multivariate christoffel functions
play

Multivariate Christoffel functions and hyperinterpolation 1 Stefano - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multivariate Christoffel functions and hyperinterpolation 1 Stefano De Marchi Department of Mathematics - University of Padova Goettingen - December 2, 2014 1 Joint work with Alvise Sommariva and Marco Vianello Motivation Len Bos, Multivariate


  1. Multivariate Christoffel functions and hyperinterpolation 1 Stefano De Marchi Department of Mathematics - University of Padova Goettingen - December 2, 2014 1 Joint work with Alvise Sommariva and Marco Vianello

  2. Motivation Len Bos, Multivariate interpolation and polynomial inequalities, Ph.D. course held in 2001 at the University of Padova (unpublished notes) 2 of 26

  3. Motivation Len Bos, Multivariate interpolation and polynomial inequalities, Ph.D. course held in 2001 at the University of Padova (unpublished notes) He proved by means of the bivariate Christoffel-Darboux formula of Xu that the Lebesgue constant of the Morrow-Patterson points, Λ MP = O ( n 6 ) . n 2 of 26

  4. Motivation Len Bos, Multivariate interpolation and polynomial inequalities, Ph.D. course held in 2001 at the University of Padova (unpublished notes) He proved by means of the bivariate Christoffel-Darboux formula of Xu that the Lebesgue constant of the Morrow-Patterson points, Λ MP = O ( n 6 ) . n Morrow-Patterson points were the basis of inspiration of the Padua Points. 2 of 26

  5. Outline 1 The problem Estimates for Christofell functions 2 Disk and ball Square and cube 3 Upper bounds for Lebesgue constants The d -dimensional ball The d -dimensional cube The Morrow-Patterson points 4 References 3 of 26

  6. Introduction Notation n ( K )) := ( n + d K ⊂ R d , P d n ( K ) , N = dim ( P d d ); 1 4 of 26

  7. Introduction Notation n ( K )) := ( n + d K ⊂ R d , P d n ( K ) , N = dim ( P d d ); 1 K n ( x , y ) : reproducing kernel of P d n ( K ) in L 2 d µ ( K ) ( µ a positive 2 measure on K ) with representation (cf. Dunkl and Xu 2001, § 3.5) N � p j ( x ) p j ( y ) , x , y ∈ R d , K n ( x , y ) = (1) j = 1 where { p j } is any orthonormal basis of P d n ( K ) in L 2 d µ ( K ) . The function N � p 2 K n ( x , x ) = j ( x ) (2) j = 1 is known as the (reciprocal of) the n -th Christoffel function of µ on K . 4 of 26

  8. Introduction Hyperinterpolation operator Definition Hyperinterpolation of multivariate continuous functions, on compact subsets or manifolds, is a discretized orthogonal projection on polynomial subspaces [Sloan JAT1995]. It requires 3 main ingredients 5 of 26

  9. Introduction Hyperinterpolation operator Definition Hyperinterpolation of multivariate continuous functions, on compact subsets or manifolds, is a discretized orthogonal projection on polynomial subspaces [Sloan JAT1995]. It requires 3 main ingredients a good cubature formula (positive weights and high precision); 1 a good formula for representing the reproducing kernel (accurate 2 and efficient); a slow increase of the Lebegsue constant (which is the operator 3 norm). 5 of 26

  10. Introduction Hyperinterpolation operator Definition Hyperinterpolation of multivariate continuous functions, on compact subsets or manifolds, is a discretized orthogonal projection on polynomial subspaces [Sloan JAT1995]. It requires 3 main ingredients a good cubature formula (positive weights and high precision); 1 a good formula for representing the reproducing kernel (accurate 2 and efficient); a slow increase of the Lebegsue constant (which is the operator 3 norm). Practically It is a total-degree polynomial approximation of multivariate continuous functions, given by a truncated Fourier expansion in o.p. for the given domain 5 of 26

