MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION
NOVEMBER 2012
Canada’s only publicly traded vehicle which offers investors exclusive exposure to U.S. Multi‐family real estate assets.
MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION Canadas only publicly traded vehicle which - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
MANAGEMENT PRESENTATION Canadas only publicly traded vehicle which offers investors exclusive exposure to U.S. Multi family real estate assets. NOVEMBER 2012 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Forward looking statements are included in this
Canada’s only publicly traded vehicle which offers investors exclusive exposure to U.S. Multi‐family real estate assets.
Forward looking statements are included in this Presentation, which involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or achievements or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance
terms and phrases such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “could”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “plan”, “predict”, “project”, “will”, “would”, and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions. Such statements may involve but are not limited to comments with respect to strategies, expectations, planned operations or future actions. These statements reflect current expectations of management regarding future events and operating performance as of the date of this
performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether or not such results will be achieved. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following factors: financial health of Pure Multi‐Family and its related cash flows, competitive and economic environment, seasonality and fluctuations in results, expansion, interest rates and foreign exchange. Cash distributions are not guaranteed and will fluctuate with the performance of Pure Multi‐Family, nature of the Units, and the proposed changes to the Canadian federal income tax treatment of income trusts. Although the forward looking statements contained in this Presentation are based upon what Pure Multi‐Family’s management believes to be reasonable assumptions, Pure Multi‐Family cannot assure investors that actual results will be consistent with these forward looking
Pure Multi‐Family. They reflect current assumptions regarding future events and operating performance including, without limitation, strong economies in the geographies in which the REIT LP operates, stable interest rates and continued strength in the multi‐family real estate sector, and speak only as of the date of this discussion. These forward looking statements are made as of the date of this Presentation and Pure Multi‐Family assumes no obligation to update or revise them to reflect new events or circumstances.
1
2
1. OVERVIEW & MANAGEMENT 2. THE MARKET OPPORTUNITY 3. THE INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS 4. THE PORTFOLIO 5. SUMMARY 6. CONTACT 7. APPENDIX
1. OVERVIEW 2. SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM 3. TRACK RECORD OF CREATING VALUE
5
primary markets in the United States, with an initial focus on the U.S. Sunbelt.
acquired six properties consisting of over 1,908 apartments located in the Dallas‐Fort Worth Metroplex area.
Darren Latoski – Executive Chairman, Director
and the U.S.
listed industrial REIT (TSX‐AAR.UN)
listed company (TSX‐WEQ.UN)
Samantha Adams – Vice President
both Canada and the U.S.
Stephen Evans – Chief Executive Officer, Director
and the U.S.
listed industrial REIT (TSX‐AAR.UN)
listed company (TSX‐WEQ.UN)
Scott Shillington, C.A. – Chief Financial Officer
track record of value creation.
7
The Sunstone Group
apartment communities for over US$288 million
(AAR.UN), one of Canada’s largest pure‐play publicly traded industrial property REIT, completed its IPO in 2007 and has returned significant value to investors since.
CAD CAD CAD CAD CAD
SUNSTONE & PURE MULTI ACQUISITIONS BY GEOGRAPHY ($MM) 2004 ‐ 2012
PIRET TOTAL RETURNS
$171 Pure Multi
1. HIGH RETURNS FOR MULTI‐FAMILY 2. U.S. FINANCIAL CRISIS 3. U.S. ECONOMIC RECOVERY VS. SUNBELT 4. SUNBELT LEADING THE RECOVERY 5. IMPACT ON SUNBELT MULTI‐FAMILY 6. THE CANADIAN ADVANTAGE
9.7% 9.7% 8.7% 8.1% 8.7% All Asset Classes = 8.4% Multi-Family Hotel Retail Industrial Office
9
generated strong investor returns
requirements
U.S. Returns by Real Estate Class (1992 – 2011)
Source: NCREIF, represents average annualized returns.
Strong Multi‐Family returns
94,439 99,421 75,086 24,792 26,671 40,803 17.0% 17.5% 22.8% 23.8% 20.5% 19.6% 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 200,000 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Total "Sunbelt" Multi-Family Units Authorized 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% "Sunbelt" as a % of Total Authorized Multi- Family Units in the U.S.
10
including multi‐family properties
properties and result in continued occupancy and rental rate increases
have steadily declined since 2006
Multi‐Family Units by Authorized Building Permits ‐ Sunbelt
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis- Sunbelt includes: TX, AZ, NV, GA.
Decreasing number of building permits
11
U.S. Real GDP Growth
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis.
1.7% 3.8% 3.9% 3.8% 2.5% 2.3% 0.4% 1.3% 1.8% 3.0% 2.2% Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 9 2010 2011 2012
Increasing US GDP trend
Source: JP. Morgan Chase, 4Q seasonally adjusted annual rates.
“Sunbelt” Real GDP Growth Rate
(1.9%) 2.0% 2.3% 3.7% 2009 2010 2011F 2012F 200
Increasing US Sunbelt GDP trend
12
Markets with Highest 2012F Absorption
Source: Marcus & Millichap, 2012 National Apartment Report.
Units in 000's 8.5 8.3 6.8 6.3 5.6 Dallas-Fort Worth Houston NYC D.C. L.A.
Source: Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division.
Sunbelt Population Growth Rates
13% 13% 15% 11% 5% 8% 9% 17% 13% 9% 5% 6% 4% 4% 4% 2005A - 2010A 2011F - 2015F 2016F - 2020F Nevada Texas Arizona Georgia United States
1. The “Sunbelt” regions (Texas, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia) have experienced strong population growth rates well above the national average and declining vacancy rates, trends which are expected to continue in the future 2. The Dallas‐Fort Worth Metroplex in particular is benefiting from broad‐based job growth
2012, nonfarm employment rose 2.4% in the Dallas‐Fort Worth area compared to 1.5% nationwide
13
new residents in the “Sunbelt” regions will first seek out rental housing rather than buying homes, increasing demand for rental housing and supporting a continued increase in rental rates
decreasing vacancy rates that compounds the effect of increasing rental rates.
Declining Vacancy Rates
Source: Marcus & Millichap, 2012 National Apartment Report.
11.2% 11.0% 11.7% 12.3% 12.3% 8.0% 6.0% 7.0% 7.9% 7.0% Dallas- Fort Worth Houston Phoenix Atlanta Las Vegas 2009 2010 2011 2012F
Increasing Asking Rents
Source: Marcus & Millichap, 2012 National Apartment Report.
$765 $746 $751 $825 $821 $832 $822 $793 $871 $815 Dallas- Fort Worth Houston Phoenix Atlanta Las Vegas 2009 2010 2011 2012F
14
40 year high in relation to the U.S. dollar, Pure Multi‐Family believes it is an
Canadian dollar in to under‐valued U.S. hard assets
Historical CAD/USD Exchange Rate
value potential in the U.S. multi‐family market, particularly as compared to the Canadian market
1.6% 2.8% 3.8% 2.0% 2.2% 2.8% 2010 2011 2012F United States Canada 8.2% 4.5% 6.7% 5.3% 2.0% 2.1% 2.7% 3.1% 2009 2010 2011 2012F United States Canada
Multi‐Family Vacancy Rates (2009 – 2012F) Multi‐Family Rent Growth (2010 – 2012F)
Source: RREEF, CBRE. Source: Marcus & Millichap Real Estate, CBRE.
More rapid decrease in USA Steeper growth in US Multi‐Family
Source: Bloomberg Financial Markets
15
16
*As at September 30th, 2012.
distribution of US$0.36 per annum
loan to gross book value range: 55% to 65% (to a maximum of 70%)
assets): 44.1%
8.6 years
RECAP
$28.8 M
$171 M in value GROWTH STRATEGY – NEXT 12 MONTHS
in Canadian apartment REIT peers)
strong‐growth cities providing economies of scale
Antonio; Austin
cities
18
Market Current 2012E Fully AFFO Cap TEV Debt/ Equity Distributed Price / AFFO (1) Payout Ratio (1) Company ($MM) ($MM) GBV Yield Yield 2012E 2013E 2012E 2013E Boardwalk REIT $3,319 $5,498 43.0% 3.0% 4.0% 25.1x 23.2x 75.9% 70.3% Canadian Apartment Properties REIT $2,179 $4,629 53.1% 4.7% 5.1% 19.5x 18.5x 91.3% 86.8% Northern Property REIT $1,011 $1,444 38.3% 4.8% 6.3% 15.9x 15.7x 76.9% 76.3% Killam Properties Inc. $637 $1,376 54.7% 4.6% 4.7% 21.3x 18.5x 97.8% 84.9% Morguard North American Residential REIT (2) $442 $762 41.9% 5.2% 5.4% 18.4x NA 95.2% NA Mainstreet Equity $351 $910 52.8% NA 3.8% 26.4x 20.3x NA NA InterRent REIT $246 $505 48.4% 2.9% 4.5% 22.0x 18.5x 63.8% 53.6% True North Apartment REIT $155 $330 61.2% 6.8% NA NA NA NA NA Average 49.2% 4.6% 4.8% 21.2x 19.1x 83.5% 74.4% Average (Excl. High/Low) 49.0% 4.5% 4.8% 21.3x 18.9x 84.8% 77.2% Pure Multi-Family REIT LP (3) $89 $188 59.9% 7.2% 7.5% 13.4x NA 96.9% NA
Source: Bloomberg and company filings as at November 6, 2012. (1) Based on 2012E consensus research estimates, except for Morguard North American Residential REIT and Pure Multi-Family REIT LP. (2) P/AFFO and AFFO Payout Ratio based on 2011A results. (3) 2012E based on FOFI pro forma for acquisitions; market cap assumes conversion of 5% carried interest. (4) 2013E run-rate based on management expectations
85%
20
Property Name: Stoneleigh at Valley Ranch Oakchase Apartments Windscape Apartments Sunset Point (2) Prairie Creek Bear Creek Location Irving, TX Arlington, TX Grand Prairie, TX Arlington, TX Richardson, TX Euless, TX Current Occupancy (1): 95.0% 95.8% 99.4% 95.3% 97% 98% Total Units: 210 236 154 408 464 436 Purchase Price (US$MM): $22.6 $13.6 $8.4 $24.6 $52.5 $49.4 Cap Rate (1): 6.9% 7.6% 7.6% 7% 7.4% 6.5% Price / Unit (US$): $107,619 $57,543 $54,408 $60,218 $113,147 $113,188 Debt Assumed (US$MM): $13.68 $8.94 $5.09 $15.97 $32.61 $32.08 Interest Rate /Term (Years): 3.51% /10 3.28%/ 5 3.52% /7 3.54% /10 6.02% /6.5 3.45%/7
BUILDING DETAILS
(1) Based on information found in October 12, 2012 Final Short Form Prospectus (2) Sunset Point and Springmist were acquired as two properties but operate as a single asset
portfolio purchase price
assumed
cap rate
interest rate
mortgage term
Portfolio Financial Facts
21
Irving, Texas
US$22,600,000 with a cap rate of 6.9%.
22
Dallas Fort Worth, TX
(236 units) was acquired
July 12, 2012 for US$13,580,133 with a cap rate of 7.6%.
23
Grand Prairie, TX
US$8,378,785 with a cap rate of 7.6%.
24
Arlington, TX
US$24,569,000 with a cap rate of 7%.
(1) Sunset Point and Springmist were acquired as two properties but operate as a single asset
25
Richardson, TX
US$52,500,000 with a cap rate of 7.4%.
26
Euless, TX
October 31, 2012 for US$49,350,000 with a cap rate of 6.5%.
– Portfolio occupancy rate at 97% with minimal capex requirements
– Strong economic and market indicators across the U.S. “Sunbelt” regions
– Distribution of US$0.36 per annum – Yield of 7.1% at $5.10 (as at November 5, 2012) – Conservative AFFO payout ratio of 85% (2013 run‐rate estimate) – Tax efficient structure
for investors
27
Andrew Greig Director of Investor Relations Phone: 604‐681‐5959 Fax: 604‐681‐5969 Email: Agreig@PureMultiFamily.com 910‐925 West Georgia Street Vancouver, BC V6C 3L2
30 Summary of US Withholding on REIT LP Dividends to the Unitholders The following summarizes the US withholding rates applicable to Canadian Unitholders who receive Pure Multi dividends . All Unitholders should consult with their own tax advisors.
INVESTOR TYPE WITHHOLDING TAX NOTES Individuals 15% RRSP’S and RRIF’S 0% TFSA’s 15% RSDSP’s, RESP’s and Other Plans 0% ‐ 30% Note 1 Non‐individual investors eligible for benefits under the Canada‐US Treaty 30% Note 2 Investors eligible for benefits under a US treaty other than the Canada‐US Treaty Please consult your tax advisor
The above chart assumes the Unitholder is a qualified resident under the Canada/US Treaty. The chart above is applicable only to 5% or less
Note 1: Whether a plan is entitled to a reduced treaty rate depends on the specific terms of the plan. Investors investing through RDSP’s, RESP’s and other similar plans should consult with their own tax advisors to determine whether a reduced treaty rate (ie. 0% or 15%) is available to them. Note 2: Non‐individual investors may be entitled to a 15% reduced treaty rate if at the time of the dividend the REIT is "diversified". Very generally, a REIT is diversified if the gross value of no single interest in real property held by the REIT exceeds 10% of the gross value of the REIT's total interest in real property.