geotechnical asset management
play

GEOTECHNICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT MIDWEST GEOTECHNICAL CONF., 9/17/2019 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GEOTECHNICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT MIDWEST GEOTECHNICAL CONF., 9/17/2019 GEOTECHNICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT Steve Taliaferro ODOT Office of Geotechnical Engineering 2 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference NCHRP RESEARCH REPORT 903 3 | 2019 Midwest


  1. GEOTECHNICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT MIDWEST GEOTECHNICAL CONF., 9/17/2019

  2. GEOTECHNICAL ASSET MANAGEMENT Steve Taliaferro ODOT Office of Geotechnical Engineering 2 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  3. NCHRP RESEARCH REPORT 903 3 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  4. REPORT 903 o Research Overview (Vol. 1) o GAM Types o Implementation Manual (Vol. 2) o “Why” of GAM o Starting GAM Implementation o Understanding the GAM Process 4 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  5. GAM TYPES o Embankments o Slopes o Soil and/or Rock o Retaining Walls o Subgrades o Ground Improvements o AUM and Karst (performance risk) o Unimproved/natural hazard 5 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  6. “WHY” OF GAM o Financial Responsibility o Managing Risk o Decision Support 6 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  7. IMPLEMENTATION o Step 1: Identify & Locate (Inventory) o Step 2: Record Asset Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Conditions o Step 3: Assess Asset Performance Consequences 7 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  8. IMPLEMENTATION o Step 4: Review Treatment Recommendations o Step 5: Analyze the Impacts of Differing Investment Levels o Step 6: Communicate Results 8 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  9. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY 1. As the asset is defined in the NCHRP Research Report 903 (Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies), does your state inventory : o Embankments o Slopes o Subgrades o Retaining Walls Landslides (Not an asset in Report 903) o o Other (describe here) 9 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  10. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY 2. As the asset is defined in the NCHRP Research Report 903 (Geotechnical Asset Management for Transportation Agencies), does your state rate: o Embankments o Slopes o Subgrades o Retaining Walls Landslides (Not an asset in Report 903) o o Other (describe here) 10 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  11. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY 3. If you answered yes to any of the above, please respond to the following: Briefly describe how your GAM system came o about o How is it accessed (by the public, internally, etc.)? o Who populates it? o How do you use the data? o Do you program projects using the data? 11 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  12. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY RESULTS Inventory: o No states are inventorying embankments, slopes, and subgrades as specifically defined in Rpt 903 o 7 of 9 states are either actively inventorying retaining walls or have development underway with such an inventory “under discussion” in an additional state 12 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  13. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY RESULTS Inventory: o 5 of 9 states are actively inventorying landslides on either a statewide (2 states) or limited (3 states) basis 13 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  14. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY RESULTS Rating: o 2 of 9 states are rating retaining walls 14 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  15. MIDWEST STATE GAM SURVEY RESULTS GAM Systems: o Active retaining wall inventories are being collected by consultants and internal forces o In-house developed databases and University research contributions common o ArcGIS Collector used by 2 states o Asset Management Legislation 15 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  16. OHIO’S GAM Retaining Walls o 3 year initial population underway o 10 year re-inspection cycle o Inventory Fields vs. Inspection Fields 16 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  17. OHIO’S GAM 17 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  18. OHIO’S GAM 18 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  19. OHIO’S GAM Geohazards o Landslide o Rockfall o Abandoned Underground Mines o Re-inspection cycles based on severity/risk rating 19 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  20. OHIO’S GAM 20 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  21. OHIO’S GAM 21 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  22. OHIO’S GAM DISTRICT 12 - SULFATE MAP Legend RIVER I-90 SO4 (ppm) 0-3000 !! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 0 ! ! ! ! 3000-5000 ! ! ! ! 9 ! ! - ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! I ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5000-8000 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 8000+ ! R U P S D I Chemical_Stabilization L C D U N E A L E K Full_Depth A L New_Pavement_Projects ! ! ! ! SADIE N O R T H W E S T I-90 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! T ! ! ! L ! ! E 0 B 8 R ! 4 ! - I E ! T ! U ! ! ! ! O ! ! ! ! I - ! 4 MEDINA 8 WILLOW 0 I-271 I-71 I-77 Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, I - 8 0 IGN, and the GIS User Community 22 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  23. OHIO’S GAM o Historic geotechnical information/data is an asset o DIGGS compatible data now required in Ohio 23 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  24. OHIO’S GAM 24 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  25. OHIO’S GAM 25 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

  26. QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION Last updated 9/24/2019 26 | 2019 Midwest Geotechnical Conference

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend