mechanical descaling by high pressure water jet
play

Mechanical descaling by high pressure water jet assoc.prof. Michal - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mechanical descaling by high pressure water jet assoc.prof. Michal Pohanka Workshop on Pickling Solutions Technology 13th of November 2019, Dsseldorf Introduction Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic Hydraulic descaling of


  1. Mechanical descaling by high pressure water jet assoc.prof. Michal Pohanka Workshop on Pickling Solutions Technology 13th of November 2019, Düsseldorf

  2. Introduction  Brno University of Technology, Czech Republic  Hydraulic descaling of coils of wires  Laboratory experiments Impact pressure distribution measurement  Hydraulic descaling  EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope   Conclusion www.heatlab.cz

  3. Brno, Czech Republic www.heatlab.cz

  4. Brno University of Technology www.heatlab.cz

  5. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering www.heatlab.cz

  6. Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow Laboratory Experimental research of heat transfer and heat treatment Numerical models of continuous casting, rolling and heat treatment Product Roll Descaling Cooling Cooling Secondary Cooling Contact Continuous Casting Rolling and heat treatment www.heatlab.cz

  7. Descaling of coils of wires – outer diameter 1.4 m www.heatlab.cz

  8. Impact pressure distribution measurement PC DAQ Nozzle Impact area Pressure Position Moving Plate Pressure Sensor www.heatlab.cz

  9. Spray comparison – High and low pressure but same water flow rate www.heatlab.cz

  10. Spray comparison – High and low pressure but same water flow rate Video www.heatlab.cz

  11. Distance 300 mm - No wires Nozzle A at 45 MPa Nozzle B at 5 MPa Catalogue spray angle 45 ° Catalogue spray angle 40 ° 6.3 3.87 3.5 5 3 4 2.5 2 3 1.5 2 1 1 0.5 0 0.03 kPa kPa 6.3 3.87 3.5 5 3 2.5 4 200 220 2 3 1.5 2 1 1 0.5 0.03 0 kPa kPa www.heatlab.cz

  12. Impact pressure measurements without dummy wires 5MPa 14 45MPa 100% 12 92% Impact pressure [kPa] 10 5MPa Nozzle A 8 45MPa Nozzle B 100% 6 79% 4 2 0 200 mm 300 mm Spraying distance www.heatlab.cz

  13. Cleaning graphite coating Nozzle A at 45 MPa Nozzle B at 5 MPa www.heatlab.cz

  14. Cleaning graphite coating - Video www.heatlab.cz

  15. Impact pressure distribution while spraying through wires 1 layer 6 layers www.heatlab.cz

  16. One layer of wires 45MPa 5MPa 3. 6 www.heatlab.cz

  17. Distance 300 mm - with 6 layers of wires – 5 MPa www.heatlab.cz

  18. Distance 300 mm - with 1-6 layers of wires – smaller nozzle, 45 MPa 1 layer 2 layers 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 kPa kPa 4 layers 6 layers 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.2 1 1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0 0 kPa kPa www.heatlab.cz

  19. Distance 300 mm - with 1-6 layers of wires - Video www.heatlab.cz

  20. Spray distances during hydraulic descaling 200 200 www.heatlab.cz

  21. Distance of descaling header from wires is 200 mm www.heatlab.cz

  22. Reduced spray angle Spray angle 45 ° Spray angle 30 ° 3.87 6.7 3.5 6 3 5 110 2.5 4 200 2 3 1.5 2 1 1 0.5 0.03 0 kPa kPa www.heatlab.cz

  23. Hydraulic descaling Wire descaling using smaller nozzle at 45 MPa for steel grade 1.4571 * This is not the final surface of the product. This is surface during pickling program. www.heatlab.cz

  24. EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope www.heatlab.cz

  25. EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope backscattered (BSE) secondary electrons (SE) www.heatlab.cz

  26. EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope Element Wt % Inte. Error O 27.8 1.4 Si 0.4 16.0 MoL 3.9 4.7 Cr 32.2 1.0 Mn 0.3 29.4 Fe 31.3 1.3 Ni 4.0 5.3 www.heatlab.cz

  27. EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope Steel grade 1.4404 Fe Cr Ni Mo Mn Si Data sheet 16.5–18.5% 10–13% 2–2.5% ≤ 2% ≤ 1% Measured 66.4% 17.6% 11.1% 2.9% 1.3% 0.8% www.heatlab.cz

  28. EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope Scale layer on 1.4404 Fe O Cr Ni Mo Mn Measured 31.3% 27.8% 32.2% 4.0% 3.9% 1.3% www.heatlab.cz

  29. EDX Analysis with a Scanning Electron Microscope Scale layer on 1.4404 Fe O Cr Ni Mo Measured 32.7% 20.8% 28.7% 13.5% 4.0% www.heatlab.cz

  30. Conclusion  Big spraying distance (200 mm and more)  Free space  Use bigger nozzle and smaller pressure  Spraying through wires  Use smaller nozzle and bigger pressure  Hydraulic descaling is effective during pickling. Thank you for your attention… www.heatlab.cz www.heatlab.cz

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend