geotechnical projects in in Ir Ireland Paul Quigley Principal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

geotechnical
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

geotechnical projects in in Ir Ireland Paul Quigley Principal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Some trends fr from recent ground in investigation contracts and geotechnical projects in in Ir Ireland Paul Quigley Principal Engineer pquigley@gdgeo.com This talk will discuss Risk and the role of geotechnical engineering


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Some trends fr from recent ground in investigation contracts and geotechnical projects in in Ir Ireland

Paul Quigley Principal Engineer pquigley@gdgeo.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

This talk will discuss…

  • Risk and the role of geotechnical engineering
  • Ground investigation in Ireland
  • Commercial out-turn from GI contracts
  • Trends from the data
  • Some comments and discussion
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Previous papers and presentations

  • Internal paper at Arup (2011)
  • Quigley, P. (2012) The value of ground

investigation in Ireland, BCRI, Dublin.

  • Quigley et al. (2015) Some trends from

recent ground investigation contracts in Ireland, Proc. XVI ECSMGE 2015, Edinburgh.

  • Quigley et al. (2016) Some trends from

recent geotechnical projects in Ireland,

  • Proc. ICE Forensic Engineering, Vol. 169

Issue 3, August 2016, pp. 83-93

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Ground related risks

BCRI 2012

From Tim Chapman (2008), ‘The relevance of developer costs in Geotechnical risk management’. IEI (2003)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Road construction

BCRI 2012

Clayton, C.I. (2011), ‘Managing Geotechnical Risk – 10 years on’.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Risk management

BCRI 2012

Lazarus & Clifton (2001) Managing project change – a best practice guide, C556, CIRIA, London

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Percentage fee scales

  • Some clients link fees to percentage of the capital costs
  • This incentivises reducing effort spent on geotechnical engineering in competitive tenders.

Some clients do not include geotechnical engineering in quality assessments.

  • This can result in excessively conservative design to account for the lack of geotechnical

engineering input. The works usually take longer to implement which has significant costs. Worse case is that the structure fails to meet performance criteria.

Scheme Civil Fee scale – detailed design Geotech proportion of

  • verall design fee

Buildings 2 – 4% 2 – 10% Roads 3 – 5% 10 – 20% Flood defence 3 – 5% 25 – 70% Ports and harbours 3 – 6% 25 – 70%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Ir Irish ground conditions

Glacial landscape

Unsorted nature of glacial till

Image taken from University of Sheffield

  • Peat covers 17% of country
  • Very soft silts adjacent to rivers,

estuaries, inter-drumlin areas, etc.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Ground investigations

Motorway development 2000 - 2010 Basement and deep excavations

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Techniques

Plus trial pits, geophysics, CPT (infrastructure / civil), dynamic probes…. Numerous contracts: Remeasureable, Lump sum, Public Works Contract, etc.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Authors and assistance fr from:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Before we have a look at the data…….

Each project is different and requires an individual assessment. But…………………..

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How much of f the tender sum is is paid id out?

  • 1. This is an investigation
  • 2. Rotary core boreholes more expensive

than cable percussive

  • 3. Conservative estimates of quantities of RC

follow on in glacial till?

  • 4. Conservative estimates of number of tests

required

  • 5. Occasionally addition ground investigation

is required or delays/overruns occur

slide-14
SLIDE 14

When the data is is presented in in a histogram….

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Is Is there a trend with project value?

€10K - €20K, N = 219 €20K - €50K, N = 77 >€50K, N = 89

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Does it it matter who designs the GI? I?

  • Contrib. N = 106

Non contrib. N = 119

slide-17
SLIDE 17

How much of f the contract is is based on fi fieldwork?

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What proportion of f the construction budget is is spent on GI? I?

Building projects Road and Bridge projects

slide-19
SLIDE 19

How many explorations on a typical sit ite?

Building area Construction cost

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Tender award based on price only…..

BCRI 2012

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

AGS BDA taskforce in UK The two lines are speculative, subjective, unquantified and unsubstantiated but useful for stimulating debate

Start of CPT use in Ireland Geophysics & Geobor S Restricted budgets and site supervision

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Poor ground investigation and geotechnical design

is frequently an issue in project cost and programme overruns.

  • Early intervention produces greater opportunity to

provide developers with certainty and guidance.

  • Ground investigations frequently cost less than the

tender cost. This suggests the presence of a conservative bias when competent geotechnical engineers design ground investigations.

  • A remeasurable contract is ideally suited for most

ground investigations. Please use the Engineers Ireland Specification and Related Documents for Ground Investigation 2nd Edition 2016 (Green Book)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusions and Recommendations

  • The proportion of the construction budget spent on

ground investigations tends to decrease with increasing project value.

  • There is a need to record data and improve

decision making. The cause of failures or losses on projects would be worthwhile sharing.

  • Is there a need to introduce quality requirements

for Ground Investigation Contractors by the State to promote best practice?

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thanks to: