Integrated Chemical and Biological Microsystems for Discovery and - - PDF document
Integrated Chemical and Biological Microsystems for Discovery and - - PDF document
Integrated Chemical and Biological Microsystems for Discovery and Process Development Klavs F. Jensen Departments of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
MIT
Reactor
ENIAC
Biochemical and Chemical Microsystems
Microfabrication has revolutionized electronic and optical information technology Microfluidic systems are emerging for analysis (microTotal Analysis Systems) Instrumented microchemical systems could revolutionize chemical research and production by
- speeding up time to production with
reduced need for upfront capital investment
- btaining chemical information (e.g.,
kinetics) and optimize chemical processes more efficiently
- providing timely, efficient synthesis
platforms
- providing safe and environmentally
friendly research and production tools
MIT
~2000
micro Total Analysis Systems (mTAS)
Laboratory equipment and facilities have changed Workflow - individual, separate
- perations - has not evolved as
rapidly
~1930
Air Lines THERMAL REACTION DROP METERING SAMPLE LOADING GEL LOADING PC Board Glass Silicon Wire Bonds DETECT
Burns et al. Science, 282, 484 (1998)
SEPARATE
www.caliper.com
µ µ µ µTAS integrate fluid manipulations, reactions, separations, and analysis Ultimately information management must also be included
MIT
µ µ µ µTotal Analysis Systems - Biological Applications
Applications
- DNA identification
- Assays
- Synthesis
Advantages:
- small volumes of
expensive reagents,
- parallel operation,
- integration of flow,
reactions, separation, and detection
- integration with
information management
J.D. Harrison (Univ. Alberta)
www.gyrosmicro.com www.nanogen.com www.micronics.com Andreas Manz, Imperial College
MIT
Why Micro Systems?
Reduced length scales
- Improved heat and mass transfer
- Increased surface to volume ratio
- Smaller reagent volume
Microfabrication
- Controlled contacting of reagents
- Integration of sensors and actuators
- Ease of replication
Chemical research and development
- Safe handling of reactive, hazardous chemistry
- Small amounts of expensive materials
- Ease of performing experiments on new chemistry
- New methods for high throughput screening
- Scalable manufacturing by “numbering up”
- Chem/bio information and faster development
- 0.002
0.038 0.078 0.118 0.158 0.198 0.238 490 530 570 610
Wavelength (nm) Absorbance
MIT
Fabrication Methods
Si - MEMS LIGA (lithography + electroplating) Lamination of patterned glass,ceramic, polymer, and metal layers Rapid Prototyping (soft lithography) Micromachining (CNC, µ µ µ µEDM, …) Si advantages:
- Si and coatings compatible with chemicals
- wide range of tools for micromachining
- ease of integration of actuation and sensing
Combination of new techniques and materials will be needed to realize advanced designs
50 µm
PDMS G.M. Whitesides Harvard
MIT
Microreactor for Liquid Phase Chemistry Integrated Heat Exchangers and Temperature Sensors
Thin-Film Temperature Sensor U = 1500 W/m2°C Heat Exchanger air gap cooling fluid reaction mixture
300µm
Optical fiber visible spectroscopy
Simulation Experiment
~ 20 ms mixing time Low Re flows - mixing by diffusion Accurate computational fluid dynamics predictions
MIT
Microreactors Integrated with IR Spectroscopy Provide Rapid Optimization and Reaction Parameters
5 mm
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1720 1745 1770 1795 1820 Wavelength (wavenumbers) Absorbance 2.43 s 4.86 s 48.6 s 81.0 s 243 s 1791 1738
H2O O Cl O OH → + HCl +
Silicon MIR crystal PDMS channels epoxy connectors 0.5 cm
1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 Wavenumbers (cm-1) Absorbance 5 x 10-3 Acetic acid, Ethyl acetate Ethanol
MIT
Microreactors for Photochemistry
Potential advantages:
- Continuous flow
- Enhancement of mass and heat transfer
- Large surface area-to-volume ratio
- No deposition on window
O
+
H O H H O O
hν (366 nm)
+
O
Model reaction: benzopinacol formation UV Lamp
Conversion Immediately Following Irradiation
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 2 4 6 8 10 12 flowrate (µl/min) conversion
Subsequent dark reactions
MIT
Multiphase Microreactors
Traditional multiphase packed-bed reactors: KLa = 0.001 - 0.08 s-1 Dominated by mass transfer
G L L G
Microreactor KLa = 2-15 s-1 Mass transfer improved 100X
36-38 µm Particle size
100µ µ µ µm MIT
Multiphase Microreactors - Hydrogenation
k a K ] H [ Rate
i L SAT
η 1 1
2
+ =
Traditional multiphase packed- bed reactors: KLa = 0.001 - 0.08 s-1 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
KLa (s
- 1)
Reaction Rate (mol/s/g catalyst)
Typical KL a values
Cyclohexene Hydrogenation Microreactor KLa = 2-15 s-1 Mass transfer improved 100X
Microreactor Results
G L L G
MIT
Handling Reactive and Toxic Chemistry
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 50 100 150 200 250 300
Conversion Temperature (°C)
On demand synthesis of phosgene
- 10 multichannel reactors: ~ 2 g/min.
R N C O R NH2 + COCl2 R NHCOCl
- HCl
R NHCONH R
- HCl
R N C O R N C O R N C O R NH2 + COCl2 R NHCOCl
- HCl
R NH2 + COCl2 R NH2 + COCl2 R NHCOCl R NHCOCl
- HCl
R NHCONH R R NHCONH R
- HCl
Point-of-use synthesis of isocyanate Phosgene synthesis CO + Cl2
- COCl2 (∆
∆ ∆ ∆H = -109 kJ/mol Shipping and storage restrictions
- Distributed production
MIT
Microreaction Technology for Direct Fluorination
NH2 NaNO2/HCl HBF4 N N
+
BF4
−
∆ F + N2 + BF3 R
F R + F2 R + HF H (l) (g) (l) (l)
Hazardous HF and F2 Heat management
- low temperature
- diluted reactants
Obstacles for direct fluorination scale-up Multi-step process Low yields Not suitable for all aromatics Current routes to fluorinated aromatics
Pyrex glass Interchannel wall Silicon Nickel Ni coating makes device compatible with F2 and HF
Microreactor for direct fluorination Room temperature
- peration gives similar
results as experiments at very low temperature
Microreactors expand operating regimes – allowing reactive chemistry to be performed safely under optimal conditions
MIT Gas Phase Catalyst Gas Phase Catalyst Test System Test System 0.55 m 0.55 m 0.65 m 0.65 m
Demonstration of Scale-Up and Integration
Replace walk-in chemical fume hood space with desktop system System integration raise significant challenges x 2
Jim Ryley et al. DuPont David Quiram MIT
MIT
µ µ µ µFluidic Integration with Soft Lithography
PMDS based systems are flexible, but not compatible with most organic solvents Applications are primarily for biological systems
Peristaltic Pump
Quake et al. Science, 288, 113 (1999)
3D Microfluidic Networks
Whitesides et al. Anal. Chem. 72, 3158 (2000)
Microfluidic Arrays
Whitesides et al. Anal. Chem. 73 5207 (2000) fluid in fluid out air pressure
MIT
µ µ µ µFluidic Systems for Biological Applications
Soft lithography methods provide opportunities for realizing microsystems with unique properties for biological applications
Microfabricated Fluorescence- Activated Cell Sorter
Quake et al. Nature Biotech. 17, 110 (1999)
Patterning Cells in Laminar Flow
Whitesides et al.
- Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 841 (2000)
MIT
Example – Isolation of Mitochondria
Would like to explore role of specific organelles in cell signaling Conventional approaches
- potential artifacts with mechanical
- r chemical cell lysis
- large samples and time
consuming
- study of average of large
population (~106)
Microsystems
- novel cell lysis and organelle
separation approaches
- small cell populations (~103)
- probe a subpopulation
- integrate functions
MIT
Lysing by Electroporation (HT-29 cells)
nucleus nucleus Intact cell Dissolving membrane Bare nucleus
Electroplated gold structure Channel on glass substrate SU-8 wall Gold thin film electrode Bond pad 200 µm 50 µm
µ µ µ µFluidic electroporation device
MIT
IsoElectric Focusing of Mitochondria
end of channel middle of channel beginning of channel
pH gradient Flow
MIT
This experiment used full content of cell lysate and whole cells. Other fractions are not labeled, therefore not visible. Mitochondria and cells were in a homogeneous mixture at the start of the channel. Separation of mitochondria from whole cells in lysate achieved.
Separation of Mitochondria from Cells
Whole cells Mitochondria fraction
Enhanced contrast 100 µm
MIT
Integrated Device Concept
Integrated microfluidic devices could enable study of
- rganelle and subcelluar response to stimuli
Lysing unit Rough separation unit Fine separation unit Buffer inlet Sample inlet /
- utlet
Stimulus Image selection Micro Facs Buffer inlet Sample inlet /
- utlet
Waste Sample Further analysis
MIT
Microfermentation Techniques
Conventional approaches
- Analytical techniques limiting
- Large parameter spaces
- Expensive fermentation units - time consuming experiments
Small instrumented bioreactors - µ µ µ µfermentors
- Parallel investigations of multiple cell cultures in well defined
physiological states (steady state)
- High throughput screen for function
- Linking and incorporation of functional genomics
- Optimization and translation into large scale processes
MIT
Opportunities
Integration of electronics, optics, and chemistry provide significant opportunities
Sensors
- chemical spectroscopy - mass, IR, UV, NMR ….
- biology - molecular, cells, tissue
Functional devices based on chemistry
- chemical fuel based power devices
- pharmacology
- consumer products
Production systems
- chemical synthesis units for on-demand, on-site production
- materials synthesis
- synthesis of nucleotides, proteins, sugars …
MIT
Acknowledgements
The microreactor team Martin A. Schmidt
Leonel Arana, Sameer Ajmera, Cyril Delattre, Nuria De Mas, Aleks Franz, Tamara Floyd, Rebecca Jackman, Matthew Losey, Hang Lu, and David Quiram The staff of the Microsystems Technology Laboratories Langer Lab Sorger Lab MicroChemical Systems Technology Center DARPA, DuPont, and Novartis Foundation
MIT
Recent Relevant Publications
1.
K.F. Jensen, Microreaction engineering - is small better?, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56, 293-303 (2001).
2.
R.J. Jackman, T.M. Floyd, R. Ghodssi, M.A. Schmidt, and K.F. Jensen, Microfluidic systems with on- line UV detection fabricated in photodefinable epoxy, J. Micromechanical and Microengineering. 11 263-279 (2001).
3.
M.W. Losey, M.A. Schmidt and K.F. Jensen, Microfabricated multiphase packed-bed reactors: Characterization of mass transfer and reactions, Ind. Eng. Research, 40, 2555-2562 (2001).
4.
S.K. Ajmera, M.W. Losey, and K.F. Jensen, Microfabricated packed-bed reactor for distributed chemical synthesis: The heterogeneous gas phase production of phosgene as a model chemistry,
- Am. Inst. Chem. Eng. J. 47, 1639-1647 (2001).
5.
S.L. Firebaugh, K.F. Jensen, M.A. Schmidt, Miniaturization and integration of photoacoustic detection with a microfabricated chemical reactor system, J. Microelectromechanical Systems, 10 232-238 (2001).
6.
- N. de Mas, R. J. Jackman, M. A. Schmidt, K F. Jensen, Microchemical systems for direct fluorination of
aromatics, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Microreaction Technology (IMRET5), Strasbourg, France, May 2001
7.
H.Lu, M.A. Schmidt, and K. F. Jensen, Photochemical reactions and on-line UV detection in microfabricated reactors, Lab-on-a-Chip, 1, 22-28 (2001)
8.
- H. Lu, R.J. Jackman, S. Gaudet, M. Cardone, M.A. Schmidt, and K.F. Jensen, “Microfluidic devices for
cell lysis and isolation of organelles,” MicroTotal Analysis Systems (mTAS) 2001, J.M. Ramsey & A. van den Berg (Eds.), Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2001). pp. 297-8
9.
- T. M. Floyd, M.A. Schmidt, K.F. Jensen, “A silicon microchip for infrared transmission kinetics studies
- f rapid homogeneous liquid reactions,” ibid pp. 277-9
10.
R.J. Jackman, K. T. Queeney, M.A. Schmidt, and K.F. Jensen, “Integration of multiple internal reflection (MIR) infrared spectroscopy with silicon-based chemical microreactors,” ibid pp. 345-6
11.
D.J. Quiram, J.F. Ryley, J. Ashmead, R.D. Bryson, D.J. Kraus, P.L. Mills, R.E. Mitchell, M.D. Wetzel, M.A. Schmidt, and K.F. Jensen, “Device level integration to form a parallel microfluidic reactor system,” ibid pp. 661-3