Phase III Stream Assessment Study: Potential Stream Restoration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

phase iii stream assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Phase III Stream Assessment Study: Potential Stream Restoration - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Phase III Stream Assessment Study: Potential Stream Restoration Projects Strawberry Run and Taylor Run December 5, 2018 Tonights Agenda Introduce the project team Why stream restoration? Healthy stream characteristics


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Phase III Stream Assessment Study: Potential Stream Restoration Projects Strawberry Run and Taylor Run

December 5, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tonight’s Agenda

  • Introduce the project team
  • Why stream restoration?
  • Healthy stream characteristics
  • City’s Stream Assessment Program
  • Project selection
  • Finished project examples
  • Next steps

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Project Team

3

Transportation and Environmental Services (T&ES) Recreation, Parks and Cultural Activities (RPCA) Department of Project Implementation (DPI)

City Departments

Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

Consultant

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Project Drivers

4

1. Water quality and improving local streams is a City priority 2. Local benefits: enhanced water quality, improved habitat, protection of property 3. State and EPA require development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for impaired streams

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Chesapeake Bay TMDL

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Cleanup Mandates

  • Enforced through the City’s stormwater permit
  • Requires ~1/4 of the City to be retrofit for water quality

treatment before 2028

  • Dense urban nature of the City limits potential solutions
  • Stream restoration is one of the more cost-efficient

approaches 6 MS4 Permit Cycle % Total

  • Approx. Acres

Phase I (2013 - 2018) 5% 120 - 130 Phase II (2018 - 2023) 35% 660 Phase III (2023 - 2028) 60% 1,450 Total All Phases 100% 2,140

slide-7
SLIDE 7

What Makes a Stream Healthy?

  • 1. Bed stability and diversity
  • 2. Sediment transport balance
  • 3. In-stream habitat & flow diversity
  • 4. Bank stability (native plant roots)
  • 5. Riparian buffer (streamside forest)
  • 6. Active floodplain
  • 7. Healthy watershed

“Multiple Benefits” or “Co-Benefits”

7

Physical Chemical Biological

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stream Pyramid

8

Courtesy of Stream Mechanics

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Scour

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Scour – Field Examples

10 Outfall to Holmes Run Strawberry Run Taylor Run

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Stream Assessment Program

11

Phase I

Stream Categorization

Mapping of streams, defining limits, and stream categorization

Phase II

Assessment of Streams

Stream habitat, infrastructure impacts, problem areas, characteristics

Phase III

Project Identification

Potential project sites evaluated and ranked. Conceptual designs for top projects.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Locations

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Potential Projects – Stream Segments

13

Unnamed Tributary near Walleston Ct. Strawberry Run near Taft Avenue Taylor Run near Chinquapin Park Holmes Run north of N. Beauregard St. Timber Branch near Ivy Hill Cemetery

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Unnamed Tributary near Walleston Ct.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Strawberry Run near Taft Avenue

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Taylor Run near Chinquapin Park

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Holmes Run north of N. Beauregard St.

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Timber Branch near Ivy Hill Cemetery

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Phase III Stream Assessment

19

Evaluation of Potential Projects

  • Field Assessment
  • Recommendations
  • Decision Matrix and Priority Ranking
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Strawberry Run

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Strawberry Run

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Strawberry Run

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Strawberry Run

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Strawberry Run

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Taylor Run

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Taylor Run

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Taylor Run

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Taylor Run

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Phase III Stream Assessment

29

Conceptual Designs and Cost Estimates

  • Conceptual Designs
  • Using Natural Channel Design (NCD) which emulates

natural river systems

  • Planning Level Cost Estimates

~900 ft ~1900 ft

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Natural Channel Design

30 Riffle Cascade Step-Pools Log Vane

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Conceptual Designs

31 Strawberry Run Taylor Run

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Feasibility

32

N

Potential Construction Access

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Benefits

Habitat Aesthetics Water Quality Native Vegetation

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Strawberry Run – Downstream Project

Before After

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35 Before

Strawberry Run – Downstream Project

After

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Joint Base Andrews

36 Before After

Courtesy of Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Cullers Run

37 Before After

Courtesy of Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Cullers Run

38

Courtesy of Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

slide-39
SLIDE 39

North Mill Creek

39 Before After

Courtesy of Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Big Rocky Run

40 Before After

Courtesy of Wood Environment & Infrastructure Solutions

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Habitat…

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Next Steps & What To Expect

42

Outreach

  • Public and Stakeholder Outreach
  • Consider feedback in designs
  • More outreach…

Finalize Phase III Stream Assessment

  • Outfall Conceptual Designs – Dec. 2018
  • Report – January 2019

Funding

  • Applied for matching 50/50 state grants
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Next Steps & What To Expect

43

Continue with Design (may depend on grant funding)

  • 30%, 60%, 90%, Final
  • Topographic survey
  • Tree survey
  • Refine designs
slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

Joni Calmbacher, PE

Stormwater Management Division Transportation & Environmental Services City of Alexandria, VA 703.746.4174 Joni.Calmbacher@alexandriava.gov

Brian Meli, PE

Department of Project Implementation City of Alexandria, VA 703.746.4110 Brian.Meli@alexandriava.gov

City Contact Information