Park Ridge Schools NJSLA Science Results: Spring 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

park ridge schools njsla science results spring 2019
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Park Ridge Schools NJSLA Science Results: Spring 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Park Ridge Schools NJSLA Science Results: Spring 2019 Administration Presented by: Cathy Timpone, Ed.D April 27, 2020. 1 Ne New Jersey Student Le Learning Assessment Sc Scie ience (NJ (NJSLA-Sc Scie ience) 2 Ne New Jersey


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Park Ridge Schools NJSLA Science Results: Spring 2019 Administration

1

Presented by: Cathy Timpone, Ed.D April 27, 2020.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Ne New Jersey Student Le Learning Assessment –Sc Scie ience (NJ (NJSLA-Sc Scie ience)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Ne New Jersey Student Le Learning Assessment –Sc Scie ience (NJ (NJSLA-Sc Scie ience)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Park Ridge Public Schools Spring 2019 NJSLA Administration Science - Percentages Grade

# OF TEST TAKERS # OF ELIGIBLE TEST TAKERS Level 1 2019 Level 2 2019 Level 3 2019 Level 4 2019 > Level 3

5

96 97 10.5 24.2 47.4 17.9 65.3

8

89 89 18.0 59.6 19.1 3.4 22.5

11

85 85 25.9 18.8 31.8 23.5 55.3

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Comparison of PARK RIDGE SCHOOL’S Spring 2019 NJSLA - SCIENCE Administration to New Jersey. Percentages for 2019

Grade Level 1 District Level 1 State Level 2 District Level 2 State Level 3 District Level 3 State Level 4 District Level 4 State 5

10.5 34.8 24.2 36.0 47.4 22.7 17.9 6.6

8

18.0 35.7 59.6 44.5 19.1 15.3 3.4 4.5

11

25.9 49.1 18.8 23.6 31.8 19.5 23.5 7.8

Notes: Percentages may not total 100 due to rounding. 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 5

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations SCIENCE - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) % Difference ≥ Level 3

  • 2019

2019 2019 2019 Asian 0.0 22.2 33.3 44.4 77.8 Hispanic 18.2 63.6 18.2 18.2 White 11.1 19.4 52.8 16.7 69.4 Economically Disadvantaged 33.3 66.7 Disabilities 43.8 25.0 18.8 12.5 31.3 ELL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 8

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations SCIENCE - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) % Difference ≥ Level 3

  • 2019

2019 2019 2019 Asian 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 50 Hispanic 37.5 56.3 6.3 6.3 White 13.2 63.2 20.6 2.9 23.5 Economically Disadvantaged 50.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Disabilities 44.4 48.0 8.0 8.0 ELL 100 100

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Comparison of Park Ridge Public Schools Subgroup – Grade 11

Spring 2018 and Spring 2019 NJSLA Administrations SCIENCE - Percentages

Subgroup Not Yet Meeting Expectations (Level 1) Partially Meeting Expectations (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) % Difference ≥ Level 3

  • 2019

2019 2019 2019 Asian 25.0 50.0 25.0 75 Hispanic 45.5 18.2 27.3 9.1 36.4 White 22.4 19.4 32.8 25.4 58.2 Economically Disadvantaged 100 100 Disabilities 92.9 7.1 7.1 ELL

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

GRADE 5 NJ STATE District East Brook West Ridge

STUDENT PERFORMANCE USING DOMAINS AND PRACTICES (PERCENT) GRADE 5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

STUDENT PERFORMANCE USING DOMAINS AND PRACTICES (PERCENT) GRADE 5

GRADE 5 NJ STATE District East Brook West Ridge

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

GRADE 8 NJ STATE PRHS

STUDENT PERFORMANCE USING DOMAINS AND PRACTICES (PERCENT) GRADE 8

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

GRADE 8 NJ STATE PRHS

STUDENT PERFORMANCE USING DOMAINS AND PRACTICES (PERCENT) GRADE 8

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

GRADE 11 NJ STATE PRHS

STUDENT PERFORMANCE USING DOMAINS AND PRACTICES (PERCENT) GRADE 11

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

GRADE 11 NJ STATE PRHS

STUDENT PERFORMANCE USING DOMAINS AND PRACTICES (PERCENT) GRADE 11

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

NJSLA-SCIENCE SPRING 2019 CUT SCORES

slide-16
SLIDE 16

¡ Elementary Science Intervention Strategies:

§ 2019-20 - The District will continue to employ the services of a Science Consultant to work with science teachers. § We will develop additional resources and strategies to teach science practices. § We will continue to explore learning and online simulations to introduce and reinforce science concept § We will continue to analyze data and overall trends and patterns in performance in Science content areas

¡ Grade 8 and 11 - Science Intervention Strategies:

§ Purchase new Science Text Books and online resources § Develop additional Formative Assessments – Do Now, Exit Ticket, Online Formative Assessments (LMS—Schoology, Ed-Puzzle) § Explore Learning and Online Simulations (PHET) – introduce and reinforce science concepts § Integrate Newsela and ReadWorks – Scientific Literacy § Emphasis on Science Practices – CER (claim, evidence, reasoning), Analyze Data (datanuggets.org) § Integrate Graphic Organizers, Guided Notes, Scientific Case-Studies § We will continue to analyze data and overall trends and patterns in performance in Science content areas

16

Intervention Strategies

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

RESOURCES

The scores from the 2019 NJSLA-Science administration are used in conjunction with local assessment results and educator input to drive internal discussions relating to the district’s Science Curriculum. Park Ridge Schools will participate in training offered by the NJDOE regarding 2020 NJ Student Learning Standards, resources and model curriculum.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

NOTABLE ACHIEVEMENTS

  • Park Ridge Student’s NJSLA – Science scores generally surpass

Statewide results.

  • Park Ridge Schools have developed and integrated enhanced

curricula and resources as well as support and extension activities for all students.

  • Park Ridge Science teachers participated in training sessions

presented by a Science Consultant.

  • An analysis of Park Ridge’s student Science test scores compared to
  • ther similar NJ district’s test scores indicate that our Science scores

are strong.