NJSLA RESULTS: SPRING 2019 ADMINISTRATION Measuring College and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

njsla results spring 2019 administration
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NJSLA RESULTS: SPRING 2019 ADMINISTRATION Measuring College and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NJSLA RESULTS: SPRING 2019 ADMINISTRATION Measuring College and Career Readiness FAIR HAVEN OCTOBER 30, 2019 1 NEW JERSEYS STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 2019 marks the 1st administration of the New Jersey Student Learning Assessments


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Measuring College and Career Readiness

NJSLA RESULTS: SPRING 2019 ADMINISTRATION

FAIR HAVEN OCTOBER 30, 2019

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

◼ 2019 marks the 1st administration of the New Jersey Student Learning Assessments (NJSLA), and the 5th administration of the version of assessment similar to the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC). This provides the opportunity to compare year-to-year results as the following slides will show. ◼ Students took NJSLA English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11. ◼ Students took NJSLA Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

◼ Level 1: Did Not Yet Meet Expectations ◼ Level 2: Partially Met Expectations ◼ Level 3: Approached Expectations ◼ Level 4: Met Expectations ◼ Level 5: Exceeded Expectations

NJSLA PERFORMANCE LEVELS

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ELA

4

2019 Cut Scores

◼ Grades 3-8: Approaching 725-749 ◼ Grade 3: Meet 750-809; Exceed 810-850 ◼ Grades 4 & 6: Meet 750-789; Exceed 790-850 ◼ Grade 5: Meet 750-798; Exceed 799-850 ◼ Grade 7: Meet 750-784; Exceed 785-850 ◼ Grade 8: Meet 750-793; Exceed 794-850

Math

◼ Grades 3-8 and Algebra 1: Approaching 725-749 ◼ Grades 3 & 5: Meet 750-789; Exceed 790-850 ◼ Grade 4: Meet 750-795; Exceed 796-850 ◼ Grade 6: Meet 750-787; Exceed 788-850 ◼ Grade 7: Meet 750-785; Exceed 786-850 ◼ Grade 8: Meet 750-800; Exceed 801-850 ◼ Algebra 1: Meet 750-804; Exceed 805-850

Score of a 3 - Approaching Score of a 4 - Meeting Score of a 5 - Exceeding

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

NJSLA Fair Haven Analysis Spring 2019

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

2016 v. 2017 v. 2018 v. 2019 FH Proficiency (4’s & 5’s) ELA Grades 3-8 (Cohort Analysis)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

2017 v. 2018 v. 2019 FH Proficiency (4’s & 5’s) ELA Grades 3-5 (Cohort Analysis)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

2016 v. 2017 v. 2018 v. 2019 FH Proficiency (4’s & 5’s) Math Grades 3-8 (Cohort Analysis)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

2017 v. 2018 v. 2019 FH Proficiency (4’s & 5’s) Math Grades 3-5 (Cohort Analysis)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Grade 3 % >= Level 4 Grade 4 % >= Level 4 Grade 5 % >= Level 4 Grade 6 % >= Level 4 Grade 7 % >= Level 4 Grade 8 % >= Level 4

District 2019 82% 80% 82% 88% 95% 91% District 2018 82% 77% 83% 90% 95% 90% District 2017 70% 79% 81% 84% 83% 88% District 2016 69% 63% 65% 61% 78% 71% Change 0% +3%

  • 1%
  • 2%

0% +1% FAIR HAVEN’S 2019 SPRING NJSLA/PARCC SCHOOL & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES PERCENT OF STUDENTS PROFICIENT (4’s & 5’s): ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Grade 3 % >= Level 4 Grade 4 % >= Level 4 Grade 5 % >= Level 4 Grade 6 % >= Level 4 Grade 7 % >= Level 4 Grade 8 % >= Level 4 Algebra I % >= Level 4

District 2019 91% 88% 80% 85% 89% 60% 100% District 2018 90% 80% 84% 91% 77% 35% 95% District 2017 69% 80% 67% 75% 65% N/A 85% District 2016 73% 67% 62% 50% 68% N/A 74% Change +1% +8%

  • 4%
  • 6%

+12% +25% +5% FAIR HAVEN’S 2019 SPRING NJSLA /PARCC SCHOOL & GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES PERCENT OF STUDENTS PROFICIENT (4’s & 5’s): MATHEMATICS

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Fair Haven Proficiency(4’s & 5’s)

2016 v. 2017 v. 2018 v. 2019

ELA Grades 3-8 (Non-Cohort)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Fair Haven Proficiency(4’s & 5’s)

2016 v. 2017 v. 2018 v. 2019

Math Grades 3-8 (Non-Cohort)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Last Year’s Peninsula Comparison Data (4’s & 5’s) ELA Grades 3-8 (2018)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

2019 Peninsula Comparison ELA (4’s & 5’s) ELA Grades 3-8

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

2019 Peninsula Comparison ELA Distribution of 4’s and 5’s

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Last Year’s Peninsula Comparison Data (4’s & 5’s) Math Grades 3-8 (2018)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

2019 Peninsula Comparison Data (4’s & 5’s) Math Grades 3-8

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

2019 Peninsula Comparison Math Distribution of 4’s and 5’s

slide-20
SLIDE 20

According the the ESSA Accountability Profiles Companion Guide (October 2018), the minimum number of students (n-size) required for calculations and accountability purposes is twenty (20). This n-size applies to calculations at district, school, and student group levels for all indicators.

◼ Currently, the Fair Haven School District is accountable to students that fall in the white subgroup, by grade level. No other group accounts for a statistically significant population, with an n-size of 20 or more in each grade. ◼ Trends shown in our students with disabilities population (less than an n-size of 20, but the second largest subgroup in each grade), indicate that in almost every grade level performance in both math and ELA has increased. Of the 13 areas that could factor in, 9 showed drastic increases ranging from a 7.2% increase to a 50% increase in proficiency. ◼ 100% of our ELLs population was proficient in both ELA and math

20

TRENDS IN ASSESSMENT DATA

(SUBGROUPS)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

QUESTIONS TO GUIDE NJSLA DATA REFLECTION

◼ How will we use NJSLA data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in our curriculum and instruction? ◼ How will we use NJSLA data as a tool to address areas in need of improvement or enhancement? ◼ How can we provide additional resources and support for our educators to meet the learning needs

  • f all our students?

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Based on the Evidence Statement Analysis documents released to the district, Fair Haven outperforms the state, and even cross-state, percentages on specific standards tested. For those indicators that the district is in line with the state/cross-state cohort, here are the concepts we will focus on to move us forward:

◼ ELA

▪ Reading Literature:

▪ Describe in depth a character, setting, or event in a story or drama, drawing on specific details in the text.

▪ Reading Information:

▪ Describe relationship between a series of historical events, scientific ideas/concepts, or steps in technical procedures, using language that pertains to time, sequence, and cause/effect.

▪ Reading of Science & Technology Subjects and Reading History

▪ Compare and contrast information gained from experiments, simulations, video, or multimedia sources with that gained from reading a text on the same topic.

▪ Language

▪ Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade level expectations.

◼ Mathematics

▪ Illustrate and explain calculations by using equations, rectangular arrays, and/or area models (finding quotients with multi-digit dividends). ▪ Recognize volume as an attribute of solid figures and understand concepts of volume measurement. ▪ Compute fluently with multi-digit numbers and find common factors and multiples.

22

Next Steps Based on Assessment Data

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Interventionists to support both Sickles and Knollwood (grades

4 and 5) students ○ Math Interventionist to continue for grades 3-5

  • Co-Teaching classes to benefit students in grades 6-8
  • Implementation of Fundations in grade 3 (now present in all

grades K-3)

  • New Creative Curriculum and training in preschool
  • Professional development for specific staff in multi-sensory

approaches to literacy

  • Lesson reflections continue to occur regularly based on

classroom execution of essential questions

  • Continue to utilize the new administrator evaluation tool

recommended by the NJDOE (NJPEPL)

23

New for 2019-2020 Instructional Experience

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Curriculum

○ Transfer of curriculum to an online site ■ Ease of use to modify curriculum and add lessons/resources

Reporting capabilities to map curriculum and locate potential gaps ○ Student choice in electives/meetings with each student entering grades 6-8 ○ Increased use of the Z Spaces, DBQs, and CERs for Knollwood students ○ Focus on Co-Teaching Model for both general education and special education settings ○ Implement Fundations for all students in grades K-3 ○ Committees in Sickles and Knollwood to plan for gifted education supports ○ New curriculum and associated professional development for preschool ○ Professional development time provided to streamline ELA curriculum for grade 4 ○ Implement a new Professional Literature Book Club for Staff ■ Focused on differentiation and social/emotional learning ○ Continue the formal RTI Program at Sickles and Knollwood ■ Provide support and assistance to middle school with Tier 1 Instruction & Intervention Strategies ○ Continue the Summer Learning Academy

24

Continuing the Work…

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Spring 2020 Testing Schedule

NJSLA - ELA and Math Assessment Dates: ◼ Math: May 5, 6, 7, 8 (6th-8th have 3 days; 3rd - 5th have 4 days) ◼ ELA: May 12, 13, 14 ◼ Makeups: Week of May 18th NJSLA - Science Testing (for 5th & 8th grade students only): ◼ May 27 & 28 ◼ Makeups: May 29 - June 5

25

NJSLA - ELA, Math & Science Schedule

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Fair Haven’s Response to Intervention (RtI) Model

Rebranding the system…

FHTSS (Fair Haven Tiered Systems of Supports)

Old I&RS

FHTSS

I&RS RtI Social/ Emotional 504 Behavioral

FHTSS is a collaborative approach to provide appropriate support to our general education population.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Students are identified utilizing the following data points:

  • NJSLA Scores
  • i-Ready Scores
  • F&P Reading Benchmarks
  • Math Assessments
  • Teacher Input
  • Classroom Observations/Performance
  • Prior Intervention supports

Multiple data points are utilized to determine if a student qualifies for instructional

  • intervention. Interventions will include:
  • Small group, explicit instruction (goal
  • riented)
  • Modeling and guided practice in

instructional skills

  • Progress monitoring

RTI The Process...

Supports provided through the Interventionist will be reinforced in the classroom, as they are in addition to a student’s core instructional curriculum.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Thank you! Questions?