MSW Association Site Plan PeAC AC De Design igns Site te Pla - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

PeAC Designs

MSW Association Site Plan

Biosystems Engineering Senior Design 8 December 2005

PeAC AC De Design igns

Site te Pla lannin ning g Con

• nsul

ultants tants

Meagan Armstrong Rachel Cancienne Megan Perry

PeAC Designs

PeAC Designs

Introduction

• Muscogee-Seminole-Wichita Baptist Association

 Founded in 1851

 Purchased 40 acres southeast of Henryetta in 1956

 Facility is used for meetings and church activities

• Acquired project through Ralph Hight, US Army

Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

• PeAC Designs will create an improved site plan

PeAC Designs

Site Description

• Grade varies throughout site

 Fairly level on north half  Rocky, steep on south half

• Vegetation change along gradient

 Grassy field on north half  Dense tree vegetation occurs on south half

• Soil properties vary throughout property

♦ North half - Linker fine sandy loam ♦ Middle property - Linker-Hector complex ♦ South half - Enders-Hector association

N

PeAC Designs

Structural Layout

• All layouts created

with ArcView 3.2

• Colors distinguish

building types

 Common use  Private use  Open air

N

PeAC Designs

Common Use Facilities

• Located on north

half of property

• 1. Women’s Ministry
• 2. Dormitory
• 3. Concession Stand
• 4. Cafeteria
• 5. Showers/Restrooms
• 6. Children’s Nursery
• 7. Chapel

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5 N

PeAC Designs

Private Use Facilities

• Church cabins &

storage buildings

 Eastern Boundary  Bisecting Property  Northwest Cluster

N

PeAC Designs

Open Air Facilities

• All on north half
• f property
• 1. Prayer Garden
• 2. Nursery Playground
• 3. Carport
• 4. Open Pavilions
• 5. Basketball Court

1 2 3 4 5 4 4 N

PeAC Designs

Electrical Distribution

• Main power utilities

indicated by:

Transformer Power Pole Power Lines

N

PeAC Designs

Water Distribution

• Two water meters
• n north edge
• Two sizes of

water lines

Water Meter 2” Line 1 ½” Line

N

PeAC Designs

Sewer Collection

• Two sizes of

wastewater lines

6” Lines 4” Lines

N

PeAC Designs

Site Expectations

• Utility Improvements

 Electrical Distribution

• Improve safety

 Water Distribution

• Increase water pressure
• Size and replace lines

 Sewer Collection

• Increase size of lagoon
• Size and replace lines

PeAC Designs

Site Expectations

• Additional Facilities

 Common Use Buildings

• Additional Dormitory
• Office/Sleeping Quarters
• Restroom Facilities

 Designated Camping Area

• RV and Tent Pad Sites
• Water and Electricity

 Larger Prayer Garden/Hiking Trail

PeAC Designs

Literature Review

• Layout Planning

 Researched different types of site plans

• Recreational Design Considerations

 Studied methods to accommodate current land features

• Design Process

 Determined steps to complete a functional design

PeAC Designs

Structural Design – Plan A

• Uses “Star” Planning Pattern

 Centralizes common use facilities  Moves main entrance  Relocates children’s nursery

• Recognizes Site Expectations

 Adds requested buildings  Incorporates RV and tent pad sites  Expands prayer garden  Includes hiking trail

PeAC Designs

Layout of Plan A

1 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 6 7 8 9 9 9 10 11

N

• 1. Dormitories
• 2. Cafeteria
• 3. Office Building
• 4. Women’s Ministry Building
• 5. Chapel
• 6. Restroom/Shower Facilities
• 7. Basketball Court
• 8. Children’s Nursery
• 9. Open Pavilions
• 10. Main Prayer Garden
• 11. Small Prayer Garden

The facilities shown include:

Hiking Trail Roads

PeAC Designs

Structural Design – Plan B

• Utilizes aspects of current structural layout

 Makes use of all large permanent structures  Eliminates unoccupied cabins and storage buildings

• Recognizes Site Expectations

 Adds requested buildings  Incorporates RV and tent pad sites  Expands prayer garden  Includes hiking trail

PeAC Designs

Layout of Plan B

The facilities shown include:

• 1. Dormitory
• 2. Office Building
• 3. Restroom/Shower

Facilities

Hiking Trail Roads

1 3 3 2

N

PeAC Designs

Feasibility of Design – Plan A

• Pros

 Utilizes shaded, level area for RV and tent camping  Uses undeveloped land for hiking trails/prayer gardens

• Cons

 Reconstruction of buildings will be costly  New trenches must be excavated for utilities  Shallow soil depth to bedrock makes excavation difficult

PeAC Designs

Feasibility of Design – Plan B

• Pros

 Maintains a majority of current structural layout  Utilizes existing utility trenches to limit cost  Includes feasible additions as in Plan A

• Cons

 Provides less organization

PeAC Designs

Final Recommendation: Plan B

• We estimate this plan to be the most cost

effective

 Does not entail extreme excavation and construction

• Includes all expansion requests of MSW Assoc.
• Makes best use of topography and soils

PeAC Designs

Acknowledgments

Linda and Don Minter

Director of MSW Association

Ralph Hight, P.E.

Chief of Engineering and Construction US Army Corps of Engineers Tulsa District

A.J. Tiger

MSW Association - Planning Committee

• Dr. Michael Kizer

Team Mentor - Associate Professor, OSU

• Dr. Paul Weckler

Assistant Professor, OSU