FEASIBILITY OF SHRIMP AND TILAPIA POLY-CULTURE IN THE NORTH-WEST OF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

feasibility of shrimp and tilapia poly culture in the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

FEASIBILITY OF SHRIMP AND TILAPIA POLY-CULTURE IN THE NORTH-WEST OF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FEASIBILITY OF SHRIMP AND TILAPIA POLY-CULTURE IN THE NORTH-WEST OF MEXICO, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AN ECONOMIC STUDY OF A HYPOTHETICAL POLY-CULTURE FARM. Francisco J. Martnez-Cordero 1 Neil J. Duncan 1 Kevin Fitzsimmons 2 1 CIAD A.C. Unidad


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FEASIBILITY OF SHRIMP AND TILAPIA POLY-CULTURE IN THE NORTH-WEST OF MEXICO, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AN ECONOMIC STUDY OF A HYPOTHETICAL POLY-CULTURE FARM. Francisco J. Martínez-Cordero1 Neil J. Duncan1 Kevin Fitzsimmons2

1CIAD A.C. Unidad Mazatlán, Mexico. 2University of Arizona, Arizona, Tucson, USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Shrimp-Tilapia polyculture.

– Increased production. – Maintain or improve shrimp survival. – Remove disease carriers from system.

  • Shrimp Farming Industry

Problems.

– Disease outbreaks – Pricing problems.

Shrimp ponds in Mexico.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Disease problems White spot syndrome virus (WSSV)

  • Many disease problems.
  • WSSV in Asia – 70,000 tons lost in Thailand

in 1996 (Flegel and Alday-Sanz 1998)

  • WSSV in Ecuador 31,000 tons of prodcution

lost from 1999 to 2000 (Illingworth-G. 2001).

  • WSSV diagnosed in Mexico in 1999

– Joins a long list of diseases affecting the industry – Many farms report mortalities higher than normal

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Pricing Problems

US MARKET AVERAGE PRICES LATIN AMERICAN AQUACULTURE, SHELL-ON SHRIMP – SIZE 26-30

US $ / pound

3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6.5 7 7.5 8 1998 1999 2000 2001 2003 2002 6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Mexican shrimp industry production

10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Tons

SAGARPA FAO

*

* Preliminary data for 2003.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Disease problems

  • Three point approach.

– Monitoring. – Movement of disease. – More stable growing environment.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Disease problems Monitoring of disease.

  • Farms start monitoring programmes of health of

shrimp during growing cycle.

– Indicator number of laboratories offering diagnostics increases from 5 in 1999 to 18-23 in 2004.

  • Monitoring by State committees.

– Collect data on disease losses above normal. – Disseminate information on spread of disease. – Give advise on improving farm management.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Disease problems Movement of disease.

  • Industry uses only hatchery produced PL

certified free from WSSV

– Hatcheries close biological cycle and start genetic selection programs.

  • All pond water filtered to less than 500µm.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Disease problems Improved management practices.

  • Better pond preparation.
  • Filtered water, < 500µm
  • Less water changes or even no water changes

(14%).

  • Lower stocking levels from 13 PL/m2 in

1999 to 11 PL/m2 in 2002.

  • Avoid autumn, not optimal growing

conditions.

– Problem seasonal production.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Price Problems

  • Record amounts of farmed shrimp in

markets, prices not expected to recover.

  • Value added products.

– Larger size. – Processing, remove head.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

General effects on Industry. Average Yield.

200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1999 2002 kg / ha

slide-12
SLIDE 12

General effects on Industry. Type of operator.

1999 2001 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percentage operated. Private Ejido Fishery

slide-13
SLIDE 13

General effects on Industry. Area under operation.

5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 1999 2001 hectars under operation

Over 5000 hectars of shrimp ponds unused or abandoned.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Feasibility of shrimp tilapia poly- culture.

  • Environmental.
  • Economic.
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Environmental Feasibility.

  • Temperature range - 16 to 36 oC.
  • Salinity range – normally 35 ppt, range 25 ppt to 45

ppt, extremes 15 to 60 ppt.

  • Red tilapia hybrid (with Oreochromis

mossambicus)

  • Large tilapia industry in Mexico capable of

supplying large volumes of red hybrids but red hybrids are NOT available now.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Economic Feasibility.

  • Economic model

– 100 hectar shrimp farm

  • Capital and operation costs, and revenues
  • btained from shrimp farms operating in

Sinaloa Mexico.

  • Data for tilapia polyculture obtained from

CRSP studies (Fitszimmons, Bolivar and Sugue; and Yi, Saelee, Naditrom and Fitzsimmons)

Francisco Martínez-Cordero

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Economic Feasibility. Production cycle

  • 1 Cycle per year.
  • Pond preparation.
  • 1 month acclimatisation and pre-ongrowing
  • f tilapia.
  • 6 month ongrowing poly-culture of shrimp

and tilapia.

  • Harvest.
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Economic Feasibility. Shrimp Production Data

10.00 Selling price head-off ($/kg) 22.62 Shrimp individual weight (head on) at harvest (gr) 15 Stocking density (PL/m2) 6 Length growout cycle (months) 1 Growout cycles/year 100 Total pond area (Has.) 1.80 F.C.R. 60 Final Survival Rate (%) 7.00 Seed price ($/1000 PL)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Economic Feasibility. Tilapia Production Data

5.68 Selling price ($/kg) 500 Tilapia individual weight at harvest (gr) 0.5 Stocking density growout (fingerling/m2) 6 Length growout cycle (months) 1 Growout cycles/year 1 Nursery time (months) 1.69 F.C.R. (growout) 75 Final survival rate (%) 0.06 Tilapia fry price ($/fingerling)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Economic Feasibility. Profitability analysis.

930,242 956,499 NPV ($) 19.18 18.85% 20-year IRR (%) 0.64 0.72 Return on variable costs 0.26 0.18 Ratio fixed : variable costs 2,561 2,582 Profit/ha./year Profit tilapia/kg tilapia (fillet) Profit shrimp/kg shrimp Operation costs/ revenues Total Profit Total Revenue Total operation cost ($/ha/year) Annual operation costs 0.03 1.95 0.85 258,241 1,720,728 14,625 1,462,487 Polyculture shrimp/tilapia 0.806 256,081 1,323,270 10,672 1,067,189 Shrimp monoculture

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Economic Feasibility. Sensitivity to shrimp price.

  • 1,000

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 20% 10%

  • 10%
  • 20%

US$ / ha / year

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Economic Feasibility. Sensitivity to tilapia price.

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 20% 10%

  • 10%
  • 20%

US$ / ha / year

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusions

  • Large areas of shrimp ponds available for rehabilitation.
  • Environmentally shrimp-tilapia poly-culture appears to

be feasible.

  • Tilapia included into shrimp model without substantial

increases in capital costs.

  • Tilapia had a small effect on the profitability of shrimp-

tilapia polyculture.

  • Shrimp remained the more important component to the

model strongly influencing profitability of the model.

  • Improved tilapia production parameter required to make

economic model profitable for shrimp-tilapia poly- culture.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Gracias CRSP

  • Lourdes P.

Lourdes P. Lyle Lyle-

  • Fritch

Fritch

  • Emilio Romero

Emilio Romero-

  • Beltrán

Beltrán

  • Rebeca

Rebeca Garay Garay-

  • Morán

Morán