HWCDSB 2017 Community Planning & Facility Partnership Information - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hwcdsb
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HWCDSB 2017 Community Planning & Facility Partnership Information - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HWCDSB 2017 Community Planning & Facility Partnership Information Session AGENDA Purpose of the Community Planning & Facilities Partnership initiative Review of Multi Year Accommodation Report Identification of available


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HWCDSB

2017 Community Planning & Facility Partnership Information Session

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AGENDA

▪ Purpose of the Community Planning & Facilities Partnership initiative ▪ Review of Multi‐ Year Accommodation Report ▪ Identification of available unused space and future capital projects ▪ Partnership criteria and cost neutral approach ▪ Application process ▪ Questions

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

COMMUNITY PLANNING & FACILITY PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE

PURPOSE

  • To encourage cooperative and collaborative relationships

between school boards and community organizations

  • To support the sharing of planning information with the local

municipality and community organizations

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

COMMUNITY PLANNING & FACILITY PARTNERSHIP INITIATIVE

INTENT

  • Improve services and supports available to students;
  • Strengthen relationships with community partners and the

public as a whole;

  • Reduce facility operating costs for school boards;
  • Maximize the use of public infrastructure through increased

flexibility and utilization; and

  • Provide a foundation for improved service delivery for

communities.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Identification of Facilities for Community Partners

  • School buildings & sites suitable and

available for community partnerships

  • Future capital projects for possible co‐

building with community partners

Accommodation Strategy and Long Term Planning

  • School buildings & sites with unused

space

  • Future facility capital projects and

future new school builds

  • Accommodation strategies: boundary

changes, program changes, consolidations, partnerships

Multi‐ Year Accommodation Report

  • Current & Projected Demographic

Trends

  • Current & Projected Residential

Trends

  • Current & Projected Enrolment Trends
  • Current & Projected Facility Capacity

and Utilization

MULTI‐ YEAR ACCOMMODATION REPORT REVIEW

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

WATERDOWN/ FLAMBOROUGH REVIEW AREA

School OTG Capacity Current Projected Enrolment 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Guardian Angels CES

447 478 488 488 504 512 526 527 526 527 538 544

Our Lady of Mount Carmel CES

384 260 250 242 240 235 235 229 218 221 217 216

  • St. Thomas the Apostle CES

599 279 302 335 366 409 445 471 493 526 540 557

Gra nd Tota l

1,430 1,017 1,040 1,065 1,110 1,157 1,207 1,227 1,237 1,275 1,295 1,317

Annual Increase/ Decrease 23 25 46 46 50 20 10 38 21 22 Available Pupil Places (+/ -) 413 390 365 320 273 224 203 193 156 135 113 Utilization Rate (%) 71% 73% 74% 78% 81% 84% 86% 86% 89% 91% 92%

School Replacement Value Estimated Renewal Needs (2016) Facility Condition Index (2016) Estimated Renewal Needs (2021) Estimated FCI (2021) Estimated Renewal Needs (2026) Estimated FCI (2026) Guardian Angels CES $8,878,380.00 $694,228.00 7.8% $2,222,464.00 25.0% $3,483,525.00 39.2% Our Lady of Mount Carmel CES $8,090,420.00 $1,837,128.00 22.7% $2,974,576.00 36.8% $3,290,633.00 40.7%

  • St. Thomas the Apostle CES

$11,915,830.00 $0.00 0.0% $0.00 0.0% $703,020.00 5.9% Gra nd Tota l $28,884,630.00 $2,531,356.00 8.8% $5,197,040.00 18.0% $7,477,178.00 25.9%

200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Review Area Enrolment Vs. Capacity

Guardian Angels CES Our Lady of Mount Carmel CES
  • St. Thomas the
Apostle CES OTG Capacity
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

DUNDAS REVIEW AREA

School OTG Capacity Current Projected Enrolment 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

  • St. Augustine CES

418 257 244 237 226 222 218 215 213 206 207 217

  • St. Bernadette CES

326 254 250 244 247 241 237 234 235 225 222 216

Gra nd Tota l

744 511 494 481 473 463 455 449 448 431 429 433

Annual Increase/ Decrease

  • 17
  • 13
  • 8
  • 10
  • 8
  • 6
  • 1
  • 17
  • 2

4 Available Pupil Places (+/ -) 233 250 263 271 281 289 295 296 313 315 311 Utilization Rate (%) 69% 66% 65% 64% 62% 61% 60% 60% 58% 58% 58%

School Replacement Value Estimated Renewal Needs (2016) Facility Condition Index (2016) Estimated Renewal Needs (2021) Estimated FCI (2021) Estimated Renewal Needs (2026) Estimated FCI (2026)

  • St. Augustine CES

$8,536,420.00 $2,292,358.00 26.9% $4,313,504.00 50.5% $4,933,389.00 57.8%

  • St. Bernadette CES

$5,906,130.00 $2,262,768.00 38.3% $3,057,671.00 51.8% $3,627,407.00 61.4% Gra nd Tota l $14,442,550.00 $4,555,126.00 31.5% $7,371,175.00 51.0% $8,560,796.00 59.3%

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Review Area Enrolment Vs. Capacity

  • St. Augustine CES
  • St. Bernadette
CES OTG Capacity
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

LOWER HAMILTON CITY REVIEW AREA

School OTG Capacity Current Projected Enrolment 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Canadian Martyrs' CES 268 179 163 168 163 158 152 149 148 141 138 139 Holy Name of Jesus CES 458 417 395 374 359 345 339 336 327 313 314 317

  • St. Agnes CES

409 344 333 337 340 339 339 335 338 348 358 362

  • St. Ann Hamilton CES

432 334 333 336 344 344 340 340 330 313 305 299

  • St. Brigid CES

547 271 262 248 239 235 234 235 224 219 221 218

  • St. David CES

521 442 445 434 436 451 439 426 431 432 429 435

  • St. Eugene CES

573 539 546 543 551 557 552 547 540 530 522 513

  • St. John the Baptist CES

400 305 298 288 288 288 277 261 249 243 237 236

  • St. Joseph CES

573 387 390 387 392 398 411 412 415 421 424 418

  • St. Lawrence CES

504 344 342 333 347 356 350 358 360 359 362 365

  • St. Luke CES

432 329 328 329 330 338 334 328 324 326 326 324

  • St. Patrick CES

291 212 209 203 202 203 185 172 162 155 161 158 Gra nd Tota l 5,408 4,103 4,043 3,980 3,991 4,011 3,953 3,899 3,848 3,800 3,797 3,784 Annual Increase/ Decrease

  • 60
  • 64

11 20

  • 59
  • 53
  • 51
  • 48
  • 3
  • 14

Available Pupil Places (+/ -) 1,305 1,365 1,428 1,417 1,397 1,456 1,509 1,560 1,608 1,611 1,624 Utilization Rate (%) 76% 75% 74% 74% 74% 73% 72% 71% 70% 70% 70% School Replacement Value Estimated Renewal Needs (2016) Facility Condition Index (2016) Estimated Renewal Needs (2021) Estimated FCI (2021) Estimated Renewal Needs (2026) Estimated FCI (2026) Canadian Martyrs' CES $7,789,380.00 $2,962,464.00 38.0% $4,878,698.00 62.6% $5,681,852.00 72.9% Holy Name of Jesus CES $9,757,010.00 $0.00 0.0% $165,904.00 1.7% $2,427,699.00 24.9%

  • St. Agnes CES

$8,174,780.00 $10,684.00 0.1% $2,364,107.00 28.9% $3,325,139.00 40.7%

  • St. Ann Hamilton CES

$9,733,630.00 $0.00 0.0% $0.00 0.0% $357,297.00 3.7%

  • St. Brigid CES

$10,143,070.00 $2,834,133.00 27.9% $4,255,026.00 42.0% $4,614,756.00 45.5%

  • St. David CES

$10,527,560.00 $1,527,854.00 14.5% $3,926,234.00 37.3% $5,345,910.00 50.8%

  • St. Eugene CES

$12,289,430.00 $3,606,260.00 29.3% $4,789,926.00 39.0% $5,340,633.00 43.5%

  • St. John the Baptist CES

$8,380,490.00 $3,337,284.00 39.8% $4,607,553.00 55.0% $5,043,570.00 60.2%

  • St. Joseph CES

$11,376,160.00 $3,930,473.00 34.6% $5,397,985.00 47.5% $5,684,177.00 50.0%

  • St. Lawrence CES

$10,557,370.00 $1,163,092.00 11.0% $2,854,347.00 27.0% $3,827,757.00 36.3%

  • St. Luke CES

$8,839,260.00 $317,243.00 3.6% $1,984,809.00 22.5% $3,519,993.00 39.8%

  • St. Patrick CES

$7,114,080.00 $3,187,729.00 44.8% $4,183,617.00 58.8% $5,047,161.00 70.9% Gra nd Tota l $114,682,220.00 $22,877,216.00 19.9% $39,408,206.00 34.4% $50,215,944.00 43.8%

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

LOWER HAMILTON CITY REVIEW AREA

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Review Area Enrolment Vs. Capacity

Canadian Martyrs' CES Holy Name of Jesus CES

  • St. Agnes CES
  • St. Ann Hamilton CES
  • St. Brigid CES
  • St. David CES
  • St. Eugene CES
  • St. John the Baptist CES
  • St. Joseph CES
  • St. Lawrence CES
  • St. Luke CES
  • St. Patrick CES

OTG Capacity

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

HAMILTON MOUNTAIN‐ ESCARPMENT TO LINC REVIEW AREA

School OTG Capacity Current Projected Enrolment 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Annunciation of Our Lord CES 599 716 728 743 754 767 760 760 764 754 749 736 Blessed Sacrament CES 475 253 250 249 254 253 264 273 268 265 265 263 Our Lady of Lourdes CES 452 338 339 342 338 347 344 346 348 345 345 337 Regina Mundi CES 291 237 235 232 225 227 225 224 221 222 219 215 Sacred Heart CES 104 162 169 174 176 176 174 172 165 147 133 126

  • St. Anthony Daniel CES

268 171 163 152 151 149 161 168 169 175 170 173

  • St. Margaret Mary CES

478 363 353 344 328 329 319 304 306 293 299 300

  • St. Michael CES

366 520 508 502 506 507 496 471 450 439 438 435

  • St. Teresa of Avila CES

268 252 244 244 243 242 237 229 235 232 239 234

  • Sts. Peter and Paul

619 592 599 604 599 602 599 588 583 567 546 541 Gra nd Tota l 3,920 3,604 3,588 3,586 3,574 3,598 3,579 3,534 3,508 3,439 3,402 3,361 Annual Increase/ Decrease

  • 16
  • 2
  • 12

24

  • 19
  • 45
  • 26
  • 70
  • 36
  • 42

Available Pupil Places (+/ -) 316 332 334 346 322 341 386 412 482 518 560 Utilization Rate (%) 92% 92% 91% 91% 92% 91% 90% 89% 88% 87% 86% School Replacement Value Estimated Renewal Needs (2016) Facility Condition Index (2016) Estimated Renewal Needs (2021) Estimated FCI (2021) Estimated Renewal Needs (2026) Estimated FCI (2026) Annunciation of Our Lord CES $11,915,830.00 $131,040.00 1.1% $622,794.00 5.2% $3,472,630.00 29.1% Blessed Sacrament CES $9,700,470.00 $3,905,290.00 40.3% $4,921,743.00 50.7% $5,860,752.00 60.4% Our Lady of Lourdes CES $9,204,190.00 $3,935,000.00 42.8% $4,543,650.00 49.4% $5,242,742.00 57.0% Regina Mundi CES $6,433,300.00 $3,130,358.00 48.7% $3,608,130.00 56.1% $3,796,324.00 59.0% Sacred Heart CES $3,289,220.00 $446,920.00 13.6% $1,289,483.00 39.2% $1,876,282.00 57.0%

  • St. Anthony Daniel CES

$6,433,300.00 $3,012,183.00 46.8% $3,569,826.00 55.5% $3,822,015.00 59.4%

  • St. Margaret Mary CES

$9,733,630.00 $3,488,742.00 35.8% $5,279,915.00 54.2% $5,279,915.00 54.2%

  • St. Michael CES

$7,818,780.00 $2,499,097.00 32.0% $4,055,943.00 51.9% $4,616,559.00 59.0%

  • St. Teresa of Avila CES

$6,161,190.00 $1,528,536.00 24.8% $1,930,580.00 31.3% $2,333,355.00 37.9%

  • Sts. Peter and Paul

$10,497,400.00 $3,437,729.00 32.7% $5,536,475.00 52.7% $6,444,612.00 61.4% Gra nd Tota l $81,187,310.00 $25,514,895.00 31.4% $35,358,539.00 43.6% $42,745,186.00 52.7%

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

HAMILTON MOUNTAIN‐ ESCARPMENT TO LINC REVIEW AREA

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 4,500 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Review Area Enrolment Vs. Capacity

Annunciation of Our Lord CES Blessed Sacrament CES Our Lady of Lourdes CES Regina Mundi CES Sacred Heart CES
  • St. Anthony Daniel CES
  • St. Margaret Mary CES
  • St. Michael CES
  • St. Teresa of Avila CES
  • Sts. Peter and Paul
OTG Capacity
slide-12
SLIDE 12

AVAILABLE SPACE FOR PARTNERSHIPS

12

AVAILABLE SURPLUS SPACE CRITERIA

Facilities utilized at 60% or less for 2 consecutive years and/or have 200 or more unused pupil places Facilities utilized at 60% or less for 2 consecutive years and/or have 200 or more unused pupil places Facilities projected to be 60% utilized or less for the next 5 years and/or have 200 or more projected unused pupil places for at least 5 years from the start of the partnership Facilities projected to be 60% utilized or less for the next 5 years and/or have 200 or more projected unused pupil places for at least 5 years from the start of the partnership Ability to identify and create a separate, distinct, and contiguous space within the facility, separate from the students Ability to identify and create a separate, distinct, and contiguous space within the facility, separate from the students Facility is not located within an area where a Pupil Accommodation Review has been announced, subject to Board Policy S‐09 Facility is not located within an area where a Pupil Accommodation Review has been announced, subject to Board Policy S‐09 Space will not be required in the future for programming or other uses Space will not be required in the future for programming or other uses Appropriate access to the space Appropriate access to the space Parking Availability Parking Availability Site use restrictions Site use restrictions Official Plan Designation and/or Zoning Restrictions Official Plan Designation and/or Zoning Restrictions Any other criteria as determined by the Board Any other criteria as determined by the Board

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AVAILABLE SPACE FOR PARTNERSHIPS

13

BLESSED SACRAMENT CES – 315 East 37th Street, Hamilton

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

FUTURE CAPITAL PROJECTS & SCHOOL SITES

PLANNED CAPITAL PROJECTS

Facility Name Description

  • f Project

Address City Postal Code Our Lady of the Assumption CES Replacement School Build 103 Fletcher Road Hannon L0R 1P0 New Binbrook CES New School Build Extension of Pumpkin Pass & Fletcher Road Binbrook L0R 1C0

  • St. Jean de Brebeuf CES

Permanent Addition & Retrofit 200 Acadia Drive Hamilton L8W 1B8

  • St. Gabriel CES

Child Care Addition 1361 Barton Street Stoney Creek L8E 5L1

  • St. Augustine CES

Retrofit for Child Care 25 Alma Street Dundas L9H 2C9

  • St. Patrick CES

Replacement School Build 20 East Avenue South Hamilton L8N 3X1

  • St. Paul CES

Permanent Addition 24 Amberwood Street Stoney Creek L8J 2H9

  • St. James the Apostle CES Replacement

School Build 29 John Murray Street Stoney Creek L8J 1C5 Under Construction Status Under Construction Design Phase Design Phase Planned- Pending Ministry Approval Planned- Pending Ministry Approval Planned- Pending Ministry Approval Planned- Pending Ministry Approval

slide-15
SLIDE 15

PARTNERSHIP CRITERIA

15 Respect the mission of the Hamilton‐ Wentworth Catholic District School Board and the values of Catholic faith Respect the mission of the Hamilton‐ Wentworth Catholic District School Board and the values of Catholic faith Protect the academic achievement and health and safety of students and staff Protect the academic achievement and health and safety of students and staff Must be appropriate for the school setting and not interfere with school/ Board

  • perations and activities

Must be appropriate for the school setting and not interfere with school/ Board

  • perations and activities

Maximize the use of excess school space Maximize the use of excess school space Improve services, programs and supports available to students Improve services, programs and supports available to students Reduce facility operating costs for the Board Reduce facility operating costs for the Board Maintain and operate the space on a cost recovery basis Maintain and operate the space on a cost recovery basis Will not prevent the Board from building, renovating, and/ or closing schools or from disposing of surplus assets when required Will not prevent the Board from building, renovating, and/ or closing schools or from disposing of surplus assets when required

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

PRINCIPLES FOR PRIMARY CONSIDERATION

slide-16
SLIDE 16

PARTNERSHIP CRITERIA

16

A COMMUNITY PARTNER MUST…

 Provide financial statements showing financial viability of their organization;  Provide proof of liability insurance (minimum of $5,000,000.00);  Agree to operate in accordance with Board Policies and Procedures;  Be willing to enter into a lease, license, or joint‐use/ partnership agreement;  Agree that all staff from the partnership entity working on school property complete a criminal background check and vulnerable sector screening; and,  Be able to bear the costs of minor renovations to protect student safety, provide appropriate washrooms and otherwise make the space suitable for use by the partner.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

COST NEUTRAL APPROACH

  • No additional costs are to be incurred by the Board to support facility

partnerships

  • Fees will be charged to partners to cover operating costs, capital costs,

administrative costs and property taxes (if applicable), for the space

  • ccupied by the partner
  • These fees may also cover legal expenses if deemed necessary
  • In co‐building, facility partners will be required to pay for and finance

their share of construction, including a proportional share of joint‐use

  • r share space
  • Additional costs to obtain municipal approvals, perform renovations to

protect student safety, provide appropriate washrooms, and

  • therwise make the space suitable for use by facility partners will be

borne by the partner

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

COST NEUTRAL APPROACH

Available Community Hubs Capital Funding

  • The Ministry of Education is providing a $50 million capital funding initiative to support the

expansion of community hub use in schools

  • The Hamilton‐ Wentworth Catholic District school Board has been allocated $456,000.00 through

this funding initiative

  • This funding can be used to:
  • Retrofit available school space into space for use by a new community partner(s) or to

expand existing community hubs spaces in schools, or

  • Improve the accessibility of a school to enable use by a broader range of community partners
slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

APPLICATION PROCESS

Visit HWCDSB’s Community Planning & Facility Partnerships Webpage Review the Board’s Policy and Procedure Fill out an application form provided

  • nline to begin

the process Submit to the Office of the Director of Education for review

slide-20
SLIDE 20

QUESTIONS ?

For more information please visit the Board’s Community Planning and Facility Partnership webpage: https://www.hwcdsb.ca/board/spaceforpartnerships/