Case Closed: Wendy L. Longmire, JD Diagnostic Error Ortale, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case closed
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case Closed: Wendy L. Longmire, JD Diagnostic Error Ortale, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Case Closed: Wendy L. Longmire, JD Diagnostic Error Ortale, Kelley, Herbert & Crawford Agenda What we will cover Diagnostic Error Data Cognitive Factors Systems Issues Lessons Learned from Case Studies Appropriate


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Case Closed: Diagnostic Error

Wendy L. Longmire, JD Ortale, Kelley, Herbert & Crawford

slide-2
SLIDE 2

What we will cover

  • Diagnostic Error Data
  • Cognitive Factors
  • Systems Issues
  • Lessons Learned from

Case Studies

  • Appropriate

Supervision

  • Improvement

Strategies

Agenda

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Why a course on Diagnostic Error?

  • Diagnostic error is the patient’s

#1 concern when surveyed

The toll of Dx Error, Leape et al. JAMA 288:2405, 2002 Singh et al. BMJ Qual Safety 21: 93-100, 2012

  • 40,000 – 80,000 deaths/year
  • 1 in 20 primary care patients involved

diagnostic error every year

  • More than half happen in Ambulatory care
slide-4
SLIDE 4

National Data (PIAA)

Internal Medicine, General and Family Practice

  • Most prevalent and expensive misadventure:

Diagnostic Error

  • Most expensive condition:

Chest pain

  • Most prevalent misdiagnosed condition:

Malignant neoplasms of the bronchus and lung

Physician Insurers Association of America-PIAA

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Cancer
  • Infections
  • Pulmonary embolism
  • Acute coronary syndrome
  • Fractures
  • Cerebrovascular disease
  • Appendicitis

Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority 2010

Top Misdiagnosed Conditions

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Common Failures in Diagnosis

  • Inadequate H & P
  • Failure to follow a

cancer screening protocol

  • Failure to include

cancer in differential dx

  • Failure to order appropriate tests or referral
  • Incorrect interpretation of tests
  • Failure to track tests and notify patients
  • Inadequate discharge planning or follow-up
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Challenges to Reliable Diagnosis

  • Atypical presentation or unusual course
  • Cognitive – recognizing acuity/severity
  • Patient factors
  • Noncompliant with treatment, failure to

follow-up

  • Poor historians or language barriers
  • Systems issues
  • Access to testing
  • Delays or misinterpretations
  • Fragmented care
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Heuristics: A Double-Edged Sword

  • Mental shortcuts commonly used in decision-making

and frequently correct. But, can lead to faulty reasoning.

  • “Familiarity breeds conclusions”
  • Occam’s razor is an example of a medical heuristic; it

dictates that the simplest explanation for all presenting symptoms should be sought

  • Common things are common
  • If you hear hoofbeats, think of horses instead of

zebras

Elstein AS, Schwartz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review

  • f the cognitive literature. BMJ 2002; 324:729–732.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Cognitive Bias

  • Anchoring – tendency to stay with an original

diagnosis or make a “snap judgment”

  • Availability- immediately comes to mind
  • Premature closure- failure to consider

possibilities once initial diagnosis is reached

  • Confirmation bias- assigning preference to

findings that confirm diagnosis or strategy

  • Context errors- clinician biased by patient

history, previous diagnosis, etc. leading to the wrong context for diagnosis

slide-10
SLIDE 10

“How Doctors Think”

  • Dr. Groupman focuses on how the doctor-patient

interaction influences diagnosis and espouses:

  • Practice conscious, reflective review
  • Patients should actively participate in care
  • Shore up knowledge gaps

Suggested asking two questions before diagnosing:

1. “What else might this be?” 2. “Could there be two things going on here?”

How Doctors Think, Jerome Groupman, MD

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

What Happened Here?

  • Heuristics/Cognitive issues
  • Adequate H & P?
  • Differential diagnosis?
  • Communication/Systems failures
  • Hand off failure
  • Problems with documentation
  • Subjective, derogatory comments
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Complex Care Is a Team Effort

Strive for:

  • Effective Communication
  • Consistent Office Processes and

Systems

  • Good Medical Record Documentation
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Poor Communications = Errors 70% of sentinel events reported to Joint Commission

caused by poor communication

  • 44% breakdown in communication with patients or

among colleagues (handoffs)

  • 21% misinformation in the medical record
  • 18% mishandling of patient requests or messages
  • 12% inaccessibility of medical records
  • 5% inadequacy of reminder systems

Source: Woolf SH, Kuzel AJ, Dovey SM, et al. A string of mistakes: the importance of cascade analysis in describing, counting, and preventing medical errors. Ann Fam Med 2004 Jul-Aug;2(4):317-26.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Continuity of Care

  • You don’t need to find and fix everything
  • Average patient has 3.6 providers
  • Refer to specialists and communicate the

relationship to patients

  • ER doctor: “It’s important you see Dr. Reed for

this belly pain.”

  • Ask patient to update you on other care

providers and treatment plans

  • “What did the ER doctor tell you this could be?”
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Handling Telephone Calls

  • Do you have written

policies?

  • Do you carefully prioritize

phone calls for the

physician to ensure urgent

  • nes are addressed

immediately?

  • Do you track 2nd or 3rd call for same problem?
  • Do you document after-hours calls?
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Documenting After-Hours Calls

  • Calls about positive test

results reported to patients

  • What was action taken/patient advised?
  • Medical advice given or history
  • btained
  • To consultants about a specific

patient

  • Medication prescribed or

changed

SVMIC offers free after-hours message pads

At a minimum, document:

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What Happened Here?

  • Faulty Systems
  • Differing Expectations
  • Radiologist would call in report
  • Communication Breakdowns
  • No news is good news
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Tracking

  • Diagnostic tests
  • Patient referrals
  • Patients requiring follow-up
  • “No-shows” or cancelled appointments
slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Patient as a Safety Net

  • Set expectations up front (Patient agenda)
  • Disclose the diagnosis to the patient and what to expect
  • Give the patient an approximate date to be notified
  • Tell the patient to call back if s/he doesn’t hear back within

timeframe

  • “No news” IS NOT “Good

news”!

  • “We will call you with your
  • results. If you don’t hear

from me or my office staff within 10 days, please call the office.”

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Tracking Documentation

  • Keep a paper log (example in book)
  • EHR can track and send an alert/reminder
  • Diagnostic tests or consultations
  • Date the report is anticipated
  • Date report received
  • Patient notified and action taken
  • Not filed until: provider review,

action taken, pt. notified

  • Missed/cancelled appointments:
  • Contact patient - # of attempts commensurate with

situation

  • Contact referring physician (form in book)
slide-23
SLIDE 23

EHR “The Sword”

  • Copy/paste and cloned notes perpetuate

inaccurate or contradictory records

  • Templates can lead to an inaccurate

diagnosis

  • Position your EHR so it isn’t a barrier

between you and the patient

  • Data display issues such as

hidden fields, multiple windows and need to scroll down or view a second page

slide-24
SLIDE 24

EHR “The Shield”

  • Decision support tools may help with

diagnosis

  • Decrease errors in calculation, faulty memory
  • Update problem lists, medications and allergies
  • Legibility of notes
  • Alerts (when not disregarded)
  • Tracking, recalls and reminders
  • Document patient education
  • Create after-visit summary
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Carryover Example

Two entries repeated at EACH VISIT for a 3 year period for cancer patient:

History: “patient was diagnosed with renal cancer 1 month ago” Medications: “no new medicines prescribed”

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • Midlevel practitioners

Supervising Relationships Supervising Relationships

  • Office Staff
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Foster Collaborative Relationships

  • Maximize staff to their

highest credentials

  • Teach and appropriately

delegate to staff who then take ownership and initiative

  • Staff huddles
  • Encourage broader

situational awareness “Doctor, didn’t you want to repeat the CBC this visit?”

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Team Participation

  • Ensure important information gets relayed to the next

level of care

  • “Front desk notifies nurse/MA that patient arrived short of

breath and mentioned he had some chest pain.”

  • Be part of the safety net: Does what you see fit with the

medical diagnosis? If not, speak up.

  • After-visit summary and

follow-up plans

  • Use “teach-back” to ensure

patient understanding

  • Provide take home

educational materials

  • Call backs for follow-up
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Midlevel Practitioner Supervision

  • Physician or substitute physician must be

available for consultation at all times

  • Must have experience and/or expertise in the

same area of medicine as the MLP

  • Must authorize drugs on

the formulary

  • Jointly developed protocols
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Midlevel Practitioner Supervision

  • Review a minimum of 20% of

records

  • 100% review of records if

controlled substance prescription given

  • Review within 10 days and certify

by signature within 30 days

  • Visit remote sites every 30 days

All supervising physicians must:

slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32

Diagnostic Tools

  • Evidence-based medicine (guidelines, clinical

protocols – document deviations)

  • Today, there is at least one published protocol

for virtually every diagnostic category

  • Recommendations

from specialty societies

  • Agency for Healthcare

Research and Quality: www.guidelines.gov

  • Error checklists
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Use Comment/Narrative Field

A few sentences should be meaningfully used to:

  • Document thought process, actions in response to event

being charted

  • Document unexpected findings or unanticipated events
  • Clarify an auto-populated entry that requires

explanation

  • Explain “drop-down” entries that don’t quite fit
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Coordinating Care

  • Communication is key.
  • You’re the primary care physician…
  • Make sure all tests/consults are tracked back to you
  • You’re the hospitalist…
  • Make sure you know when and how to

hand-off the care back to the admitting physician

  • You’re the consultant…
  • Make sure you know who ordered the

consult, whether the report should be immediately communicated to the

  • rdering physician and to whom you are

to transmit report

  • Always tell the patient / family who is managing what condition.
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Takeaways

  • Complex Care is a team effort –

train to maximize staff

  • Always construct a differential

diagnosis (What else could this be?)

  • Not sure? keep looking…
  • Obtain appropriate referrals or

second opinions

  • Structure the handoff process
  • Use decision support resources
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Takeaways

  • Consider diagnostic checklists
  • Follow recommended screening

guidelines

  • Ensure an efficient and effective

system of communicating abnormal and critical results clinician to clinician

  • Improve the quality of your

documentation

  • Partner with your patient and

remember communication is key!