melnea cass boulevard
play

Melnea Cass Boulevard Design Objectives Meeting March 15, 2012 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Melnea Cass Boulevard Design Objectives Meeting March 15, 2012 presented by Boston Transportation Department with Howard/Stein-Hudson Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge Toole Design Group GLC Development Resources Boston Transportation


  1. Melnea Cass Boulevard Design Objectives Meeting March 15, 2012 presented by Boston Transportation Department with Howard/Stein-Hudson Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge Toole Design Group GLC Development Resources Boston Transportation Department

  2. Agenda Part 2 – Framing Design Concepts Part 2 – Framing Design Concepts Part 1 – Presentation Part 1 – Presentation 6:30 – 7:15 PM 6:30 – 7:15 PM 6:00 – 6:30 PM 6:00 – 6:30 PM • • Breakout Groups Breakout Groups Introduction/Process Introduction/Process Part 3 – Breakout Group Part 3 – Breakout Group What we have learned: What we have learned: • • Community Vision Community Vision Reports/ Q & A – 7:15 – 8:00 PM Reports/ Q & A – 7:15 – 8:00 PM • • Design Directions Design Directions • • Group representatives give summaries of Group representatives give summaries of breakout group discussion breakout group discussion Complete Streets Principles Complete Streets Principles • • Questions and answers Questions and answers Corridor-wide Framework Corridor-wide Framework • • Melnea Cass Boulevard Melnea Cass Boulevard by Area by Area Boston Transportation Department

  3. Boston Transportation Department Project Area

  4. Project Tim eline  Initial Public Meeting – 10/11/2011 • Introducing the project  Community Visioning Meeting – 12/14/2011 • Envisioning success  Design Objectives Meeting – Tonight • Turning the vision into concepts  Sharing Initial Concepts – Spring 2012  Gaining consensus on Preferred Option – Summer 2012 Boston Transportation Department

  5. W hat W e Heard From You - Vision  Safe, clean and beautiful  Well-maintained – snow and litter consistently removed  All parcels owned and cared for  Safe for cyclists and pedestrians  Providing safe, effective transit service  Moving calmed vehicular traffic effectively  Fully integrated with its surrounding neighborhood  A catalyst for neighborhood economic development Boston Transportation Department

  6. W hat W e Heard From You – Design Direction  Keep mature trees as part of new landscaping  Soften the Boulevard – reduce “highway feel” Calm traffic – enhance pedestrian/cyclist safety • Connect to walking/cycling infrastructure beyond the corridor •  Fully integrate the Boulevard with cross streets and the neighborhood Provide a gateway to Dudley Square • Design buildings for active street life • Safe and family-friendly • Boston Transportation Department

  7. W hat W e Learned – Econom ic Developm ent Community Vision Community Vision Development Tools Development Tools Tighten connections to jobs: Tighten connections to jobs: Improve transit Improve transit • • Longwood Medical Area Longwood Medical Area • • Boston University Boston University Keep, but calm, high traffic volumes Keep, but calm, high traffic volumes Medical Center Medical Center • • Southeast Expressway Southeast Expressway Improve pedestrian environment Improve pedestrian environment Strengthen and grow retail center: Strengthen and grow retail center: Create attractive, high-quality Create attractive, high-quality • • Improve connections between Improve connections between environment environment Dudley Square and South End Dudley Square and South End • • Increase shopper population Increase shopper population Develop retail and commercial: Develop retail and commercial: • • At major intersections At major intersections • • Visual connections between Visual connections between Dudley Square and South End Dudley Square and South End • • Draw people across the Draw people across the Boulevard Boulevard • • Create a sense of place Create a sense of place Boston Transportation Department

  8. Com plete Streets Principles  Complete Streets are designed and operated to enable safe access for all users.  Pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities must be able to safely and comfortably move along and across a complete street. Boston Transportation Department

  9. Com plete Streets Principles • Create vibrant public spaces • Respect and foster a “sense of place” • Create opportunities for healthy living and physical activity • Support economic development • Design for sustainability • “Smart” in the use of technology Boston Transportation Department

  10. Com plete Streets Principles  Pedestrian Safety • • Accessible sidewalks • Appropriate degree of separation from roadways • Lower motor vehicle speeds • Well-lit facilities • Pedestrian-friendly intersections  Shorter crossings  Minimal delay  Less exposure to conflicts  Frequent accessible crossings Comfort and Convenience • • Street trees • Comfortable and inviting spaces with amenities • Connections to other modes Boston Transportation Department

  11. Pedestrian Connectivity [ Insert Assessment Map Here] Boston Transportation Department

  12. Pedestrian Connectivity [ Insert Assessment Map Here] Boston Transportation Department

  13. Com plete Streets Principles  Bicycle Safety • • Dedicated space • Degree of separation between modes • Lower motor vehicle speeds • Less exposure to conflicts • Well-lit facilities • Bicycle-friendly intersections  Minimum green intervals  Bicycle detection  Bicycle priority (i.e. signals, bicycle boxes, etc.) Comfort and Convenience • • Consistent facility types • Connections to other modes • Access to shot term and long term parking • Wayfinding signage Boston Transportation Department

  14. Bicycle Connectivity [ Insert Assessment Map Here] Boston Transportation Department

  15. Com plete Streets Principles  Motor Vehicles Safety • • Designs that reduce conflicts and the severity of crashes • Intuitive and clear geometry • Appropriate degree of separation between modes • Safe options for turning movements • Well-lit facilities • Efficient intersection designs  Minimal delay  Coordinated signal timing Comfort and Convenience • • Well-maintained roadways • Clear guidance and Wayfinding • Access to parking Boston Transportation Department

  16. Com plete Streets Principles  Transit Safety • • Safe and accessible transit stops • Appropriate sidewalk widths • Less conflicts with other modes • Well-lit facilities • Transit-friendly intersections  Minimal delay in service  Accessible crossings  Transit prioritization  Responsive signal design Comfort and Convenience • • Comfortable and inviting transit stops with amenities • Well-maintained transit stops and roadways • Connections to other modes • Real-time route information Boston Transportation Department

  17. Boston Transportation Department [ Insert Assessment Map Here] MBTA Route 1

  18. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route 8

  19. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route 1 9

  20. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route 4 7

  21. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Route CT3

  22. Boston Transportation Department MBTA Routes and Stops

  23. Boston Transportation Department The Urban Ring

  24. BRT ( Bus Rapid Transit)  Frequent Service  Real-time Information  Widely-spaced Stops  Traffic Signal Control  High-capacity Vehicles  Dedicated Lanes Boston Transportation Department

  25. BRT Stations  Safe Pedestrian Access  Easy Loading/Unloading  Comfort and Security Boston Transportation Department

  26. BRT Configurations  Curbside Bus Lanes  Buses mix with traffic  Parking conflicts  Right turn conflicts  Slower travel times and less reliability Boston Transportation Department

  27. BRT Configurations  Center Bus Lanes  Buses don’t mix with traffic  No parking conflicts and turning conflicts managed through signal design  Faster travel times and increased reliability Boston Transportation Department

  28. BRT Alternatives TRAVEL LANES • Urban Ring Phase 2 Locally Preferred Alternative • Reviewed by the Roxbury community including STATION Center Bus RSMPOC • Typically most efficient design for BRT Lanes • Passengers exit onto median island station • Better access for new development STATION and curbside parking TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES Boston Transportation Department

  29. BRT Alternatives TRAVEL LANES • Urban Ring Phase 2 Locally Preferred Alternative • Reviewed by the Roxbury community including STATION Center Bus RSMPOC • Typically most efficient design for BRT Lanes • Passengers exit onto median island station • Better access for new development STATION and curbside parking TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES • Bus stops next to curb for passenger STATION loading/unloading Curbside • Parking conflicts TRAVEL LANES Bus Lanes • Intersection conflicts TRAVEL LANES STATION • Passengers exit bus onto island and STATION curb stations Bus Lanes • Parking access issues One Side • Intersection challenges STATION TRAVEL LANES TRAVEL LANES Boston Transportation Department

  30. Com plete Streets Com ponents Exclusive Transit Lanes Boston Transportation Department

  31. Com plete Streets Com ponents Travel/ Exclusive Travel/ Parking Transit Parking Lanes Lanes Lanes Boston Transportation Department

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend