overview
play

Overview P EGASUS : ultra-low A ST designed to study stability - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

I NITIAL O PERATION OF THE U PGRADED P EGASUS ST E XPERIMENT Raymond.J. Fonck University of Wisconsin-Madison for the P EGASUS team: D. Battaglia M. Bongard S. Burke N. Eideitis B. Ford G. Garstka M. Kozar B. Lewicki E. Unterberg G. Winz


  1. I NITIAL O PERATION OF THE U PGRADED P EGASUS ST E XPERIMENT Raymond.J. Fonck University of Wisconsin-Madison for the P EGASUS team: D. Battaglia M. Bongard S. Burke N. Eideitis B. Ford G. Garstka M. Kozar B. Lewicki E. Unterberg G. Winz presented to the 10th International ST Workshop Kyoto, Japan Sept. 29- Oct. 1, 2004 P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  2. Overview • P EGASUS : ultra-low A ST designed to study stability limits as A → 1 and Ip/I TF >1 • High β t and Ip=I TF achieved ohmically • Low-order tearing modes and ideal kinks limited access to higher Ip/I TF • Path to high Ip/I TF and β via suppression of instabilities • After fire: Lab rebuilt with significant upgrades • Advancing the experiment mission by improving plasma control P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  3. Mission: Explore plasma limits as A → 1 Pegasus is an extremely low-aspect ratio facility exploring quasi-spherical high-pressure plasmas with the goal of minimizing the central column while maintaining good confinement and stability Original Pegasus Goals: • Stability and confinement at high Ip/I TF I p /I tf = figure of merit for access to low-A physics - Extension of tokamak studies 100 TS-3,4 Spheromaks • Limits on β t and Ip/I TF (kink) as A → 1 q ψ =6 - Overlap between the tokamak and the spheromak 10 P EGASUS CDX-U, Ip/ITF NSTX, HIT, TST-M, MAST Globus-M, 1 ETE } Planned Future Emphases: START MEDUSA 0.1 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 “tokamak-spheromak Aspect Ratio • Support ST program movement to next overlap region” stages - EBW tests for heating & CD (w/PPPL) - Noninductive startup tests - Novel divertor design tests (w/UT) - CT fueling tests (w/UCD) - Diagnostics - High-pressure gas puff for deep fueling P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  4. P EGASUS is University-Scale, Mid-Sized ST Centerstack: Equilibrium Field Exposing Ohmic Heating Solenoid (NHMFL) Coils Experimental Parameters Parameter Achieved Phase II Goals A 1.15-1.3 1.12-1.3 R (m) 0.2-0.38 0.2-0.45 I p (MA) 0.16 0.30 Vacuum I N (MA/m-T) 6-8 15-20 Vessel RB t (T-m) 0.03 0.1 κ 1.4 − 3.7 1.4 − 3.7 τ shot (s) 0.02 0.05 RF Heating n e (10 19 m -3 ) 10 1-5 Antenna β t (%) 20 > 40 P HHFW (MW) 0.2 1.0 Toroidal Field Coils Plasma Ohmic Trim Coils Limiters P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  5. A < 1.3 → Ready Ohmic Access to High β t • β t up to 25% and I N up to 6.5 achieved ohmically • Low field → high I N and β t 30 = Pegasus data 5 . 3 β N = 6 = 25 β N 20 Conventional Tokamaks t (%) 15 START β 10 5 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 I N = I p /(aB t ) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  6. Toroidal field utilization exhibits a “soft limit” around unity • Maximum I p I TF • Soft limit due to two factors: - Large, internal 2/1, 3/2 tearing modes degrade plasma - Low shear over most of plasma, high resistivity - Reduced Volt-sec as TF decreases 0.16 I p =I tf Plasma Current (MA) 0.12 0.08 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.08 0.12 0.16 TF Rod Current (MA) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  7. Two factors contributed to the I p /I TF 1 soft limit Large resistive MHD instabilities degrade plasma as TF ↓ • low B t and fast dI p /dt → early appearance of low-order q=m/n - fixed sine-wave loop voltage ��� � ��� • high resistivity early Ip ��� � ��� Gauss • ultra-low A → low central shear kA �� � δ B �� ⇒ Result: rapid growth of tearing �� �� �� modes and large saturated island widths � �� ����� - Most common modes: m/n=2/1, 3/2 ���� Frequency (Hz) - Leads to decreased C E , I p 3/2 ���� • I p /I TF 1 ⇒ q 0 1.5 - 2 2/1 ���� ���� 2/1 � ����� ����� ����� ����� ����� ����� Reduced effective Volt-seconds as TF ↓ Time (s) • reduced toroidal field → delayed startup • delayed startup + fixed sine V loop waveform → reduced effective V-s P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  8. Measured q-profile indicates low central shear Tangential PHC SXR image • 2D soft x-ray camera gives q-profile Center column - Images soft x-rays - Constant-intensity surfaces determined - Mapped into flux space - G-S equation with SXR constraints - Iterate solution until convergence • Measured q-profile ⇒ low central shear ⇒ Image Contours: Measured Reconstructed 12 ⇒ ����������������� q 8 ��� q 4 ψ N 0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ψ N P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  9. MHD affected by q-profile tailoring and TF strength • q-profile tailoring increases plasma performance - Discharge tailoring → plasmas with reduced MHD activity, increase W and Ip - Increased shear, increased q 0 ⇒ delay tearing onset - MHD amplitude decreases with increasing shear • Increased toroidal field strength also reduces MHD activity - Along Ip=Itf contour: δ B ↑ as TF ↓ - At high TF effect of MHD minimal - CE = 0.4 - At lower TF MHD amplitude increases - CE increases - Stored energy decreases ⇒ Access higher Ip/I TF , β t via increased q 0 , T e , shear � Mode Amplitude δ B/B (x10 -3 ) � � Pegasus Data � � � � � � ������������������������������������ P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  10. High q 95 external kink limit observed • High Ip plasmas often disrupt 8 0.16 • q 95 = 5 observed 7 0.12 preceding disruption Plasma - � i =0.5 at this time MA q 95 6 0.08 Current • DCON analysis ⇒ unstable 0.04 5 to n=1 external kink - m=5 most unstable mode 0.00 4 0.012 0.016 0.020 0.024 • Consistent with theory expectation 8 MHD 100 Amplitude 1.0 Poloidal mode eigenfunctions Free- 6 via DCON m=5 Boundary T/s Energy 0.8 AU (DCON) 4 Real u1 0.6 10 2 0.4 0 0.2 m=4 0.02 0 0.021 0.022 0.023 m=3 m=2 m=1 0.0 Time (s) 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment ψ N University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  11. Planned path to access to high I p /I tf , β t operation • Suppression of large internal MHD modes - Vary q ( ψ ) - Lower η before q ( ψ ) approaches low-order rational mode surfaces • Expand access to external kink modes studies - Plasma time evolution, shape - Edge conditions and edge currents • Access to very high β t regime for stability analysis - OH access and HHFW heating availability P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  12. New tools to access Ip > Itf • Suppress tearing modes early in discharge evolution = Transiently manipulate q during discharge: - Increased TF at startup => high Itf, low inductance TF bundle - Variable Ip and R 0 control => coil-current-waveform control = Reduce resistivity before low-order rationals appear - Maximize J => Vloop control, position & shape control - Increase ohmic flux => new ohmic power supply - Use HHFW system => position control, Vloop control • Explore edge kink boundary at high field utilization - Manipulate edge shear => divertor coils for separatrix & PF shape control - Decrease edge currents => loop voltage control - Manipulate plasma shape => shape control - Manipulate current profile => Vloop control, position control P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  13. Overview of P EGASUS Phase II Rebuild • Power Systems Entirely Replaced - PWM controlled H-Bridges allow for complete waveform control - Coil currents increased significantly - 6 MJ of electrolytic capacitors installed outside of experimental building - New power buses installed • Low-inductance Toroidal Field Centerstack Installed - Provides increased, time-variable TF • Lab Infrastructure Improved or Replaced - Shielded conduits and cable trays installed - New grounding system installed - Control and Safety systems upgraded - Bakeable gas system - Upgraded AC, air, and water services installed - Passive Stray field “flux catcher” installed for public safety P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  14. Phase I laboratory layout (2002) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  15. Laboratory before rebuild (October 2002) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

  16. Rebuilt laboratory (June 2004) P EGASUS Toroidal Experiment University of Wisconsin-Madison 10th STW Sept.29, 2004 - rjf

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend