (2004) ] � D ( µ ) � λγ 5 M = − λγ 5 D ( − µ ) D ( µ ): staggered Dirac operator with 2 × -stout smeared links λ : small explicit breaking of residual symmetry ◮ Necessary to observe spontaneous symmetry breaking at finite V . ◮ Serves as a regulator in the pion condensation phase. ◮ Strange quark: rooted staggered fermions (no chemical potential) ◮ Quark masses are tuned to their physical values. 6 × 16 3 , 24 3 , 32 3 , 8 × 24 3 , 32 3 , 40 3 , 10 × 28 3 , 40 3 ◮ Lattice sizes: . . .

  10. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation λ -extrapolations For physical results: λ needs to be removed! Problem: dependence on λ is not known! (at least for most of the observables) T = 124 MeV, µ I = 68 MeV 2.1 T = 124 MeV, µ I = 85 MeV T = 162 MeV, µ I = 68 MeV 1.8 1.5 � n I � /T 3 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 aλ

  11. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation λ -extrapolations For physical results: λ needs to be removed! Problem: dependence on λ is not known! (at least for most of the observables) 5e-05 T = 114 MeV, µ I = 34 MeV 0 T = 124 MeV, µ I = 34 MeV T = 148 MeV, µ I = 34 MeV -5e-05 R � -0.0001 ψψ � ¯ -0.00015 a 4 m R -0.0002 -0.00025 -0.0003 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 aλ

  12. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation λ -extrapolations For physical results: λ needs to be removed! Problem: dependence on λ is not known! (at least for most of the observables) Best possibility for model independence: ◮ Use a (cubic) spline extrapolation. ◮ Fix one of the external points. ◮ Leave the associated outer deriatives free. (additional free parameters) ◮ To stabilise the extrapolation: Need to assume that last two points lie on a (cubic) curve! Remaining systematic effect: Position of nodepoints influences the result!

  13. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation λ -extrapolations Possible solution: Perform a “spline Monte-Carlo” [ see S. Borsanyi ] ◮ Average “all” splines with a similarly good description of the data. Allow for changes of # of nodes and node positions. ◮ Splines are weighted according to some suitable “action” S . Two possibilities: ◮ Use the Akaike information criterion: S AIC = 2 N P + χ 2 ◮ Use the negative goodness of the fit: S GOD = P ( χ 2 , N dof ) − 1 P ( χ 2 , N dof ) = γ ( χ 2 / 2 , N dof / 2) – cumulative χ 2 distribution function Γ( N dof / 2) ( γ : lower incomplete gamma fct.) ◮ Problem: oscillating solutions ⇒ Include some measure δ for oscillations Full action: S = S AIC / GOD + f × δ (parameter f needs to be tuned)

  14. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion Simulation setup and λ extrapolation λ -extrapolations Results with S AIC and f = 10 . 0: T = 124 MeV, µ I = 68 MeV 2.1 T = 124 MeV, µ I = 85 MeV T = 162 MeV, µ I = 68 MeV 1.8 1.5 � n I � /T 3 1.2 0.9 0.6 preliminary 0.3 0 0.002 0.004 0.006 0.008 aλ

  15. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential 3. QCD at small isospin chemical potential

  16. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential Definition of the transition point Investigate the finite temperature transition (crossover) for µ I < µ C I . � ¯ � Transition temperature T C is defined by the behaviour of ψψ : ◮ Standard: Use the inflection point of the condensate. ◮ Easier alternative for µ I < µ C I : Use the point where subtracted condensate reaches a certain value. (that value has to be known from µ = 0 – Silver Blaze)

  17. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential Definition of the transition point Investigate the finite temperature transition (crossover) for µ I < µ C I . � ¯ � Transition temperature T C is defined by the behaviour of ψψ : ◮ Standard: Use the inflection point of the condensate. ◮ Easier alternative for µ I < µ C I : Use the point where subtracted condensate reaches a certain value. (that value has to be known from µ = 0 – Silver Blaze)

  18. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential Definition of the transition point Investigate the finite temperature transition (crossover) for µ I < µ C I . � ¯ � Transition temperature T C is defined by the behaviour of ψψ : ◮ Standard: Use the inflection point of the condensate. ◮ Easier alternative for µ I < µ C I : Use the point where subtracted condensate reaches a certain value. (that value has to be known from µ = 0 – Silver Blaze) Here: Use subtracted u / d condensate renormalised by the quark mass: � ¯ � � ¯ � ¯ � � � � � m R ψψ R = m u / d ψψ − ψψ � T =0 ,µ I =0 � ¯ R = − 7 . 407 10 − 5 GeV 4 � Value at the transition (in continuum): m R ψψ [ BW: Borsanyi et al , JHEP1009 (2010) ]

  19. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential Definition of the transition point µ I = 0 MeV 0 R [GeV 4 ] -3e-05 -6e-05 � ψψ � ¯ -9e-05 m R preliminary -0.00012 120 140 160 180 T [MeV] Curves: Simple spline interpolation.

  20. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential Definition of the transition point µ I = 0 MeV 0 µ I = 17 MeV R [GeV 4 ] -3e-05 -6e-05 � ψψ � ¯ -9e-05 m R preliminary -0.00012 120 140 160 180 T [MeV] Curves: Simple spline interpolation.

  21. QCD with isospin chemical potential: low densities and Taylor expansion QCD at small isospin chemical potential Definition of the transition point µ I = 0 MeV 0 µ I = 17 MeV µ I = 34 MeV R [GeV 4 ] -3e-05 -6e-05 � ψψ � ¯ -9e-05 m R preliminary -0.00012 120 140 160 180 T [MeV] Curves: Simple spline interpolation.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend