Ma Magnetoh ohydrod odynami mic T Turb rbulence i in St - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ma magnetoh ohydrod odynami mic t turb rbulence i in st
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Ma Magnetoh ohydrod odynami mic T Turb rbulence i in St - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ma Magnetoh ohydrod odynami mic T Turb rbulence i in St Stoch ochastic A c Accr ccretion on F Flows Amit K Chattopadhyay SARI, Mathematics Aston University Collaborators: Banibrata Mukhopadhyay (IISc), Sujit K Nath (U. Leeds) The


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Ma Magnetoh

  • hydrod
  • dynami

mic T Turb rbulence i in St Stoch

  • chastic A

c Accr ccretion

  • n F

Flows

Amit K Chattopadhyay

SARI, Mathematics Aston University

Collaborators:

Banibrata Mukhopadhyay (IISc), Sujit K Nath (U. Leeds)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The talk was based on the following papers

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Accretion-Jet Formation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Accr ccretion flows

A A rot

  • tating mass (e.

(e.g. disc) ) in a clos

  • sed

ed or

  • rbit arou
  • und a cen

entral gravitating bod

  • dy (e.

(e.g. black hol

  • le)

e) can em emit radiation when en en ener ergy & angular momen entum are e extract cted ed è in inwar ard d spir piralling alling orbit bit

←T~1010 K Hard X-rays : advection T≤107 K soft X-rays ↓ or UV

↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↓

jet

↑ ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ↓

jet

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ma Magne neto-Ro Rotational-In Instability y (MRI) RI)

Mukhopadhyay-Afshordi-Narayan ApJ 2005: Fast transient growth in instability due to non-normal modes, arising out of Coriolis force. The energy grows by more than a factor of 100 for a Reynolds number R = 300 and more than a factor of 1000 for R = 1000 è Turbulence. For a Keplerian disk, similar perturbations with vertical structure grow by no more than a factor of 4, explaining why the same simulations did not find turbulence in this system.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ge General al se set of MHD equatio ions: s: Hot flo lows

Nath & Mukhopadhyay 2015

In a local shearing box Ω ~ 1/rq ,

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Co Complex plane (Argand diagram): Strong magnetic field effects

Bhatia & Mukhopadhyay 2016

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Un Unanswered Questions from MRI Th Theory

  • 1. Is there any pure hydrodynamic instability? NO! (Pringle, Ann. Rev. AA 1981).
  • 2. What to do with non-magnetic instability?
  • 3. How to incorporate the fact that thermal instability > viscous instability?
  • 4. Can we accommodate the fact that even ‘cold’ accretion stars are actually very hot
  • 103 C (cold X-ray star) to 106 C (hot X-ray star)?

Our Hypothesis:

  • Draw from De Dominicis-Martin (PRA 19, 419, 1979) Chattopadhyay-Bhattacharjee

(PRE 63, 0116306, 2000) models of stochastically forced Navier-Stokes flows in sheared coaxial cylinders (total velocity u = uc + ub) that directly addresses points 2-4 above and laterally 1.

  • OUR MODEL: stochastically forced Orr-Sommerfeld and Squire equations in

presence of Coriolis force

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Fo Forced Orr-Som Sommerfeld Mod

  • del: Magn

gnetic vs St Stoc

  • chastic:

Ch Chattopadhyay-Mu Mukhopadhyay Mo Model

} }

Magnetized Non-normal model Stochastic Model

(magnetic fluctuations à noise)

}

Noise Strength

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Co Correlation F Functions

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Te Temporal Correlation vs Time Difference (Sh

Shows stron

  • ng

g and fast gr growing g instability)

1.00 0.50 5.00 0.10 10.00 0.05 Τ 100 1000 104 105 106 107 108 Cu 1.00 0.50 5.00 0.10 10.00 0.05 Τ 100 1000 104 105 106 Cu

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Sp Spatial ial Correla latio ion vs Length Sc Scale ale (Fi

Finite length su suppressi ssion of f sp spatial instability)

104 0.001 0.01 0.1 r 1000 105 107 Su 104 0.001 0.01 0.1 r 1104 200 500 1000 2000 5000 Su

slide-14
SLIDE 14

10 100 1000 104 105 k 1017 1013 109 105 0.1 1000 u

k

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MA MAGNETIZED & & Stocha chastically Force ced d Orr rr-Sommerf rfeld d Mo Mode del: Cha Chattopa padh dhyay-Nath h Mo Mode del

Noise Strength

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Sp Spatio ioTemporal al Correla latio ion vs Sp Spac ace/Tim ime Dif ifference

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Sp Spatio ioTemporal al Cross-Co Correlations vs Space/Time Difference

Velocity-Vorticity cross-correlation q=1.5 (solid), 1.7 (dashed), 1.9 (dotted), ~2 (dot-dashed)

2 4 6 8 10 τ 1010 1011 1012 CuζB 2 4 6 8 10 τ 1010 1011 1012 1013 CζζB

Vorticity-magnetic vorticity cross-correlation q=1.5 (solid), 1.7 (dashed), 1.9 (dotted), ~2 (dot-dashed)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Sp Spatio ioTemporal al Cross-Co Correlations vs Space/Time Difference

Velocity-Magnetic field TEMPORAL cross-correlation q=1.5 (solid), 1.7 (dashed), 1.9 (dotted), ~2 (dot-dashed) Vorticity-magnetic vorticity SPATIAL cross-correlation q=1.5 (solid), 1.7 (dashed), 1.9 (dotted), ~2 (dot-dashed)

2 4 6 8 10 τ 109 1010 1011 1012 CuB 10-2 0.05 0.10 0.20 0.50 r 107 108 109 1010 SuB

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Summary and Conclusions

Ø Origin of instability and then plausible turbulence in accretion discs and similar laboratory shear

flows is generally a big question. ØMagnetorotational Instability (MRI) is a good mechanism for magnetic accretion discs, but it is limited to weak field regime and not applicable to laboratory flows. But that does not explain instability in non-magnetic accretion flows. ØStochastic Forcing can bridge the magnetic & non-magnetic accretion ends. ØCross-correlations lead to time symmetry violation that ‘adds on’ to the Coriolis force which in turn leads to suppression of Alfven waves at finite time scales.