NEW JERSEY STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT (NJSLA) Results: Spring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
new jersey student learning assessment njsla results
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NEW JERSEY STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT (NJSLA) Results: Spring - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 11, 2024 361 likes •971 views

NEW JERSEY STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT (NJSLA) Results: Spring 2019 Administrations Measuring College and Career Readiness Presented by: Cathy Timpone, Ed.D 1 October 21, 2019. NEW JERSEYS STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM NJSLA NJ

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Measuring College and Career Readiness

1

NEW JERSEY STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT (NJSLA) Results: Spring 2019 Administrations

Presented by: Cathy Timpone, Ed.D October 21, 2019.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

¡ NJSLA – NJ STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT ¡ NJSLA in English Language Arts and Literacy Assessments (ELA/L) in grades 3 – 11. ¡ NJSLA Mathematics Assessments in grades 3 – 8 and End of Course Assessments in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II. ¡ Science results from NJDOE have not been received at this time.

NEW JERSEY’S STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

¡ Compare 3 year’s of NJSLA Test Results and Changes in Levels 1&2 and Levels 4&5. ¡ Compare 2 year’s data relating to number of students tested. ¡ Compare Park Ridge student results to students state- wide Results

NJSLA ANALYSIS

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

¡ Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations ¡ Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations ¡ Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations ¡ Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations ¡ Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations

NJSLA PERFORMANCE LEVELS

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s Spring 2017, Spring 2018 & Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 1 2019 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 2 2019 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 3 2019 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 4 2019 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 Level 5 2019 Change in Level 1 and 2 2017 to 2019 Change in Level 4 and 5 2017 to 2019** 3

1.1 3.6

5.6

9.1 9.6

2.8

8.0 15.7

9.9

67.0 48.2

69.0

14.8 22.9

12.7

  • 1.8
  • O.1

4

3.9 3.5

4.9

11.7 9.3

13.4

50.6 37.2

51.2

33.8 50.0

30.5 1

  • 2.7

5

1.2 1.3 8.1 1.3

4.2

14.0 12.5

12.6

45.3 60.0

52.6

31.4 25.0

30.5

  • 5.1

+ 6.4 6

5.1 6.4 7.3

3.5

19.2 15.9

12.9

48.7 41.5

50.6

20.5 35.4

32.9

  • 8

+ 14.3 7

2.2

3.1

5.7 5.6

7.3

17.0 11.1

13.5

42.5 32.2

36.5

34.9 48.9

39.6 + 4.7

  • 1.3

8

3.4 0.9

3.4

1.7 1.9

4.5

20.5 17.0

9.0

32.5 50.0

36.0

41.9 30.2

47.2 + 2.8 + 8.8 9

1.2 2.1

1.1

4.8 4.1

1.1

9.6 12.4

12.6

45.8 48.5

53.7

38.6 33.0

31.6

  • 3.8

+ 0.9 10

5.6 3.5

3.1

7.0 4.7

3.1

18.3 7.1

12.2

49.3 40.0

28.6

19.7 44.7

53.1

  • 6.4

+ 12.7

*Grade 11 test was optional for 2018-2019 assessment year. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s Spring 2017, Spring 2018 & Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations-Mathematics - Percentages

Grade Level 1 2017 Level 1 2018 Level 1 2019 Level 2 2017 Level 2 2018 Level 2 2019 Level 3 2017 Level 3 2018 Level 3 2019 Level 4 2017 Level 4 2018 Level 4 2019 Level 5 2017 Level 5 2018 Level 5 2019 Change in Level 1 and 2 2017 to 2019 Change in Level 4 and 5 2017 to 2019** 3

2.3 1.2

1.4

2.3 9.6

9.9

14.8 20.5

14.1

43.2 39.8

52.1

37.5 28.9

22.5

+ 6.7

  • 6.1

4

3.8 0.0

1.2

3.8 7.0

6.0

17.5 14.0

18.1

56.3 50.0

55.4

18.8 29.1

19.3

  • 0.4
  • 0.4

5

1.2 2.5

2.1

7.0 2.5

7.3

14.0 16.3

11.5

59.3 55.0

40.6

18.6 23.8

38.5

+ 1.2 + 1.2

6

3.8 1.2

2.4

6.4 11.0

7.1

21.8 15.9

25.9

47.4 48.8

50.6

20.5 23.2

14.1

  • 0.7
  • 3.2

7

4.4

2.1

16.7 9.9

10.4

27.5 25.3

18.8

47.1 46.2

53.1

8.8 14.3

15.6

  • 4.2

+ 12.8

8*

36.4 10.2

15.2

30.3 18.4

26.1

24.2 42.9

41.3

9.1 28.6

17.4

0.0

0.0

  • 25.4

+ 8.3

ALG I***

2.6 4.3

2.1

6.0 9.6

11.6

19.7 8.5

11.6

57.3 62.8

57.9

14.5 14.9

16.8

+ 5.1 + 2.9

GEO***

3.4

1.2

5.1 15.7

15.7

42.3 30.3

37.3

39.7 36.0

38.6

12.8 14.6

7.2

+ 11.8

  • 6.7

ALG II***

19.2 12.5

5.0

16.4 13.9

5.0

17.8 22.2

16.7

41.1 40.3

56.7

5.5 11.1

16.7

  • 25.6

+ 26.8 *Approximately 30,000 New Jersey students in grade 8 participated in the Algebra I assessment. Thus, Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. **Level 4 and Level 5 is an indication a student is on pace to be college and career ready. *** NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students Notes: Data shown is preliminary. Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. ALG 1 Is Algebra 1; GEO is Geometry; ALG II is Algebra 2. 6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s 2017 to 2019 Spring NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts – Percentage Changes

Grade

Levels 1 & 2 District Trend Levels 1 & 2 District Levels 1 & 2 State Trend Levels 1 & 2 State Level 3 District Trend Level 3 District Level 3 State Trend Level 3 State Levels 4 & 5 District Trend Levels 4 & 5 District Levels 4 & 5 State Trend Levels 4 & 5 State

3

−

  • 1.8%

+

1.3%

+

1.9

−

1.1%

−

  • 0.1

−

0.1%

4

+

1%

+

0.7%

+

1.7

−

2.3%

−

  • 2.7

+

1.5%

5

−

  • 5.1%

+

0.9%

−

  • 1.4

+

0.1%

+

6.4

−

1.1%

6

−

  • 8%

−

1.1%

−

  • 6.3

−

1.7%

+

14.3

+

2.8%

7

+

4.7%

−

1.0%

−

  • 3.5

−

2.7%

−

  • 1.3

+

3.6%

8

+

2.8%

−

1.2%

−

  • 11.5

−

2.6%

+

8.8

+

3.7%

9

−

  • 3.8%

−

2.5%

+

3

−

1.8%

+

0.9

+

4.4%

10

−

  • 6.4%

−

8.9%

−

  • 6.1

−

3.6%

+

12.7

+

12.5% * NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students . State Percentages do not include results for Grade 11.

  • Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.
  • The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) shows a decrease of the % change

from the previous year. 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s 2017 to 2019 Spring NJSLA Administrations Mathematics – Percentage Changes

Grade Levels 1 & 2 District Trend Levels 1 & 2 District Levels 1 & 2 State Trend Levels 1 & 2 State Level 3 District Trend Level 3 District Level 3 State Trend Level 3 State Levels 4 & 5 District Trend Levels 4 & 5 District Levels 4 & 5 State Trend Levels 4 & 5 State 3

+

6.7

−

0.5%

−

  • 0.7

−

2.1%

−

  • 6.1

+

2.6% 4

−

  • 0.4

−

2.3%

+

0.6

−

1.4%

−

  • 0.4

+

3.7% 5

+

1.2

+

3.2%

−

  • 2.5

−

3.8%

+

1.2

+

0.6% 6

−

  • 0.7

+

3.4%

+

4.1

−

0.3%

−

  • 3.2

−

3.1% 7

−

  • 4.2

+

0.7%

−

  • 8.7

−

3.7%

+

12.8

+

1.6% 8

−

  • 25.4

+

2.1%

+

17.1

−

0.4%

+

8.3

+

2.6% Algebra I***

+

5.1

+

2.0%

−

  • 8.1

−

3.0%

+

2.9

+

1.0% Geometry***

+

11.8

−

1.1%

−

  • 5

0.0%

−

  • 6.7

+

1.1% Algebra II***

−

  • 25.6

−

0.1%

−

  • 1.1

+

0.3%

+

26.8

−

0.3% *Some students in grade 8 participated in the Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, Math 8 outcomes are not representative

  • f grade 8 performance as a whole. *** NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students, state results do not include Grade 11 results.

Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding.

  • The plus sign (+) indicates an increase of the % change from the previous year where a minus sign (-) shows a decrease of the % change from the previous

year. 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2018 & Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts

Grade Students Tested 2019 Students Tested 2018 Difference between number of students tested in 2018 and 2019 3 71 83

  • 12

4 82 86

  • 4

5 95 80

15

6 85 82

3

7 96 90

6

8 89 106

  • 17

9 95 97

  • 2

10 98 85

13

Total 711 709

2

** NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students. Note: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for English Language Arts. 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s Number of Students Tested Spring 2018 & Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations

Mathematics

Grade Students Tested 2019 Students Tested 2018 Difference between number of students tested in 2018 and 2019 3 71 83

  • 12

4 83 86

  • 3

5 96 80

16

6 85 82

3

7 96 91

5

8* 46 49

  • 3

Algebra I** 95 94

1

Algebra II** 60 72

  • 12

Geometry** 83 89

  • 6

Total

715 726

  • 11

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. ** NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students Notes: “Students Tested” represents individual valid test scores for Mathematics. 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s

Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts to State of New Jersey Percentages for 2019

Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State 3

5.6 14.0 2.8 14.4 9.9 21.4 69.0 42.8 12.7 7.4

4

0.0 8.6 4.9 12.6 13.4 21.4 51.2 39.1 30.5 18.3

5

0.0 7.4 4.2 12.5 12.6 22.2 52.6 45.6 30.5 12.3

6

0.0 7.3 3.5 12.6 12.9 23.9 50.6 40.9 32.9 15.2

7

3.1 8.9 7.3 10.5 13.5 17.8 36.5 33.1 39.6 29.7

8

3.4 9.2 4.5 10.3 9.0 17.7 36.0 38.0 47.2 24.9

9

1.1 11.3 1.1 11.8 12.6 21.1 53.7 36.7 31.6 19.2

10

3.1 14.3 3.1 10.9 12.2 15.9 28.6 33.4 53.1 25.5 *Grade 11 does not include students who took an AP/IB test. ** NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students, state results do not include Grade 11 results. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Comparison of Park Ridge Public School’s

Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics to New Jersey - Percentages for 2019

Grade Level 1, District Level 1, State Level 2, District Level 2, State Level 3, District Level 3, State Level 4, District Level 4, State Level 5, District Level 5, State

3

1.4

8.0

9.9

13.9

14.1

23.0

52.1

41.2

22.5

13.9 4

1.2

8.6

6.0

14.7

18.1

25.7

55.4

43.3

19.3

7.7 5

2.1

6.4

7.3

20.9

11.5

25.8

40.6

35.8

38.5

11.0 6

2.4

9.6

7.1

22.5

25.9

27.4

50.6

33.1

14.1

7.5 7

2.1

7.6

10.4

21.1

18.8

29.3

53.1

33.8

15.6

8.3 8*

15.2

23.3

26.1

23.1

41.3

24.3

17.4

28.2

0.0

1.1 Algebra I**

2.1

9.3

11.6

26.0

11.6

21.4

57.9

37.7

16.8

5.6 Algebra II** 5.0 10.6 5.0 11.7 16.7 21.4 56.7 49.7 16.7 6.6 Geometry** 1.2 10.4 15.7 24.6 37.3 32.8 38.6 26.9 7.2 5.3

*Some students in grade 8 participated in the Algebra I assessment in place of the 8th grade Math assessment. Thus, Math 8 outcomes are not representative of grade 8 performance as a whole. ** NJSLA 2018-2019 assessments were optional for 11th Grade students, state results do not include Grade 11 results. Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes English Language Arts Grade 3 - Percentages

ELA03

Not Yet Meeting Expectati

  • ns

(Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

6 6 14 66 9 75

West Ridge

6 6 72 17 89

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes English Language Arts Grade 4 - Percentages

ELA04

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (% Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (% Level 2) Approaching Expectations (% Level 3) Meeting Expectations (% Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (% Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

5 23 48 25 73

West Ridge

5 5 55 36 91

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes English Language Arts Grade 5 - Percentages

ELA05

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (% Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (% Level 2) Approaching Expectations (% Level 3) Meeting Expectations (% Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (% Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

7 7 52 33 85

West Ridge

20 54 27 81

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes English Language Arts Grade 6 - Percentages

ELA06

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (% Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (% Level 2) Approaching Expectations (% Level 3) Meeting Expectations (% Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (% Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

3 16 53 29 82

West Ridge

4 11 49 36 85

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes Mathematics –Grade 3 - Percentages

MAT03

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

14 20 46 20 66

West Ridge

3 6 8 58 25 83

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes Mathematics - Grade 4 - Percentages

MAT04

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

10 12 59 20 79

West Ridge

2 2 24 52 19 71

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes Mathematics - Grade 5 - Percentages

MAT05

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

4 2 9 40 45 85

West Ridge

15 15 41 29 70

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes Mathematics - Grade 6 - Percentages

MAT06

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

East Brook

5 13 13 53 16 69

West Ridge

2 36 49 13 62

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes English Language Arts Grade 7 - 10 Percentages

ELA07

Not Yet Meeting Expectatio ns (% Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (% Level 2) Approaching Expectations (% Level 3) Meeting Expectations (% Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (% Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

Grade 7

3 7 14 36 40 76

Grade 8

3 4 9 36 47 83

Grade 9

1 1 13 54 32 86

Grade 10

3 3 12 29 53 82

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

PARK RIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT 2019 Spring NJSLA School- & Grade-Level Outcomes Mathematics - Percentages

GRADE/ COURSE

Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % of students at Level 4 and 5

Grade 7

2 10 19 53 16 69

Grade 8

15 26 41 17 17

Algebra 1

2 12 12 58 17 75

Geometry

1 16 37 39 7 46

Algebra II

5 5 17 57 17 74

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 3

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 50.0 66.7 33.3 33.3 +16.7 Hispanic 10.0 0.0 25.0 22.2 20.0 22.2 40.0 55.6 5.0 0.0 +10.6 White 1.9 7.4 5.7 0.0 15.1 7.4 50.9 72.2 26.4 13.0 +7.9 Economically Disadvantaged 11.1 0.0 33.3 40.0 22.2 20.0 22.2 40.0 11.1 0.0 +6.7 Disabilities 9.1 28.6 36.4 7.1 9.1 14.3 45.5 35.7 0.0 14.3 +4.5 ELL 16.7 0.0 50.0 50.0 33.3 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 +25

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 4

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 25.0 16.7 75.0 66.7

  • 16.6

Hispanic 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 40.0 16.7 60.0 55.6 0.0 11.1 +6.7 White 0.0 0.0 4.6 1.9 6.2 13.2 35.4 54.7 53.8 30.2

  • 4.3

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 0.0 22.2 66.7 44.4 33.3 11.1

  • 16.6

Disabilities 0.0 0.0 16.7 37.5 25.0 37.5 41.7 12.5 16.7 12.5 +8.3 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 100.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 + 84.9

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 5

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 72.7 44.4 27.3 44.4

  • 11.2

Hispanic 0.0 0.0 12.5 0.0 25.0 27.3 62.5 72.7 0.0 0.0 +10.2 White 1.7 0.0 0.0 5.6 13.8 11.1 56.9 52.8 27.6 30.6

  • 1.1

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 33.3 40.0 66.7 20.0 0.0 +6.7 Disabilities 14.3 0.0 14.3 18.8 42.9 31.3 28.6 43.8 0.0 6.3 +21.5 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

  • 100

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 6

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 60.0 83.3 40.0 Hispanic 0.0 0.0 17.6 10.0 23.5 20.0 47.1 60.0 11.8 10.0 +11.1 White 0.0 0.0 5.3 3.3 15.8 14.8 42.1 45.9 36.8 36.1 +3.1 Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 20.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 75.0 20.0 25.0

  • 60.0

Disabilities 0.0 0.0 21.1 22.2 47.4 33.3 21.1 44.4 10.5 0.0 +12.8 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 7

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 16.7 75.0 83.3 Hispanic 5.3 5.0 10.5 20.0 10.5 25.0 42.1 40.0 31.6 10.0

  • 23.7

White 1.5 3.0 4.5 4.5 12.1 11.9 30.3 35.8 51.5 44.8

  • 1.2

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 33.3 20.0 0.0 40.0 33.3 20.0 33.3 20.0

  • 26.6

Disabilities 8.3 11.8 16.7 29.4 25.0 29.4 29.2 23.5 20.8 5.9

  • 20.6

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 8

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 50.0 70.0 50.0 Hispanic 0.0 6.3 0.0 12.5 36.4 12.5 18.2 43.8 45.5 25.0 +5.1 White 1.2 2.9 1.2 2.9 17.3 8.8 56.8 33.8 23.5 51.5 +5 Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 33.3 33.3 0.0 0.0 66.7 33.3 0.0 33.3

  • 0.1

Disabilities 0.0 12.0 6.7 16.0 66.7 20.0 26.7 36.0 0.0 16.0 +25.3 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 +100

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 9

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 0.0 71.4 28.6 14.3 71.4 +14.3 Hispanic 0.0 0.0 7.7 8.3 15.4 25.0 53.8 41.7 23.1 25.0

  • 10.2

White 2.6 1.4 3.9 0.0 11.8 12.5 46.1 55.6 35.5 30.6 +4.6 Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 33.3 16.7 66.7 +50 Disabilities 8.0 0.0 16.0 1.2 32.0 8.6 36.0 54.3 8.0 35.8 +46.1 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 10

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations English Language Arts- Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.3 25.0 14.3 75.0 71.4

  • 14.3

Hispanic 9.1 8.3 0.0 0.0 18.2 25.0 45.5 25.0 27.3 41.7

  • 6.1

White 3.0 2.5 4.5 3.8 4.5 10.1 41.8 30.4 46.3 53.2

  • 4.5

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 16.7 100.0 33.3

  • 50

Disabilities 21.4 11.5 14.3 11.5 35.7 30.8 28.6 23.1 0.0 23.1 +17.6 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0

  • 100

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 3

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 33.3 83.3 66.7

+16.7

Hispanic 5.0 0.0 20.0 33.3 35.0 33.3 30.0 22.2 10.0 11.1

  • 6.7

White 0.0 1.9 7.5 7.4 17.0 11.1 49.1 61.1 26.4 18.5

+4.1

Economically Disadvantaged 11.1 0.0 22.2 40.0 33.3 40.0 22.2 20.0 11.1 0.0

  • 13.3

Disabilities 9.1 7.1 18.2 28.6 18.2 14.3 36.4 42.9 18.2 7.1

  • 4.6

ELL 0.0 0.0 50.0 50.0 33.0 50.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 0.0

  • 16.7

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 4

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 0.0 75.0 33.3 25.0 50.0

  • 16.7

Hispanic 0.0 0.0 30.0 11.1 30.0 44.4 40.0 44.4 0.0 0.0

4.4

White 0.0 1.9 4.6 3.7 13.8 13.0 47.7 61.1 33.8 20.4 Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 33.3 22.2 0.0 44.4 66.7 22.2 0.0 11.1

  • 33.4

Disabilities 0.0 11.1 33.3 44.4 41.7 22.2 8.3 22.2 16.7 0.0

  • 2.8

ELL 0.0 0.0 100.0 25.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0

25 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 5

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.5 33.3 54.5 66.7 Hispanic 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 50.0 33.3 50.0 41.7 0.0 8.3 White 3.4 2.8 3.4 6.9 15.5 9.7 55.2 43.1 22.4 37.5

+3

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 40.0 33.3 40.0 66.7 20.0 0.0

6.7

Disabilities 14.3 5.9 14.3 35.3 42.9 29.4 28.6 17.6 0.0 11.8

0.8

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 6

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 60.0 66.7 40.0 Hispanic 5.9 10.0 29.4 20.0 17.6 40.0 35.3 30.0 11.8 0.0

  • 17.1

White 0.0 1.6 7.0 6.6 15.8 27.9 56.1 52.5 21.1 11.5

  • 13.2

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 25.0 0.0 75.0 20.0 0.0

+55

Disabilities 0.0 22.2 47.4 33.3 15.8 33.3 26.3 11.1 10.5 0.0

  • 25.7

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 7

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 33.3 50.0 66.7 Hispanic 10.5 5.0 15.8 30.0 31.6 30.0 42.1 30.0 0.0 5.0

  • 7.1

White 3.0 1.5 9.0 6.0 25.4 16.4 46.3 61.2 16.4 14.9

+13.4

Economically Disadvantaged 16.7 20.0 50.0 20.0 0.0 20.0 33.3 40.0 0.0 0.0

+6.7

Disabilities 16.7 11.8 29.2 41.2 29.2 11.8 20.8 29.4 4.2 5.9

+10.3

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

  • 100

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 8

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Hispanic 0.0 7.1 42.9 21.4 42.9 64.3 14.3 7.1 0.0 0.0

  • 7.2

White 12.8 18.8 15.4 28.1 38.5 31.3 33.3 21.9 0.0 0.0

  • 11.4

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 33.3 40.0 33.3 60.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

  • 33.3

Disabilities 28.6 22.7 28.6 50.0 21.4 22.7 21.4 4.5 0.0 0.0

  • 16.9

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade Algebra I

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 70.0 50.0 30.0 50.0 Hispanic 8.3 0.0 25.0 25.0 8.3 16.7 33.3 58.3 25.0 0.0 White 4.2 2.6 8.5 10.5 9.9 10.5 66.2 59.2 11.3 17.1

  • 1.2

Economically Disadvantaged 20.0 0.0 60.0 16.7 0.0 16.7 20.0 66.7 0.0 0.0

46.7

Disabilities 18.2 5.6 36.4 55.6 22.7 22.2 22.7 11.1 0.0 5.6

  • 3.3

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0

100 37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade Geometry

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 42.9 11.1 14.3 44.4 42.9 33.3

20.5

Hispanic 0.0 0.0 30.8 12.5 30.8 37.5 38.5 50.0 0.0 0.0

11.5

White 4.5 1.6 13.6 17.2 28.8 39.1 39.4 37.5 13.6 4.7

  • 10.8

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 66.7 50.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 0.0

  • 33.3

Disabilities 6.3 5.0 43.8 40.0 25.0 45.0 18.8 10.0 6.3 0.0

  • 15.1

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade Algebra II

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations Mathematics - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % Difference ≥ Level 4

  • 2018

2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Asian 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 33.3 50.0 33.3 50.0

+33.4

Hispanic 0.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 40.0 0.0 20.0 83.3 0.0 16.7

+80

White 14.3 6.0 12.7 6.0 20.6 20.0 42.9 54.0 9.5 14.0

+15.6

Economically Disadvantaged 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 0.0 0.0

+100

Disabilities 20.0 22.2 80.0 11.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.6 0.0 11.1

+66.7

ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

  • 50

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

WIDA ACCESS FOR ELLS 2.0 ASSESSMENT

Administered 2018-2019 School Year

slide-41
SLIDE 41

¡ According to Https://www.scribd.com ¡ ACCESS for ELLS is an English Language proficiency assessment for students in grades K-12. ¡ Proficient level scores are reported as numbers that range from 1.0 – 6.0 1.0 is the “beginner ” score, while 6.0 can be considered an “advanced” English proficiency score. ¡ Students who score between a 4.5 and 6.0 will be considered for exiting the program.

¡ 44% of Park Ridge ESL students exited

the program at the end of the 2018-19 school year. ¡ Scores:

1 = Entering – Knows and uses minimal social language and minimal academic language with visual and graphic support. 2 = Emerging - Knows and uses some English and general academic language with visual and graphic support. 3 = Developing - Knows and uses social English and some specific academic language with visual and graphic support. 4 = Expanding - Knows and uses some English and some technical academic language. 5 = Bridging - Knows and uses social and academic language working with grade level material. 6= Reaching – Knows and uses social and academic language at the highest level measured by this test.

41

WIDA – ACCESS FOR ELLS 2.0 ASSESSMENT ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY SPRING 2018 TEST RESULTS

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

WIDA – ACCESS: SPRING 2019 TEST RESULTS PERCENTAGE OF STUDENTS AT EACH LEVEL DISTRICT-WIDE

Entering Emerging Developing Expanding Bridging

Entering 9.09% Emerging 18.18% Developing 24.24% Expanding 45.45% Bridging 3.03%

slide-43
SLIDE 43

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS ASSESSMENT

(DLM)

Administered Spring 2018

slide-44
SLIDE 44

¡ Grades 3-7 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Determine critical elements of text § Integrate ideas and information from text § Construct understandings of text § Use writing to communicate

¡ Grades 8-9 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Construct understandings of text § Use writing to communicate § Integrate ideas and information from text

¡ Grades 10-11 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Construct understandings of text § Use writing to communicate § Integrate ideas and information from text § Integrate ideas and information in writing

¡ Grading:

§ Emerging § Approaching the Target § At Target § Advanced

44

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS

Percentages

A d v a n c e d 9 . 9 % Approaching 18.18%

At Target 45.45%

Emerging 27.27%

slide-46
SLIDE 46

¡ Grades 3-4 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Understand number structures § Solve problems involving area, perimeter, and volume § Represent and interpret data displays § Understand patterns and functional thinking § Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic operations § Understand and use measurement principles and units of measure § Using operations and models to solve problems

46

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT MATHEMATICS

¡ Grades 5-6 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Understand number structures § Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic operations § Solve problems involving area, perimeter, and volume § Represent and interpret data displays § Compare, compose and decompose numbers and sets § Understand and use geometric properties of two-and three- dimensional shapes § Understand and use measurement principles and units of measure § Understand patterns and functional thinking

Grading: Emerging, Approaching, At Target, Advanced

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT MATHEMATICS

¡ Grades 7-8 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Understand number structures § Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic operations § Solve problems involving area, perimeter, and volume § Use operations and models to solve problems § Compare, compose and decompose numbers and sets § Understand and use geometric properties of two-and three-dimensional shapes § Represent and interpret data displays § Understand patterns and functional thinking

Grading: Emerging, Approaching, At Target, Advanced

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT MATHEMATICS Grading: Emerging, Approaching, At Target, Advanced

¡ Grades 9 Conceptual areas tested: § Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic

  • perations

§ Solve problems involving area, perimeter, and volume § Understand and use geometric properties of two-and three- dimensional shapes § Use operations and models to solve problems ¡ Grades 10 Conceptual areas tested:

§ Calculate accurately and efficiently using simple arithmetic

  • perations

§ Understand and use measurement principles and units of measure § Use operations and models to solve problems § Understand and use geometric properties of two-and three- dimensional shapes § Represent and interpret data displays § Understand patterns and functional thinking

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT MATHEMATICS

Percentages

Advanced 10% Approaching 10% At-Target 50%

Emerging 30%

slide-50
SLIDE 50

¡Grades 5, 8, 11 ¡DOMAINS tested:

§EARTH & SPACE SCIENCE §PHYSICAL SCIENCE §LIFE SCIENCE ¡ Grading:

§ Emerging § Approaching the Target § At Target § Advanced

50

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT SCIENCE

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

DYNAMIC LEARNING MAPS 2018-2019 ASSESSMENT SCIENCE

Percentages

At Target 33.33%

Emerging 66.67%

slide-52
SLIDE 52

2019-2020 ACTIVITIES

¡ WHAT ARE WE DOING BASED ON THE DATA? § We EXAMINE and thoroughly analyze the DATA § We Find Opportunities for Improvement, Set Measurable Goals § Develop Action Plans, Carry Out Action Plan ¡ Administrators and teachers analyze 2018-19 test results and set goals to differentiate instruction based on student results. ¡ Develop strategies to move students from levels 1,2,& 3 to levels 4 & 5. ¡ Teachers Attending ELA and Math Workshops on Classroom Practices and teaching strategies. ¡ Teachers trained by ELA Consultants ¡ Using technology to enhance instruction and student understanding of content. ¡ Prepare for the NJSLA Science Assessment in grades 5, 8 and a comprehensive Science Assessment in grade 11.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

2019-2020 PARK RIDGE SCHOOL’S STATE ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

.

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

2019-2020 PARK RIDGE SCHOOL’S STATE ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE

.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

UNIT UNIT TESTING TIME (MINUTES) Unit 1 75 Unit 2 75 Total: 2 Units Total: 150 Minutes

ELA UNITS AND TESTING TIMES FOR SPRING 2020 STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS

NJSLA – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS – GRADE 3 UNIT UNIT TESTING TIME (MINUTES) Unit 1 90 Unit 2 90 Total: 2 Units Total: 180 Minutes NJSLA – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS – GRADES 4 & 5 NJSLA – ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS – GRADES 6 TO 10 UNIT UNIT TESTING TIME (MINUTES) Unit 1 90 Unit 2 90 Total: 2 Units Total: 180 Minutes

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

UNIT UNIT TESTING TIME (MINUTES)

Unit 1 60 Unit 2 60 Unit 3 60 Total: 3 Units Total: 180 Minutes

MATHEMATICS UNITS AND TESTING TIMES FOR SPRING 2020 STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS

NJSLA – MATHEMATICS – GRADES 3 TO 5 UNIT UNIT TESTING TIME (MINUTES)

Unit 1 60 Unit 2 60 Unit 3 60 Total: 3 Units Total: 180 Minutes

NJSLA – MATHEMATICS– GRADES 6 TO 8 NJSLA – MATHEMATICS– ALGEBRA I, GEOMETRY, ALGEBRA II UNIT UNIT TESTING TIME (MINUTES)

Unit 1 90 Unit 2 90 Total: 2 Units Total: 180 Minutes

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

Unit Unit Testing Time (Minutes) Unit 1 45 Unit 2 45 Unit 3 45 Unit 4 45 4 Units 180 Minutes NJSLA Science Assessment Grades 5 & 8 Unit Unit Testing Time (Minutes) Unit 1 60 Unit 2 60 Unit 3 60 Unit 4 60 4 Units 240 Minutes NJSLA Science Assessment Grade 11 SCIENCE UNITS AND TESTING TIMES FOR SPRING 2020 STATEWIDE ASSESSMENTS

slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

QUESTIONS & COMMENTS