Case Comparisons Department of Government London School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case comparisons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Case Comparisons Department of Government London School of - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Case Comparisons Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection 1 Uses of Case Studies 2 Case Comparisons 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Case Comparisons

Department of Government London School of Economics and Political Science

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

1 Uses of Case Studies 2 Case Comparisons 3 Case Selection

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

1 Uses of Case Studies 2 Case Comparisons 3 Case Selection

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

What is a case study?

Definition: “an intensive study of a single unit for the purpose of understanding a larger class

  • f (similar) units” (Gerring 2004, 342)

Broad uses: Description Concept definition and measurement Induction/Theory development Theory testing Exploration of mechanisms

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

1: Description

Case study might be descriptive Historical or interpretive Think “biography” of a case

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

2: Concept Definition

Sometimes you don’t know what you are studying Case studies can clarify what something is a case of This helps you to:

Refine your concept definition Improve measurement

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

3: Theory development

Case is an instance of a phenomenon There is some outcome to be explained

Outcome is case itself Outcome of a case Outcome as part of case

Look for “Causal Process Observations” Attempt to identify generalizable explanations

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Causal Process Observations

Definition: “An insight or piece of data that provides information about the context, process, or mechanism, and that contributes distinctive leverage in causal inference”1 Essentially pieces of evidence that offer insight into within-case counterfactuals

1Brady and Collier 2004, p.277

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

4: Theory testing

“Actual case” comparisons

Mill’s methods

Fearon’s “Counterfactual method” Process tracing

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

5: Mechanisms

Imagine you already have evidence for a causal relationship A case study can help you explore or test for “mechanisms” of that effect This is our focus next week

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

What is a case study?

Definition: “an intensive study of a single unit for the purpose of understanding a larger class

  • f (similar) units” (Gerring 2004, 342)

Broad uses: Description Concept definition and measurement Induction/Theory development Theory testing Exploration of mechanisms

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

What is a case study?

Definition: “an intensive study of a single unit for the purpose of understanding a larger class

  • f (similar) units” (Gerring 2004, 342)

Broad uses: Description Concept definition and measurement Induction/Theory development Theory testing Exploration of mechanisms

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis Within scope conditions of theory

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis Within scope conditions of theory Well-defined concepts

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis Within scope conditions of theory Well-defined concepts Measures of high construct validity, accuracy, and precision

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis Within scope conditions of theory Well-defined concepts Measures of high construct validity, accuracy, and precision Possible to observe any correlation between potential cause and outcome

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis Within scope conditions of theory Well-defined concepts Measures of high construct validity, accuracy, and precision Possible to observe any correlation between potential cause and outcome Consistent with or an improvement upon past methods

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

A Good Test

Correct level of analysis Within scope conditions of theory Well-defined concepts Measures of high construct validity, accuracy, and precision Possible to observe any correlation between potential cause and outcome Consistent with or an improvement upon past methods Test using different data than data used to generate theory

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Theory testing involves: Between-case comparisons, or Across-time comparisons, or Between-case & across-time comparisons Within-case comparisons at a lower level

  • f analysis
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Theory testing involves: Between-case comparisons, or Across-time comparisons, or Between-case & across-time comparisons Within-case comparisons at a lower level

  • f analysis
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

1 Uses of Case Studies 2 Case Comparisons 3 Case Selection

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005)

In pairs, discuss the following: What is the outcome? What is the theory? What are the cases examined? How are the cases compared? You have 3 minutes.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Figure 1 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins

  • f Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Figure 1 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins

  • f Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Figure 1 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins

  • f Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Figure 1 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins

  • f Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Figure 1 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins

  • f Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Mill’s methods2

1 Agreement 2 Difference 3 Agreement and Difference 4 Residue 5 Concomitant variations

2Discussed in Holland (1986)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Mill’s methods2

1 Agreement 2 Difference 3 Agreement and Difference 4 Residue 5 Concomitant variations

2Discussed in Holland (1986)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Using Mill’s Methods

1 Identify an outcome to explain

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Using Mill’s Methods

1 Identify an outcome to explain 2 Find cases and score on outcome

Need outcome variation

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Using Mill’s Methods

1 Identify an outcome to explain 2 Find cases and score on outcome

Need outcome variation

3 Categorize cases on possible

explanations

Need variation

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Using Mill’s Methods

1 Identify an outcome to explain 2 Find cases and score on outcome

Need outcome variation

3 Categorize cases on possible

explanations

Need variation

4 Apply Mill’s methods to:

Identify deterministic causes Eliminate deterministic causes

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Agreement

If two or more instances of the phenomenon under investigation have only one circumstance in common, the circumstance in which alone all the instances agree, is the cause (or effect) of the given phenomenon. Often called “most different systems” design.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Table 2 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Table 2 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Difference

If an instance in which the phenomenon under investigation occurs, and an instance in which it does not occur, have every circumstance save one in common, that one occurring only in the former; the circumstance in which alone the two instances differ, is the effect, or cause, or an necessary part of the cause, of the phenomenon.

Often called “most similar systems” design.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Table 2 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection Table 2 from Doner, Ritchie, Slater (2005). “Systemic Vulnerability and the Origins of Developmental States.” International Organization 59: 327–361.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Agreement and Difference

If two or more instances in which the phenomenon occurs have only one circumstance in common, while two or more instances in which it does not occur have nothing in common save the absence of that circumstance; the circumstance in which alone the two sets

  • f instances differ, is the effect, or cause,
  • r a necessary part of the cause, of the

phenomenon.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Limitations of Mill’s Methods

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Limitations of Mill’s Methods

Necessary causes (Deterministic)

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Limitations of Mill’s Methods

Necessary causes (Deterministic) Works best with limited number of variables

Variables have to be categorical Multiple causation is difficult to accommodate

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Limitations of Mill’s Methods

Necessary causes (Deterministic) Works best with limited number of variables

Variables have to be categorical Multiple causation is difficult to accommodate

Works best with limited number of cases

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Limitations of Mill’s Methods

Necessary causes (Deterministic) Works best with limited number of variables

Variables have to be categorical Multiple causation is difficult to accommodate

Works best with limited number of cases Assume all potential explanations not examined do not matter

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Mixing Methods

Between-case comparisons help us understand causality We may want to mix this with further in-depth case studies

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Mixing Methods

Between-case comparisons help us understand causality We may want to mix this with further in-depth case studies

Hypothesis confirming: “most likely” case

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Mixing Methods

Between-case comparisons help us understand causality We may want to mix this with further in-depth case studies

Hypothesis confirming: “most likely” case Hypothesis weakening: “least likely” case

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Mixing Methods

Between-case comparisons help us understand causality We may want to mix this with further in-depth case studies

Hypothesis confirming: “most likely” case Hypothesis weakening: “least likely” case Hypothesis generating: “deviant” cases

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

1 Uses of Case Studies 2 Case Comparisons 3 Case Selection

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Case selection

Our ambitions about what kind of inferences we want to derive from our descriptions influence how we select cases.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Case selection

Our ambitions about what kind of inferences we want to derive from our descriptions influence how we select cases. Purposive

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Case selection

Our ambitions about what kind of inferences we want to derive from our descriptions influence how we select cases. Purposive Comparative

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Case selection

Our ambitions about what kind of inferences we want to derive from our descriptions influence how we select cases. Purposive Comparative Representative

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Case selection

Our ambitions about what kind of inferences we want to derive from our descriptions influence how we select cases. Purposive Comparative Representative

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

What cases can we compare?

Cases should be matched on covariates Constant covariates cannot be (individually) causal3

3But, constant covariates may be INUS causes (insufficient but necessary parts of

an unnecessary but sufficient cause)

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

What cases can we compare?

Cases should be matched on covariates Constant covariates cannot be (individually) causal3 Holding time constant may be useful, but not always Spain 2016 vs. Italy 2016 Spain 1982 vs. Romania 1990

3But, constant covariates may be INUS causes (insufficient but necessary parts of

an unnecessary but sufficient cause)

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

What cases can we compare?

Cases should be matched on covariates Constant covariates cannot be (individually) causal3 Holding time constant may be useful, but not always Spain 2016 vs. Italy 2016 Spain 1982 vs. Romania 1990 This logic applies regardless of n

3But, constant covariates may be INUS causes (insufficient but necessary parts of

an unnecessary but sufficient cause)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

An Example

For example, if we think smoking might cause lung cancer, how would we know?

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

An Example

For example, if we think smoking might cause lung cancer, how would we know? How would we know if smoking caused lung cancer for an individual who smoked? What’s the relevant counterfactual?

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

An Example

For example, if we think smoking might cause lung cancer, how would we know? How would we know if smoking caused lung cancer for an individual who smoked? What’s the relevant counterfactual? How would we know if smoking causes lung cancer on average across many individuals? What’s the relevant counterfactual?

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Example

slide-68
SLIDE 68

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Example

1 Partition population into “smokers” (X = 1)

and “non-smokers” (X = 0)

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Example

1 Partition population into “smokers” (X = 1)

and “non-smokers” (X = 0)

2 Identify possible confounds

Sex Age Income Education Parental smoking Diet etc.

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Cancer Sex Environment Parental Smoking

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Example

1 Partition population into “smokers” (X = 1)

and “non-smokers” (X = 0)

2 Identify possible confounds

Sex Age Income Education Parental smoking Diet etc.

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

population university degree

  • ld

male female young male female no degree

  • ld

male female young male female

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Example

1 Partition population into “smokers” (X = 1)

and “non-smokers” (X = 0)

2 Identify possible confounds

Sex Age Income Education Parental smoking Diet etc.

3 Estimate difference in cancer rates between

smokers and non-smokers within each group of covariates

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Cancer Sex Environment Parental Smoking

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Smoking Cancer Sex Environment Parental Smoking Other factors

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Uses of Case Studies Case Comparisons Case Selection

Activity!

1 Think about the population of all television

programmes

2 Identify one factor that you think might

affect viewership

3 Identify other factors that may confound the

effect of the factor and partition the population based upon those factors What are the other factors? Do you have “treated” and “comparison” cases in every “cell”?

slide-78
SLIDE 78