effect of stocking density of red hybrid tilapia
play

EFFECT OF STOCKING DENSITY OF RED HYBRID TILAPIA ( OREOCHROMIS SP.) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

EFFECT OF STOCKING DENSITY OF RED HYBRID TILAPIA ( OREOCHROMIS SP.) ON GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF JUVENILE TILAPIA AND SHRIMP ( LITOPENAEUS VANNAMEI ) IN POLYCULTURE. Alejandro Macdonald-Vera 1,2 Neil J. Duncan 2 Wilfrido M. Contreras-Snchez 1 Kevin


  1. EFFECT OF STOCKING DENSITY OF RED HYBRID TILAPIA ( OREOCHROMIS SP.) ON GROWTH AND SURVIVAL OF JUVENILE TILAPIA AND SHRIMP ( LITOPENAEUS VANNAMEI ) IN POLYCULTURE. Alejandro Macdonald-Vera 1,2 Neil J. Duncan 2 Wilfrido M. Contreras-Sánchez 1 Kevin Fitzsimmons 3 1 Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, Mexico. 2 CIAD A.C. Unidad Mazatlan, Mexico. 3 University of Arizona, Arizona, Tucson, USA

  2. • Shrimp Farming Industry in Mexico. – Industry is prospering. – Disease and pricing problems. – Inefficient farms stop operating. Alejandro Macdonald-Vera who completed the study. – Over 5000 ha of shrimp ponds unused. • Shrimp-Tilapia polyculture. – Increased production. – Maintain or improve shrimp survival. – Remove disease carriers from system. Shrimp ponds in Mexico.

  3. Methods • White shrimp – PL 16 - 0.004g – Litopenaeus vannamei – Certified free from white spot • Red hybrid tilapia - 4.6±0.9g – Genetic component of Oreochromis mossambicus Pond preparation, ploughed and limed. – All males (hormonal treatment) – Acclimatised to 35ppt sea water, 5ppt per day. • Pond preparation. – Salinity range - 28 to 35 ppt – Temperature range - 16.2 to 25.6°C Mosquito mesh divisions to make experimental enclosures

  4. Methods experimental design Block B Block A Block C outlet Water 4 3 9 6 5 2 1 8 7 inlet. 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.5 0.5 0 0 0 0.5 Experimental pond set up. • 9 enclosures (7x30=210m 2 ) in 3 blocks, A, B, C. • All enclosures stocked with 30 shrimp/m 2 • Tilapia stocked at 3 densities, 0, 0.25, 0.5 fish/m 2 to give the experimental groups T0, T0.25 and T0.5

  5. Methods • Stocking – Shrimp and tilapia were acclimatised and randomly stocked into each enclosure. • Sampling. – Every 2 weeks. Stocking. – 20 tilapia caught and weighed. – 30 shrimp weighed. • Harvest. – Experiment lasted for 8 weeks. – All shrimp and tilapia were harvested, counted and a random sample weighed. Sampling.

  6. Results - Statistics NEWVAR16 Shapiro-Wilk W=.97691, p<.0002 • Weight data was not normal. 120 Shrimp 110 100 – Some shrimp weight 90 distribution 80 distributions were highly 70 No of obs 60 skewed towards larger 50 40 individuals. 30 20 – Some tilapia weight 10 VAR7 Expected 0 Normal distributions had 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 7 Upper Boundaries (x <= boundary) characteristics of a bimodal 6 distribution, 23 to 42% 5 maturing females were found 4 during the harvest. 3 No of obs • 2 way Scheirer-Ray-Hare 2 Tilapia extension of the Kruskal-Wallis 1 Expected distributions 0 and the DUNNS test were used Normal 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 NEWVAR13 Upper Boundaries (x <= boundary) Shapiro-Wilk W=.97111, p<.0110 to compare weight distributions 35 30 25 • Survival distributions were 20 No of obs normally distributed and were 15 10 compared with ANOVA. 5 Expected 0 Normal 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 Upper Boundaries (x <= boundary)

  7. Results – Tilapia Growth. 50 45 40 35 Weight (g) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 5 Dec 22 Dec 5 Jan 19 Jan 2 Feb No significant differences were observed for tilapia weights among treatments T0.25 and T0.5 or blocks A, B and C.

  8. Results – Shrimp Growth. 3 2.5 2 Weight (g) 1.5 1 0.5 0 5 Dec 22 Dec 5 Jan 19 Jan 2 Feb No significant differences were observed among treatments T0, T0.25 and T0.5

  9. Results – Shrimp Growth. 3.0 b Block A b 2.5 a Block B 2.0 ab b Weight (g) Block C a 1.5 b a 1.0 a 0.5 a a a 0.0 22 Dec 5 Jan 19 Jan 2 Feb Significant differences (P<0.05) were observed among blocks A, B and C.

  10. Results – Survival. 100 a a a a a 90 80 b Survival % a a 70 a 60 a a 50 40 30 20 10 0 Block Block Block T0 T0.25 T0.5 Block Block Block T0 T0.25 T0.5 A B C A B C Shrimp Tilapia There were no significant differences among tilapia survivals. There were no significant differences among shrimp survivals for treatments, T0, T0.25 and T0.5. There were significant differences (p<0.05) among shrimp survivals for blocks A, B and C.

  11. Conclusions • Stocking densities of 0, 0.25 and 0.5 fish/m 2 did not significantly affect growth or survival of juvenile shrimp and tilapia. • Block or position in the pond did significantly affect (p<0.05) growth and survival of juvenile shrimp. • These are encouraging results that suggest shrimp tilapia poly-culture has good potential for diversifying the Mexican shrimp culture industry and rehabilitating disused shrimp ponds.

  12. Gracias CRSP Juan Manuel Gonzalez and his family • Gabriela Velasco • Michael Achury • Leonardo Ibarra • Noemi Garcia • Rafael Guzman • Estela Rodriguez. • Ricardo Alvarez

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend