Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia with a Suspended, Bacterial-Based, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

intensive tank culture of tilapia with a suspended
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia with a Suspended, Bacterial-Based, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia with a Suspended, Bacterial-Based, Treatment Process James Rakocy, Donald Bailey, Eric Thoman and Charlie Shultz University of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Intensive Tank Culture of Tilapia with a Suspended, Bacterial-Based, Treatment Process

James Rakocy, Donald Bailey, Eric Thoman and Charlie Shultz

University of the Virgin Islands Agricultural Experiment Station

  • St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tank Dimensions and Characteristics

Size: 200 m3, 16 m diameter, 1 m mean water depth Block wall and 30 mil HDPE liner Surface area: 200 m2 (0.02 ha or 1/20 acre) Bottom: 3o slope to center Center clarifier: 1 m3, 45o slope, fiberglass, 10-cm drain Outside standpipe for solids removal Aeration: three ¾-hp vertical-lift aerators Water movement: one ¾-hp vertical-lift aerator tilted horizontally

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Tank Design

16 m Sludge Cone Volume = 1.0 m3 1.09 m 0.15 m Freeboard Total Culture Volume = 200 m3 Sludge Removal Line 3º Slope

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tank Plan View

To storage lagoo Flow Base addition tank Central cone Drain Aeration device Sludge collection and measurement

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Treatment Processes and Production Management

Continuous aeration Mixing to maintain suspension of bacterial floc Nitrification in water column Settleable solid waste removal once daily Feed twice daily with floating feed (32% protein) Feed ad libitum for 30 – 60 minutes Monitor pH daily, maintain pH 7.5 with Ca(OH)2 Add CaCl2 to prevent nitrite toxicity

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Production

81.0 1.9 13.7 3.0 201 678 73.6 25 2 78.9 2.2 14.4 4.0 175 912 214 20 1 Surviva (%) FCR Final Biomass (kg/m3) Growth Rate (g/d) Culture Period (d) Final Size (g) Initial Size (g) Stocking Rate (#/m3) Trial

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Major Inputs and Outputs

2 1 Trial 52.8 1.5 25.4 470 880 200 23.0 Feed (kg/day) 52.8 1.7 366 401 200 Electricity (kWh/day) Base Addition (kg/day) Sludge (L/d) Makeup Water (L/day) Initial Water (m3)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Water Quality

Trial 2 Mean Trial 1 Mean Parameter (mg/L) 204 7.8 2.7 1.8 28.5 7.9 224 Total Alkalinity 7.8 pH 1.5 NO2-N 1.2 NH3-N 26.8 Water Temp (C) 5.5 DO

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Water Quality

Trial 2 Mean Trial 1 Mean Parameter (mg/L) 317 19.2 855 48 363 924 301 Cl 16.9 Ortho-Phosphate 476 TSS 29 Settleable solids (ml/L) 353 COD 1895 Chlorophyll a (ug/L)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Total Ammonia Nitrogen – Trial 1 & 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 Week Concentration (mg/L) Trial 1 Trial 2

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Nitrite Nitrogen – Trial 1 & 2

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 Week Concentration (mg/L) Trial 1 Trial 2

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Nitrate Nitrogen – Trial 1 & 2

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 Week Concentration (mg/L) Trial 1 Trial 2

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Feed – Trial 1

10 20 30 40 50

14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112 126 140 154 168

Day Feed (kg) kg Feed

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Feed – Trial 2

10 20 30 40 50 1 29 57 85 113 141 169 197 Date

Feed (kgs)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Sludge – Trial 1

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 14 28 42 56 70 84 98 112 126 140 154 168 Day Liters (L)

Liters

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Total Suspended Solids Settling Curve

500 1000 1500 2000 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (min) TSS (mg/L) Trial 1 Trial 2

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Clarifier effluent Culture tank water Sludge from clarifier After 10 minutes of settling

Clarifier Efficiency

slide-36
SLIDE 36

88.5 Removal (%) 26,230 Sludge TSS (mg/L) 136 Effluent TSS (mg/L) 1178 Influent TSS (mg/L)

External Clarifier Efficiency

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Sludge – Trial 2

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 1 29 57 85 113 141 169 197 Day Sludge removed (L) Sludge removed

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Day 7-21 Day 1-6 2.5 3.3 Cone (%) 97.5 96.7 Clarifier (%) Percentage 0.3 1.0 Mean (kg/d) 4.8 5.9 Total (kg) Cone 12.3 29.2 Mean (kg/d) 184.4 175.5 Total (kg) Clarifier

Sludge Removal

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Total Suspended Solids

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2 4 6 8 1 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 2 2 2 4 2 6 2 8 Week Concentration (mg/L) Trial2

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Advantages of Bacterial-Based Tank Culture

Simple management Low water requirements Seepage problems avoided Not affected by algal die-offs Algae and bacteria supplement tilapia diet No off-flavor detected Production ~ 30 times higher than ponds No recruitment problem Wastewater used to irrigate and fertilize field crops

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Disadvantages of Bacterial-Based Tank Culture

Feeding response fluctuates Suspended solids nitrification less stable than fixed-film nitrification High energy input

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Key Results

Total tilapia production: 2,740 – 2,880 kg in a 0.02-ha tank Daily makeup water averaged 0.20 - 0.43% of total volume: 0.40-0.86 m3 Recovered approximately 0.38 m3 of water daily for irrigation and fertilization of field crops.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Future Research

Scale-up (1,000 m2?, 4,000 m2?) Aeration requirement Size and number of clarifiers Species Economics

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Conclusions

A simple tank construction method was developed The tank was nearly 30 times more productive than a standard earthen pond (13.7 and 14.4 vs. 0.5 kg/m3) External clarifier simplifies construction, improves solids removal and water quality and may increase production This production technology conserves water and recovers solids and nutrients