and Blended Families Maximizing Tax Benefits, Incorporating Pre- and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

and blended families
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

and Blended Families Maximizing Tax Benefits, Incorporating Pre- and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presenting a live 110-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Estate Planning for Second Marriages and Blended Families Maximizing Tax Benefits, Incorporating Pre- and Postnuptial Agreements, and Meeting Obligations to Children and Spouses


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Estate Planning for Second Marriages and Blended Families

Maximizing Tax Benefits, Incorporating Pre- and Postnuptial Agreements, and Meeting Obligations to Children and Spouses

Today’s faculty features:

1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific

The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's

  • speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you

have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.

TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 2012

Presenting a live 110-minute webinar with interactive Q&A

Bridget K. Sullivan, Member, Sherman & Howard, Denver John T . Midgett, Shareholder, Midgett & Preti, Virginia Beach, Va. Kristin A. Pace, Partner, Fitzgerald Abbott & Beardsley, Oakland, Calif.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-961-9091 and enter your PIN when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps:

  • Close the notification box
  • In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of

attendees at your location

  • Click the SEND button beside the box

FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY

slide-4
SLIDE 4

If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps:

  • Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-

hand column on your screen.

  • Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a

PDF of the slides for today's program.

  • Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
  • Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Estate Planning for Second Marriages and Blended Families

Crafting Estate Plans to Incorporate Pre- and Post-Nuptial Agreements

John T. Midgett john.midgett@midgettpreti.com

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Overview

 “Marriage is the triumph of imagination over

  • intelligence. Second marriage is the triumph
  • f hope over experience.” – Oscar Wilde
slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Challenges and Issues

 Ethical Issues of Joint Representation  Titling of Assets  Beneficiary Designations  Choices of Fiduciaries

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Ethical Issues of Joint Representation

 Model Rules of Professional Conduct

 Rule 1:7 – a lawyer shall not represent a client if

the representation involves a current conflict of interest.

 ACTEC Commentaries

 RE: MRPC 1.7: Some conflicts of interest are so

serious that the informed consent of the parties is insufficient to allow the lawyer to undertake or continue the representation (a “non-waivable conflict).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Some Indications of Potential Conflicts of Interest

 Pre-Nuptial Agreement  Post-Nuptial Agreement  Either or both spouse has a child or children

from a prior relationship

 Great Disparity in Assets of the Parties  Great Disparity in the Ages of the Parties  Past Representation of a Single Party

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Issues the Lawyer Should Consider

 Laws of Intestate Succession  Elective Share Laws  Statutes favoring “Omitted Spouses”  Joint Tenancy issues  Beneficiary Designations on Life Insurance

and Annuities

 Beneficiary Designations on Qualified

Retirement Plans

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Laws of Intestate Succession

 Statutory “will”  Is the share for the surviving spouse too little

  • r too large?

 How are children to be treated?

 Children from prior relationships  Children with surviving spouse?  The spouse’s children from prior relationships?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Elective Share Laws

 Surviving spouse may be entitled to a

percentage of the TOTAL estate, including non-probate assets

 Usually involves litigation to determine

 Expensive  Divisive

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

“Omitted Spouse” statutes

 Testator made a will (avoiding intestacy) but

subsequently marries

 Invokes statutory presumption that Testator

did not intend to disinherit spouse

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Joint Tenancy Issues

 Joint Tenancy with Surviving Spouse

 With Rights of Survivorship  Without Rights of Survivorship

 Joint Tenancy with Children

 With Rights of Survivorship  Without Rights of Survivorship

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Beneficiary Designations – Life Insurance

 Coordinates with Pre or Post Marital

Agreements?

 Who is in control of proceeds?  Balancing economic needs  Each policy must be examined and the

beneficiary changed, if needed

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Beneficiary Designations – Qualified Retirement Plans

 Consider Pay-out options available to

surviving spouse

 Who controls balance, if any, at survivor’s

death

 Trusts as beneficiaries

 “Oldest Beneficiary” rule for measuring lives  Marital deduction issues – Battle between RMD

and mandatory income payout. See Rev. Rul. 2006-26.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Issues the Lawyer Should Consider

 Presence and Effect of Pre- and Post-Nuptial

Agreements

 Presence and Effect of Divorce Decrees and

Property Settlement Agreements

 Buy-Sell Agreements

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Issues the Lawyer Should Consider

 Family Dynamics

 Putting the “fun” in dysfunctional

 “What we have here is a failure to communicate!”- from

the movie Cool Hand Luke

 Jealousy and Greed

 Control and Management  Balancing the interest of “Yours, Mine and Ours”

slide-19
SLIDE 19

November 13, 2012

Bridget Sullivan, Esq.

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. 633 17th Street, #3000 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 299-8130

Discussion of Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements

Estate Planning for Second Marriages and Blended Families

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Bridget Sullivan is a Member in the Tax & Probate Department of Sherman & Howard’s Denver office. She practices in the areas of estate planning, wealth transfer planning, estate administration, trust administration, and litigation related to trusts and estates. Ms. Sullivan focuses on sophisticated estate planning techniques and prenuptial agreements. She has counseled clients on a variety of wealth transfer strategies and charitable giving techniques to accomplish family giving objectives while minimizing the impact of gift, estate, generation-skipping transfer, and income taxes.

  • Ms. Sullivan graduated from Yale Law School in 1990.

She is named in Best Lawyers in America for Trust and Estates and is named as a Colorado Super Lawyer.

Bridget K. Sullivan, Esq.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

  • 1. INTRODUCTION
  • The principal purpose of a marital agreement is to

alter the rights otherwise provided by law of one or both spouses to the property of the other spouse, whether upon termination of the marriage by divorce or by death or both.

  • Many states have a marital agreement act, which

determines the rights of parties who have entered a marital agreement, the types of matters that parties may agree to and the enforceability of marital agreements.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

  • 2. REASONS FOR HAVING A MARITAL AGREEMENT
  • Create certainty with respect to the disposition of

property at the end of a marriage.

  • Protect family legacy assets and provide assurance

to the senior generation which may have built the family wealth.

  • Protect family owned or closely held business

interests.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

  • Protect the interests of children from a prior marriage.
  • Protect family trusts in a divorce.
  • Provide security and certainty to the less wealthy

spouse.

  • Simplify and reduce the expense that often

accompanies divorce or litigation upon death of the spouse.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

  • Waivers of Surviving Spouse Rights

– A marital agreement may govern the rights of the parties in the event of the termination of the marriage by death of either party. – The agreement may include a partial or complete waiver of property rights arising at death. – The agreement may also include a promise to provide for a substitute transfer of property to the waiving spouse.

  • 3. RIGHTS OF SURVIVING SPOUSE UPON DEATH OF

OTHER SPOUSE

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

– While both parties to a martial agreement may agree to waive – in whole or in part – their respective property rights arising at death, each party remains free to leave more property to the other than would be required by the agreement. – A release and waiver of “all rights upon death” or equivalent language in a marital agreement encompasses the waiver of several statutorily granted spousal rights and priorities.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

  • Status as Surviving Spouse

– A person who is divorced from a decedent or whose marriage has been annulled is not a surviving spouse. – However a decree of separation does not terminate the status of husband and wife for death purposes. A husband and wife are considered married regardless of whether a divorce action has been instituted. – A marital agreement can modify these provisions, stating specifically that a separation decree or the filing of an action for divorce terminates all surviving spouse rights.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

  • Intestate Share of Surviving Spouse

– If a person dies without a will, the decedent’s property will be distributed in accordance with the applicable statute of intestate succession. – Under many states, the surviving spouse’s share of the intestate estate is dependent upon the circumstances of the parties, including whether there are adult or minor children of the marriage and whether the decedent has adult or minor children from another relationship. – Under the law of many states, the surviving spouse receives the entire intestate estate (1) when the decedent has no surviving descendants or ancestors or (2) when all

  • f the decedent’s surviving descendants are also

descendants of the surviving spouse and there are not

  • ther descendants of the surviving spouse who survive

the decedent (i.e., it was likely a first marriage for both spouses).

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

  • Spouse’s Elective or Statutory Share

– Dower refers to the legal right or interest that a wife acquired in the estate of her husband. It consists of the right to one-third of the husband’s real property. Curtesy is the common law life estate given to a husband in the real property of a deceased wife. Many states have abolished dower and curtesy, replacing these common law rights with statutory rights to an elective or forced share. – Absent a marital agreement, the surviving spouse has the right to an elective share of the augmented estate. Uniform Probate Code states, such as Colorado, have adopted a right to elect an amount not greater than 50%

  • f the “augmented estate”). Under the Uniform Probate

Code, the percentage of the augmented estate to which the surviving spouse is entitled is determined by the length of time the spouses were married, but is essentially as follows:

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

If the Decedent and the Spouse The Elective Share Were Married to Each Other: Percentage Is:

  • Less than 1 year

Supplemental amount only

  • 1 year but less than 2 years

5% of the augmented estate

  • 2 year but less than 3 years

10% of the augmented estate

  • 3 year but less than 4 years

15% of the augmented estate

  • 4 year but less than 5 years

20% of the augmented estate

  • 5 year but less than 6 years

25% of the augmented estate

  • 6 year but less than 7 years

30% of the augmented estate

  • 7 year but less than 8 years

35% of the augmented estate

  • 8 year but less than 9 years

40% of the augmented estate

  • 9 year but less than 10 years

45% of the augmented estate

  • 10 year or more

50% of the augmented estate

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

  • Augmented Estate

– The augmented estate is comprised of property owned by the decedent at death as well as certain pre-death gifts to the surviving spouse and to third parties. The augmented estate is a statutory concept created to prevent disinheritance of a spouse through transfers to others while at the same time equitably accounting for inter vivos and testamentary transfers to the spouse.

  • Pretermitted Spouse

– Absent a marital agreement, if a married person dies having executed his or her will prior to the marriage, and such will does not provide for the surviving spouse, then the surviving spouse has the right to take a share of the estate as a “pretermitted spouse.” The pretermitted spouse’s share of the estate is generally equal to the spouse’s intestate share.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

  • Family and Exempt Property Allowances

– Absent a martial agreement, in many states a surviving spouse is entitled to the family and exempt property

  • allowances. These allowances are in addition to the

intestate or elective shares. These are generally modest amounts.

  • Priority to Serve as Personal Representative or Executor

– In many states, the priority to serve as personal representative or executor is established by the decedent’s

  • will. However, in the absence of a will or if the will fails to

nominate someone who can act in such position, the surviving spouse has priority to act. This priority to serve can be waived in a marital agreement.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

  • Federal Law Rights to Retirement Plan Assets

– The survivorship rights in and benefits under qualified retirement plans are governed by federal law, including ERISA and other provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, it is federal law, and not state law, that governs when and how a participant may obtain a valid waiver of survivorship rights and interests in such plans. – A participant in a retirement plan cannot obtain a valid waiver of spousal survivorship rights prior to the parties’

  • marriage. Thus, the general waivers of “all rights upon

death” or even a specific waiver of rights to a retirement plan, will not constitute an effective waiver of spousal survivorship rights in a retirement plan. – Waivers in a prenuptial agreement must be coupled with mutual promises to execute separate retirement plan waivers after the parties are married.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

  • 5. WAIVERS OF SURVIVING SPOUSE ENTITLEMENTS IN

MARITAL AGREEMENTS

  • Waiver of statutory and common law rights upon

death.

– A release and waiver of “all rights upon death” or equivalent language in a marital agreement encompasses the waiver of statutorily granted spousal rights and priorities. – Such waivers can be done in a general waiver or in a more specific laundry list of waivers.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

– My laundry list (covering Colorado law) generally appears as follows:

  • “Specific Waiver. Upon the death of either of us, the
  • ther waives the following:

– The right to take an intestate share under Colo. Rev.

  • Stat. 15-11-102 or 15-11-301;

– The right to an elective share under Colo. Rev. Stat. 15-11-201, and to take any interest in the augmented estate under Colo. Rev. Stat. 15-11-202; – The right to an exempt property allowance under

  • Colo. Rev. Stat. 15 11-403;

– The rights of an omitted spouse under Colo. Rev.

  • Stat. 15-11-301;

– The right to a family allowance under Colo. Rev.

  • Stat. 15-11-404;
slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

– The right to a homestead interest under Colo.

  • Rev. Stat. 38-41-201 and 38-41-204 (as to each
  • ther, but not as to third parties);

– The right to act as a personal representative or trustee of the estate or trust of the other, unless specifically nominated or designated by the other; – All rights to any pension plan, profit sharing plan, deferred compensation plan or retirement benefits and cash accumulations in life insurance which have or might have accrued for the benefit of the

  • ther, unless specifically designated as

beneficiary; each of us agrees to execute the documents necessary to effectuate that waiver as required by the terms of the pension plan, profit sharing plan, deferred compensation plan or retirement benefit plan, state law or federal law;

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

– Any rights to contest any disposition of property by the other by any inter vivos trust; – Any provisions of the Colorado Marital Agreement Act, Colo. Rev. Stat. 14-2-301 through 310 in conflict with this Agreement; and – Any rights either of us might have to claim any portion of the estate of the other under the laws of any jurisdiction other than Colorado which are of like or similar purpose to the enumerated Colorado statutes that provide dower, curtesy, forced heirship, community property or marital property interests or any other right to claim against the estate of a deceased spouse by a surviving spouse.”

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

  • Limitations on Waivers If There Are Children of the

Marriage

– Note, in cases of young couples marrying with family wealth who do not have children from previous marriages, sometimes these waivers of rights upon death are appropriate only if there are no children of the marriage. – However, if there are children of the marriage, it may not make sense to have the less wealthy spouse waive “all rights upon death.” If the wealthier spouse fails to follow up with estate planning or with proper estate planning, the less wealthy spouse, now the parent of the children of the marriage, may be disinherited.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

  • Community Property Waivers

– I practice in Colorado, which has adopted the Uniform Probate Code state and is not a community property

  • state. An exhaustive discussion of community property is
  • utside the scope of this outline.

– Generally, community property is owned by both spouses

  • equally. Community property does not include property
  • wned by a spouse prior to marriage, property gifted from
  • ne spouse to the other, property inherited by a spouse
  • r property which was separate property prior to the time

the spouses moved to the community property

  • jurisdiction. The titling of property is not determinative of

its status. Earned income of the spouses is community

  • property. Income from separate property is community

property in some jurisdictions and not in others.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

– Frequently, parties execute a marital agreement in one state and move to another jurisdiction. All practitioners should be careful to draft waivers of rights upon death broadly enough to cover rights granted in any jurisdiction. A well drafted waiver of rights upon death will include a specific waiver of any property rights based on the laws of community property. – From an estate planning perspective, one benefit of preserving community property is that the entire property receives a step-up in basis at the death of the first spouse. I.R.C. § 1014 (b)(6). Under Section 1014(b)(6), even though

  • nly the decedent spouse’s one-half interest is includable in

his gross estate, the entire community property obtains a stepped up basis. This is perhaps the greatest advantage of community property. Because of this advantage, a lawyer preparing a marital agreement for clients in a community property state or clients who have migrated from a community property state will want to consider whether to retain the community property character of certain assets.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

6 SUBSTITUTE TRANSFERS IN EXCHANGE FOR WAIVERS OF SURVIVING SPOUSE RIGHTS

  • It is common for parties who enter into mutual

waivers of rights upon death to agree to make substitute transfer to each other, either during the marriage or at the time of death. Like most provisions of a marital agreement, the wealthier party may seek complete waivers from the less wealthy party in exchange for certain promised gift transfers during marriage and/or certain transfer upon death.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

– Federal Gift Tax Marital Deduction Issues

  • Gifts to a Spouse During Marriage. Transfers to the

spouse during the marriage will qualify for the unlimited deduction for gift tax purposes, so long as such transfers are made outright to the surviving spouse or to a qualifying

  • trust. I.R.C. § 2523.
  • A gift of a life estate or terminable interest will not qualify

for the gift tax marital deduction, unless such transfer is a qualified terminable interest as described in I.R.C. § 2523(f).

  • Outright gift transfers are obviously simplest from the

perspective of qualifying for the gift tax exclusion. However, clients may be adverse to such outright transfers and may wish to make transfers in trust for the spouse.

  • If an inter vivos trust is created for the spouse, be sure the

trust qualifies as a QTIP trust. If a QTIP trust is created and funded during the marriage, be sure to make a timely QTIP election. The IRS provides no relief for a late filed QTIP election for an inter vivos QTIP trust.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

There are several significant advantages of a lifetime QTIP trust in a marital agreement setting.

  • It allows the wealthier spouse to provide an income

stream to the less wealthy spouse during the marriage, after the wealthier spouse’s death, and in the case of a divorce (as maintenance).

  • At the death of the beneficiary spouse, regardless of

the order of deaths, the trust assets will pass to the beneficiaries selected by the wealthier spouse (presumably the children from the first marriage).

  • The unified credit and GST exemption of the less

wealthy spouse can be fully utilized, saving the wealthier spouse’s beneficiaries estate tax.

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

  • Cautions. Be wary of provisions which transfer a

property to the less wealthy spouse during the marriage, such as title to a residence, but provide that if a divorce were to occur the residence shall revert to the wealthier spouse. This may be attractive from an estate planning perspective and it may be attractive to the less wealthy spouse because she will hold the residence outright (rather than in a marital trust) at the wealthier spouse’s death. However, this arrangement may not qualify for the gift tax deduction as an outright transfer to the less wealthy spouse. Rather it will likely be treated as a terminable interest because the interest transferred to the less wealthy spouse will terminate or fail upon an event (the divorce) and because the donor retains in himself an interest in such property (the right of the property to revert to the donor upon a divorce). I.R.C. § 2523(b).

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

– Also be wary of drafting provisions which require the wealthier spouse to make transfers during the marriage

  • r upon termination of the marriage to the children of the

less wealthy spouse. Such contemplated gifts should qualify for the gift tax annual exclusion (currently $12,000 or $24,000 if the spouses will gift split) or the exclusion for payment of certain educational or medical

  • expenses. I.R.C. § 2503.
slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

– Gift Splitting. A marital agreement may request the less wealthy spouse to agree to gift splitting during the marriage, thereby allowing the wealthier spouse to maximize gifting to descendants. Be specific about whether the less wealthy spouse is consenting to gift splitting for annual exclusion gifts only or whether he/she is also consenting to use of his or her lifetime gift tax exemption.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

  • Federal Estate Tax Marital Deduction

– The substitute transfer of property described in a marital agreement should qualify for the federal estate tax marital

  • deduction. If the form of the transfer qualifies for the

unlimited marital deduction, the property transferred will pass free of the federal estate tax at the transferring party’s death. When a martial agreement provides for a marital deduction qualifying transfer, such as a QTIP trust, the agreement should explicitly allocate liability for the estate tax arising at the survivor’s death (presumably from the assets of the QTIP trust). – The following common forms of testamentary spousal transfers will qualify for the unlimited marital deduction.

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

  • An outright, unrestricted transfer of property;
  • A transfer for a qualified terminable interest property

(QTIP) trust;

  • A transfer to an estate trust or a power of appointment

trust;

  • A transfer to a qualified domestic trust (QDOT) for a

non-citizen surviving spouse;

  • A transfer of the right to unitrust or annuity payments

from a charitable remainder trust.

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

  • QTIP Trusts

– Estate planners frequently use QTIP trusts to provide for a second spouse, particularly when a party wishes to preserve wealth for children of a prior marriage. A testamentary marital trust, created under the decedent’s will or revocable trust will qualify for the marital deduction as a QTIP trust if:

  • Property passes from the decedent to the QTIP trust;
  • The governing instrument requires all income to be

distributed at least annually to the surviving spouse;

  • No other beneficiary may have any rights in the trust during

the surviving spouse’s lifetime; and

  • The personal representative or executor makes the

corresponding election on the federal estate tax return filed for the decedent’s estate. I.R.C. § 2056(b)(7).

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

  • The obvious benefit of the QTIP trust is that the

surviving spouse need not be given a general power of appointment over the trust and therefore may be prevented from disinheriting the remaindermen of the trust (presumably, the deceased spouse’s children from a prior marriage).

  • Another advantage of the QTIP trust is that if the

surviving spouse has a minimal estate of his or her

  • wn, the unified credit of that less wealthy surviving

spouse can be utilized for the benefit of the wealthier spouse’s beneficiaries. The same is true of the less wealthy surviving spouse’s generation skipping transfer tax (GST) exemption.

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

– Standards and Guidelines for Principal Distributions. Provided that the surviving spouse is entitled to the income from the trust, at least annually, the surviving spouse need not be given any other beneficial interests to the principal of the trust. Additional access to principal, however, is frequently given to the surviving spouse for health, support, and maintenance. Many times the marital agreement will specify under what circumstances principal may be accessed by the surviving spouse.

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

– Selection of Trustees.

  • The marital agreement may specify that a third party

will serve as sole trustee or as co-trustee with the surviving spouse to ensure better protection to the trust assets for the remainder beneficiaries.

  • “Neutral” trustees and successor trustees are

generally advisable. The surviving spouse as sole trustee generally provides less protection to principal than the deceased spouse may want.

  • On the other hand, a child of the decedent (the step-

child of the surviving spouse) as trustee may cause family discord.

  • A surviving spouse might be allowed to select a

trustee among a group of mutually agreeable potential trustees.

  • Or, a surviving spouse could be authorized to appoint

an institutional trustee.

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

– Selection of Assets.

  • The marital agreement may provide specific directions

with regard to what assets will be directed into the QTIP trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse.

  • If there is a closely held business, both spouse’s may

favor terms prohibiting such closely held stock from passing to the QTIP trust.

  • If the wealthier spouse holds promissory notes from

children, the less wealth spouse may want to include a provision specifically prohibiting those types of assets from being used to fund the QTIP trust.

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

– Residence.

  • Frequently, the marital agreement will address the use

and disposition of the residence by the non-owner spouse after the death of the owner spouse.

  • If the residence is transferred to the QTIP trust, it will

be important to include provisions in the QTIP trust so that the surviving spouse’s rights to the residence will constitute the necessary qualifying income interest (i.e, the surviving spouse must have the right to demand that unproductive property be made productive).

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

  • Use of Life Insurance in Conjunction with a Marital

Agreement

– Some parties to a marital agreement favor a waiver by the less wealthy spouse of all rights upon death of the wealthy spouse coupled with a death benefit paid to the surviving spouse pursuant to a life insurance policy. – If the wealthy spouse owns the policy and designates his

  • r her spouse as the beneficiary, the policy proceeds will

be included in the decedent’s estate, by will qualify for the estate tax marital deduction. – If the surviving spouse is both the owner and the beneficiary of the policy, the policy proceeds will not be included in the decedent’s gross estate.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

– The parties to the marital agreement may want to address specifically what type of policy is to be acquired to satisfy the provisions of the agreement. Term insurance vs. permanent insurance. – The parties to the agreement also may want to specify that the beneficiary spouse be the owner of the policy. – The agreement should specifically address which party will have the obligation to pay the premiums.

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

– If you represent the beneficiary spouse, consider drafting a backstop provision which will give the surviving spouse a right to claim against the decedent’s estate if, for any reason, such insurance is not in place at the death of the spouse whose life was to be insured. – Consider using a QTIP trust or an irrevocable life insurance trust as the beneficiary of the insurance policy if the wealthy spouse wishes to have the policy proceeds remaining after the surviving spouse’s death pass to his or her children from a previous marriage.

slide-57
SLIDE 57

57

  • Joint Tenancy

– Clients should be advised regarding the implications of joint tenancy and the possibility of defeating all of the careful planning for death in the marital agreement by holding property as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. – Consider including a provision in the marital agreement which gives the wealthier spouse credit for joint tenancy transfers against any required devises to the surviving

  • spouse. I generally include the following language:
slide-58
SLIDE 58

58

  • “Effect of Jointly Held Property, Beneficiary

Designation Property, or Transfer on Death Property Payable to Joe. If Jane predeceases Joe, the

  • bligation to provide Joe with an outright disposition of

cash or marketable securities having a fair market value of $500,000 under paragraph ______ shall be deemed satisfied to the extent of the date of death value of any cash or marketable securities passing by beneficiary designation or transfer on death designation and to the extent of one-half of the date of death value of cash or marketable securities passing by joint tenancy or tenancy by the entireties as a result

  • f Jane’s death.”

OR

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59

“If Jane predeceases Joe, the obligation to provide Joe with $2,000,000 in a marital trust under paragraph ____ shall be deemed satisfied to the extent of the date of death value of any property passing by beneficiary designation or transfer on death designation and to the extent of one-half of the date of death value of joint tenancy or tenancy by the entireties property passing to Joe as a result of Jane’s death. If the value of property passing to Joe by beneficiary designation, transfer on death designation, joint tenancy or tenancy by the entireties should exceed the required amount payable to Joe pursuant to paragraphs _____, then Jane’s estate shall have no further obligation to Joe under this Agreement, nor shall Joe have any obligation to return funds to Jane's estate.”

slide-60
SLIDE 60

60

  • 7. DIVORCE AND TRUSTS – PROTECTING TRUSTS IN

A MARITAL AGREEMENT

  • The development of the law in most states regarding

treatment of interests in trusts as property for purposes of property division in a dissolution proceeding has been quite varied and, at times, inconsistent.

  • It is critical that the drafter of prenuptial agreements

understand the law of his or her state which governs treatment of trusts in divorce.

slide-61
SLIDE 61

61

  • Best to address all trusts of which your client is a

beneficiary (even a remainder beneficiary) in the marital agreement to ensure that those trust interests are not subject to litigation if the marriage ends in divorce. Bottom Line: Your client should have a prenuptial agreement if he or she is the beneficiary of trusts.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

62

  • 8. DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES, INCOME,

AND BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN TRUSTS

  • In order for a prenuptial agreement to be

enforceable, each of the parties to a marital agreement will need to make full financial disclosure. Each party should prepare (or have prepared) the following:

– A net worth statement, detailing with reasonable accuracy all assets, liabilities, financial obligations, and net worth. Hard to value assets such as closely held business interests, should be valued on a reasonable basis if no formal valuation exists. The basis for such “reasonable estimate” should be provided to the other party and his or her counsel.

slide-63
SLIDE 63

63

– Income information for the last three years. – All beneficial interests in trusts should be disclosed, even if your client is a remote or remainder beneficiary. A copy of the trust agreement and a detailed statement regarding the assets of the trust should be included.

  • These should be provided to each party and the
  • attorneys. They will also be attached as exhibits to the

prenuptial agreement.

  • Failure to disclose adequately is a significant ground

for challenge of marital agreements. Err on the side of

  • ver disclosure.
slide-64
SLIDE 64

64

  • 9. TREATMENT OF DEBT
  • Generally, prenuptial agreements define separate

and marital debt, so that if there were to be a divorce, it is clear how debt should be allocated.

– Generally, all debt which one party enters the marriage with is defined to be his or her separate debt, and vice versa. – You would then want to define debt which is incurred during the marriage as either separate debt or joint debt, depending on the nature of the debt, and the clients’ expectations for how that debt will be treated.

slide-65
SLIDE 65

65

10. COORDINATION OF ESTATE PLANNING DOCUMENTS WITH THE MARITAL AGREEMENT

  • Maintenance of Testamentary Documents

– If the marital agreement requires that wills, trusts, beneficiary designations, deeds, or other documents be prepared to reflect the agreement reached, this can be done by one of two methods: (1) the marital agreement can be drafted as a specific roadmap which will contain the essential terms of the documents that will be prepared at a later date, or (2) the marital agreement can include concurrently prepared and executed documents as exhibits to the agreement. – If the parties execute a marital agreement which provides a general waiver or “all rights upon death” or similar language, be sure to advise your client to maintain updated estate planning documents after the marriage if your client does in fact wish to leave property to the spouse.

slide-66
SLIDE 66

66

  • Enforcement for Breach

– If the marital agreement requires a spouse to devise property to the surviving spouse, the agreement constitutes a contract to devise property. – Be sure to consult your state laws regarding contracts to make a will or devise to ensure that the marital agreement satisfies any specific requirements. – The surviving spouse would then be treated as a claimant against the decedent’s estate and would have to comply with the claims statutes. – If you represent the spouse who is to receive the devise in accordance with the marital agreement, consider including language which extends the surviving spouse’s time for making a claim and which reimburses the surviving spouse for attorney’s fees incurred in connection with the claim.

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

  • New Estate Planning Clients – Verify Whether a Marital

Agreement Exists

– New estate planning clients may not mention the existence

  • f an old marital agreement. Estate planning attorneys

should specifically confirm with clients whether or nor a marital agreement exists, and if one does, obtain a copy. – Have a discussion with both spouses about whether a joint representation makes sense in light of the marital agreement or whether one party may want to engage separate counsel to review the estate planning documents

  • n his or her behalf.
slide-68
SLIDE 68

68

  • Estate Planning Clients with Grown Children

– When preparing estate planning documents for wealthy clients with grown children, consider having a discussion with those clients regarding whether the children have or should have marital agreements in place. This may affect whether a client decides to leave property outright

  • r in a lifetime trust to an adult child.
slide-69
SLIDE 69

ESTATE PLANNING FOR SECOND MARRIAGES AND BLENDED FAMILIES Tax Issues Unique to the Blended Family and Structuring Estate Plans Using Trusts

Kristin A. Pace, Esq. Fitzgerald Abbott & Beardsley LLP 1221 Broadway, 21st Floor Oakland, California 94612 (510) 451-3300 kpace@fablaw.com

November 13, 2012

#483564

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Tax Issues Unique to the Blended Family

Where we today now that the election is over?

  • President Obama’s Estate / Gift Tax

Wish List

  • Working with What We Have

70

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Tax Reform Act of 2010 (the “Act”)

  • Increased Exemption
  • Portability – Is this still a viable

planning option?

  • Planning for the sunset of the Act at the

end of 2012

71

slide-72
SLIDE 72

72

Tax Reform Act of 2010 (the “Act”)

Increased Exemption

  • Formula funding problems
  • Under-funded spouse
  • Gift splitting
slide-73
SLIDE 73

73

Increased Exemption

  • Formula funding problems
  • Beware of unintended results
  • Depending on who the beneficiaries of the bypass

trust are, spouse or children could wind up with a reduced share of the trust estate

  • Economic volatility can affect beneficial interests in

the QTIP trust and the bypass trust depending on type of funding formula utilized (i.e. pecuniary marital vs. pecuniary bypass)

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

Increased Exemption

  • Under-funded spouse
  • Outright gift to spouse during lifetime does

not work well in the blended family setting

  • Transmutation Agreements
  • Lifetime QTIP trust as an alternative
  • Ethical issues
slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

Increased Exemption

  • Gift splitting
  • Annual exclusion planning
  • Exemption planning
  • Ethical issues
slide-76
SLIDE 76

76

Tax Reform Act of 2010 (the “Act”)

Portability

  • Very limited applicability, but could work well if

underfunded spouse dies first

  • Remarriage: portability only applies to the last

deceased spouse’s unused exemption

  • Expires December 31, 2012
  • Need to file 706 in order to take advantage of

portability regardless of estate value

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Tax Reform Act of 2010 (the “Act”)

Planning for the sunset of the Act at the end of 2012

  • Planners should revisit the use of formula

clauses to avoid unexpected results

  • In the immortal words of Yogi Berra, we

may be facing “déjà vu all over again”

slide-78
SLIDE 78

78

Planning for the sunset of the Act at the end of 2012

What “déjà vu all over again” could look like:

  • December 2012 may look a lot like

December 2010

  • Polarization in Congress could also result

in delays

slide-79
SLIDE 79

79

Use of Trusts in Creating Blended Family Estate Plans

  • QTIP trusts: testamentary and lifetime
  • Bypass trusts
  • Alternative trusts
  • Who should act as trustee?
slide-80
SLIDE 80

80

Use of Trusts in Creating Blended Family Estate Plans

  • QTIP trusts: testamentary and lifetime
  • All income to surviving spouse: accounting income
  • vs. net taxable income
  • Disadvantage: No other current beneficiaries

allowed

  • Funding issues: partnership interests, IRAs, non-

income producing assets

  • Should surviving spouse be given limited power of

appointment?

slide-81
SLIDE 81

81

Use of Trusts in Creating Blended Family Estate Plans

  • Bypass trusts
  • Who should be the beneficiaries?
  • Spouse
  • Children
  • Sprinkling trust
  • Funding issues
  • Legacy assets if children are beneficiaries
slide-82
SLIDE 82

82

Use of Trusts in Creating Blended Family Estate Plans

  • Alternative trusts
  • Spousal Limited Access Trusts
  • Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust
  • Non-Charitable Unitrust
  • Charitable Planning
  • Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts:

Planning for the Family Business

slide-83
SLIDE 83
  • Spousal lifetime access trust (“SLAT”) provides one

method to “lock-in” at least one spouse’s $5 million gift tax exemption

Consider Spousal Lifetime Trust for 2012 Planning for Second Marriages

83

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Spousal Lifetime Access Trust

SMITH FAMILY 2012 IRREVOCABLE TRUST (“Bucket”) Distributions can be made for benefit of Spouse, Children, and their Descendants Lifetime 2012 Trust for Child #1 Upon termination of the Smith Family 2012 Trust, property would be divided into equal shares for Children Lifetime Trusts for Child #1's Descendants Lifetime 2012 Trust for Child #2 Lifetime Trusts for Child #2's Descendants

84

slide-85
SLIDE 85
  • One spouse (in this example, Husband) would be the

creator (“settlor”) of the SLAT

  • The SLAT would be established primarily for the benefit
  • f Wife and the Children
  • For a second marriage, it is recommended that a person
  • ther than Wife would be Trustee of the SLAT for

purposes of making distributions to Wife; Wife could be Trustee of the SLAT for purposes of making distributions to the Children

Structure of the SLAT

85

slide-86
SLIDE 86
  • Trustee has the sole and absolute discretion to

make distributions to Wife during her lifetime

  • Trustee would be prohibited from making

distributions that would satisfy Husband’s support

  • bligation (which attaches by reason of their

marriage)

  • Trustee would be prohibited from making

distributions to wife if marriage terminated by divorce

Structure of the SLAT

86

slide-87
SLIDE 87
  • Distributions could also be made to the Children or

Grandchildren

  • The trust instrument could give Wife a testamentary

special power of appointment, but only among Husband’s descendants

Structure of the SLAT

87

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Benefits of Using a SLAT

  • Husband “locks-in” the use of his $5,120,000 gift and

GST tax exemptions while still giving Trustee significant flexibility in distributing assets for the benefit of Wife

  • By using the gift tax exemption now, all future income

and appreciation attributable to the SLAT is also removed from Husband’s gross estate

  • SLAT can grow tax free, as it is a grantor trust, so

husband will pay the SLAT’s income tax liabilities.

  • As a grantor trust, husband can substitute assets

between himself and the SLAT with no capital gain

  • As a grantor trust, husband can pay rent for the use of

SLAT assets with no income tax consequences.

88

slide-89
SLIDE 89
  • Though the gifted assets would be held in trust,

such assets would still be available to Wife if a financial need arose

  • Flexibility is maintained through Wife’s Power of

Appointment

Benefits of Using a SLAT

89

slide-90
SLIDE 90
  • The trust could be structured, if desired, as a

“grantor trust;” if structured this way, the SLAT assets will grow, from the Children’s point of view, tax free

  • Husband could also allocate his $5 million federal

GST tax exemption to the SLAT

Benefits of Using a SLAT

90

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Risks & Other Considerations

  • A SLAT is not tax-efficient if cash flow from the gifted

assets is needed for day-to-day living

  • A SLAT should typically be funded only with assets a

couple is comfortable giving away

  • No distributions may be allowed to Husband

91

slide-92
SLIDE 92
  • Is it possible for both Husband and Wife to

create SLATs?

  • Technically possible to create two SLATs, but it is

generally not advisable because of “reciprocal trust” doctrine

Risks & Other Considerations

92

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Risks & Other Considerations

Mortality

  • If Husband and Wife create a SLAT, Wife’s mortality

risks should be considered Divorce

  • Similarly, the potential effects of a future divorce

should be carefully considered before creating a SLAT

  • Draft for termination of Second Wife’s rights if a

divorce occurs

93

slide-94
SLIDE 94

94

Alternative Trusts

Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust

  • Create an inheritance for spouse or children
  • Especially useful when second spouse is

close in age to children from first marriage

  • Advantage: No estate tax on proceeds if

trust is properly structured

  • Disadvantage: Inflexibility if spouse is

named as beneficiary

slide-95
SLIDE 95

95

Alternative Trusts

Non-Charitable Unitrust

  • Advantage: Can help to alleviate tension

between income and remainder beneficiaries

slide-96
SLIDE 96

96

Alternative Trusts

Non-Charitable Unitrust Sample Provision:

“The Trustee shall pay to or apply for the benefit of the Surviving Spouse each year the greater of (a) the entire net income from the Marital Trust or (b) four per cent (4%) of the fair market value of the Marital Trust determined as of the end of the preceding year, in monthly or other convenient installments as the Surviving Spouse may request, but in no event less often than annually.”

slide-97
SLIDE 97

97

Charitable Planning

  • Charitable Lead Trusts: “Jackie O Plan”
  • Charitable Remainder Trusts

Alternative Trusts

slide-98
SLIDE 98

98

Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts: Planning for the Family Business

  • Can be used for succession planning (i.e. transfer
  • f business to the next generation)
  • Advantages:
  • Spouse is entitled to income stream from

Promissory Note

  • Spouse’s status is reduced to that of a creditor
  • Children are left to manage the business without

interference from spouse

Alternative Trusts

slide-99
SLIDE 99

99

Intentionally Defective Grantor Trusts

  • Disadvantages
  • Complex planning transaction
  • Business must have cash flow to support the

Promissory Note

Alternative Trusts

slide-100
SLIDE 100

100

Use of Trusts in Creating Blended Family Estate Plans

  • Who should act as Trustee?
  • Need to consider the purpose of the

trust

  • Need to consider the make up of the

trust beneficiaries

  • Consider corporate or professional

fiduciary

slide-101
SLIDE 101

101

Use of Trusts in Creating Blended Family Estate Plans

  • Who should act as Trustee?
  • Why is this important?
  • Trustee chooses the team
  • Lawyer
  • Investment advisor
  • CPA
  • Trustee makes tax elections
  • Trustee funds the trust
  • Trustee invests trust assets
slide-102
SLIDE 102

102

Issues Relating to Children

 Title to Assets

 Joint Tenancy

 Without survivorship  With survivorship

 Payable on Death or Transfer on Death

Provisions

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-103
SLIDE 103

Issues Relating to Children

 Gifting

 Does the creation of a post-marital agreement

binding the surviving spouse to provide for the decedent’s child create a gift transaction?

 See PLR 201116006 and 201216005

103

slide-104
SLIDE 104

104

Issues Relating to Children

Beneficiary Designations

 Life Insurance  Annuities  Qualified Retirement Plans  Outright payment  Conduit Trusts

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-105
SLIDE 105

105

Issues Relating to Children

 “Anti-Vulture” Distributions

Leaving assets to children at death may eliminate potential conflict between the children (especially those from a prior marriage) and the surviving spouse by minimizing the necessity for the children to circle the spouse like vultures awaiting his/her death to “get our rightful inheritance”.

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-106
SLIDE 106

106

Issues Relating to Children

 Outright Distribution v. Use of Trust  Structuring Distributions in Trust

 “Pot” or Common Trusts v. Separate shares  Handling great diversity in ages of children

 Distributions upon attaining certain age  Distributions at specified dates

 Who should control?

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-107
SLIDE 107

107

Issues Relating to Children

 Child as an Agent under a Durable Power of

Attorney

 Conflicts with surviving spouse  Conflicts with other siblings – Whole/Half/Step  Compensation Issues  Communication/Reporting

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-108
SLIDE 108

108

Issues Relating to Children

 Child as an Agent under Advance Medical

Directive

 Conflicts with surviving spouse  Conflicts with other siblings – Whole/Half/Step  Dealing with the Emotional Issues  Communication/Reporting

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-109
SLIDE 109

109

Issues Relating to Children

 Child Acting as Trustee of Trust

 Control over the surviving spouse’s share?

 Conflicts of Interest?  Contempt?

 Communication issues  Compensation Issues

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti

slide-110
SLIDE 110

110

Issues Relating to Children

 Child as Executor

 Many of the same problems as serving as

Executor

 Requires resident of state where Decedent lived  Probate as a public forum for family disharmony

John T. Midgett, Shareholder Midgett & Preti