Multiband superconductivity in interface superconductors
Jonathan Edge edge@kth.se
- Multiband superconductivity
- STO and LAO/STO
- Probes for multiband SC
- Multiband signature in Hc2
- Results for Hc2 in STO and
LAO/STO
JME & A.Balatsky arXiv:1401.5318
Multiband superconductivity in interface superconductors Jonathan - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Multiband superconductivity in interface superconductors Jonathan Edge Multiband superconductivity edge@kth.se STO and LAO/STO Probes for multiband SC Multiband signature in H c2 Results for Hc2 in STO and LAO/STO JME &
LAO/STO
JME & A.Balatsky arXiv:1401.5318
LAO/STO
particle band hole band EF
Fermi energy
the Fermi surface
the density of states
particle band hole band EF
Fermi energy
the Fermi surface
the density of states
particle band hole band EF
Fermi energy
the Fermi surface
the density of states
2∆
crossing the Fermi energy
gaps Δ open up
Suhl, PRL 1959
particle bands hole bands EF
crossing the Fermi energy
gaps Δ open up
Suhl, PRL 1959
particle bands hole bands EF
crossing the Fermi energy
gaps Δ open up
Suhl, PRL 1959
particle bands hole bands EF
∆1
∆2
the two gaps, novel dynamics
are found to be multiband superconductors
the two gaps, novel dynamics
are found to be multiband superconductors Our interest: is the specific material SrTiO3 (STO) and the interface between LaAlO3 (LAO) and STO a multiband superconductor?
(PrOs4Sb12 (2005), CePt3Si , uranium compounds…)
Nagamatsu, J. et al., 2001 Seyfarth, PRL 2005 Mukuda, JPSJ 2009
multiple coherence peaks
a b
Richter, nature 2013
~3eV
vacancies make it conducting
developed
and theoretically for 50 years
Mannhart, Nature 2004 Müller, PRB (1979)
be discovered
resulted in high Tc cuprate SC
a multiband supeconductor
Koonce et al PR 163 380 Binnig, PRL1980 v.d.Marel, PRB 2011
be discovered
resulted in high Tc cuprate SC
a multiband supeconductor
Koonce et al PR 163 380 Binnig, PRL1980 v.d.Marel, PRB 2011
~ 5eV)
interface layer
~ 5eV)
interface layer STO
~ 5eV)
interface layer STO LAO
~ 5eV)
interface layer STO LAO Electron gas
~ 5eV)
interface layer STO LAO Electron gas
~ 5eV)
interface layer STO LAO Electron gas
low T
superconducting areas can be patterned with STM on nm scale
devices
Reyren, Science 2007 Cen, Nat. Mat. 2008
the sample/interface material
superconducting dome appears.
Koonce PR 1967 Caviglia Nature 2008
Probes which have tried to address this issue
100 dI/dV (mS) −100 –50 50 100 V (μV) 2 3 4 5 6 7
T = 0.05 K 0.10K 0.14K 0.18K 0.22K 0.26K 0.28K
c
Richter, Nature 2013
0.5 1 0.5 1
T/Tc ns(T)/ns(T=40 mK)
weak clean BCS (c)
Bert, PRB 2012
compare STO compare
Other potential probes
Lin 1409.2423
Hc2 is one of the few probes applicable both to the bulk and interface system
interface
~ z. 2!fm Dm ✓ r2
x + r2 y + r2 z + 4⇡iHx
ry 4⇡2H2x2 2 ◆ fm = 2∆m m: band index (2 {1, 2}), Dm: Diffusion coefficient in the band fm: quasiclassical anomalous Green’s function
∆m = 2⇡T
wD
X
ω>0
X
m0
mm0fm0(~ r, !) : coupling constants
tions) we get pairs (Hc2, Tc).
JME & Balatsky, arXiv:1401.5318
Solve for two sets of parameters: η = D2/D1
Parameters: Fernandes, PRB 2013 Parameters: Bussmann-Holder, Ferroelectrics 2010
λ11 = 0.14, λ22 = 0.13, λ12 = 0.02 λ11 = 0.3, λ22 = 0.1, λ12 = 0.015
Thin superconducting layer
cost: effectively H increases
d∆ dz = 0
LAO STO VAC
2ωfm Dm ⇣ r2
x + r2 z 4π2H2x2 φ2
⌘ fm = 2∆m r2
z ! π2 4d2
Rashba SOC
anomalous Green’s function f becomes a matrix
singlet component
rxf ! rxf + iαme ~ [σy, f] α : SOC coupling strength
Comparison: bulk STO results
λ11 = 0.14, λ22 = 0.13, λ12 = 0.02
fp=0.2
λ11 = 0.14 λ12 = 0.02 λ11 = 0.14 λ22 = 0.14 η = D2 D1 = 0.1 Hc2 is useful when
λ12 ⌧ λ11
measure onset of SC λ11 ≈ λ22
following Kogan, PRB 2009
more gaps open
multiband superconductivity - applicable to bulk and interface
probes
EF
∆1
∆2more gaps open
multiband superconductivity - applicable to bulk and interface
probes
EF
∆1
∆2