J tIN i fJy I l f 1 x C r Green Springs Interchange Exit 14 - - PDF document
f17 d b lJ t fJ fr u 9 J9r @ J J tIN i fJy I l f 1 x C r Green Springs Interchange Exit 14 North Ashland Interchange Exit 19 INTERCHANGE AREA MANAGEMENT PLANS lAMP ODors Mission Provide a safe efficient transportation system that
f17 d blJ t
fJ
1
@
J9r
x
C
Green Springs Interchange Exit 14
NorthAshland Interchange Exit 19
INTERCHANGE
AREA
MANAGEMENT
PLANS
lAMP
ODors Mission
Provide asafe efficient transportation system that
supports economic opportunity and livable communitiesfor Oregonians
lAMP 14 19 Overview
What is lAMP 1 4
1 9
Why an lAMP
lAMP Content lAMP Process Flowchart Ashland s Partnership Role
1
Exit 19 N Ashland Valley View
view northwest on
5 1964
Other ODOTArea Bridge
Projects
Bundles 301 and 314
Bundle 301
Replaces 5bridges
1 5 overpass Eagle Mill Road Bridges located 2 miles south of Exit 19
Bear Creek Bridges located 0 8 miles north of Exit 14 and Neil Creek Road Bridge located approximately 3 miles south of
Ashland
Design work beginning Construction scheduled early 2008 Bundle 314 Replaces 2bridges
1 5underpass
Ashland St
Greensprings Hwy Bridge at Exit 14
South Valley View Road Bridge at Exit 19
Design work to begin Spring
March
2007
@ 2yrs
Public participation opportunity during design Construction anticipated 2009 2011
2
What is lAMP 14 19
An
Interchange Area Management Plan
a 20 year
plan for managing Interchanges to achieve a balanced land use and transportation relationship
An agency partnership plan expressing Ashland Jackson County and ODOT s management objectives A plan to protect the function
capacity 0
an
interchange
i e
managing the margin
An element ofthe Ashland Jackson County TSPs
Transportation System Plans adopted by City Co
An ODOT Facility Plan
adopted by the OTC
tJ
Why an
lAMP
Purpose
Need
Similar to the movement of blood throughout the
body a transportation network serves as the
lifeline for the movement ofpeople goods and services within and beyond the
commuf
ity
L
tMU
Without effective management the network may become overly congested and clogged leading to
interchange
local street traffic problems prior to the design and functional life ofthe facility An IAMP provides the management tools necessary for the long term sustainability ofthe network
dU5
crQ
JI ff
b7tTjt1M
3
I Why
Land Use
Transportation Basics
Source Stover
Koepke Transportation andLandnevelopment 2dedition
fi
ure
1
11M T
1ion Und U
DfNeIopment Cyck
Complete
Access
I
Control
Id I
i
Movement Arterial
E E
l
a
cCollector
it D
Access local
Access
Figure 43 IIJsic Functional Clnses
Why
Land Use
Transportation Basics
Source Stover
Koepke TI
ansporlalion
andLand Development 2nd edition Growth
IAMP Purpose
To manage This margin
Supply
Demand
Congestion Private Development
Perfect Equilibrium Points Time
Figure 1 3 Balance Between Increments of Development
and Improvements in Transportation Facilities
Source Winick 13J as modified by Owolabi
81
4
lAMP Content
Front matter purpose a intent
problem statement interchange function goals a objectives management
area
authority Existing Conditions Inventory a Data Analysis
Future Conditions Analysis
Management Alternatives Development and Analysis Interchange Area and Access Management elim Adoption a Implementation
Local Gov t a the OTC
D
PIIl TICf
Cr
lJ
5
Y
d
PotentiallAMPManagement Tools
Transportation System Management
TSM
traffic control lane striping signing Transportation Demand Management
TOM TOM strategies transit service
multi
modal facilities
Trip Budget Ordinance
trip caps trip allocation strategies
Other land use strategies and ordinances to preserve
capacity safety and performance standards
zone changes density controls U
Interchange Ramp Metering
Other transportation system improvements
A
IAMPFuture Fiffects
tt5t
r
Increased quality in balancing LU T
better planning leading to better
1 4L
z
h
management decisions
to lffi
Recognition of the importance of
Access Management to interchange area
safety
access
Increased predictability among Local Governments
ODOT and developers
6
lAMP FutureFJ
Tects
Protection of facility improvements serving 20 year minimum growth Better future decision making
Responsible stewardship of major public
investments for interchange facilities
Ashland s Role
Ashland
ODOT Partnership on Project
Partner in project decision making process
via CAC
TAC
and city PC CC decisions
Adopt the plan City and the OTC Oregon Transportation Commission
Drive Public Involvement
Designate Citizens Advisory Committee
CAC membership
TechnicalAdvisory Committee
TAC
staff Coordinate meetings facilities and timing of
Public Workshops 7
Available Resources
ODOT Transportation Development
Division
TDD
http
www oregon govI ODOT ITDITPI
lAMP Guidelines
http
www oregon gov IODOTITD
ITPI docs Dublications
lAMP Iguide
Iines Ddf John D McDonald
Project Manager
541 957 3688
Questions
Answers
thank you
CONTACTS
John D McDonald
Project Manager
541 957 3688
John MCDONALD@odot state or us
David J
Pyles Development Review Planner
541 774 6399
David PVLES@odot state or us
8
November 15 2006
Cynthia Gunn
2410 Demaray Grants Pass OR 97526 RE Hwy 199 Expressway Upgrade Dear Cynthia Thank you for your phone call regarding the Hwy 199 Expressway Upgrade project You werecalling in response to our letter notifying you about surveying in along Hubbard and Demaray As we spoke on the phone the Hwy 199 Expressway Upgrade project is in a study phase to determine solutions for solving safety and congestions problems along Hwy 199 from Midway to the South Y Citizen Teams have been meeting for almost 2 years developing alternatives and narrowing the alternatives down
They have forwarded 2 alternatives for additional detailed technical analysis
each of which contains the same modifications in the Hubbard area
Specifically in your area the proposed modifications include
Traffic Signal on US 199 @ Hubbard
Improvements to Hubbard and realigning the connection to Demaray Adding a left turn lane on Demaray
NB
to turn north onto Hubbard
The Hwy 199 Expressway team will be releasing the draft project study Environmental Assessment for
public review and comment after the first of the year
I d encourage you to provide any comments
regarding the proposal during the public comment period
After the public comment period the Citizen Teams may make changes to the proposal based on the public comments
In addition ODOT staff will
respond and address the comments in the final study report due out in late spring
I am including the concepts that the teams are studying
The only difference in the two concepts is the modifications at Allen Creek and Redwood Ave they both have the same treatments along the highway and in the western section
If you have questions about what the lines on the paper or anything else please call or we can meet in person to discuss further please don t hesitate to call Gary Learning
774 6388
Sincerely Eryca McCartin
ODOT Project Leader
Rogue Valley Office
cc
Debbie Timms ODOT Project Leader
Gary Learning
ODOT Public Relations
T I Existing Conditions Inventory and Data Analysis IAMP Definition and Background Future Conditions Analysis Alternatives Development and Analysis Interchange Data Management Plan
PART III: IAMP PROCESS FLOW CHART
Local Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners/City Council work sessions to present the goals and objectives of the plan and adoption requirements TAC reviews analysis and confirms problem statement Problem Statement Interchange Functions TAC defines desired interchange function, establishes goals and objectives plan, and delineates planning area boundaries Purpose and Introduction ODOT Region office determines that an IAMP is needed; assigns ODOT Project Manager Planning and Management Area ODOT Project Manager develops statement of work, timeline, staffing requirements,
budget, with local government input ODOT project manager identifies and contacts local government representative (community development director/planning director/public works director) ODOT project manager and local gov't rep form TAC Data gathering, processing, and preparation of background technical memoranda Analysis of future conditions to identify issues and problems Develop alternative outcomes and findings Compile draft IAMP Revise draft IAMP according to TAC and public feedback and comments Planning Commission hearing to adopt resolution endorsing IAMP and amendments Board of County Commissioners/City Council hearing to adopt IAMP and amendments resolution endorsing Goals and Objectives Public Workshop #2 to present and receive input on potential alternatives Public Workshop #1 to introduce the plan and gather input on potential
Develop implementation measures: land use plan and
control, and identify future improvements Public Workshop #3 present draft IAMP and receive input Local Government Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Other Public Workshops
KEY
OTC adopts IAMP elements as facility plan