Beaverdam, Killbuck and Wyerough Run Stream Redesignation Petitions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

beaverdam killbuck and wyerough run stream redesignation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Beaverdam, Killbuck and Wyerough Run Stream Redesignation Petitions - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Beaverdam, Killbuck and Wyerough Run Stream Redesignation Petitions Petitioner: Clearfield Creek Watershed Association Environmental Quality Board Meeting May 21, 2014 Stream Petition Contents Petitioner Provides: Petitioner Information


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Beaverdam, Killbuck and Wyerough Run Stream Redesignation Petitions

Petitioner: Clearfield Creek Watershed Association

Environmental Quality Board Meeting May 21, 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Stream Petition Contents

  • Petitioner Information
  • Petition Information
  • Requested action (i.e., to amend a

regulation)

  • Justification for requesting action
  • Who/What entities will be affected by this

regulation change?

  • Is current litigation involved?
  • Stream redesignation information

Petitioner Provides:

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Submit petition to EQB via Policy Office
  • Completeness review
  • Present to EQB for consideration
  • If accepted by EQB for further study,
  • Department conducts biological

survey; file search; and public information request

3

Stream Redesignation Petition

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Current Designation: CWF

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Proposed Designation: EV

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Water quality and biological data was provided in support of the petitions for Beaverdam, Killbuck and Wyerough Runs. The petitioner believes an assessment of the submitted information will qualify the petitioned streams for Exceptional Value redesignation.

Basis of the Petition

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Department Findings

  • Petitions are complete
  • Information requirements have been

met as defined in §23.2 of the EQB Petition Policy

  • Redesignation requests do not conflict

with federal law

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recommendation

  • The Department recommends the

acceptance of all three petitions for further study.

  • If accepted, because of their close

proximity and common base of supportive information, these three petitions will be studied and managed concurrently as if they are one petition.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Kelly Heffner Deputy Secretary for Water Management Michelle Moses Bureau of Regulatory Counsel Tony Shaw Division of Water Quality Standards