NCDOT WETLAND MODELING PROGRAM UPDATES Presented at the Interagency - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ncdot wetland modeling program updates
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

NCDOT WETLAND MODELING PROGRAM UPDATES Presented at the Interagency - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NCDOT WETLAND MODELING PROGRAM UPDATES Presented at the Interagency Coordination Meeting October 16, 2014 Morgan Weatherford, NC DOT PURPOSE AND NEED NCDOTs Streamlined Project Development Process includes GIS-based impact projections


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NCDOT WETLAND MODELING PROGRAM UPDATES

Presented at the Interagency Coordination Meeting October 16, 2014

Morgan Weatherford, NC DOT

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PURPOSE AND NEED

  • NCDOT’s Streamlined Project Development Process includes GIS-based

impact projections

  • Existing GIS data sources are not of sufficient quality => all proposed

corridors must be field surveyed => more time and money

  • Examples:
  • USFWS National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
  • USGS 1:24,000 scale streamlines
  • NRCS Soil Survey Maps
slide-3
SLIDE 3

PURPOSE AND NEED

  • Produce high quality GIS data that is accurate and consistent enough

to compare alternatives

  • Reduce field work, costs and project delivery times
  • NCDOT goal of requiring full field delineations only for LEDPA

corridor.

  • Three pilot projects established: Carthage, Kinston, and ? (originally

Dillsboro Bypass)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

PILOT PROJECT - CARTHAGE

  • Carthage bypass, TIP R-2212, is the first proposed pilot

project

  • Located in Moore Co.
  • Triassic Basins and Sandhills ecoregions
  • Wetland and headwater stream models developed and applied
  • Accuracy assessed
  • Results were used to determine utility and feasibility of

expansion of modeling efforts to other pilot projects and eventually the entire state

slide-5
SLIDE 5

RESULTS CARTHAGE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RESULTS CARTHAGE (BY CORRIDOR)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

PILOT PROJECT – KINSTON BYPASS

  • Kinston bypass, TIP R-2553, is the second proposed pilot

project

  • Located in Lenoir Co.
  • Rolling Coastal Plains, Southeaster Floodplains/Low Terraces

and Carolina Flatwoods ecoregions

  • Wetland and headwater stream models developed and applied
  • Updated ~30 layers for the entire county to help choose

LEDPA

  • Developed GIS-based NRTR
  • Developed remote-assessment for stream crossings for CP2A
  • Developed county-wide ditch model to estimate lateral effect –

to be determined how to use appropriately

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RESULTS KINSTON

slide-9
SLIDE 9

STIP Project No. R-2553

Initial Route Options Developed

slide-10
SLIDE 10

STIP Project No. R-2553

21 DSAs Refined and Narrowed to 17 (follow-up to CP2)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

17 DSAs Narrowed Down to 12 at CP2 Revisited

slide-12
SLIDE 12

KINSTON BYPASS

  • Allows for consideration/evaluation of a large amount of initial

alternatives

  • Can easily quantify impacts of new alternatives or revised alternatives
  • Allows for design revisions “outside of the corridor” without the need

for additional field work – Avoidance and minimization of impacts by shifting roadway and interchanges – Late addition of Shallow Bypass alternative based on public input

STIP Project No. R-2553

slide-13
SLIDE 13

KINSTON BYPASS

Stream and Wetland LiDAR based models developed to produce GIS data layers – Time and cost savings $250,000 = Stream and Wetland GIS data layers VS $600,000 = Traditional field delineation – Model results extend beyond project study area – Can be used for other projects (Carey Road Ext) – Kinston results applicable to three ecoregionsme and c – SOS to CP2A (10/2009 to 4/2014) 53* months vs. 69 month avg. = a savings of 16 months

STIP Project No. R-2553

slide-14
SLIDE 14

R-2609 - US 401 IMPROVEMENTS

  • From Fayetteville to Fuquay-Varina
  • Not Pilot Project
  • Applying what was developed for Kinston Bypass
  • Using to review alternatives for CP2
  • Sandhills, SFLT, Rolling Coastal Plain, Northern Outer Piedmont
slide-15
SLIDE 15

GENERAL METHODS

Field data

Terrain (GIS) data Model Development (SAS, GIS) Mathematical model

1 / (1 + Exp(-39.1406 + ([asp] * -0.00214) + ([avgasp] * - 0.00187) + ([plan] * 0.9620) + ([avgplan] * -104.7) + ([avgprof] * 47.9643) + ([d8slp] * -7.9884) + ([avgd8slp] * 79.0305) + ([elev] * -0.00321) + ([plen] * -0.00015) + ([lntlen] * 3.0704)))

slide-16
SLIDE 16

GENERAL METHODS

Field data

Model applied to test area Accuracy

GIS stream lines or wetland polygons

slide-17
SLIDE 17

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL (DEM) RASTER

DEM overview (scale 1:100K) DEM detail (scale 1:285)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

THINGS TO DO WITH DEMS: TERRAIN DERIVATIVES

Elevation Slope

slide-19
SLIDE 19

TERRAIN DERIVATIVE EXAMPLES

Curvature Depression analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

VARIABLES

  • 12 Terrain Derivatives
  • Soils
  • LULC
  • Other Models
  • Post treatment variables
  • Requires ArcGIS w Spatial Analyst, Taudem, TAS, SAS
  • Can be time-consuming, need for automation
slide-21
SLIDE 21

CURRENT RESEARCH PROJECT

  • Automated generation of terrain derivatives
  • One click wetland prediction
  • Refinement stage
slide-22
SLIDE 22

RESEARCH PROJECT

slide-23
SLIDE 23

UPCOMING RESEARCH PROJECTS

  • To expand on current wetland models
  • NCWAM wetland type
  • Functional assessment (Not trying to duplicate NCWAM in

GIS)

  • To predict tidal wetlands using the new QL2 LiDAR
slide-24
SLIDE 24

QL2 LIDAR

  • USGS/FPM captured 20 coastal counties earlier this year
  • 20 more counties (paid for by NCDOT) also earlier this year
  • 20 counties each year for the next three years
  • 0.59 ft. fundamental vertical accuracy at 95% confidence level

(open terrain)

  • Nominal 2 points per meter
  • Intensity values
  • Point cloud classification
slide-25
SLIDE 25

QL2 LIDAR

slide-26
SLIDE 26

QL2 LIDAR

slide-27
SLIDE 27

QL2 LIDAR

slide-28
SLIDE 28

QUESTIONS?