  11. Introduction Initial observation We observe the following fact. Let { a n } ∈ R + be a sequence s.t. � a n ≥ C n ( d µ, K ) = max x ∈ K K n ( x , x ) (3) Let � � � � P d L n : C ( K ) , � · � L ∞ ( K ) → n , � · � L 2 (4) d µ ( K ) uniformly bounded operators, i.e. ∃ M > 0 s.t. for every n �L n f � L 2 d µ ( K ) �L n � = sup ≤ M . � f � L ∞ ( K ) f � 0 Then this estimate holds: �L n f � L ∞ ( K ) �L n � ∞ = sup ≤ a n M . (5) � f � L ∞ ( K ) f � 0 6 of 26

  12. Lebesgue constant of the hyperinterpolation operator Given cubature formula ( X , w ) for µ , exact in P d 2 n ( K ) , with nodes X = X n = { ξ i ( n ) , i = 1 , . . . , V} ⊂ K and positive weights w = w n = { w i ( n ) , i = 1 , . . . , V} , V ≥ N = dim ( P d n ( K )) , { p j , j = 1 , . . . , N } be any orthonormal basis of P d n ( K ) in L 2 d µ ( K ) . hyperinterpolation operator is the discretized orthogonal projection L n : C ( K ) → P d n ( K ) defined as N � L n f ( x ) = � f , p j � ℓ 2 w ( X ) p j ( x ) , j = 1 where ℓ 2 w ( X ) is equipped with the scalar product V � � f , g � = w i f ( ξ i ) g ( ξ i ) . i = 1 7 of 26

  13. ”Lebesgue constant” of the hyperinterpolation operator Corollary 1 Assume that (3) holds, then � �L n � ∞ ≤ a n µ ( K ) . (6) Proof. Following Sloan [JAT95], we can write by exactness in P d 2 n ( K ) and the Pythagorean theorem in ℓ 2 w ( X ) � � V � � w i f 2 ( ξ i ) �L n f � L 2 d µ ( K ) = �L n f � ℓ 2 w ( X ) ≤ � f � ℓ 2 w ( X ) = i = 1 � � V � � � � ≤ w i � f � ℓ ∞ ( X ) = µ ( K ) � f � ℓ ∞ ( X ) ≤ µ ( K ) � f � L ∞ ( K ) , i = 1 � so that in Proposition 1 we can take M = µ ( K ) . � 8 of 26

  14. Estimates disk and ball, K = B d Here we use the Gegenbauer measure W λ ( x ) = ( 1 − | x | 2 ) λ − 1 / 2 , λ > − 1 2 , (7) 9 of 26

  15. Estimates disk and ball, K = B d Here we use the Gegenbauer measure W λ ( x ) = ( 1 − | x | 2 ) λ − 1 / 2 , λ > − 1 2 , (7) Bos in [NZJM,94] proved � �� n + d � � n + d − 1 �� 2 = O ( n d / 2 ) , C n ( W 0 ( x ) d x , B d ) ≤ + (8) ω d d d ω d being the surface area of the unit sphere S d ⊂ R d + 1 . Later [Bloom, Bos, Levenberg, APM12] showed that C n has polynomial growth on the ball for d µ = W λ ( x ) d x , λ ≥ 0. No explicit bounds were provided! 9 of 26

  16. Estimates formulas for K = B 2 Main ingredient: Zernike polynomials (see [Carnicer, God´ es NA14]), orthogonal basis on the disk w.r.t. Lebesgue measure (used in optics)  � 2 ( h + 1 ) R m h ( r ) cos ( m θ ) , m ≥ 0    α m   Z m ˆ  h ( r , θ ) = (9)    �  2 ( h + 1 )  R m  h ( r ) sin ( m θ ) , m < 0   α m for 0 ≤ h ≤ n , | m | ≤ h , h − m ∈ 2 Z , where  2 , m = 0    α m = (10)    1 , m � 0   R m h ( r ) = ( − 1 ) ( h − m ) / 2 r m P m , 0 ( h − m ) / 2 ( 1 − 2 r 2 ) (11) and P m , 0 is the corresponding Jacobi polynomial of degree j . j 10 of 26

  17. Estimates formulas for the disk, K = B 2 Relevant property: for 0 ≤ h ≤ n , | m | ≤ h , h − m ∈ 2 Z � 2 h + 2 | ˆ Z m h ( r , θ ) | ≤ , x = ( r cos ( θ ) , r sin ( θ )) ∈ B 2 . π n n h ( r , θ )) 2 ≤ 1 � � � � (ˆ Z m K n ( x , x ) = ( 2 h + 2 ) π h = 0 | m |≤ h , h − m ∈ 2 Z h = 0 | m |≤ h , h − m ∈ 2 Z n = 1 ( 2 h + 2 )( n − h + 1 ) = 1 � 3 π ( n + 1 )( n + 2 )( n + 3 ) , π h = 0 and hence 1 � ( n + 1 )( n + 2 )( n + 3 ) = O ( n 3 / 2 ) . C n ( d x , B 2 ) ≤ √ (12) 3 π 11 of 26

  18. Estimates formulas for the cube, K = [ − 1 , 1 ] d Jacobi measure d � ( 1 − x i ) α ( 1 + x i ) β , α, β > − 1 , d µ = W α,β ( x ) d x , W α,β ( x ) = i = 1 (13) Total-degree orthonormal product basis d � Π α,β P α,β ˆ k ( x ) = k i ( x i ) , 0 ≤ | k | ≤ n , (14) i = 1 i = 1 k i , and ˆ P α,β where k = ( k 1 , . . . , k d ) with k i ≥ 0 and | k | = � d m denotes the m -th degree polynomial of the univariate orthonormal Jacobi basis with parameters α and β . 12 of 26

  19. Estimates formulas for K = [ − 1 , 1 ] d For max { α, β } ≥ − 1 / 2, max | ˆ P α,β k i | at ± 1, then � | ˆ P α,β m ( t ) | ≤ | ˆ P α,β ( 2 m + α + β + 1 )Γ( m + α + β + 1 )Γ( m + q + 1 ) m ( sign ( α − β )) | = 2 α + β + 1 m ! Γ( m + min { α, β } + 1 ) ≤ c ( α, β ) m q + 1 / 2 , t ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] , q = max { α, β } ≥ − 1 (15) 2 , 13 of 26

  20. Estimates formulas for K = [ − 1 , 1 ] d � 2 � � Π α,β x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] d K n ( x , x ) = max max k ( x ) x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] d 0 ≤| k |≤ n d d � 2 ≤ ( c ( α, β )) 2 d � � � � k 2 q + 1 � ˆ P α,β = k i ( sign ( α − β )) i 0 ≤| k |≤ n i = 1 0 ≤| k |≤ n i = 1 n − � d − 1 j = 1 k j n n − k 1 � � � k 2 q + 1 k 2 q + 1 k 2 q + 1 = ( c ( α, β )) 2 d = O ( n ( 2 q + 2 ) d ) , · · · 1 2 d k 1 = 0 k 2 = 0 k d = 0 which gives the qualitative bound C n ( W α,β ( x ) d x , [ − 1 , 1 ] d ) = O ( n ( q + 1 ) d ) . (16) 14 of 26

  21. Special cases α = β = 0, Legendre polynomials � 2 m + 1 | ˆ P 0 , 0 m ( t ) | ≤ ˆ P 0 , 0 m ( 1 ) = , t ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] , 2 from which we have n − � d − 1 j = 1 kj n − k 1 d n � 2 1 � � � P 0 , 0 � � � ˆ x ∈ [ − 1 , 1 ] d K n ( x , x ) = max ki ( 1 ) = ( 2 k 1 + 1 ) ( 2 k 2 + 1 ) · · · ( 2 k d + 1 ) , (17) 2 d i = 1 k 1 = 0 k 2 = 0 kd = 0 0 ≤| k |≤ n 15 of 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend